SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Purpose: VMAT is about to be established clinically on a wide basis and may increase the efficiency of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment. The goal of this investigation was to compare VMAT to established IMRT delivery techniques of serial Tomotherapy and segmental IMRT for prostate c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2847-2847
Hauptverfasser: Wolff, D, Stieler, F, Polednik, M, Abo‐Madyan, Y, Mai, S, Steil, V, Wenz, F, Lohr, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2847
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2847
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 35
creator Wolff, D
Stieler, F
Polednik, M
Abo‐Madyan, Y
Mai, S
Steil, V
Wenz, F
Lohr, F
description Purpose: VMAT is about to be established clinically on a wide basis and may increase the efficiency of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment. The goal of this investigation was to compare VMAT to established IMRT delivery techniques of serial Tomotherapy and segmental IMRT for prostate cancer. Method and Materials: Using CT data sets of 9 patients treated for prostate cancer, treatment plans for all three techniques were created. Segmental IMRT was planned for a conventional MLC (Elekta MLCi, 2×40leaves, 1cm) and serial Tomotherapy for the MIMiC Multivane‐Collimator (NOMOS, Corp.), using the Corvus 6.3 (Nomos; Pencil beam). VMAT was planned with ERGO++ R1.6 (3D Line Medical Systems/Elekta; Pencil beam). Segmental IMRT plans with MLC used 7 isotropic beams. Serial Tomotherapy plans were calculated in 1cm mode and for a 300° rotation. VMAT plans were created with a 360° and two 100° rotations. Evaluation of plan quality used metrics of conformity index (CI=Vtissue Dmin/Vtarget), homogeneity index (HI=Dmax/Dprescribed), dose to normal tissue and the isodose which encompasses 95% of the target volume. Results: Median indices for conformity and homogeneity of the Corvus plans were CI 2,34/HI 1,21; MLC based segmental IMRT CI 2,89/HI 1,22; and VMAT plans CI 2,02/HI 1,11. 76Gy were prescribed to the median dose of the PTV. The resulting median doses to organ at risk (OAR) for (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) were as follows: for anterior rectum (52,2Gy/52,4Gy/60,5Gy), posterior rectum (32,3Gy/33,5Gy/34,3Gy) and bladder (44,9Gy/44,1Gy/53,7Gy). Volumes for 50% of prescribed dose (38Gy) in normal tissue were 1091ml/1583ml/1191ml. Dose encompassing 95% of PTV was (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) 68,8Gy/66,6Gy/70,7Gy. Median treatment time (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) was 15min/7,5min/3min. Conclusion: Rotational therapy techniques showed higher conformity, coverage and lower normal tissue dose. Homogeneity and dose to posterior rectum were similar for all approaches. VMAT plans are deliverable within a 3minute time slot which is the most efficient treatment option compared to the other approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2962280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2962280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP2280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1770-7914c1f21ef764160bb623fe7cdee9f902ce87ee894e1afc08af36a582abb56e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYgefIMewWSx7f73hkSRhI1EFq6bUqZSs7sl3RLCzUfwPXwrn8QS9qqHmUm-75f5MoPQLSUDSmlyTwcsjRhLyBnqsCD2vYCR9Bx1CEkDjwUkvERXTfNBCIn8kHTQ93zx8_k1HruWuwp9-oBHutpyoxpdYy3xUpe7CqxRAmd6vSu5hTUeGoHzDRi-PeDeMhvmfbxXdoPnYBQvca4rbVub12snv1dQW-f0Ggvbk7bR2vbxJHvLsdQGP2rdWJwb4PbIHqNnxkkuD494LcBcowvJywZu2tlFi-enfPTiTV_Hk9Fw6gkax8SLUxoIKhkFGUcBjchqFTFfQizWAKlMCROQxABJGgDlUpCESz_iYcL4ahVG4HdR_7RXuPzGgCy2RlXcHApKiuOXC1q0X3asd2L3qoTD32CRzVr-7sQ3QrnTlK7_Wf4LWuiNlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wolff, D ; Stieler, F ; Polednik, M ; Abo‐Madyan, Y ; Mai, S ; Steil, V ; Wenz, F ; Lohr, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolff, D ; Stieler, F ; Polednik, M ; Abo‐Madyan, Y ; Mai, S ; Steil, V ; Wenz, F ; Lohr, F</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: VMAT is about to be established clinically on a wide basis and may increase the efficiency of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment. The goal of this investigation was to compare VMAT to established IMRT delivery techniques of serial Tomotherapy and segmental IMRT for prostate cancer. Method and Materials: Using CT data sets of 9 patients treated for prostate cancer, treatment plans for all three techniques were created. Segmental IMRT was planned for a conventional MLC (Elekta MLCi, 2×40leaves, 1cm) and serial Tomotherapy for the MIMiC Multivane‐Collimator (NOMOS, Corp.), using the Corvus 6.3 (Nomos; Pencil beam). VMAT was planned with ERGO++ R1.6 (3D Line Medical Systems/Elekta; Pencil beam). Segmental IMRT plans with MLC used 7 isotropic beams. Serial Tomotherapy plans were calculated in 1cm mode and for a 300° rotation. VMAT plans were created with a 360° and two 100° rotations. Evaluation of plan quality used metrics of conformity index (CI=Vtissue Dmin/Vtarget), homogeneity index (HI=Dmax/Dprescribed), dose to normal tissue and the isodose which encompasses 95% of the target volume. Results: Median indices for conformity and homogeneity of the Corvus plans were CI 2,34/HI 1,21; MLC based segmental IMRT CI 2,89/HI 1,22; and VMAT plans CI 2,02/HI 1,11. 