Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)

Condylostoma, the type genus of the family Condylostomatidae, is a well‐known and taxonomically confusing genus with more than 30 nominal species. The phylogenetic relationships among congeners and related genera remain obscure despite the continuous discovery of new species and detailed redescripti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoologica scripta 2020-03, Vol.49 (2), p.250-264
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xumiao, Li, Ju, Xu, Kuidong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 2
container_start_page 250
container_title Zoologica scripta
container_volume 49
creator Chen, Xumiao
Li, Ju
Xu, Kuidong
description Condylostoma, the type genus of the family Condylostomatidae, is a well‐known and taxonomically confusing genus with more than 30 nominal species. The phylogenetic relationships among congeners and related genera remain obscure despite the continuous discovery of new species and detailed redescription of known species over the past decades. Based on a total of 24 new sequences obtained from nine Condylostoma isolates, we conducted phylogenetic analyses by combining multiple marker genes. The molecular phylogenetic trees indicate that: (a) the monophyly of the family Condylostomatidae is supported by the rDNA locus and SSU rDNA sequences with high support value but is no longer sustained by both the ITS1‐5.8S‐ITS2 and LSU rDNA sequences; (b) Condylostoma is very likely a paraphyletic genus, and the possibility that it is a polyphyletic group cannot be denied, and (c) the genera Condylostentor and Chattonidium are suggested to evolve from a radiation of Condylostoma species. Furthermore, in an effort to provide better resolutions for understanding the evolutionary relationships of condylostomatids, the secondary structures of the variable regions 2 and 4 (V2 and V4) of SSU rDNA and ITS2 transcripts are predicted. The results revealed that the V2 and V4 structures are rather conserved at the genus level, while the ITS2 structures are much more variable.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/zsc.12383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_zsc_12383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353352551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-cfb05f995f1c139917644b0cfefaeb7b3d0c388d7e10e276e239dd99a04c9bf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWC8L3yDgxqLTJpO5ZSmDN6i4UDduhkzmxKZMJzVJlXHlI_iMPompLe4Ez1kcCN9_OPkQOqJkREON350c0ZgVbAsNaJKxKEsI30YDwgiJWJxmu2jPuRkhpMgoGaDudtl6_QwdfH181sJBgxfTvjXhpceiE23vwGGjsJ8Clqbz1ryCdVq0WIm5bntcmq4JAefNXHjdCMAnpW61WUyNFWf4GjxY462WUxDDA7SjROvgcDP30ePlxUN5HU3urm7K80kkY56zSKqapIrzVFFJGec0z5KkJlKBElDnNWuIZEXR5EAJxHkGMeNNw7kgieS14mwfHa_3Lqx5WYLz1cwsbfiOq2KWMpbGaUoDNVxT0hrnLKhqYfVc2L6ipFrprILO6kdnYE_X7BvURjmpoZPwywefSVGQVYdabS7-T5faB3OmK82y8yE63kR1C_3fF1VP9-X6tG_qzJrJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353352551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chen, Xumiao ; Li, Ju ; Xu, Kuidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xumiao ; Li, Ju ; Xu, Kuidong</creatorcontrib><description>Condylostoma, the type genus of the family Condylostomatidae, is a well‐known and taxonomically confusing genus with more than 30 nominal species. The phylogenetic relationships among congeners and related genera remain obscure despite the continuous discovery of new species and detailed redescription of known species over the past decades. Based on a total of 24 new sequences obtained from nine Condylostoma isolates, we conducted phylogenetic analyses by combining multiple marker genes. The molecular phylogenetic trees indicate that: (a) the monophyly of the family Condylostomatidae is supported by the rDNA locus and SSU rDNA sequences with high support value but is no longer sustained by both the ITS1‐5.8S‐ITS2 and LSU rDNA sequences; (b) Condylostoma is very likely a paraphyletic genus, and the possibility that it is a polyphyletic group cannot be denied, and (c) the genera Condylostentor and Chattonidium are suggested to evolve from a radiation of Condylostoma species. Furthermore, in an effort to provide better resolutions for understanding the evolutionary relationships of condylostomatids, the secondary structures of the variable regions 2 and 4 (V2 and V4) of SSU rDNA and ITS2 transcripts are predicted. The results revealed that the V2 and V4 structures are rather conserved at the genus level, while the ITS2 structures are much more variable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-3256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; Ciliophora ; Condylostomatidae ; Congeners ; DNA ; Evolutionary Biology ; Genera ; Genes ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; multigene‐phylogeny ; New species ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Physical characteristics ; Radiation ; rDNA ; Science &amp; Technology ; secondary structure ; Structures ; Taxonomy ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Zoologica scripta, 2020-03, Vol.49 (2), p.250-264</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>11</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000488080800001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-cfb05f995f1c139917644b0cfefaeb7b3d0c388d7e10e276e239dd99a04c9bf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-cfb05f995f1c139917644b0cfefaeb7b3d0c388d7e10e276e239dd99a04c9bf93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1444-0747 ; 0000-0002-7457-0183</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzsc.12383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzsc.12383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xumiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kuidong</creatorcontrib><title>Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)</title><title>Zoologica scripta</title><addtitle>ZOOL SCR</addtitle><description>Condylostoma, the type genus of the family Condylostomatidae, is a well‐known and taxonomically confusing genus with more than 30 nominal species. The phylogenetic relationships among congeners and related genera remain obscure despite the continuous discovery of new species and detailed redescription of known species over the past decades. Based on a total