Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources

The reconstruction of the angular and spatial intensity distribution from radiative flux maps measured in high flux solar simulators (HFSS) or optical concentrators is an ill-posed inverse problem requiring special solution strategies. We aimed at providing a solution strategy for the determination...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of solar energy engineering 2019-04, Vol.141 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Suter, Clemens, Meouchi, Antoine Torbey, Levêque, Gaël, Haussener, Sophia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of solar energy engineering
container_volume 141
creator Suter, Clemens
Meouchi, Antoine Torbey
Levêque, Gaël
Haussener, Sophia
description The reconstruction of the angular and spatial intensity distribution from radiative flux maps measured in high flux solar simulators (HFSS) or optical concentrators is an ill-posed inverse problem requiring special solution strategies. We aimed at providing a solution strategy for the determination of intensity distributions of arbitrarily complicated concentrating facilities. The approach consists of the inverse reconstruction of the intensities from multiple radiative flux maps recorded at various positions around the focal plane. The approach was validated by three test cases including uniform spatial, Gaussian spatial, and uniform angular distributions for which we successfully predicted the intensity for a square-shaped target with edge length of 0.5 m and for a displacement range spanning ±1.5 m at a resolution of 3.2 × 106 elements, yielding relative errors between 19.8–26.4% and 15.7–25.6% when using Tikhonov regularization and the conjugate gradient least square (CGLS) method, respectively. The latter method showed superior performance and was used at a resolution of 2.35 × 107 elements to analyze EPFL's HFSS comprising 18 lamps. The inverse solution for a single lamp retrieved from experimentally measured and simulated radiative flux maps showed peak intensities of 13.7 MW/m2/sr and 16.0 MW/m2/sr, respectively, with a relative error of 81.1%. The inverse reconstruction of the entire simulator by superimposing the single lamp intensities retrieved from simulated flux maps resulted in a maximum intensity of 18.8 MW/m2/sr with a relative error of 80%. The inverse method proved to provide reasonable intensity predictions with limited resolution of details imposed by the high gradients in the radiative flux maps.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4042227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4042227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>368807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a249t-d8dc10dbea1ec93f9faa611de0dedfac82c77425b7423492e5161112a3fc92193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB89eevWw2Gn3oz0SIkKCMVE5N0M7lSXAknYh4q93CVxmDvNkMvMy9ghiAADFCwxykUspqyvWg0LqTBtdXrOeAGOyUiq4ZXcprYQApQrZY_Pp9kAxER9ucX1MdeJN4J_oa2zrA_Hxev_L33GXeGgib5fER0uM6FqK9V9Hmu3JT-qf5Zl-NfvoKN2zm4DrRA-X3mfz8ev3aJLNPt6mo-EsQ5mbNvPaOxB-QQjkjAomIJYAnoQnH9Bp6aoql8WiKyo3kgroxiBRBWckGNVnz-e9LjYpRQp2F-sNxqMFYU95WLCXPDr7dLaYNmRX3aHdx8mqUmtRqX-7lluX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Suter, Clemens ; Meouchi, Antoine Torbey ; Levêque, Gaël ; Haussener, Sophia</creator><creatorcontrib>Suter, Clemens ; Meouchi, Antoine Torbey ; Levêque, Gaël ; Haussener, Sophia</creatorcontrib><description>The reconstruction of the angular and spatial intensity distribution from radiative flux maps measured in high flux solar simulators (HFSS) or optical concentrators is an ill-posed inverse problem requiring special solution strategies. We aimed at providing a solution strategy for the determination of intensity distributions of arbitrarily complicated concentrating facilities. The approach consists of the inverse reconstruction of the intensities from multiple radiative flux maps recorded at various positions around the focal plane. The approach was validated by three test cases including uniform spatial, Gaussian spatial, and uniform angular distributions for which we successfully predicted the intensity for a square-shaped target with edge length of 0.5 m and for a displacement range spanning ±1.5 m at a resolution of 3.2 × 106 elements, yielding relative errors between 19.8–26.4% and 15.7–25.6% when using Tikhonov regularization and the conjugate gradient least square (CGLS) method, respectively. The latter method showed superior performance and was used at a resolution of 2.35 × 107 elements to analyze EPFL's HFSS comprising 18 lamps. The inverse solution for a single lamp retrieved from experimentally measured and simulated radiative flux maps showed peak intensities of 13.7 MW/m2/sr and 16.0 MW/m2/sr, respectively, with a relative error of 81.1%. The inverse reconstruction of the entire simulator by superimposing the single lamp intensities retrieved from simulated flux maps resulted in a maximum intensity of 18.8 MW/m2/sr with a relative error of 80%. The inverse method proved to provide reasonable intensity predictions with limited resolution of details imposed by the high gradients in the radiative flux maps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0199-6231</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4042227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of solar energy engineering, 2019-04, Vol.141 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a249t-d8dc10dbea1ec93f9faa611de0dedfac82c77425b7423492e5161112a3fc92193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a249t-d8dc10dbea1ec93f9faa611de0dedfac82c77425b7423492e5161112a3fc92193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,38501</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suter, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meouchi, Antoine Torbey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levêque, Gaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haussener, Sophia</creatorcontrib><title>Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources</title><title>Journal of solar energy