SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Purpose: To study perturbing effect of bone tissue interface in Gamma Knife dose distribution. Methods: PAGAT polymer gel was manufactured in‐house and poured into two PET cylinders for 3D measurement. Small vials were used for calibration.For 2D measurement EBT2 film was placed in mid portion of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part23), p.3497-3497
Hauptverfasser: Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar, Vivekanandhan, S, Kale, SS, Rath, GK, Bisht, Raj Kishor, Sharma, BS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3497
container_issue 6Part23
container_start_page 3497
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar
Vivekanandhan, S
Kale, SS
Rath, GK
Bisht, Raj Kishor
Sharma, BS
description Purpose: To study perturbing effect of bone tissue interface in Gamma Knife dose distribution. Methods: PAGAT polymer gel was manufactured in‐house and poured into two PET cylinders for 3D measurement. Small vials were used for calibration.For 2D measurement EBT2 film was placed in mid portion of third gel filled PET cylinder. A bone material (+1400HU) of length 7cm and width 1.3cm was placed in the path of radiation beam at a distance of 4.5cm from measurement region to investigate its influence on dose distribution. For treatment planning each gel cylinder was fixed in Leksell frame and imaged in X‐Ray CT with scanning parameters: Tube Voltage — 120kVp, Tube Current — 130mAs, Slice Thickness — 1mm. Acquired images were transferred to Leksell Gamma Plan TPS (LGP Version 10.1). A treatment plan consisting of single 16mm collimator with coordinates x=100, y=100, z=100 was generated using convolution algorithm based planning (CABP). Each cylinder was positioned in treatment table and exposed to time calculated by the TPS. Irradiated gel was imaged with MRI (GE Medical Systems) to extract dose information from R2 maps and to determine subtle influence of bone material in the radiation path. Scanning parameter used: TE — 13.6ms, TR — 5000ms, slice thickness — 1.2mm, no of echoes — 8, FOV — 256×256mm2. Similarly exposed EBT2 film was scanned with EPSON scanner (Expression 10000XL) to measure dose. Results: 3D and 2D measurement showed altered dose distribution in profile measurement, isodose overlay and dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison. For a gamma pass criteria of 1%/1mm voxel pass rate was around 76%. Conclusion: Presence of bone material in the radiation path perturbed the dose distribution unnoticeable in TPS calculation. Any HU value above +1024 is truncated by CABP hence need to incorporate higher HU values for accurate dose calculation in Gamma Knife TPS. The scientific resources used in this work were from the completed project N‐964 provided by AERB, Mumbai.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4925063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4925063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP5063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723-fb05b61791510f1703721e3d29d602de3dd4a3e30c3dbc0765632db4233dc9bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQoDLyBV4aU658kmA2qUiqKqEiYI8c_yKhJkJ0IZeMReEaehEC6MhzdO3w6w0HonMCcEHJ1SeZc0ARSdoAiyjMWcwriEEUAgseUQ3KMTkJ4AxhJAhFq8pfvz6_lmGJMKsQ1zl3d72Tn2ga3Ft-2jcGFC6E3eN10xlupDO5anHe9HvDW-K731cSX1hrVYdfglaxriR8aZw1-ltq1ofevxg-n6MjKXTBn-ztDxd2yWNzHm6fVenGziVVGWWwrSKqUZIIkBCzJgGWUGKap0ClQPX6aS2YYKKYrBVmapIzqilPGtBKVYjN0MdUq34bgjS3fvaulH0oC5e9OJSn3O402nuyH25nhf1g-bv_8D9OLafA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar ; Vivekanandhan, S ; Kale, SS ; Rath, GK ; Bisht, Raj Kishor ; Sharma, BS</creator><creatorcontrib>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar ; Vivekanandhan, S ; Kale, SS ; Rath, GK ; Bisht, Raj Kishor ; Sharma, BS</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To study perturbing effect of bone tissue interface in Gamma Knife dose distribution. Methods: PAGAT polymer gel was manufactured in‐house and poured into two PET cylinders for 3D measurement. Small vials were used for calibration.For 2D measurement EBT2 film was placed in mid portion of third gel filled PET cylinder. A bone material (+1400HU) of length 7cm and width 1.3cm was placed in the path of radiation beam at a distance of 4.5cm from measurement region to investigate its influence on dose distribution. For treatment planning each gel cylinder was fixed in Leksell frame and imaged in X‐Ray CT with scanning parameters: Tube Voltage — 120kVp, Tube Current — 130mAs, Slice Thickness — 1mm. Acquired images were transferred to Leksell Gamma Plan TPS (LGP Version 10.1). A treatment plan consisting of single 16mm collimator with coordinates x=100, y=100, z=100 was generated using convolution algorithm based planning (CABP). Each cylinder was positioned in treatment table and exposed to time calculated by the TPS. Irradiated gel was imaged with MRI (GE Medical Systems) to extract dose information from R2 maps and to determine subtle influence of bone material in the radiation path. Scanning parameter used: TE — 13.6ms, TR — 5000ms, slice thickness — 1.2mm, no of echoes — 8, FOV — 256×256mm2. Similarly exposed EBT2 film was scanned with EPSON scanner (Expression 10000XL) to measure dose. Results: 3D and 2D measurement showed altered dose distribution in profile measurement, isodose overlay and dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison. For a gamma pass criteria of 1%/1mm voxel pass rate was around 76%. Conclusion: Presence of bone material in the radiation path perturbed the dose distribution unnoticeable in TPS calculation. Any HU value above +1024 is truncated by CABP hence need to incorporate higher HU values for accurate dose calculation in Gamma Knife TPS. The scientific resources used in this work were from the completed project N‐964 provided by AERB, Mumbai.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4925063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Dosimetry ; Gamma ray effects ; Gels ; Medical treatment planning ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; Perturbation methods ; Polymers ; Positron emission tomography ; Radiosurgery</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part23), p.3497-3497</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4925063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivekanandhan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, SS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, GK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Raj Kishor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, BS</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: To study perturbing effect of bone tissue interface in Gamma Knife dose distribution. Methods: PAGAT polymer gel was manufactured in‐house and poured into two PET cylinders for 3D measurement. Small vials were used for calibration.For 2D measurement EBT2 film was placed in mid portion of third gel filled PET cylinder. A bone material (+1400HU) of length 7cm and width 1.3cm was placed in the path of radiation beam at a distance of 4.5cm from measurement region to investigate its influence on dose distribution. For treatment planning each gel cylinder was fixed in Leksell frame and imaged in X‐Ray CT with scanning parameters: Tube Voltage — 120kVp, Tube Current — 130mAs, Slice Thickness — 1mm. Acquired images were transferred to Leksell Gamma Plan TPS (LGP Version 10.1). A treatment plan consisting of single 16mm collimator with coordinates x=100, y=100, z=100 was generated using convolution algorithm based planning (CABP). Each cylinder was positioned in treatment table and exposed to time calculated by the TPS. Irradiated gel was imaged with MRI (GE Medical Systems) to extract dose information from R2 maps and to determine subtle influence of bone material in the radiation path. Scanning parameter used: TE — 13.6ms, TR — 5000ms, slice thickness — 1.2mm, no of echoes — 8, FOV — 256×256mm2. Similarly exposed EBT2 film was scanned with EPSON scanner (Expression 10000XL) to measure dose. Results: 3D and 2D measurement showed altered dose distribution in profile measurement, isodose overlay and dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison. For a gamma pass criteria of 1%/1mm voxel pass rate was around 76%. Conclusion: Presence of bone material in the radiation path perturbed the dose distribution unnoticeable in TPS calculation. Any HU value above +1024 is truncated by CABP hence need to incorporate higher HU values for accurate dose calculation in Gamma Knife TPS. The scientific resources used in this work were from the completed project N‐964 provided by AERB, Mumbai.