of 24 new sequences obtained from nine Condylostoma isolates, we conducted phylogenetic analyses by combining multiple marker genes. The molecular phylogenetic trees indicate that: (a) the monophyly of the family Condylostomatidae is supported by the rDNA locus and SSU rDNA sequences with high support value but is no longer sustained by both the ITS1‐5.8S‐ITS2 and LSU rDNA sequences; (b) Condylostoma is very likely a paraphyletic genus, and the possibility that it is a polyphyletic group cannot be denied, and (c) the genera Condylostentor and Chattonidium are suggested to evolve from a radiation of Condylostoma species. Furthermore, in an effort to provide better resolutions for understanding the evolutionary relationships of condylostomatids, the secondary structures of the variable regions 2 and 4 (V2 and V4) of SSU rDNA and ITS2 transcripts are predicted. The results revealed that the V2 and V4 structures are rather conserved at the genus level, while the ITS2 structures are much more variable.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Ciliophora</subject><subject>Condylostomatidae</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>multigene‐phylogeny</subject><subject>New species</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Physical characteristics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>rDNA</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>secondary structure</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0300-3256</issn><issn>1463-6409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWC8L3yDgxqLTJpO5ZSmDN6i4UDduhkzmxKZMJzVJlXHlI_iMPompLe4Ez1kcCN9_OPkQOqJkREON350c0ZgVbAsNaJKxKEsI30YDwgiJWJxmu2jPuRkhpMgoGaDudtl6_QwdfH181sJBgxfTvjXhpceiE23vwGGjsJ8Clqbz1ryCdVq0WIm5bntcmq4JAefNXHjdCMAnpW61WUyNFWf4GjxY462WUxDDA7SjROvgcDP30ePlxUN5HU3urm7K80kkY56zSKqapIrzVFFJGec0z5KkJlKBElDnNWuIZEXR5EAJxHkGMeNNw7kgieS14mwfHa_3Lqx5WYLz1cwsbfiOq2KWMpbGaUoDNVxT0hrnLKhqYfVc2L6ipFrprILO6kdnYE_X7BvURjmpoZPwywefSVGQVYdabS7-T5faB3OmK82y8yE63kR1C_3fF1VP9-X6tG_qzJrJ</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Chen, Xumiao</creator><creator>Li, Ju</creator><creator>Xu, Kuidong</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-0747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-0183</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)</title><author>Chen, Xumiao ; Li, Ju ; Xu, Kuidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-cfb05f995f1c139917644b0cfefaeb7b3d0c388d7e10e276e239dd99a04c9bf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Ciliophora</topic><topic>Condylostomatidae</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>multigene‐phylogeny</topic><topic>New species</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Physical characteristics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>rDNA</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>secondary structure</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xumiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kuidong</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Zoologica scripta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xumiao</au><au>Li, Ju</au><au>Xu, Kuidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)</atitle><jtitle>Zoologica scripta</jtitle><stitle>ZOOL SCR</stitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>250-264</pages><issn>0300-3256</issn><eissn>1463-6409</eissn><abstract>Condylostoma, the type genus of the family Condylostomatidae, is a well‐known and taxonomically confusing genus with more than 30 nominal species. The phylogenetic relationships among congeners and related genera remain obscure despite the continuous discovery of new species and detailed redescription of known species over the past decades. Based on a total of 24 new sequences obtained from nine Condylostoma isolates, we conducted phylogenetic analyses by combining multiple marker genes. The molecular phylogenetic trees indicate that: (a) the monophyly of the family Condylostomatidae is supported by the rDNA locus and SSU rDNA sequences with high support value but is no longer sustained by both the ITS1‐5.8S‐ITS2 and LSU rDNA sequences; (b) Condylostoma is very likely a paraphyletic genus, and the possibility that it is a polyphyletic group cannot be denied, and (c) the genera Condylostentor and Chattonidium are suggested to evolve from a radiation of Condylostoma species. Furthermore, in an effort to provide better resolutions for understanding the evolutionary relationships of condylostomatids, the secondary structures of the variable regions 2 and 4 (V2 and V4) of SSU rDNA and ITS2 transcripts are predicted. The results revealed that the V2 and V4 structures are rather conserved at the genus level, while the ITS2 structures are much more variable.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/zsc.12383</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-0747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-0183</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-3256
ispartof Zoologica scripta, 2020-03, Vol.49 (2), p.250-264
issn 0300-3256
1463-6409
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_zsc_12383
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Biological evolution
Ciliophora
Condylostomatidae
Congeners
DNA
Evolutionary Biology
Genera
Genes
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
multigene‐phylogeny
New species
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Physical characteristics
Radiation
rDNA
Science & Technology
secondary structure
Structures
Taxonomy
Zoology
title Multigene‐based phylogeny analyses of the controversial family Condylostomatidae (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A44%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multigene%E2%80%90based%20phylogeny%20analyses%20of%20the%20controversial%20family%20Condylostomatidae%20(Ciliophora,%20Heterotrichea)&rft.jtitle=Zoologica%20scripta&rft.au=Chen,%20Xumiao&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=250-264&rft.issn=0300-3256&rft.eissn=1463-6409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zsc.12383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353352551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353352551&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true