engineering</title><addtitle>J. Sol. Energy Eng</addtitle><description>The reconstruction of the angular and spatial intensity distribution from radiative flux maps measured in high flux solar simulators (HFSS) or optical concentrators is an ill-posed inverse problem requiring special solution strategies. We aimed at providing a solution strategy for the determination of intensity distributions of arbitrarily complicated concentrating facilities. The approach consists of the inverse reconstruction of the intensities from multiple radiative flux maps recorded at various positions around the focal plane. The approach was validated by three test cases including uniform spatial, Gaussian spatial, and uniform angular distributions for which we successfully predicted the intensity for a square-shaped target with edge length of 0.5 m and for a displacement range spanning ±1.5 m at a resolution of 3.2 × 106 elements, yielding relative errors between 19.8–26.4% and 15.7–25.6% when using Tikhonov regularization and the conjugate gradient least square (CGLS) method, respectively. The latter method showed superior performance and was used at a resolution of 2.35 × 107 elements to analyze EPFL's HFSS comprising 18 lamps. The inverse solution for a single lamp retrieved from experimentally measured and simulated radiative flux maps showed peak intensities of 13.7 MW/m2/sr and 16.0 MW/m2/sr, respectively, with a relative error of 81.1%. The inverse reconstruction of the entire simulator by superimposing the single lamp intensities retrieved from simulated flux maps resulted in a maximum intensity of 18.8 MW/m2/sr with a relative error of 80%. The inverse method proved to provide reasonable intensity predictions with limited resolution of details imposed by the high gradients in the radiative flux maps.</description><issn>0199-6231</issn><issn>1528-8986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB89eevWw2Gn3oz0SIkKCMVE5N0M7lSXAknYh4q93CVxmDvNkMvMy9ghiAADFCwxykUspqyvWg0LqTBtdXrOeAGOyUiq4ZXcprYQApQrZY_Pp9kAxER9ucX1MdeJN4J_oa2zrA_Hxev_L33GXeGgib5fER0uM6FqK9V9Hmu3JT-qf5Zl-NfvoKN2zm4DrRA-X3mfz8ev3aJLNPt6mo-EsQ5mbNvPaOxB-QQjkjAomIJYAnoQnH9Bp6aoql8WiKyo3kgroxiBRBWckGNVnz-e9LjYpRQp2F-sNxqMFYU95WLCXPDr7dLaYNmRX3aHdx8mqUmtRqX-7lluX</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Suter, Clemens</creator><creator>Meouchi, Antoine Torbey</creator><creator>Levêque, Gaël</creator><creator>Haussener, Sophia</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources</title><author>Suter, Clemens ; Meouchi, Antoine Torbey ; Levêque, Gaël ; Haussener, Sophia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a249t-d8dc10dbea1ec93f9faa611de0dedfac82c77425b7423492e5161112a3fc92193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suter, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meouchi, Antoine Torbey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levêque, Gaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haussener, Sophia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of solar energy engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suter, Clemens</au><au>Meouchi, Antoine Torbey</au><au>Levêque, Gaël</au><au>Haussener, Sophia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources</atitle><jtitle>Journal of solar energy engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Sol. Energy Eng</stitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0199-6231</issn><eissn>1528-8986</eissn><abstract>The reconstruction of the angular and spatial intensity distribution from radiative flux maps measured in high flux solar simulators (HFSS) or optical concentrators is an ill-posed inverse problem requiring special solution strategies. We aimed at providing a solution strategy for the determination of intensity distributions of arbitrarily complicated concentrating facilities. The approach consists of the inverse reconstruction of the intensities from multiple radiative flux maps recorded at various positions around the focal plane. The approach was validated by three test cases including uniform spatial, Gaussian spatial, and uniform angular distributions for which we successfully predicted the intensity for a square-shaped target with edge length of 0.5 m and for a displacement range spanning ±1.5 m at a resolution of 3.2 × 106 elements, yielding relative errors between 19.8–26.4% and 15.7–25.6% when using Tikhonov regularization and the conjugate gradient least square (CGLS) method, respectively. The latter method showed superior performance and was used at a resolution of 2.35 × 107 elements to analyze EPFL's HFSS comprising 18 lamps. The inverse solution for a single lamp retrieved from experimentally measured and simulated radiative flux maps showed peak intensities of 13.7 MW/m2/sr and 16.0 MW/m2/sr, respectively, with a relative error of 81.1%. The inverse reconstruction of the entire simulator by superimposing the single lamp intensities retrieved from simulated flux maps resulted in a maximum intensity of 18.8 MW/m2/sr with a relative error of 80%. The inverse method proved to provide reasonable intensity predictions with limited resolution of details imposed by the high gradients in the radiative flux maps.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4042227</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0199-6231
ispartof Journal of solar energy engineering, 2019-04, Vol.141 (2)
issn 0199-6231
1528-8986
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4042227
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Inverse Analysis of Radiative Flux Maps for the Characterization of High Flux Sources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inverse%20Analysis%20of%20Radiative%20Flux%20Maps%20for%20the%20Characterization%20of%20High%20Flux%20Sources&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20solar%20energy%20engineering&rft.au=Suter,%20Clemens&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0199-6231&rft.eissn=1528-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4042227&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E368807%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true