Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT
Purpose: Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 081904 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Makeev, Andrey Glick, Stephen J. |
description | Purpose:
Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue.
Methods:
Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters.
Results:
The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose.
Conclusions:
A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyp |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4811328 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4811328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419343131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqEyBBS9QReoGKoX62k7ibJDQiBYkEF3M3nKcawjKxFPbM4i3x0OGEQiBN_777vE5voQcAj0BAPkbToQE4Ex-IRMmKp4LRuuvZEJpLXImaLFLvodwTykteUG_kV3Ga1ZxkBNyfTmsMMTuVsfODZmzWYhpmU6M7rMuok-7FWYejRtC9EvzzFnnsxbbBEVss8ajDjGbzvbJjtV9wIPNvEdmf85n04v86ubv5fTsKjdF8puj0CiENQBMmrKUWstG6LpkUEJjaVUXhaipLI21VloumxYLxhCqVMYR-B45HWUXy2aOrcEhet2rhe_m2j8qpzv19mbo7tStWyleQVnVLAn8HAVcCqqCSTnNXQo4oImKpUELEIk62jzj3f9l-iU174LBvtcDumVQIKDmggNfOzoeUeNdCB7t1gxQte6RArXpUWJ_vHa_JV-akoB8BB66Hh8_VlLX_zaCv0Z-HeS5j9ualfOv-EVrP4PfW30CfKq2YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419343131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue.
Methods:
Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters.
Results:
The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose.
Conclusions:
A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4811328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23927318</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ALGORITHMS ; Anisotropy ; biological tissues ; Breast ; breast CT ; Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Contrast ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Digital radiography ; dosimeters ; Emulation; Software simulation ; Huber prior ; Humans ; hyperbolic equations ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image reconstruction ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; iterative reconstruction ; Likelihood Functions ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mammography - methods ; maximum likelihood estimation ; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; microcalcification detection ; Noise ; penalized maximum likelihood ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; POINT SOURCES ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiation Imaging Physics ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Reconstruction ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; total variation norm ; virtual machines ; X-RAY SPECTRA ; X‐ray detectors</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4811328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4811328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22220514$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue.
Methods:
Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters.
Results:
The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose.
Conclusions:
A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</description><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>biological tissues</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>breast CT</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>dosimeters</subject><subject>Emulation; Software simulation</subject><subject>Huber prior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperbolic equations</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image reconstruction</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>iterative reconstruction</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>maximum likelihood estimation</subject><subject>MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>microcalcification detection</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>penalized maximum likelihood</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>POINT SOURCES</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiation Imaging Physics</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>total variation norm</subject><subject>virtual machines</subject><subject>X-RAY SPECTRA</subject><subject>X‐ray detectors</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqEyBBS9QReoGKoX62k7ibJDQiBYkEF3M3nKcawjKxFPbM4i3x0OGEQiBN_777vE5voQcAj0BAPkbToQE4Ex-IRMmKp4LRuuvZEJpLXImaLFLvodwTykteUG_kV3Ga1ZxkBNyfTmsMMTuVsfODZmzWYhpmU6M7rMuok-7FWYejRtC9EvzzFnnsxbbBEVss8ajDjGbzvbJjtV9wIPNvEdmf85n04v86ubv5fTsKjdF8puj0CiENQBMmrKUWstG6LpkUEJjaVUXhaipLI21VloumxYLxhCqVMYR-B45HWUXy2aOrcEhet2rhe_m2j8qpzv19mbo7tStWyleQVnVLAn8HAVcCqqCSTnNXQo4oImKpUELEIk62jzj3f9l-iU174LBvtcDumVQIKDmggNfOzoeUeNdCB7t1gxQte6RArXpUWJ_vHa_JV-akoB8BB66Hh8_VlLX_zaCv0Z-HeS5j9ualfOv-EVrP4PfW30CfKq2YQ</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Makeev, Andrey</creator><creator>Glick, Stephen J.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</title><author>Makeev, Andrey ; Glick, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5118-e4ae44fc1128c668aa8b4a962161bf0795549086cfff8f38bde522e17ae43e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>biological tissues</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>breast CT</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>dosimeters</topic><topic>Emulation; Software simulation</topic><topic>Huber prior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperbolic equations</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image reconstruction</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>iterative reconstruction</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>maximum likelihood estimation</topic><topic>MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>microcalcification detection</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>penalized maximum likelihood</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>POINT SOURCES</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiation Imaging Physics</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>total variation norm</topic><topic>virtual machines</topic><topic>X-RAY SPECTRA</topic><topic>X‐ray detectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makeev, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glick, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makeev, Andrey</au><au>Glick, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>081904</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>081904-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><eissn>0094-2405</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
Dedicated breast CT has great potential for improving the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) in dedicated breast CT is a promising alternative to traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). One of the difficulties in using SIR is the presence of free parameters in the algorithm that control the appearance of the resulting image. These parameters require tuning in order to achieve high quality reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigated the penalized maximum likelihood (PML) method with two commonly used types of roughness penalty functions: hyperbolic potential and anisotropic total variation (TV) norm. Reconstructed images were compared with images obtained using standard FBP. Optimal parameters for PML with the hyperbolic prior are reported for the task of detecting microcalcifications embedded in breast tissue.