76Gy were prescribed to the median dose of the PTV. The resulting median doses to organ at risk (OAR) for (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) were as follows: for anterior rectum (52,2Gy/52,4Gy/60,5Gy), posterior rectum (32,3Gy/33,5Gy/34,3Gy) and bladder (44,9Gy/44,1Gy/53,7Gy). Volumes for 50% of prescribed dose (38Gy) in normal tissue were 1091ml/1583ml/1191ml. Dose encompassing 95% of PTV was (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) 68,8Gy/66,6Gy/70,7Gy. Median treatment time (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) was 15min/7,5min/3min. Conclusion: Rotational therapy techniques showed higher conformity, coverage and lower normal tissue dose. Homogeneity and dose to posterior rectum were similar for all approaches. VMAT plans are deliverable within a 3minute time slot which is the most efficient treatment option compared to the other approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2962280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Cancer ; Dosimetry ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; Multileaf collimators ; Therapeutics ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2847-2847</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2962280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,1416,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolff, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieler, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polednik, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abo‐Madyan, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steil, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohr, F</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: VMAT is about to be established clinically on a wide basis and may increase the efficiency of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment. The goal of this investigation was to compare VMAT to established IMRT delivery techniques of serial Tomotherapy and segmental IMRT for prostate cancer. Method and Materials: Using CT data sets of 9 patients treated for prostate cancer, treatment plans for all three techniques were created. Segmental IMRT was planned for a conventional MLC (Elekta MLCi, 2×40leaves, 1cm) and serial Tomotherapy for the MIMiC Multivane‐Collimator (NOMOS, Corp.), using the Corvus 6.3 (Nomos; Pencil beam). VMAT was planned with ERGO++ R1.6 (3D Line Medical Systems/Elekta; Pencil beam). Segmental IMRT plans with MLC used 7 isotropic beams. Serial Tomotherapy plans were calculated in 1cm mode and for a 300° rotation. VMAT plans were created with a 360° and two 100° rotations. Evaluation of plan quality used metrics of conformity index (CI=Vtissue Dmin/Vtarget), homogeneity index (HI=Dmax/Dprescribed), dose to normal tissue and the isodose which encompasses 95% of the target volume. Results: Median indices for conformity and homogeneity of the Corvus plans were CI 2,34/HI 1,21; MLC based segmental IMRT CI 2,89/HI 1,22; and VMAT plans CI 2,02/HI 1,11. 76Gy were prescribed to the median dose of the PTV. The resulting median doses to organ at risk (OAR) for (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) were as follows: for anterior rectum (52,2Gy/52,4Gy/60,5Gy), posterior rectum (32,3Gy/33,5Gy/34,3Gy) and bladder (44,9Gy/44,1Gy/53,7Gy). Volumes for 50% of prescribed dose (38Gy) in normal tissue were 1091ml/1583ml/1191ml. Dose encompassing 95% of PTV was (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) 68,8Gy/66,6Gy/70,7Gy. Median treatment time (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) was 15min/7,5min/3min. Conclusion: Rotational therapy techniques showed higher conformity, coverage and lower normal tissue dose. Homogeneity and dose to posterior rectum were similar for all approaches. VMAT plans are deliverable within a 3minute time slot which is the most efficient treatment option compared to the other approaches.