SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World”
Purpose: This report outlines the hurdles and successes encountered in integrating a Varian On‐Board Imaging (OBI) system with an existing linear accelerator (linac) in a mixed vendor environment with the goal to perform high volume routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Method and Materials: Varian OBI was a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical Physics 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2707-2707 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2707 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2707 |
container_title | Medical Physics |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Lehmann, Joerg Glass, J Stacy Skubic, Stan Asche, Dave |
description | Purpose: This report outlines the hurdles and successes encountered in integrating a Varian On‐Board Imaging (OBI) system with an existing linear accelerator (linac) in a mixed vendor environment with the goal to perform high volume routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Method and Materials: Varian OBI was added to an existing linac concurrently with the requisite installations of an MV Portal Vision (PV) and a Varian 4D integrated treatment console (4DITC). The system was connected to an existing IMPAC MOSAIQ environment with a Philips Pinnacle planning system. Results: The integrated system is functioning and is used daily for more than 20 CBCT patients. Pending the OBI software update, patients are predominantly scanned with the “low dose protocol”. Isocenter accuracy and system safety checks have been implemented as routine quality assurance (QA) measures. Several glitches with the OBI system software have surfaced, which necessitated intervention from the vendor's highest tiered technical support personnel. These glitches include unexplained loss of calibration data, non‐functioning components, and the display of seemingly non‐essential error messages, which appear to be unrelated to the functioning of the system. Furthermore, the robotic arms moving the kV source and imaging panel have at multiple instances crashed into themselves. For patient safety they are now only moved when in the lateral position. Workflow problems also have arisen with the recording of offsets and the preparation of the planning CT data set used for reference in CBCT. Conclusion: An add‐on OBI system for CBCT is a viable clinical solution, which however requires much patience and persistence, especially in a mixed vendor environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.2961672 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2961672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP1672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-ea1dedc5d71fadba9b4fbd24a9002107946417bd13dbe3794c120659ac35d9f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwkAURSdGExFd-Aez1aT43sy047iTRgsKwSjospl2pjBSKGkxhh2f4Afoz_EllsBWF---3JuTu7iEnCO0EPH6CltMBRhIdkAaTEjuCQbqkDQAlPCYAP-YnFTVOwAE3IcGeXwZbdZfUVTLQ33I-A3t66mbj2nHjSf0tcg_ZpYO2l0atsMhfSvKKXVzull_LyeWPludb7PcbNY_p-Qo03llz_a_SUb3d8Ow4_UGUTe87XkpSsk8q9FYk_pGYqZNolUissQwoRUAQ5BKBAJlYpCbxPLapsgg8JVOuW9UxniTXOx607KoqtJm8aJ0M12uYoR4u0KM8X6FmvV27KfL7epvMO4_7fnLHV-lbqmXrpj_U_4L1wNrNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World”</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lehmann, Joerg ; Glass, J Stacy ; Skubic, Stan ; Asche, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Joerg ; Glass, J Stacy ; Skubic, Stan ; Asche, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This report outlines the hurdles and successes encountered in integrating a Varian On‐Board Imaging (OBI) system with an existing linear accelerator (linac) in a mixed vendor environment with the goal to perform high volume routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Method and Materials: Varian OBI was added to an existing linac concurrently with the requisite installations of an MV Portal Vision (PV) and a Varian 4D integrated treatment console (4DITC). The system was connected to an existing IMPAC MOSAIQ environment with a Philips Pinnacle planning system. Results: The integrated system is functioning and is used daily for more than 20 CBCT patients. Pending the OBI software update, patients are predominantly scanned with the “low dose protocol”. Isocenter accuracy and system safety checks have been implemented as routine quality assurance (QA) measures. Several glitches with the OBI system software have surfaced, which necessitated intervention from the vendor's highest tiered technical support personnel. These glitches include unexplained loss of calibration data, non‐functioning components, and the display of seemingly non‐essential error messages, which appear to be unrelated to the functioning of the system. Furthermore, the robotic arms moving the kV source and imaging panel have at multiple instances crashed into themselves. For patient safety they are now only moved when in the lateral position. Workflow problems also have arisen with the recording of offsets and the preparation of the planning CT data set used for reference in CBCT. Conclusion: An add‐on OBI system for CBCT is a viable clinical solution, which however requires much patience and persistence, especially in a mixed vendor environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2961672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Computed tomography ; Computer software ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Linear accelerators ; Medical imaging ; Quality assurance ; Robotics ; Solution processes</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2707-2707</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2961672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, J Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skubic, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asche, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World”</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: This report outlines the hurdles and successes encountered in integrating a Varian On‐Board Imaging (OBI) system with an existing linear accelerator (linac) in a mixed vendor environment with the goal to perform high volume routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Method and Materials: Varian OBI was added to an existing linac concurrently with the requisite installations of an MV Portal Vision (PV) and a Varian 4D integrated treatment console (4DITC). The system was connected to an existing IMPAC MOSAIQ environment with a Philips Pinnacle planning system. Results: The integrated system is functioning and is used daily for more than 20 CBCT patients. Pending the OBI software update, patients are predominantly scanned with the “low dose protocol”. Isocenter accuracy and system safety checks have been implemented as routine quality assurance (QA) measures. Several glitches with the OBI system software have surfaced, which necessitated intervention from the vendor's highest tiered technical support personnel. These glitches include unexplained loss of calibration data, non‐functioning components, and the display of seemingly non‐essential error messages, which appear to be unrelated to the functioning of the system. Furthermore, the robotic arms moving the kV source and imaging panel have at multiple instances crashed into themselves. For patient safety they are now only moved when in the lateral position. Workflow problems also have arisen with the recording of offsets and the preparation of the planning CT data set used for reference in CBCT. Conclusion: An add‐on OBI system for CBCT is a viable clinical solution, which however requires much patience and persistence, especially in a mixed vendor environment.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Solution processes</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwkAURSdGExFd-Aez1aT43sy047iTRgsKwSjospl2pjBSKGkxhh2f4Afoz_EllsBWF---3JuTu7iEnCO0EPH6CltMBRhIdkAaTEjuCQbqkDQAlPCYAP-YnFTVOwAE3IcGeXwZbdZfUVTLQ33I-A3t66mbj2nHjSf0tcg_ZpYO2l0atsMhfSvKKXVzull_LyeWPludb7PcbNY_p-Qo03llz_a_SUb3d8Ow4_UGUTe87XkpSsk8q9FYk_pGYqZNolUissQwoRUAQ5BKBAJlYpCbxPLapsgg8JVOuW9UxniTXOx607KoqtJm8aJ0M12uYoR4u0KM8X6FmvV27KfL7epvMO4_7fnLHV-lbqmXrpj_U_4L1wNrNQ</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Lehmann, Joerg</creator><creator>Glass, J Stacy</creator><creator>Skubic, Stan</creator><creator>Asche, Dave</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World”</title><author>Lehmann, Joerg ; Glass, J Stacy ; Skubic, Stan ; Asche, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-ea1dedc5d71fadba9b4fbd24a9002107946417bd13dbe3794c120659ac35d9f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Solution processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, J Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skubic, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asche, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lehmann, Joerg</au><au>Glass, J Stacy</au><au>Skubic, Stan</au><au>Asche, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World”</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2707</spage><epage>2707</epage><pages>2707-2707</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: This report outlines the hurdles and successes encountered in integrating a Varian On‐Board Imaging (OBI) system with an existing linear accelerator (linac) in a mixed vendor environment with the goal to perform high volume routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Method and Materials: Varian OBI was added to an existing linac concurrently with the requisite installations of an MV Portal Vision (PV) and a Varian 4D integrated treatment console (4DITC). The system was connected to an existing IMPAC MOSAIQ environment with a Philips Pinnacle planning system. Results: The integrated system is functioning and is used daily for more than 20 CBCT patients. Pending the OBI software update, patients are predominantly scanned with the “low dose protocol”. Isocenter accuracy and system safety checks have been implemented as routine quality assurance (QA) measures. Several glitches with the OBI system software have surfaced, which necessitated intervention from the vendor's highest tiered technical support personnel. These glitches include unexplained loss of calibration data, non‐functioning components, and the display of seemingly non‐essential error messages, which appear to be unrelated to the functioning of the system. Furthermore, the robotic arms moving the kV source and imaging panel have at multiple instances crashed into themselves. For patient safety they are now only moved when in the lateral position. Workflow problems also have arisen with the recording of offsets and the preparation of the planning CT data set used for reference in CBCT. Conclusion: An add‐on OBI system for CBCT is a viable clinical solution, which however requires much patience and persistence, especially in a mixed vendor environment.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.2961672</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2707-2707 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2961672 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Calibration Computed tomography Computer software Cone beam computed tomography Linear accelerators Medical imaging Quality assurance Robotics Solution processes |
title | SU‐GG‐J‐123: Making High Volume OBI CBCT Work in “the Real World” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90GG%E2%80%90J%E2%80%90123:%20Making%20High%20Volume%20OBI%20CBCT%20Work%20in%20%E2%80%9Cthe%20Real%20World%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Lehmann,%20Joerg&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2707&rft.epage=2707&rft.pages=2707-2707&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2961672&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP1672%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |