Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint

Offshore platforms are prone to fatigue damage. To evaluate the fatigue damage, these platforms are periodically inspected during the in-service lifetime. Inspection activities provide additional information, which includes detection and measurement of crack size. A Bayesian framework can be used to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering 2021-04, Vol.143 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Khalili, H, Oterkus, S, Barltrop, N, Bharadwaj, U
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering
container_volume 143
creator Khalili, H
Oterkus, S
Barltrop, N
Bharadwaj, U
description Offshore platforms are prone to fatigue damage. To evaluate the fatigue damage, these platforms are periodically inspected during the in-service lifetime. Inspection activities provide additional information, which includes detection and measurement of crack size. A Bayesian framework can be used to update the probability distribution of the uncertain parameters such as crack size. After updating the distribution of the crack size, it is possible to improve the estimation of joint reliability. The main purpose of this study is to present different methods of Bayesian inference to update the probability distribution of the crack size using the inspection results and to demonstrate how the results are different. Two different methods are presented: analytical (conjugate) and numerical methods. The advantages and shortcomings of each method are discussed. To compare the results of the analytical and numerical methods, two different situations are considered; updating the crack size distribution for a particular joint and updating the crack size distribution for several joints that have almost the same conditions. Although the proposed methodology can be applied to different kinds of structures, an example of tubular joints in a specific jacket platform is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach and to compare the results of two methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4048155
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4048155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1086326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a285t-7d5cabefc91416fd087e2ef03f00a725ae898f499359f2202e047183c3182a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqUwsDN4ZUjxs-PEHqFQPlTEQCsxEbnJc-vSOpXtDOXXE9RO9w5HV1eHkGtgIwCQdzDKWa5AyhMyAMlVpnTxdUoGTGmelRz0ObmIcc0YCCHZgHw_OmsxoE_0wewxOuPpO6ZV20Rq20Dnu8Yk55c0rZBO-rrskI6DqX_op_tF-uhiCm7RJdd66jw1dNYtuo0J9K11Pl2SM2s2Ea-OOSTzydNs_JJNP55fx_fTzHAlU1Y2sjYLtLWGHArbMFUiR8uEZcyUXBpUWtlcayG15ZxxZHkJStQCFDfciiG5PezWoY0xoK12wW1N2FfAqn8xFVRHMT17c2BN3GK1brvg-2s9qArBC_EHrJReVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Khalili, H ; Oterkus, S ; Barltrop, N ; Bharadwaj, U</creator><creatorcontrib>Khalili, H ; Oterkus, S ; Barltrop, N ; Bharadwaj, U</creatorcontrib><description>Offshore platforms are prone to fatigue damage. To evaluate the fatigue damage, these platforms are periodically inspected during the in-service lifetime. Inspection activities provide additional information, which includes detection and measurement of crack size. A Bayesian framework can be used to update the probability distribution of the uncertain parameters such as crack size. After updating the distribution of the crack size, it is possible to improve the estimation of joint reliability. The main purpose of this study is to present different methods of Bayesian inference to update the probability distribution of the crack size using the inspection results and to demonstrate how the results are different. Two different methods are presented: analytical (conjugate) and numerical methods. The advantages and shortcomings of each method are discussed. To compare the results of the analytical and numerical methods, two different situations are considered; updating the crack size distribution for a particular joint and updating the crack size distribution for several joints that have almost the same conditions. Although the proposed methodology can be applied to different kinds of structures, an example of tubular joints in a specific jacket platform is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach and to compare the results of two methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-896X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4048155</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, 2021-04, Vol.143 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a285t-7d5cabefc91416fd087e2ef03f00a725ae898f499359f2202e047183c3182a2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a285t-7d5cabefc91416fd087e2ef03f00a725ae898f499359f2202e047183c3182a2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38497</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khalili, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oterkus, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barltrop, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharadwaj, U</creatorcontrib><title>Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint</title><title>Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering</title><addtitle>J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng</addtitle><description>Offshore