Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips
This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are als...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of turbomachinery 2021-05, Vol.143 (5) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of turbomachinery |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Jung, Jin-sol Kim, Inkyom Joo, Jin Sung Lee, Sang Woo |
description | This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s < 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.4049920 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4049920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1096824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1Lw0AUxBdRMFYP3j3s1UPq26_n7rGUaoWCYKt4C6_JLqSkSd1NwP73RtrTwPBjmBnG7gVMhRDmSUw1aOckXLBMGGlz6wAuWQbWutyA_r5mNyntAIRSRmfsY_F78LHe-7anhq_7oTryruUzH7vq2NK-LvmqS4lTW_Glp55vIrUp-MhDF_kXxbobEl__DJ6a0dzUh3TLrgI1yd-ddcI-Xxab-TJfvb--zWernJTAPrfGBekwWABQJYZSVEpWZNEbhxWikE5tCUFK7UnZZ9TKWwlbhYjGSqUm7PGUW8axYfShOIxDKB4LAcX_GYUozmeM7MOJpbT3xa4bYjtWG0GHVmr1B1otWS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s < 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-504X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4049920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of turbomachinery, 2021-05, Vol.143 (5)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38497</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inkyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><title>Journal of turbomachinery</title><addtitle>J. Turbomach</addtitle><description>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s < 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</description><issn>0889-504X</issn><issn>1528-8900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1Lw0AUxBdRMFYP3j3s1UPq26_n7rGUaoWCYKt4C6_JLqSkSd1NwP73RtrTwPBjmBnG7gVMhRDmSUw1aOckXLBMGGlz6wAuWQbWutyA_r5mNyntAIRSRmfsY_F78LHe-7anhq_7oTryruUzH7vq2NK-LvmqS4lTW_Glp55vIrUp-MhDF_kXxbobEl__DJ6a0dzUh3TLrgI1yd-ddcI-Xxab-TJfvb--zWernJTAPrfGBekwWABQJYZSVEpWZNEbhxWikE5tCUFK7UnZZ9TKWwlbhYjGSqUm7PGUW8axYfShOIxDKB4LAcX_GYUozmeM7MOJpbT3xa4bYjtWG0GHVmr1B1otWS8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Jung, Jin-sol</creator><creator>Kim, Inkyom</creator><creator>Joo, Jin Sung</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Woo</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</title><author>Jung, Jin-sol ; Kim, Inkyom ; Joo, Jin Sung ; Lee, Sang Woo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a316t-859f296f80003c6fc1d32da86e596d661293ba60224ea387643e820b366658233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jin-sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inkyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Woo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of turbomachinery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Jin-sol</au><au>Kim, Inkyom</au><au>Joo, Jin Sung</au><au>Lee, Sang Woo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips</atitle><jtitle>Journal of turbomachinery</jtitle><stitle>J. Turbomach</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0889-504X</issn><eissn>1528-8900</eissn><abstract>This paper presents aerodynamic loss data for five squealer configurations of a full squealer (FS), a pressure-side squealer (PS), a suction-side squealer (SS), a camberline squealer (CS), and a full-camberline squealer (FCS) in a low-speed turbine cascade. In addition, tip thermal load data are also reported for the FS, PS, and SS tips. The results show that when h/s (tip clearance-to-span ratio) ≥ 0.96%, the mass-averaged loss for the FS tip decreases, has a minimum value, and then increases, as the squealer height (hst) increases. for h/s = 0.48%, however, the loss changes with hst/s are found to be minute. For the FS tip, the loss tends to increase, as the squealer thickness increases. Adding a camberline squealer to the FS tip is not beneficial in the loss reduction. When hst/s < 3.82% for h/s = 0.96%, the FS tip has the lowest mass-averaged loss, the SS tip has the second-lowest loss, the PS tip has higher loss compared to the SS tip, and the CS tip loss is highest, regardless of hst/s. For h/s = 0.96%, the average tip thermal load for the FS tip is lower than the PS tip one but is higher than the SS tip one. Thus, the SS tip delivers the lowest average thermal load, irrespective of hst/s.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4049920</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-504X |
ispartof | Journal of turbomachinery, 2021-05, Vol.143 (5) |
issn | 0889-504X 1528-8900 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4049920 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; ASME Transactions Journals (Current) |
title | Experimental Study on Aerodynamic Loss and Heat Transfer for Various Squealer Tips |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A51%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Study%20on%20Aerodynamic%20Loss%20and%20Heat%20Transfer%20for%20Various%20Squealer%20Tips&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20turbomachinery&rft.au=Jung,%20Jin-sol&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0889-504X&rft.eissn=1528-8900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4049920&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E1096824%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |