Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System

On the base of the two classical thermodynamic cycles (Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle), solar-boosted Kalina system (Kalina solar system) and solar-boosted Rankine system (Rankine solar system) with traditional nonconcentrating flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and evacuated tube solar collector (ET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of solar energy engineering 2013-02, Vol.135 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Faming, Ikegami, Yasuyuki, Arima, Hirofumi, Zhou, Weisheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of solar energy engineering
container_volume 135
creator Sun, Faming
Ikegami, Yasuyuki
Arima, Hirofumi
Zhou, Weisheng
description On the base of the two classical thermodynamic cycles (Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle), solar-boosted Kalina system (Kalina solar system) and solar-boosted Rankine system (Rankine solar system) with traditional nonconcentrating flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) are investigated in the present paper. The proposed solar systems are considered to be the hybrid of power generation subcycle and solar collector subcycle. Their electricity generating performances are compared under their respective optimal operating conditions to clarify which one is more competitive in solar utilization. Results show that ETSC is the better choice for the both solar systems. Further, the performance comparison shows that the low-temperature solar energy utilized in Kalina cycle is predominant to generate electricity. Meanwhile, the study also find that mass flow rate of the power generation subcycle, mass flow rate of the solar collector subcycle, mass fraction of ammonia and the regenerator performance are important operational parameters for high performance of the Kalina solar system. Finally, with the aid of the weather conditions of Kumejima Island in Japan, the perceptual knowledge for Kalina solar system by using an application case is shown in the paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4007495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4007495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>443620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-24439b5578c589ae4edbe36763883a209ecd5f52eab9f4ec2926494d4bc7f24d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKw0AUhgdRsF4Wrt3MxoWL6FyTGXe1aBULFi_rcJqcYGoyU2YipTsfwp1v55OY0iK4OnD-7z8cPkJOOLvgnOtLfqEYy5TVO2TAtTCJsSbdJQPGrU1SIfk-OYhxzhiXUosB-Z5iqHxowRVIhw6aVawj9RXt3pBO_DJ5wXaBAbqPgPTZNxCSa-9jhyWd-iUGOka3jmvv6POq37c_n19TCB29v6Ij3y4g1LHPrrFbIjr6AE3tYHNpW6DgSvoE7r12-C84InsVNBGPt_OQvN7evIzuksnj-H40nCQgTdolQilpZ1pnptDGAiosZyjTLJXGSBDMYlHqSguEma0UFsKKVFlVqlmRVUKV8pCcb-4WwccYsMoXoW4hrHLO8rXVnOdbqz17tmEXEAtoqtCLq-NfQWTCCGtNz51uOIgt5nP_EXq3Me9fTQWTvzZNgwE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Sun, Faming ; Ikegami, Yasuyuki ; Arima, Hirofumi ; Zhou, Weisheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Faming ; Ikegami, Yasuyuki ; Arima, Hirofumi ; Zhou, Weisheng</creatorcontrib><description>On the base of the two classical thermodynamic cycles (Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle), solar-boosted Kalina system (Kalina solar system) and solar-boosted Rankine system (Rankine solar system) with traditional nonconcentrating flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) are investigated in the present paper. The proposed solar systems are considered to be the hybrid of power generation subcycle and solar collector subcycle. Their electricity generating performances are compared under their respective optimal operating conditions to clarify which one is more competitive in solar utilization. Results show that ETSC is the better choice for the both solar systems. Further, the performance comparison shows that the low-temperature solar energy utilized in Kalina cycle is predominant to generate electricity. Meanwhile, the study also find that mass flow rate of the power generation subcycle, mass flow rate of the solar collector subcycle, mass fraction of ammonia and the regenerator performance are important operational parameters for high performance of the Kalina solar system. Finally, with the aid of the weather conditions of Kumejima Island in Japan, the perceptual knowledge for Kalina solar system by using an application case is shown in the paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0199-6231</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4007495</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSEEDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Electric power plants ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Electrical power engineering ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Miscellaneous ; Natural energy ; Photovoltaic conversion ; Power networks and lines ; Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells ; Solar collectors ; Solar energy ; Solar thermal conversion</subject><ispartof>Journal of solar energy engineering, 2013-02, Vol.135 (1)</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-24439b5578c589ae4edbe36763883a209ecd5f52eab9f4ec2926494d4bc7f24d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-24439b5578c589ae4edbe36763883a209ecd5f52eab9f4ec2926494d4bc7f24d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,38519</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27282998$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Faming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegami, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arima, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weisheng</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System</title><title>Journal of solar energy engineering</title><addtitle>J. Sol. Energy Eng</addtitle><description>On the base of the two classical thermodynamic cycles (Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle), solar-boosted Kalina system (Kalina solar system) and solar-boosted Rankine system (Rankine solar system) with traditional nonconcentrating flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) are investigated in the present paper. The proposed solar systems are considered to be the hybrid of power generation subcycle and solar collector subcycle. Their electricity generating performances are compared under their respective optimal operating conditions to clarify which one is more competitive in solar utilization. Results show that ETSC is the better choice for the both solar systems. Further, the performance comparison shows that the low-temperature solar energy utilized in Kalina cycle is predominant to generate electricity. Meanwhile, the study also find that mass flow rate of the power generation subcycle, mass flow rate of the solar collector subcycle, mass fraction of ammonia and the regenerator performance are important operational parameters for high performance of the Kalina solar system. Finally, with the aid of the weather conditions of Kumejima Island in Japan, the perceptual knowledge for Kalina solar system by using an application case is shown in the paper.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Photovoltaic conversion</subject><subject>Power networks and lines</subject><subject>Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells</subject><subject>Solar collectors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar thermal conversion</subject><issn>0199-6231</issn><issn>1528-8986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtKw0AUhgdRsF4Wrt3MxoWL6FyTGXe1aBULFi_rcJqcYGoyU2YipTsfwp1v55OY0iK4OnD-7z8cPkJOOLvgnOtLfqEYy5TVO2TAtTCJsSbdJQPGrU1SIfk-OYhxzhiXUosB-Z5iqHxowRVIhw6aVawj9RXt3pBO_DJ5wXaBAbqPgPTZNxCSa-9jhyWd-iUGOka3jmvv6POq37c_n19TCB29v6Ij3y4g1LHPrrFbIjr6AE3tYHNpW6DgSvoE7r12-C84InsVNBGPt_OQvN7evIzuksnj-H40nCQgTdolQilpZ1pnptDGAiosZyjTLJXGSBDMYlHqSguEma0UFsKKVFlVqlmRVUKV8pCcb-4WwccYsMoXoW4hrHLO8rXVnOdbqz17tmEXEAtoqtCLq-NfQWTCCGtNz51uOIgt5nP_EXq3Me9fTQWTvzZNgwE</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Sun, Faming</creator><creator>Ikegami, Yasuyuki</creator><creator>Arima, Hirofumi</creator><creator>Zhou, Weisheng</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System</title><author>Sun, Faming ; Ikegami, Yasuyuki ; Arima, Hirofumi ; Zhou, Weisheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-24439b5578c589ae4edbe36763883a209ecd5f52eab9f4ec2926494d4bc7f24d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Photovoltaic conversion</topic><topic>Power networks and lines</topic><topic>Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells</topic><topic>Solar collectors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar thermal conversion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Faming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegami, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arima, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weisheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of solar energy engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Faming</au><au>Ikegami, Yasuyuki</au><au>Arima, Hirofumi</au><au>Zhou, Weisheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of solar energy engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Sol. Energy Eng</stitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0199-6231</issn><eissn>1528-8986</eissn><coden>JSEEDO</coden><abstract>On the base of the two classical thermodynamic cycles (Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle), solar-boosted Kalina system (Kalina solar system) and solar-boosted Rankine system (Rankine solar system) with traditional nonconcentrating flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) are investigated in the present paper. The proposed solar systems are considered to be the hybrid of power generation subcycle and solar collector subcycle. Their electricity generating performances are compared under their respective optimal operating conditions to clarify which one is more competitive in solar utilization. Results show that ETSC is the better choice for the both solar systems. Further, the performance comparison shows that the low-temperature solar energy utilized in Kalina cycle is predominant to generate electricity. Meanwhile, the study also find that mass flow rate of the power generation subcycle, mass flow rate of the solar collector subcycle, mass fraction of ammonia and the regenerator performance are important operational parameters for high performance of the Kalina solar system. Finally, with the aid of the weather conditions of Kumejima Island in Japan, the perceptual knowledge for Kalina solar system by using an application case is shown in the paper.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4007495</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0199-6231
ispartof Journal of solar energy engineering, 2013-02, Vol.135 (1)
issn 0199-6231
1528-8986
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4007495
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Applied sciences
Electric power plants
Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering
Electrical power engineering
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Miscellaneous
Natural energy
Photovoltaic conversion
Power networks and lines
Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells
Solar collectors
Solar energy
Solar thermal conversion
title Performance Analysis of the Low-Temperature Solar-Boosted Power Generation System—Part I: Comparison Between Kalina Solar System and Rankine Solar System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A45%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Low-Temperature%20Solar-Boosted%20Power%20Generation%20System%E2%80%94Part%20I:%20Comparison%20Between%20Kalina%20Solar%20System%20and%20Rankine%20Solar%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20solar%20energy%20engineering&rft.au=Sun,%20Faming&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0199-6231&rft.eissn=1528-8986&rft.coden=JSEEDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4007495&rft_dat=%3Casme_cross%3E443620%3C/asme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true