Methods:
Computer simulations were used to acquire projections in a half-cone beam geometry. The modeled setup describes a realistic breast CT benchtop system, with an x-ray spectra produced by a point source and an a-Si, CsI:Tl flat-panel detector. A voxelized anthropomorphic breast phantom with 280 μm microcalcification spheres embedded in it was used to model attenuation properties of the uncompressed woman's breast in a pendant position. The reconstruction of 3D images was performed using the separable paraboloidal surrogates algorithm with ordered subsets. Task performance was assessed with the ideal observer detectability index to determine optimal PML parameters.
Results:
The authors' findings suggest that there is a preferred range of values of the roughness penalty weight and the edge preservation threshold in the penalized objective function with the hyperbolic potential, which resulted in low noise images with high contrast microcalcifications preserved. In terms of numerical observer detectability index, the PML method with optimal parameters yielded substantially improved performance (by a factor of greater than 10) compared to FBP. The hyperbolic prior was also observed to be superior to the TV norm. A few of the best-performing parameter pairs for the PML method also demonstrated superior performance for various radiation doses. In fact, using PML with certain parameter values results in better images, acquired using 2 mGy dose, than FBP-reconstructed images acquired using 6 mGy dose.
Conclusions:
A range of optimal free parameters for the PML algorithm with hyperbolic and TV norm-based potentials is presented for the microcalcification detection task, in dedicated breast CT. The reported values can be used as starting values of the free parameters, when SIR techniques are used for image reconstruction. Significant improvement in image quality can be achieved by using PML with optimal combination of parameters, as compared to FBP. Importantly, these results suggest improved detection of microcalcifications can be obtained by using PML with lower radiation dose to the patient, than using FBP with higher dose.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>23927318</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4811328</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.081904-n/a |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4811328 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ALGORITHMS Anisotropy biological tissues Breast breast CT Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging Computed tomography Computerised tomographs computerised tomography COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY Cone beam computed tomography Contrast Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications Digital radiography dosimeters Emulation Software simulation Huber prior Humans hyperbolic equations Image data processing or generation, in general IMAGE PROCESSING Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods image reconstruction ITERATIVE METHODS iterative reconstruction Likelihood Functions MAMMARY GLANDS Mammography - methods maximum likelihood estimation MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FIT Medical image noise medical image processing Medical image quality Medical image reconstruction Medical imaging Medical X‐ray imaging microcalcification detection Noise penalized maximum likelihood PHANTOMS Phantoms, Imaging POINT SOURCES RADIATION DOSES Radiation Imaging Physics RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Reconstruction Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods total variation norm virtual machines X-RAY SPECTRA X‐ray detectors |
title | Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A56%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20statistical%20iterative%20reconstruction%20for%20dedicated%20breast%20CT&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Makeev,%20Andrey&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=081904&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=081904-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4811328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1419343131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419343131&rft_id=info:pmid/23927318&rfr_iscdi=true |