Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips

This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are als...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of turbomachinery 2021-05, Vol.143 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Jin-sol, Kim, Inkyom, Joo, Jin Sung, Lee, Sang Woo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of turbomachinery
container_volume 143
creator Jung, Jin-sol
Kim, Inkyom
Joo, Jin Sung
Lee, Sang Woo
description This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s < 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4049920
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4049920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1096824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1Lw0AUxBdRMFYP3j3s1UPq26_n7rGUaoWCYKt4C6_JLqSkSd1NwP73RtrTwPBjmBnG7gVMhRDmSUw1aOckXLBMGGlz6wAuWQbWutyA_r5mNyntAIRSRmfsY_F78LHe-7anhq_7oTryruUzH7vq2NK-LvmqS4lTW_Glp55vIrUp-MhDF_kXxbobEl__DJ6a0dzUh3TLrgI1yd-ddcI-Xxab-TJfvb--zWernJTAPrfGBekwWABQJYZSVEpWZNEbhxWikE5tCUFK7UnZZ9TKWwlbhYjGSqUm7PGUW8axYfShOIxDKB4LAcX_GYUozmeM7MOJpbT3xa4bYjtWG0GHVmr1B1otWS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s &lt; 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-504X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4049920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of turbomachinery, 2021-05, Vol.143 (5)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38497</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inkyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><title>Journal of turbomachinery</title><addtitle>J. Turbomach</addtitle><description>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s &lt; 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</description><issn>0889-504X</issn><issn>1528-8900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1Lw0AUxBdRMFYP3j3s1UPq26_n7rGUaoWCYKt4C6_JLqSkSd1NwP73RtrTwPBjmBnG7gVMhRDmSUw1aOckXLBMGGlz6wAuWQbWutyA_r5mNyntAIRSRmfsY_F78LHe-7anhq_7oTryruUzH7vq2NK-LvmqS4lTW_Glp55vIrUp-MhDF_kXxbobEl__DJ6a0dzUh3TLrgI1yd-ddcI-Xxab-TJfvb--zWernJTAPrfGBekwWABQJYZSVEpWZNEbhxWikE5tCUFK7UnZZ9TKWwlbhYjGSqUm7PGUW8axYfShOIxDKB4LAcX_GYUozmeM7MOJpbT3xa4bYjtWG0GHVmr1B1otWS8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Jung, Jin-sol</creator><creator>Kim, Inkyom</creator><creator>Joo, Jin Sung</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Woo</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><author>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inkyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of turbomachinery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Jin-sol</au><au>Kim, Inkyom</au><au>Joo, Jin Sung</au><au>Lee, Sang Woo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</atitle><jtitle>Journal of turbomachinery</jtitle><stitle>J. Turbomach</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0889-504X</issn><eissn>1528-8900</eissn><abstract>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s &lt; 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4049920</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-504X
ispartof Journal of turbomachinery, 2021-05, Vol.143 (5)
issn 0889-504X
1528-8900
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4049920
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
title Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A51%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Study%20on%20Aerodynamic%20Loss%20and%20Heat%20Transfer%20for%20Various%20Squealer%20Tips&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20turbomachinery&rft.au=Jung,%20Jin-sol&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0889-504X&rft.eissn=1528-8900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4049920&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E1096824%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true