SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT

Purpose: Cone‐beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for providing image guidance in radiotherapy and interventional procedures. Due to the patient safety concern involved in repetitive CBCT scans, significant effort has been devoted to possibly lowering imaging dose in CBCT. For a given total dose, it is al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2011-06, Vol.38 (6), p.3443-3443
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Z, Han, X, Pearson, E, Bian, J, Sidky, E, Pelizzari, C, Pan, X
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3443
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3443
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 38
creator Zhang, Z
Han, X
Pearson, E
Bian, J
Sidky, E
Pelizzari, C
Pan, X
description Purpose: Cone‐beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for providing image guidance in radiotherapy and interventional procedures. Due to the patient safety concern involved in repetitive CBCT scans, significant effort has been devoted to possibly lowering imaging dose in CBCT. For a given total dose, it is also important to investigate how image quality can be affected by dose allocations over projection views and by image‐reconstruction algorithms. In this work, we investigate quantitatively how image quality changes resulted from different combinations of dose‐allocation parameters and some existing reconstruction algorithms. Methods: We performed simulation studies by using a numerical phantom containing structures ofdifferent contrast levels. We also acquired real data of a Catphan phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) by using the on‐board imaging system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). At three different total dose levels, we allocated each of them to different numbers of views ranging from 120 to 650. For each allocation scheme we applied the FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms to obtain reconstructed images. A set of quantitative metrics were used to evaluate image quality based on relevant tasks. Results: Preliminary results showed that for total dose levels under study, both FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms yield images with comparable quality when a large number of views are considered and that images reconstructed by the ASD‐POCS from smaller number of views generally exhibit higher quality. Overall, for each given total dose level the ASD‐POCS algorithm yields images of comparable or higher quality than does the FDK algorithm. Conclusions: We demonstrated that CBCT image quality can be optimized for a fixed total dose by choosing an appropriate combination of dose‐ allocation parameters and reconstruction algorithm. This finding may potentially be used for improving current CBCT image quality and for designing innovative, low‐dose CBCT imaging protocols.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.3611775
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3611775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP1775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1775-775f8bf95da0cc3994a97286c27c683f429ccf0fcaada6fba2a0024e3c147dd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4AbegpTy7DhxzK6E8qeiVmq7jlzHllIldWUHVdlxBM7ISXBot7AYvcV8Gs0bhK4JjAgh2R0ZxSkhnCcnaEAZjyNGQZyiAYBgEWWQnKML7zcAkMYJDNBmsfr-_JoEvQUBv8djPHe6rppqK12HF-1H2WG7xbNdWzWyxo_W60CO69oq2VbBmUsnG91q57GxDk_tPvg9hnO77dkHLRucLy_RmZG111fHO0Srp8kyf4mms-fXfDyNVN87CjLZ2oiklKBULASTgtMsVZSrNIsNo0IpA0ZJWcrUrCWVAJTpWBHGy5LHQ3RzyFXOeu-0KXYuVHddQaDoRypIcRwpsNGB3Ve17v4Gi_f5kb898F5V7e_7_4T_APcfeWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Z ; Han, X ; Pearson, E ; Bian, J ; Sidky, E ; Pelizzari, C ; Pan, X</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z ; Han, X ; Pearson, E ; Bian, J ; Sidky, E ; Pelizzari, C ; Pan, X</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Cone‐beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for providing image guidance in radiotherapy and interventional procedures. Due to the patient safety concern involved in repetitive CBCT scans, significant effort has been devoted to possibly lowering imaging dose in CBCT. For a given total dose, it is also important to investigate how image quality can be affected by dose allocations over projection views and by image‐reconstruction algorithms. In this work, we investigate quantitatively how image quality changes resulted from different combinations of dose‐allocation parameters and some existing reconstruction algorithms. Methods: We performed simulation studies by using a numerical phantom containing structures ofdifferent contrast levels. We also acquired real data of a Catphan phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) by using the on‐board imaging system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). At three different total dose levels, we allocated each of them to different numbers of views ranging from 120 to 650. For each allocation scheme we applied the FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms to obtain reconstructed images. A set of quantitative metrics were used to evaluate image quality based on relevant tasks. Results: Preliminary results showed that for total dose levels under study, both FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms yield images with comparable quality when a large number of views are considered and that images reconstructed by the ASD‐POCS from smaller number of views generally exhibit higher quality. Overall, for each given total dose level the ASD‐POCS algorithm yields images of comparable or higher quality than does the FDK algorithm. Conclusions: We demonstrated that CBCT image quality can be optimized for a fixed total dose by choosing an appropriate combination of dose‐ allocation parameters and reconstruction algorithm. This finding may potentially be used for improving current CBCT image quality and for designing innovative, low‐dose CBCT imaging protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3611775</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Computed tomography ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Dosimetry ; Image reconstruction ; Medical image quality ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; Medical radiation safety ; Radiation therapy ; Safety procedures</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2011-06, Vol.38 (6), p.3443-3443</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.3611775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,1417,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidky, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelizzari, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, X</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: Cone‐beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for providing image guidance in radiotherapy and interventional procedures. Due to the patient safety concern involved in repetitive CBCT scans, significant effort has been devoted to possibly lowering imaging dose in CBCT. For a given total dose, it is also important to investigate how image quality can be affected by dose allocations over projection views and by image‐reconstruction algorithms. In this work, we investigate quantitatively how image quality changes resulted from different combinations of dose‐allocation parameters and some existing reconstruction algorithms. Methods: We performed simulation studies by using a numerical phantom containing structures ofdifferent contrast levels. We also acquired real data of a Catphan phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) by using the on‐board imaging system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). At three different total dose levels, we allocated each of them to different numbers of views ranging from 120 to 650. For each allocation scheme we applied the FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms to obtain reconstructed images. A set of quantitative metrics were used to evaluate image quality based on relevant tasks. Results: Preliminary results showed that for total dose levels under study, both FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms yield images with comparable quality when a large number of views are considered and that images reconstructed by the ASD‐POCS from smaller number of views generally exhibit higher quality. Overall, for each given total dose level the ASD‐POCS algorithm yields images of comparable or higher quality than does the FDK algorithm. Conclusions: We demonstrated that CBCT image quality can be optimized for a fixed total dose by choosing an appropriate combination of dose‐ allocation parameters and reconstruction algorithm. This finding may potentially be used for improving current CBCT image quality and for designing innovative, low‐dose CBCT imaging protocols.</description><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical radiation safety</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Safety procedures</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4AbegpTy7DhxzK6E8qeiVmq7jlzHllIldWUHVdlxBM7ISXBot7AYvcV8Gs0bhK4JjAgh2R0ZxSkhnCcnaEAZjyNGQZyiAYBgEWWQnKML7zcAkMYJDNBmsfr-_JoEvQUBv8djPHe6rppqK12HF-1H2WG7xbNdWzWyxo_W60CO69oq2VbBmUsnG91q57GxDk_tPvg9hnO77dkHLRucLy_RmZG111fHO0Srp8kyf4mms-fXfDyNVN87CjLZ2oiklKBULASTgtMsVZSrNIsNo0IpA0ZJWcrUrCWVAJTpWBHGy5LHQ3RzyFXOeu-0KXYuVHddQaDoRypIcRwpsNGB3Ve17v4Gi_f5kb898F5V7e_7_4T_APcfeWE</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Zhang, Z</creator><creator>Han, X</creator><creator>Pearson, E</creator><creator>Bian, J</creator><creator>Sidky, E</creator><creator>Pelizzari, C</creator><creator>Pan, X</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT</title><author>Zhang, Z ; Han, X ; Pearson, E ; Bian, J ; Sidky, E ; Pelizzari, C ; Pan, X</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1775-775f8bf95da0cc3994a97286c27c683f429ccf0fcaada6fba2a0024e3c147dd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical radiation safety</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Safety procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidky, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelizzari, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, X</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Z</au><au>Han, X</au><au>Pearson, E</au><au>Bian, J</au><au>Sidky, E</au><au>Pelizzari, C</au><au>Pan, X</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3443</spage><epage>3443</epage><pages>3443-3443</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Cone‐beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for providing image guidance in radiotherapy and interventional procedures. Due to the patient safety concern involved in repetitive CBCT scans, significant effort has been devoted to possibly lowering imaging dose in CBCT. For a given total dose, it is also important to investigate how image quality can be affected by dose allocations over projection views and by image‐reconstruction algorithms. In this work, we investigate quantitatively how image quality changes resulted from different combinations of dose‐allocation parameters and some existing reconstruction algorithms. Methods: We performed simulation studies by using a numerical phantom containing structures ofdifferent contrast levels. We also acquired real data of a Catphan phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) by using the on‐board imaging system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). At three different total dose levels, we allocated each of them to different numbers of views ranging from 120 to 650. For each allocation scheme we applied the FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms to obtain reconstructed images. A set of quantitative metrics were used to evaluate image quality based on relevant tasks. Results: Preliminary results showed that for total dose levels under study, both FDK and ASD‐POCS algorithms yield images with comparable quality when a large number of views are considered and that images reconstructed by the ASD‐POCS from smaller number of views generally exhibit higher quality. Overall, for each given total dose level the ASD‐POCS algorithm yields images of comparable or higher quality than does the FDK algorithm. Conclusions: We demonstrated that CBCT image quality can be optimized for a fixed total dose by choosing an appropriate combination of dose‐ allocation parameters and reconstruction algorithm. This finding may potentially be used for improving current CBCT image quality and for designing innovative, low‐dose CBCT imaging protocols.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.3611775</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2011-06, Vol.38 (6), p.3443-3443
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3611775
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Computed tomography
Cone beam computed tomography
Dosimetry
Image reconstruction
Medical image quality
Medical image reconstruction
Medical imaging
Medical radiation safety
Radiation therapy
Safety procedures
title SU‐E‐J‐07: A Preliminary Study on Optimal Dose‐Allocation Parameters for Low‐Dose Cone‐Beam CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90J%E2%80%9007:%20A%20Preliminary%20Study%20on%20Optimal%20Dose%E2%80%90Allocation%20Parameters%20for%20Low%E2%80%90Dose%20Cone%E2%80%90Beam%20CT&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Zhang,%20Z&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3443&rft.epage=3443&rft.pages=3443-3443&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3611775&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP1775%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true