platforms are prone to fatigue damage. To evaluate the fatigue damage, these platforms are periodically inspected during the in-service lifetime. Inspection activities provide additional information, which includes detection and measurement of crack size. A Bayesian framework can be used to update the probability distribution of the uncertain parameters such as crack size. After updating the distribution of the crack size, it is possible to improve the estimation of joint reliability. The main purpose of this study is to present different methods of Bayesian inference to update the probability distribution of the crack size using the inspection results and to demonstrate how the results are different. Two different methods are presented: analytical (conjugate) and numerical methods. The advantages and shortcomings of each method are discussed. To compare the results of the analytical and numerical methods, two different situations are considered; updating the crack size distribution for a particular joint and updating the crack size distribution for several joints that have almost the same conditions. Although the proposed methodology can be applied to different kinds of structures, an example of tubular joints in a specific jacket platform is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach and to compare the results of two methods.</description><issn>0892-7219</issn><issn>1528-896X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqUwsDN4ZUjxs-PEHqFQPlTEQCsxEbnJc-vSOpXtDOXXE9RO9w5HV1eHkGtgIwCQdzDKWa5AyhMyAMlVpnTxdUoGTGmelRz0ObmIcc0YCCHZgHw_OmsxoE_0wewxOuPpO6ZV20Rq20Dnu8Yk55c0rZBO-rrskI6DqX_op_tF-uhiCm7RJdd66jw1dNYtuo0J9K11Pl2SM2s2Ea-OOSTzydNs_JJNP55fx_fTzHAlU1Y2sjYLtLWGHArbMFUiR8uEZcyUXBpUWtlcayG15ZxxZHkJStQCFDfciiG5PezWoY0xoK12wW1N2FfAqn8xFVRHMT17c2BN3GK1brvg-2s9qArBC_EHrJReVA</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Khalili, H</creator><creator>Oterkus, S</creator><creator>Barltrop, N</creator><creator>Bharadwaj, U</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint</title><author>Khalili, H ; Oterkus, S ; Barltrop, N ; Bharadwaj, U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a285t-7d5cabefc91416fd087e2ef03f00a725ae898f499359f2202e047183c3182a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khalili, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oterkus, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barltrop, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharadwaj, U</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khalili, H</au><au>Oterkus, S</au><au>Barltrop, N</au><au>Bharadwaj, U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint</atitle><jtitle>Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0892-7219</issn><eissn>1528-896X</eissn><abstract>Offshore platforms are prone to fatigue damage. To evaluate the fatigue damage, these platforms are periodically inspected during the in-service lifetime. Inspection activities provide additional information, which includes detection and measurement of crack size. A Bayesian framework can be used to update the probability distribution of the uncertain parameters such as crack size. After updating the distribution of the crack size, it is possible to improve the estimation of joint reliability. The main purpose of this study is to present different methods of Bayesian inference to update the probability distribution of the crack size using the inspection results and to demonstrate how the results are different. Two different methods are presented: analytical (conjugate) and numerical methods. The advantages and shortcomings of each method are discussed. To compare the results of the analytical and numerical methods, two different situations are considered; updating the crack size distribution for a particular joint and updating the crack size distribution for several joints that have almost the same conditions. Although the proposed methodology can be applied to different kinds of structures, an example of tubular joints in a specific jacket platform is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach and to compare the results of two methods.</abstract><doi>10.1115/1.4048155</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7219
ispartof Journal of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, 2021-04, Vol.143 (2)
issn 0892-7219
1528-896X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4048155
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
title Different Bayesian Methods for Updating the Fatigue Crack Size Distribution in a Tubular Joint
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Bayesian%20Methods%20for%20Updating%20the%20Fatigue%20Crack%20Size%20Distribution%20in%20a%20Tubular%20Joint&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20offshore%20mechanics%20and%20Arctic%20engineering&rft.au=Khalili,%20H&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0892-7219&rft.eissn=1528-896X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4048155&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E1086326%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true