Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT

Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Makeev, Andrey, Glick, Stephen J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page 081904
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 40
creator Makeev, Andrey
Glick, Stephen J.
description Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue. Methods: Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters. Results: The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose. Conclusions: A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyp
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4811328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4811328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419343131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqEyBBS9QReoGKoX62k7ibJDQiBYkEF3M3nKcawjKxFPbM4i3x0OGEQiBN_777vE5voQcAj0BAPkbToQE4Ex-IRMmKp4LRuuvZEJpLXImaLFLvodwTykteUG_kV3Ga1ZxkBNyfTmsMMTuVsfODZmzWYhpmU6M7rMuok-7FWYejRtC9EvzzFnnsxbbBEVss8ajDjGbzvbJjtV9wIPNvEdmf85n04v86ubv5fTsKjdF8puj0CiENQBMmrKUWstG6LpkUEJjaVUXhaipLI21VloumxYLxhCqVMYR-B45HWUXy2aOrcEhet2rhe_m2j8qpzv19mbo7tStWyleQVnVLAn8HAVcCqqCSTnNXQo4oImKpUELEIk62jzj3f9l-iU174LBvtcDumVQIKDmggNfOzoeUeNdCB7t1gxQte6RArXpUWJ_vHa_JV-akoB8BB66Hh8_VlLX_zaCv0Z-HeS5j9ualfOv-EVrP4PfW30CfKq2YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419343131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue. Methods: Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters. Results: The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose. Conclusions: A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4811328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23927318</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ALGORITHMS ; Anisotropy ; biological tissues ; Breast ; breast CT ; Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Contrast ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Digital radiography ; dosimeters ; Emulation; Software simulation ; Huber prior ; Humans ; hyperbolic equations ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image reconstruction ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; iterative reconstruction ; Likelihood Functions ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mammography - methods ; maximum likelihood estimation ; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; microcalcification detection ; Noise ; penalized maximum likelihood ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; POINT SOURCES ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Reconstruction ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; total variation norm ; virtual machines ; X-RAY SPECTRA ; X‐ray detectors</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4811328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4811328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22220514$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue. Methods: Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters. Results: The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose. Conclusions: A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</description><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>biological tissues</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>breast CT</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>dosimeters</subject><subject>Emulation; Software simulation</subject><subject>Huber prior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperbolic equations</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image reconstruction</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>iterative reconstruction</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>maximum likelihood estimation</subject><subject>MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>microcalcification detection</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>penalized maximum likelihood</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>POINT SOURCES</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>total variation norm</subject><subject>virtual machines</subject><subject>X-RAY SPECTRA</subject><subject>X‐ray detectors</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqEyBBS9QReoGKoX62k7ibJDQiBYkEF3M3nKcawjKxFPbM4i3x0OGEQiBN_777vE5voQcAj0BAPkbToQE4Ex-IRMmKp4LRuuvZEJpLXImaLFLvodwTykteUG_kV3Ga1ZxkBNyfTmsMMTuVsfODZmzWYhpmU6M7rMuok-7FWYejRtC9EvzzFnnsxbbBEVss8ajDjGbzvbJjtV9wIPNvEdmf85n04v86ubv5fTsKjdF8puj0CiENQBMmrKUWstG6LpkUEJjaVUXhaipLI21VloumxYLxhCqVMYR-B45HWUXy2aOrcEhet2rhe_m2j8qpzv19mbo7tStWyleQVnVLAn8HAVcCqqCSTnNXQo4oImKpUELEIk62jzj3f9l-iU174LBvtcDumVQIKDmggNfOzoeUeNdCB7t1gxQte6RArXpUWJ_vHa_JV-akoB8BB66Hh8_VlLX_zaCv0Z-HeS5j9ualfOv-EVrP4PfW30CfKq2YQ</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Makeev, Andrey</creator><creator>Glick, Stephen J.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><author>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>biological tissues</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>breast CT</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>dosimeters</topic><topic>Emulation; Software simulation</topic><topic>Huber prior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperbolic equations</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image reconstruction</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>iterative reconstruction</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>maximum likelihood estimation</topic><topic>MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>microcalcification detection</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>penalized maximum likelihood</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>POINT SOURCES</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>total variation norm</topic><topic>virtual machines</topic><topic>X-RAY SPECTRA</topic><topic>X‐ray detectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makeev, Andrey</au><au>Glick, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>081904</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>081904-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><eissn>0094-2405</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue. Methods: Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters. Results: The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose. Conclusions: A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>23927318</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4811328</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
0094-2405
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4811328
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ALGORITHMS
Anisotropy
biological tissues
Breast
breast CT
Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Cone beam computed tomography
Contrast
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Digital radiography
dosimeters
Emulation
Software simulation
Huber prior
Humans
hyperbolic equations
Image data processing or generation, in general
IMAGE PROCESSING
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
image reconstruction
ITERATIVE METHODS
iterative reconstruction
Likelihood Functions
MAMMARY GLANDS
Mammography - methods
maximum likelihood estimation
MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT
Medical image noise
medical image processing
Medical image quality
Medical image reconstruction
Medical imaging
Medical X‐ray imaging
microcalcification detection
Noise
penalized maximum likelihood
PHANTOMS
Phantoms, Imaging
POINT SOURCES
RADIATION DOSES
Radiation Imaging Physics
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Reconstruction
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
total variation norm
virtual machines
X-RAY SPECTRA
X‐ray detectors
title Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A56%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20statistical%20iterative%20reconstruction%20for%20dedicated%20breast%20CT&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Makeev,%20Andrey&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=081904&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=081904-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4811328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1419343131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419343131&rft_id=info:pmid/23927318&rfr_iscdi=true