Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models
Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of fluids engineering 2020-06, Vol.142 (6) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of fluids engineering |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Sharma, Vatsalya Eswaran, Vinayak Chakraborty, Debasis |
description | Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.4045985 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4045985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1072592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK4evHvI1UPXTJpsk-NS_FhYFWwFT5bYptLSNkumq-y_N3X3MgPPPAwzLyHXwBYAIO9gIZiQWskTMgPJVaQZfJySGWNaRZwzfk4uEFvGII6FmpHP1PXb3WjGxg2mo6tQ9tggdTXNvRnwx3q0NHNDU9L10NpyEmkz0Gy3DaN_nnqHWHful75jM3zTt9VLRp9dZTu8JGe16dBeHfuc5A_3efoUbV4f1-lqExku2RiVwhpdSSkEKKiNjSulE8UD08bIwCERmqlE1_KrjE1VioqzhGu5tFzxZTwnt4e15XSKt3Wx9U1v_L4AVky5FFAccwnuzcE12NuidTsffsYgJlxqHv8ByaNedg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><description>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-901X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4045985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of fluids engineering, 2020-06, Vol.142 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eswaran, Vinayak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><title>Journal of fluids engineering</title><addtitle>J. Fluids Eng</addtitle><description>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</description><issn>0098-2202</issn><issn>1528-901X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK4evHvI1UPXTJpsk-NS_FhYFWwFT5bYptLSNkumq-y_N3X3MgPPPAwzLyHXwBYAIO9gIZiQWskTMgPJVaQZfJySGWNaRZwzfk4uEFvGII6FmpHP1PXb3WjGxg2mo6tQ9tggdTXNvRnwx3q0NHNDU9L10NpyEmkz0Gy3DaN_nnqHWHful75jM3zTt9VLRp9dZTu8JGe16dBeHfuc5A_3efoUbV4f1-lqExku2RiVwhpdSSkEKKiNjSulE8UD08bIwCERmqlE1_KrjE1VioqzhGu5tFzxZTwnt4e15XSKt3Wx9U1v_L4AVky5FFAccwnuzcE12NuidTsffsYgJlxqHv8ByaNedg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Sharma, Vatsalya</creator><creator>Eswaran, Vinayak</creator><creator>Chakraborty, Debasis</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><author>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eswaran, Vinayak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluids engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Vatsalya</au><au>Eswaran, Vinayak</au><au>Chakraborty, Debasis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluids engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Fluids Eng</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>0098-2202</issn><eissn>1528-901X</eissn><abstract>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4045985</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-2202 |
ispartof | Journal of fluids engineering, 2020-06, Vol.142 (6) |
issn | 0098-2202 1528-901X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4045985 |
source | ASME Transactions Journals (Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Analysis%20of%20Transverse%20Sonic%20Injection%20in%20Supersonic%20Crossflow%20Using%20RANS%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluids%20engineering&rft.au=Sharma,%20Vatsalya&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=0098-2202&rft.eissn=1528-901X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4045985&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E1072592%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |