SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients

Purpose: To study the variability of patient-specific motion models derived from 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) images using different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived by 1) applying DIR between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3322-3322
Hauptverfasser: Dhou, S, Ionascu, D, Lewis, J, Williams, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3322
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3322
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 43
creator Dhou, S
Ionascu, D
Lewis, J
Williams, C
description Purpose: To study the variability of patient-specific motion models derived from 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) images using different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived by 1) applying DIR between each 4DCT image and a reference image, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs, resulting in a motion model (a set of eigenvectors capturing the variations in the DVFs). Three DIR algorithms were used: 1) Demons, 2) Horn-Schunck, and 3) iterative optical flow. The motion models derived were compared using patient 4DCT scans. Results: Motion models were derived and the variations were evaluated according to three criteria: 1) the average root mean square (RMS) difference which measures the absolute difference between the components of the eigenvectors, 2) the dot product between the eigenvectors which measures the angular difference between the eigenvectors in space, and 3) the Euclidean Model Norm (EMN), which is calculated by summing the dot products of an eigenvector with the first three eigenvectors from the reference motion model in quadrature. EMN measures how well an eigenvector can be reconstructed using another motion model derived using a different DIR algorithm. Results showed that comparing to a reference motion model (derived using the Demons algorithm), the eigenvectors of the motion model derived using the iterative optical flow algorithm has smaller RMS, larger dot product, and larger EMN values than those of the motion model derived using Horn-Schunck algorithm. Conclusion: The study showed that motion models vary depending on which DIR algorithms were used to derive them. The choice of a DIR algorithm may affect the accuracy of the resulting model, and it is important to assess the suitability of the algorithm chosen for a particular application. This project was supported, in part, through a Master Research Agreement with Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4955568
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4955568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP5568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1358-8ed04864cd80c3405c1abee61e6f65336b43e32b89a54f2814aeb8bdc485814a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxi0EEqFw4A0scaFILv679XJLUmgrpaJKGq4rr3ecGG3WkW1A-2o8HU4Tju3p04x-832jGYTeM3rBGNOf2YWslVKVfoEmXF4KIjmtX6IJpbUkXFL1Gr1J6SeltBKKTtDf1ZrMyWw5JfTyC_5hojet730ecXD43mQPQyarPVjvvMV3IfswFOmgT_gKov8NHV4nP2zwlXcOYsFL34W4M20P-HZnNoCXsPEpR_M4PO03Ifq83SVcMLz4VWbnZrAQ8SoXg5CNzSVrFroRL03nQ95CNPsRf1zNlg_n_7dKb9ErZ_oE7056htbfvj7Mb8ji-_XtfLoglgmliYaOSl1J22lqRbmAZaYFqBhUrlJCVK0UIHira6Ok45pJA61uOyu1OhTiDH04-oaUfZOsz2C3NgwD2NxwXnEpeF2o8yNlY0gpgmv20e9MHBtGm8NrGtacXlNYcmT_-B7Gp8Hm7v7Efzryh_DHKz5j_g8teJyr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dhou, S ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J ; Williams, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J ; Williams, C</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To study the variability of patient-specific motion models derived from 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) images using different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived by 1) applying DIR between each 4DCT image and a reference image, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs, resulting in a motion model (a set of eigenvectors capturing the variations in the DVFs). Three DIR algorithms were used: 1) Demons, 2) Horn-Schunck, and 3) iterative optical flow. The motion models derived were compared using patient 4DCT scans. Results: Motion models were derived and the variations were evaluated according to three criteria: 1) the average root mean square (RMS) difference which measures the absolute difference between the components of the eigenvectors, 2) the dot product between the eigenvectors which measures the angular difference between the eigenvectors in space, and 3) the Euclidean Model Norm (EMN), which is calculated by summing the dot products of an eigenvector with the first three eigenvectors from the reference motion model in quadrature. EMN measures how well an eigenvector can be reconstructed using another motion model derived using a different DIR algorithm. Results showed that comparing to a reference motion model (derived using the Demons algorithm), the eigenvectors of the motion model derived using the iterative optical flow algorithm has smaller RMS, larger dot product, and larger EMN values than those of the motion model derived using Horn-Schunck algorithm. Conclusion: The study showed that motion models vary depending on which DIR algorithms were used to derive them. The choice of a DIR algorithm may affect the accuracy of the resulting model, and it is important to assess the suitability of the algorithm chosen for a particular application. This project was supported, in part, through a Master Research Agreement with Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4955568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; Biomedical modeling ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Eigenvalues ; EIGENVECTORS ; Flow visualization ; Image registration ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; LUNGS ; Medical imaging ; NEOPLASMS ; Optical flow ; PATIENTS ; QUADRATURES ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; Radiation therapy ; RADIOTHERAPY</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3322-3322</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4955568$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22624329$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><title>SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: To study the variability of patient-specific motion models derived from 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) images using different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived by 1) applying DIR between each 4DCT image and a reference image, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs, resulting in a motion model (a set of eigenvectors capturing the variations in the DVFs). Three DIR algorithms were used: 1) Demons, 2) Horn-Schunck, and 3) iterative optical flow. The motion models derived were compared using patient 4DCT scans. Results: Motion models were derived and the variations were evaluated according to three criteria: 1) the average root mean square (RMS) difference which measures the absolute difference between the components of the eigenvectors, 2) the dot product between the eigenvectors which measures the angular difference between the eigenvectors in space, and 3) the Euclidean Model Norm (EMN), which is calculated by summing the dot products of an eigenvector with the first three eigenvectors from the reference motion model in quadrature. EMN measures how well an eigenvector can be reconstructed using another motion model derived using a different DIR algorithm. Results showed that comparing to a reference motion model (derived using the Demons algorithm), the eigenvectors of the motion model derived using the iterative optical flow algorithm has smaller RMS, larger dot product, and larger EMN values than those of the motion model derived using Horn-Schunck algorithm. Conclusion: The study showed that motion models vary depending on which DIR algorithms were used to derive them. The choice of a DIR algorithm may affect the accuracy of the resulting model, and it is important to assess the suitability of the algorithm chosen for a particular application. This project was supported, in part, through a Master Research Agreement with Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>EIGENVECTORS</subject><subject>Flow visualization</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>LUNGS</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>Optical flow</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>QUADRATURES</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxi0EEqFw4A0scaFILv679XJLUmgrpaJKGq4rr3ecGG3WkW1A-2o8HU4Tju3p04x-832jGYTeM3rBGNOf2YWslVKVfoEmXF4KIjmtX6IJpbUkXFL1Gr1J6SeltBKKTtDf1ZrMyWw5JfTyC_5hojet730ecXD43mQPQyarPVjvvMV3IfswFOmgT_gKov8NHV4nP2zwlXcOYsFL34W4M20P-HZnNoCXsPEpR_M4PO03Ifq83SVcMLz4VWbnZrAQ8SoXg5CNzSVrFroRL03nQ95CNPsRf1zNlg_n_7dKb9ErZ_oE7056htbfvj7Mb8ji-_XtfLoglgmliYaOSl1J22lqRbmAZaYFqBhUrlJCVK0UIHira6Ok45pJA61uOyu1OhTiDH04-oaUfZOsz2C3NgwD2NxwXnEpeF2o8yNlY0gpgmv20e9MHBtGm8NrGtacXlNYcmT_-B7Gp8Hm7v7Efzryh_DHKz5j_g8teJyr</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Dhou, S</creator><creator>Ionascu, D</creator><creator>Lewis, J</creator><creator>Williams, C</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients</title><author>Dhou, S ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J ; Williams, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1358-8ed04864cd80c3405c1abee61e6f65336b43e32b89a54f2814aeb8bdc485814a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>EIGENVECTORS</topic><topic>Flow visualization</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>LUNGS</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>Optical flow</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>QUADRATURES</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhou, S</au><au>Ionascu, D</au><au>Lewis, J</au><au>Williams, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3322</spage><epage>3322</epage><pages>3322-3322</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To study the variability of patient-specific motion models derived from 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) images using different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived by 1) applying DIR between each 4DCT image and a reference image, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs, resulting in a motion model (a set of eigenvectors capturing the variations in the DVFs). Three DIR algorithms were used: 1) Demons, 2) Horn-Schunck, and 3) iterative optical flow. The motion models derived were compared using patient 4DCT scans. Results: Motion models were derived and the variations were evaluated according to three criteria: 1) the average root mean square (RMS) difference which measures the absolute difference between the components of the eigenvectors, 2) the dot product between the eigenvectors which measures the angular difference between the eigenvectors in space, and 3) the Euclidean Model Norm (EMN), which is calculated by summing the dot products of an eigenvector with the first three eigenvectors from the reference motion model in quadrature. EMN measures how well an eigenvector can be reconstructed using another motion model derived using a different DIR algorithm. Results showed that comparing to a reference motion model (derived using the Demons algorithm), the eigenvectors of the motion model derived using the iterative optical flow algorithm has smaller RMS, larger dot product, and larger EMN values than those of the motion model derived using Horn-Schunck algorithm. Conclusion: The study showed that motion models vary depending on which DIR algorithms were used to derive them. The choice of a DIR algorithm may affect the accuracy of the resulting model, and it is important to assess the suitability of the algorithm chosen for a particular application. This project was supported, in part, through a Master Research Agreement with Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4955568</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3322-3322
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4955568
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ACCURACY
ALGORITHMS
Biomedical modeling
Cancer
Computed tomography
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Eigenvalues
EIGENVECTORS
Flow visualization
Image registration
ITERATIVE METHODS
LUNGS
Medical imaging
NEOPLASMS
Optical flow
PATIENTS
QUADRATURES
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
Radiation therapy
RADIOTHERAPY
title SU-C-BRA-07: Variability of Patient-Specific Motion Models Derived Using Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU-C-BRA-07:%20Variability%20of%20Patient-Specific%20Motion%20Models%20Derived%20Using%20Different%20Deformable%20Image%20Registration%20Algorithms%20for%20Lung%20Cancer%20Stereotactic%20Body%20Radiotherapy%20(SBRT)%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Dhou,%20S&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3322&rft.epage=3322&rft.pages=3322-3322&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4955568&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP5568%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true