Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models

Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fluids engineering 2020-06, Vol.142 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Sharma, Vatsalya, Eswaran, Vinayak, Chakraborty, Debasis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of fluids engineering
container_volume 142
creator Sharma, Vatsalya
Eswaran, Vinayak
Chakraborty, Debasis
description Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4045985
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4045985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1072592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK4evHvI1UPXTJpsk-NS_FhYFWwFT5bYptLSNkumq-y_N3X3MgPPPAwzLyHXwBYAIO9gIZiQWskTMgPJVaQZfJySGWNaRZwzfk4uEFvGII6FmpHP1PXb3WjGxg2mo6tQ9tggdTXNvRnwx3q0NHNDU9L10NpyEmkz0Gy3DaN_nnqHWHful75jM3zTt9VLRp9dZTu8JGe16dBeHfuc5A_3efoUbV4f1-lqExku2RiVwhpdSSkEKKiNjSulE8UD08bIwCERmqlE1_KrjE1VioqzhGu5tFzxZTwnt4e15XSKt3Wx9U1v_L4AVky5FFAccwnuzcE12NuidTsffsYgJlxqHv8ByaNedg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><description>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-901X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4045985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of fluids engineering, 2020-06, Vol.142 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eswaran, Vinayak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><title>Journal of fluids engineering</title><addtitle>J. Fluids Eng</addtitle><description>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</description><issn>0098-2202</issn><issn>1528-901X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK4evHvI1UPXTJpsk-NS_FhYFWwFT5bYptLSNkumq-y_N3X3MgPPPAwzLyHXwBYAIO9gIZiQWskTMgPJVaQZfJySGWNaRZwzfk4uEFvGII6FmpHP1PXb3WjGxg2mo6tQ9tggdTXNvRnwx3q0NHNDU9L10NpyEmkz0Gy3DaN_nnqHWHful75jM3zTt9VLRp9dZTu8JGe16dBeHfuc5A_3efoUbV4f1-lqExku2RiVwhpdSSkEKKiNjSulE8UD08bIwCERmqlE1_KrjE1VioqzhGu5tFzxZTwnt4e15XSKt3Wx9U1v_L4AVky5FFAccwnuzcE12NuidTsffsYgJlxqHv8ByaNedg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Sharma, Vatsalya</creator><creator>Eswaran, Vinayak</creator><creator>Chakraborty, Debasis</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</title><author>Sharma, Vatsalya ; Eswaran, Vinayak ; Chakraborty, Debasis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-c4ea9d5544181fae3d89782a9d9aa555417490879f5bc3adc4d2072956e28263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vatsalya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eswaran, Vinayak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluids engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Vatsalya</au><au>Eswaran, Vinayak</au><au>Chakraborty, Debasis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluids engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Fluids Eng</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>0098-2202</issn><eissn>1528-901X</eissn><abstract>Transverse injection at sonic speed from a rectangular slot into a supersonic crossflow is numerically explored with an indigenously developed parallel three-dimensional (3D) Reynold-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver for unstructured grids. The RANS models used for turbulence closure are the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) model and the two-equation shear stress transport (SST) model. For each model, the influence of compressibility corrections is assessed. Due to the presence of shock-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI) in the flow, various STBLI corrections are assessed for both the models. Most of the simulations are two-dimensional (2D), but three-dimensional simulations are also performed to investigate the mismatch between the experimental dataset and the numerical results. The SA model is less sensitive to STBLI corrections, but some improvement in its prediction of the separation distance is found with the compressibility corrections. The SST model results are insensitive to the compressibility corrections, but the STBLI correction improves its results. Improved agreement with the experimental dataset is found when simulations are done in 3D, suggesting that the experiments were not so close to 2D as previously believed.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4045985</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-2202
ispartof Journal of fluids engineering, 2020-06, Vol.142 (6)
issn 0098-2202
1528-901X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4045985
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Computational Analysis of Transverse Sonic Injection in Supersonic Crossflow Using RANS Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Analysis%20of%20Transverse%20Sonic%20Injection%20in%20Supersonic%20Crossflow%20Using%20RANS%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluids%20engineering&rft.au=Sharma,%20Vatsalya&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=0098-2202&rft.eissn=1528-901X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4045985&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E1072592%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true