A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests

Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manufacturing science and engineering 2017-07, Vol.139 (7)
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Dazhong, Jennings, Connor, Terpenny, Janis, Gao, Robert X, Kumara, Soundar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Journal of manufacturing science and engineering
container_volume 139
creator Wu, Dazhong
Jennings, Connor
Terpenny, Janis
Gao, Robert X
Kumara, Soundar
description Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the system of interest to develop closed-form mathematical models. However, prior knowledge of system behavior is not always available, especially for complex manufacturing systems and processes. To complement model-based prognostics, data-driven methods have been increasingly applied to machinery prognostics and maintenance management, transforming legacy manufacturing systems into smart manufacturing systems with artificial intelligence. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of data-driven methods, most of these prognostic methods are based on classical machine learning techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence, various machine learning algorithms have been developed and widely applied in many engineering fields. The objective of this research is to introduce a random forests (RFs)-based prognostic method for tool wear prediction as well as compare the performance of RFs with feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) ANNs and SVR. Specifically, the performance of FFBP ANNs, SVR, and RFs are compared using an experimental data collected from 315 milling tests. Experimental results have shown that RFs can generate more accurate predictions than FFBP ANNs with a single hidden layer and SVR.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4036350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4036350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>454654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-d1ad781c6a7894aec99cf1c06ce7f89f329c36e5f041f12d14671c71ec9b43033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFPAjEUhBujiYgePHvp1cNiH223XW-EiJpgNALxuKndFpawLWm7Jvx7S-D05vDNZN4gdA9kBAD8CUaM0JJycoEGwMeykBXll1kTKQqgXFyjmxi3hABIRgeon-Cp7_YqqNT-GbxIfXPA3uEPpTetM3huVHCtW-PJbu1DmzZdxNYHvOhUSJlyvVU69SEjz3jp_Q7_ZAf-CqZpdWpz0ioe7d_KNb7DMx9MTPEWXVm1i-bufIdoNXtZTt-K-efr-3QyL1T-IBUNqEZI0KUSsmLK6KrSFjQptRFWVpaOK01Lwy1hYGHcACsFaAEZ_GWUUDpEj6dcHXyMwdh6H9rc_FADqY971VCf98rsw4lVsTP11vfB5Wo146zkjP4Dq4BnBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Wu, Dazhong ; Jennings, Connor ; Terpenny, Janis ; Gao, Robert X ; Kumara, Soundar</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dazhong ; Jennings, Connor ; Terpenny, Janis ; Gao, Robert X ; Kumara, Soundar</creatorcontrib><description>Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the system of interest to develop closed-form mathematical models. However, prior knowledge of system behavior is not always available, especially for complex manufacturing systems and processes. To complement model-based prognostics, data-driven methods have been increasingly applied to machinery prognostics and maintenance management, transforming legacy manufacturing systems into smart manufacturing systems with artificial intelligence. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of data-driven methods, most of these prognostic methods are based on classical machine learning techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence, various machine learning algorithms have been developed and widely applied in many engineering fields. The objective of this research is to introduce a random forests (RFs)-based prognostic method for tool wear prediction as well as compare the performance of RFs with feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) ANNs and SVR. Specifically, the performance of FFBP ANNs, SVR, and RFs are compared using an experimental data collected from 315 milling tests. Experimental results have shown that RFs can generate more accurate predictions than FFBP ANNs with a single hidden layer and SVR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-1357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4036350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ASME</publisher><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2017-07, Vol.139 (7)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-d1ad781c6a7894aec99cf1c06ce7f89f329c36e5f041f12d14671c71ec9b43033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-d1ad781c6a7894aec99cf1c06ce7f89f329c36e5f041f12d14671c71ec9b43033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,38499</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dazhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terpenny, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Robert X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumara, Soundar</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests</title><title>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</title><addtitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the system of interest to develop closed-form mathematical models. However, prior knowledge of system behavior is not always available, especially for complex manufacturing systems and processes. To complement model-based prognostics, data-driven methods have been increasingly applied to machinery prognostics and maintenance management, transforming legacy manufacturing systems into smart manufacturing systems with artificial intelligence. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of data-driven methods, most of these prognostic methods are based on classical machine learning techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence, various machine learning algorithms have been developed and widely applied in many engineering fields. The objective of this research is to introduce a random forests (RFs)-based prognostic method for tool wear prediction as well as compare the performance of RFs with feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) ANNs and SVR. Specifically, the performance of FFBP ANNs, SVR, and RFs are compared using an experimental data collected from 315 milling tests. Experimental results have shown that RFs can generate more accurate predictions than FFBP ANNs with a single hidden layer and SVR.</description><issn>1087-1357</issn><issn>1528-8935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFPAjEUhBujiYgePHvp1cNiH223XW-EiJpgNALxuKndFpawLWm7Jvx7S-D05vDNZN4gdA9kBAD8CUaM0JJycoEGwMeykBXll1kTKQqgXFyjmxi3hABIRgeon-Cp7_YqqNT-GbxIfXPA3uEPpTetM3huVHCtW-PJbu1DmzZdxNYHvOhUSJlyvVU69SEjz3jp_Q7_ZAf-CqZpdWpz0ioe7d_KNb7DMx9MTPEWXVm1i-bufIdoNXtZTt-K-efr-3QyL1T-IBUNqEZI0KUSsmLK6KrSFjQptRFWVpaOK01Lwy1hYGHcACsFaAEZ_GWUUDpEj6dcHXyMwdh6H9rc_FADqY971VCf98rsw4lVsTP11vfB5Wo146zkjP4Dq4BnBw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Wu, Dazhong</creator><creator>Jennings, Connor</creator><creator>Terpenny, Janis</creator><creator>Gao, Robert X</creator><creator>Kumara, Soundar</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests</title><author>Wu, Dazhong ; Jennings, Connor ; Terpenny, Janis ; Gao, Robert X ; Kumara, Soundar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-d1ad781c6a7894aec99cf1c06ce7f89f329c36e5f041f12d14671c71ec9b43033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dazhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terpenny, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Robert X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumara, Soundar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Dazhong</au><au>Jennings, Connor</au><au>Terpenny, Janis</au><au>Gao, Robert X</au><au>Kumara, Soundar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>7</issue><issn>1087-1357</issn><eissn>1528-8935</eissn><abstract>Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the system of interest to develop closed-form mathematical models. However, prior knowledge of system behavior is not always available, especially for complex manufacturing systems and processes. To complement model-based prognostics, data-driven methods have been increasingly applied to machinery prognostics and maintenance management, transforming legacy manufacturing systems into smart manufacturing systems with artificial intelligence. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of data-driven methods, most of these prognostic methods are based on classical machine learning techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence, various machine learning algorithms have been developed and widely applied in many engineering fields. The objective of this research is to introduce a random forests (RFs)-based prognostic method for tool wear prediction as well as compare the performance of RFs with feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) ANNs and SVR. Specifically, the performance of FFBP ANNs, SVR, and RFs are compared using an experimental data collected from 315 milling tests. Experimental results have shown that RFs can generate more accurate predictions than FFBP ANNs with a single hidden layer and SVR.</abstract><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4036350</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1087-1357
ispartof Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2017-07, Vol.139 (7)
issn 1087-1357
1528-8935
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4036350
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
title A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms%20for%20Smart%20Manufacturing:%20Tool%20Wear%20Prediction%20Using%20Random%20Forests&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Wu,%20Dazhong&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=7&rft.issn=1087-1357&rft.eissn=1528-8935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4036350&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E454654%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true