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYgefIMewWSx7f73hkSRhI1EFq6bUqZSs7sl3RLCzUfwPXwrn8QS9qqHmUm-75f5MoPQLSUDSmlyTwcsjRhLyBnqsCD2vYCR9Bx1CEkDjwUkvERXTfNBCIn8kHTQ93zx8_k1HruWuwp9-oBHutpyoxpdYy3xUpe7CqxRAmd6vSu5hTUeGoHzDRi-PeDeMhvmfbxXdoPnYBQvca4rbVub12snv1dQW-f0Ggvbk7bR2vbxJHvLsdQGP2rdWJwb4PbIHqNnxkkuD494LcBcowvJywZu2tlFi-enfPTiTV_Hk9Fw6gkax8SLUxoIKhkFGUcBjchqFTFfQizWAKlMCROQxABJGgDlUpCESz_iYcL4ahVG4HdR_7RXuPzGgCy2RlXcHApKiuOXC1q0X3asd2L3qoTD32CRzVr-7sQ3QrnTlK7_Wf4LWuiNlA</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Wolff, D</creator><creator>Stieler, F</creator><creator>Polednik, M</creator><creator>Abo‐Madyan, Y</creator><creator>Mai, S</creator><creator>Steil, V</creator><creator>Wenz, F</creator><creator>Lohr, F</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Wolff, D ; Stieler, F ; Polednik, M ; Abo‐Madyan, Y ; Mai, S ; Steil, V ; Wenz, F ; Lohr, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1770-7914c1f21ef764160bb623fe7cdee9f902ce87ee894e1afc08af36a582abb56e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolff, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieler, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polednik, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abo‐Madyan, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steil, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohr, F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolff, D</au><au>Stieler, F</au><au>Polednik, M</au><au>Abo‐Madyan, Y</au><au>Mai, S</au><au>Steil, V</au><au>Wenz, F</au><au>Lohr, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2847</spage><epage>2847</epage><pages>2847-2847</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: VMAT is about to be established clinically on a wide basis and may increase the efficiency of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment. The goal of this investigation was to compare VMAT to established IMRT delivery techniques of serial Tomotherapy and segmental IMRT for prostate cancer. Method and Materials: Using CT data sets of 9 patients treated for prostate cancer, treatment plans for all three techniques were created. Segmental IMRT was planned for a conventional MLC (Elekta MLCi, 2×40leaves, 1cm) and serial Tomotherapy for the MIMiC Multivane‐Collimator (NOMOS, Corp.), using the Corvus 6.3 (Nomos; Pencil beam). VMAT was planned with ERGO++ R1.6 (3D Line Medical Systems/Elekta; Pencil beam). Segmental IMRT plans with MLC used 7 isotropic beams. Serial Tomotherapy plans were calculated in 1cm mode and for a 300° rotation. VMAT plans were created with a 360° and two 100° rotations. Evaluation of plan quality used metrics of conformity index (CI=Vtissue Dmin/Vtarget), homogeneity index (HI=Dmax/Dprescribed), dose to normal tissue and the isodose which encompasses 95% of the target volume. Results: Median indices for conformity and homogeneity of the Corvus plans were CI 2,34/HI 1,21; MLC based segmental IMRT CI 2,89/HI 1,22; and VMAT plans CI 2,02/HI 1,11. 76Gy were prescribed to the median dose of the PTV. The resulting median doses to organ at risk (OAR) for (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) were as follows: for anterior rectum (52,2Gy/52,4Gy/60,5Gy), posterior rectum (32,3Gy/33,5Gy/34,3Gy) and bladder (44,9Gy/44,1Gy/53,7Gy). Volumes for 50% of prescribed dose (38Gy) in normal tissue were 1091ml/1583ml/1191ml. Dose encompassing 95% of PTV was (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) 68,8Gy/66,6Gy/70,7Gy. Median treatment time (MIMiC/MLC/VMAT) was 15min/7,5min/3min. Conclusion: Rotational therapy techniques showed higher conformity, coverage and lower normal tissue dose. Homogeneity and dose to posterior rectum were similar for all approaches. VMAT plans are deliverable within a 3minute time slot which is the most efficient treatment option compared to the other approaches.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.2962280</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2847-2847
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2962280
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anatomy
Cancer
Dosimetry
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Multileaf collimators
Therapeutics
Tissues
title SU‐GG‐T‐531: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Serial Tomotherapy and Segmental (step and Shoot) IMRT for Boost Treatment of Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90GG%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90531:%20Comparison%20of%20Volumetric%20Modulated%20Arc%20Therapy%20(VMAT)%20with%20Serial%20Tomotherapy%20and%20Segmental%20(step%20and%20Shoot)%20IMRT%20for%20Boost%20Treatment%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Wolff,%20D&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2847&rft.epage=2847&rft.pages=2847-2847&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2962280&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP2280%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true