SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum

Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of implanted gold fiducials secondary to the placement of a rectal marker to delineate the luminal surface of rectum. Method and Materials: Five prostate‐cancer patients were scanned by using a CT scanner (Brilliance Big Bore, Philips) for planning purposes. CT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2835-2835
Hauptverfasser: Jang, S, Wu, H, Sourivong, P, Katz, S, Rosen, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2835
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2835
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 35
creator Jang, S
Wu, H
Sourivong, P
Katz, S
Rosen, L
description Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of implanted gold fiducials secondary to the placement of a rectal marker to delineate the luminal surface of rectum. Method and Materials: Five prostate‐cancer patients were scanned by using a CT scanner (Brilliance Big Bore, Philips) for planning purposes. CT images were acquired with a rectal marker (Intermark Inc., UK) and then followed by images without the marker. For all of the patients, two or three gold fiducials were implanted into the prostate for image‐guided radiation treatment. Both CT images were fused and registered based on the bony structure and then the gold fiducials were contoured for evaluating the displacement due to the rectal marker. Displacements of gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker were computed. Also, displacements of gold fiducials against the isocenter as well as femoral head were computed for comparison. Results: Mean displacement of gold fiducials was less than 2.5 mm in all directions (lateral:0.12±0.15cm, vertical:0.21±0.29cm, longitudinal:0.14±0.27cm). However, the maximum displacement of fiducials in anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior directions was approximately 3.5mm and all cases were skewed toward the anterior direction, demonstrating that the movement of gold fiducials due to a rectal marker was strongly related. Maximum change in distance between gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker was 0.12±0.13cm. In addition, maximum displacement between the gold fiducials and insocenter/femoral head with and without the rectal marker was 0.17±0.09cm for insocenter and 0.15±0.08cm for femoral head, respectively. This finding confirmed that the treatment margin of 5mm was adequate to cover the deformation of prostate as well as rectum caused by rectal marker insertion, especially in the anterior‐posterior direction. Conclusions: Overall, the relative positions of gold fiducials were minimally changed with and without rectal marker. However, the rectal marker forced up the rectal wall and prostate anteriorly (mean:0.21±0.29cm) with maximum displacement of 3.5mm.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2962229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2962229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP2229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1779-24c58baaf197511cd22a2635c5a94b59e918dfd8fd378d277bf15c39683382e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A-8BSnFduLaZof6CJVaUdF2Hbl-gCGPykmEumPDnm_kS3DUbmExMxrpzNXcC8A1RgOMMb_DAyKGhBBxAnokYXGUECROQQ8hkUQkQfQcXNT1G0JoGFPUA1-rzc_nd5qGtg6VcHQPx67e5VKZwpQNrCycFWEtG6NhWuUaTp1ulZN5DcetgU0Fn41qZA4X0r8bD5fdqYa28nBsclca2bjyBTavBs7bwpWBXLXeBqjT7m7b4hKc2SBoro6zDzbTyXr0GM2f0tnoYR4pzJgI_yvKt1JaLBjFWGlCJAk-FJUi2VJhBObaam51zLgmjG0tpioWQx7HnBgc98HNQVf5qq69sdnOu0L6fYZR1uWX4eyYX2CjA_vhcrP_G8wWyyN_e-Br5ZrguSr_Ef8FUs9_SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jang, S ; Wu, H ; Sourivong, P ; Katz, S ; Rosen, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Jang, S ; Wu, H ; Sourivong, P ; Katz, S ; Rosen, L</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of implanted gold fiducials secondary to the placement of a rectal marker to delineate the luminal surface of rectum. Method and Materials: Five prostate‐cancer patients were scanned by using a CT scanner (Brilliance Big Bore, Philips) for planning purposes. CT images were acquired with a rectal marker (Intermark Inc., UK) and then followed by images without the marker. For all of the patients, two or three gold fiducials were implanted into the prostate for image‐guided radiation treatment. Both CT images were fused and registered based on the bony structure and then the gold fiducials were contoured for evaluating the displacement due to the rectal marker. Displacements of gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker were computed. Also, displacements of gold fiducials against the isocenter as well as femoral head were computed for comparison. Results: Mean displacement of gold fiducials was less than 2.5 mm in all directions (lateral:0.12±0.15cm, vertical:0.21±0.29cm, longitudinal:0.14±0.27cm). However, the maximum displacement of fiducials in anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior directions was approximately 3.5mm and all cases were skewed toward the anterior direction, demonstrating that the movement of gold fiducials due to a rectal marker was strongly related. Maximum change in distance between gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker was 0.12±0.13cm. In addition, maximum displacement between the gold fiducials and insocenter/femoral head with and without the rectal marker was 0.17±0.09cm for insocenter and 0.15±0.08cm for femoral head, respectively. This finding confirmed that the treatment margin of 5mm was adequate to cover the deformation of prostate as well as rectum caused by rectal marker insertion, especially in the anterior‐posterior direction. Conclusions: Overall, the relative positions of gold fiducials were minimally changed with and without rectal marker. However, the rectal marker forced up the rectal wall and prostate anteriorly (mean:0.21±0.29cm) with maximum displacement of 3.5mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2962229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Computed tomography ; Gold ; Medical imaging ; Radiation treatment</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2835-2835</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2962229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,1417,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sourivong, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, L</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of implanted gold fiducials