</description><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Gamma ray effects</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Medical treatment planning</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Perturbation methods</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Radiosurgery</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQoDLyBV4aU658kmA2qUiqKqEiYI8c_yKhJkJ0IZeMReEaehEC6MhzdO3w6w0HonMCcEHJ1SeZc0ARSdoAiyjMWcwriEEUAgseUQ3KMTkJ4AxhJAhFq8pfvz6_lmGJMKsQ1zl3d72Tn2ga3Ft-2jcGFC6E3eN10xlupDO5anHe9HvDW-K731cSX1hrVYdfglaxriR8aZw1-ltq1ofevxg-n6MjKXTBn-ztDxd2yWNzHm6fVenGziVVGWWwrSKqUZIIkBCzJgGWUGKap0ClQPX6aS2YYKKYrBVmapIzqilPGtBKVYjN0MdUq34bgjS3fvaulH0oC5e9OJSn3O402nuyH25nhf1g-bv_8D9OLafA</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar</creator><creator>Vivekanandhan, S</creator><creator>Kale, SS</creator><creator>Rath, GK</creator><creator>Bisht, Raj Kishor</creator><creator>Sharma, BS</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery</title><author>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar ; Vivekanandhan, S ; Kale, SS ; Rath, GK ; Bisht, Raj Kishor ; Sharma, BS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c723-fb05b61791510f1703721e3d29d602de3dd4a3e30c3dbc0765632db4233dc9bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Gamma ray effects</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Medical treatment planning</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Perturbation methods</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Radiosurgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivekanandhan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, SS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, GK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisht, Raj Kishor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, BS</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Natanasabapathi, Gopishankar</au><au>Vivekanandhan, S</au><au>Kale, SS</au><au>Rath, GK</au><au>Bisht, Raj Kishor</au><au>Sharma, BS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6Part23</issue><spage>3497</spage><epage>3497</epage><pages>3497-3497</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To study perturbing effect of bone tissue interface in Gamma Knife dose distribution. Methods: PAGAT polymer gel was manufactured in‐house and poured into two PET cylinders for 3D measurement. Small vials were used for calibration.For 2D measurement EBT2 film was placed in mid portion of third gel filled PET cylinder. A bone material (+1400HU) of length 7cm and width 1.3cm was placed in the path of radiation beam at a distance of 4.5cm from measurement region to investigate its influence on dose distribution. For treatment planning each gel cylinder was fixed in Leksell frame and imaged in X‐Ray CT with scanning parameters: Tube Voltage — 120kVp, Tube Current — 130mAs, Slice Thickness — 1mm. Acquired images were transferred to Leksell Gamma Plan TPS (LGP Version 10.1). A treatment plan consisting of single 16mm collimator with coordinates x=100, y=100, z=100 was generated using convolution algorithm based planning (CABP). Each cylinder was positioned in treatment table and exposed to time calculated by the TPS. Irradiated gel was imaged with MRI (GE Medical Systems) to extract dose information from R2 maps and to determine subtle influence of bone material in the radiation path. Scanning parameter used: TE — 13.6ms, TR — 5000ms, slice thickness — 1.2mm, no of echoes — 8, FOV — 256×256mm2. Similarly exposed EBT2 film was scanned with EPSON scanner (Expression 10000XL) to measure dose. Results: 3D and 2D measurement showed altered dose distribution in profile measurement, isodose overlay and dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison. For a gamma pass criteria of 1%/1mm voxel pass rate was around 76%. Conclusion: Presence of bone material in the radiation path perturbed the dose distribution unnoticeable in TPS calculation. Any HU value above +1024 is truncated by CABP hence need to incorporate higher HU values for accurate dose calculation in Gamma Knife TPS. The scientific resources used in this work were from the completed project N‐964 provided by AERB, Mumbai.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4925063</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part23), p.3497-3497
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4925063
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dosimetry
Gamma ray effects
Gels
Medical treatment planning
Medical X‐ray imaging
Perturbation methods
Polymers
Positron emission tomography
Radiosurgery
title SU‐E‐T‐699: Simulation of Bone Tissue Interface to Study Perturbation Effect in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90699:%20Simulation%20of%20Bone%20Tissue%20Interface%20to%20Study%20Perturbation%20Effect%20in%20Gamma%20Knife%20Radiosurgery&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Natanasabapathi,%20Gopishankar&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6Part23&rft.spage=3497&rft.epage=3497&rft.pages=3497-3497&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4925063&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP5063%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true