secondary to the placement of a rectal marker to delineate the luminal surface of rectum. Method and Materials: Five prostate‐cancer patients were scanned by using a CT scanner (Brilliance Big Bore, Philips) for planning purposes. CT images were acquired with a rectal marker (Intermark Inc., UK) and then followed by images without the marker. For all of the patients, two or three gold fiducials were implanted into the prostate for image‐guided radiation treatment. Both CT images were fused and registered based on the bony structure and then the gold fiducials were contoured for evaluating the displacement due to the rectal marker. Displacements of gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker were computed. Also, displacements of gold fiducials against the isocenter as well as femoral head were computed for comparison. Results: Mean displacement of gold fiducials was less than 2.5 mm in all directions (lateral:0.12±0.15cm, vertical:0.21±0.29cm, longitudinal:0.14±0.27cm). However, the maximum displacement of fiducials in anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior directions was approximately 3.5mm and all cases were skewed toward the anterior direction, demonstrating that the movement of gold fiducials due to a rectal marker was strongly related. Maximum change in distance between gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker was 0.12±0.13cm. In addition, maximum displacement between the gold fiducials and insocenter/femoral head with and without the rectal marker was 0.17±0.09cm for insocenter and 0.15±0.08cm for femoral head, respectively. This finding confirmed that the treatment margin of 5mm was adequate to cover the deformation of prostate as well as rectum caused by rectal marker insertion, especially in the anterior‐posterior direction. Conclusions: Overall, the relative positions of gold fiducials were minimally changed with and without rectal marker. However, the rectal marker forced up the rectal wall and prostate anteriorly (mean:0.21±0.29cm) with maximum displacement of 3.5mm.</description><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Radiation treatment</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A-8BSnFduLaZof6CJVaUdF2Hbl-gCGPykmEumPDnm_kS3DUbmExMxrpzNXcC8A1RgOMMb_DAyKGhBBxAnokYXGUECROQQ8hkUQkQfQcXNT1G0JoGFPUA1-rzc_nd5qGtg6VcHQPx67e5VKZwpQNrCycFWEtG6NhWuUaTp1ulZN5DcetgU0Fn41qZA4X0r8bD5fdqYa28nBsclca2bjyBTavBs7bwpWBXLXeBqjT7m7b4hKc2SBoro6zDzbTyXr0GM2f0tnoYR4pzJgI_yvKt1JaLBjFWGlCJAk-FJUi2VJhBObaam51zLgmjG0tpioWQx7HnBgc98HNQVf5qq69sdnOu0L6fYZR1uWX4eyYX2CjA_vhcrP_G8wWyyN_e-Br5ZrguSr_Ef8FUs9_SA</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Jang, S</creator><creator>Wu, H</creator><creator>Sourivong, P</creator><creator>Katz, S</creator><creator>Rosen, L</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum</title><author>Jang, S ; Wu, H ; Sourivong, P ; Katz, S ; Rosen, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1779-24c58baaf197511cd22a2635c5a94b59e918dfd8fd378d277bf15c39683382e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Radiation treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sourivong, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jang, S</au><au>Wu, H</au><au>Sourivong, P</au><au>Katz, S</au><au>Rosen, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2835</spage><epage>2835</epage><pages>2835-2835</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of implanted gold fiducials secondary to the placement of a rectal marker to delineate the luminal surface of rectum. Method and Materials: Five prostate‐cancer patients were scanned by using a CT scanner (Brilliance Big Bore, Philips) for planning purposes. CT images were acquired with a rectal marker (Intermark Inc., UK) and then followed by images without the marker. For all of the patients, two or three gold fiducials were implanted into the prostate for image‐guided radiation treatment. Both CT images were fused and registered based on the bony structure and then the gold fiducials were contoured for evaluating the displacement due to the rectal marker. Displacements of gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker were computed. Also, displacements of gold fiducials against the isocenter as well as femoral head were computed for comparison. Results: Mean displacement of gold fiducials was less than 2.5 mm in all directions (lateral:0.12±0.15cm, vertical:0.21±0.29cm, longitudinal:0.14±0.27cm). However, the maximum displacement of fiducials in anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior directions was approximately 3.5mm and all cases were skewed toward the anterior direction, demonstrating that the movement of gold fiducials due to a rectal marker was strongly related. Maximum change in distance between gold fiducials with and without the rectal marker was 0.12±0.13cm. In addition, maximum displacement between the gold fiducials and insocenter/femoral head with and without the rectal marker was 0.17±0.09cm for insocenter and 0.15±0.08cm for femoral head, respectively. This finding confirmed that the treatment margin of 5mm was adequate to cover the deformation of prostate as well as rectum caused by rectal marker insertion, especially in the anterior‐posterior direction. Conclusions: Overall, the relative positions of gold fiducials were minimally changed with and without rectal marker. However, the rectal marker forced up the rectal wall and prostate anteriorly (mean:0.21±0.29cm) with maximum displacement of 3.5mm.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.2962229</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2835-2835
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2962229
source Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Computed tomography
Gold
Medical imaging
Radiation treatment
title SU‐GG‐T‐480: Displacement of Implanted Gold Fiducials Due to Rectal Marker Placed for Delineating the Luminal Surface of Rectum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90GG%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90480:%20Displacement%20of%20Implanted%20Gold%20Fiducials%20Due%20to%20Rectal%20Marker%20Placed%20for%20Delineating%20the%20Luminal%20Surface%20of%20Rectum&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Jang,%20S&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2835&rft.epage=2835&rft.pages=2835-2835&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2962229&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP2229%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true