A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD

Summary The utility of zero‐time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero‐time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single‐centre study, we examined the utility and impact on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplant international 2021-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1506-1516
Hauptverfasser: Luque, Yosu, Jamme, Matthieu, Aubert, Olivier, Roux, Arthur, Martinez, Frank, Amrouche, Lucile, Tinel, Claire, Galmiche, Louise, Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul, Audenet, François, Legendre, Christophe, Anglicheau, Dany, Rabant, Marion
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1516
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1506
container_title Transplant international
container_volume 34
creator Luque, Yosu
Jamme, Matthieu
Aubert, Olivier
Roux, Arthur
Martinez, Frank
Amrouche, Lucile
Tinel, Claire
Galmiche, Louise
Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul
Audenet, François
Legendre, Christophe
Anglicheau, Dany
Rabant, Marion
description Summary The utility of zero‐time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero‐time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single‐centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero‐time KB among ECD. Ninety‐two zero‐time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero‐time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tri.13933
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_tri_13933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539206203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-d3a062a8ab52c7148f9421ccf7124a7e8d5384550688236d875198feef4545803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUxgdR7LW68A0CbhSZNpM_k8yyjFULBUHqeshNztzmOjepSYYyrnyEbvqCPonneosLQfBsEk5-5zsf-arqZUNPGqzTkvxJwzvOH1WrRnBWM6bU42pFOy5qqpU4qp7lvKWUMi3p0-qIC9oppfSquj8jX70LsBDnszXJEQfWZx8DySWZApuFrE0GR7DzHVL8-eOu-B2Qa59LnCI-m2CmJftMbJwnRyYwjpSIbTKH7ZyLHz2O-2AToBBeSLkGEtMGiTKn4OJtIPtVxOxi2JDz_t3z6slopgwvHs7j6sv786v-Y3356cNFf3ZZW84prx03tGVGm7VkVjVCj51gjbWjapgwCrSTXAspaas1463TSjadHgFGIYXUlB9Xrw-6Nyl-myGXYYe_ANNkAsQ5D0zyjuEKyhF99Re6jWge3SHVUsFb1TZIvTlQNsWcE4zDTfI7k5ahocM-qwGzGn5nhezbA3sL6zhm6yFY-MNjWK2iUuNyrL2y_n-698UUzLCPcyg4evow6idY_u1ouPp8cbD2C7dgtfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560436761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Luque, Yosu ; Jamme, Matthieu ; Aubert, Olivier ; Roux, Arthur ; Martinez, Frank ; Amrouche, Lucile ; Tinel, Claire ; Galmiche, Louise ; Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul ; Audenet, François ; Legendre, Christophe ; Anglicheau, Dany ; Rabant, Marion</creator><creatorcontrib>Luque, Yosu ; Jamme, Matthieu ; Aubert, Olivier ; Roux, Arthur ; Martinez, Frank ; Amrouche, Lucile ; Tinel, Claire ; Galmiche, Louise ; Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul ; Audenet, François ; Legendre, Christophe ; Anglicheau, Dany ; Rabant, Marion</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The utility of zero‐time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero‐time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single‐centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero‐time KB among ECD. Ninety‐two zero‐time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero‐time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P &lt; 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P &lt; 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero‐time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD. When performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tri.13933</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34097778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Arteriosclerosis ; Decision analysis ; Fibrosis ; Histology ; histopathology ; kidney biopsy ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney transplants ; Kidneys ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Science &amp; Technology ; Surgery ; Survival ; transplant outcomes ; Transplantation ; zero‐time biopsy</subject><ispartof>Transplant international, 2021-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1506-1516</ispartof><rights>2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000670586200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-d3a062a8ab52c7148f9421ccf7124a7e8d5384550688236d875198feef4545803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-d3a062a8ab52c7148f9421ccf7124a7e8d5384550688236d875198feef4545803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3172-6571 ; 0000-0001-5696-6478 ; 0000-0003-4595-7570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftri.13933$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftri.13933$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luque, Yosu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamme, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aubert, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrouche, Lucile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinel, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galmiche, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audenet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legendre, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglicheau, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabant, Marion</creatorcontrib><title>A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD</title><title>Transplant international</title><addtitle>TRANSPL INT</addtitle><description>Summary The utility of zero‐time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero‐time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single‐centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero‐time KB among ECD. Ninety‐two zero‐time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero‐time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P &lt; 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P &lt; 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero‐time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD. When performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.</description><subject>Arteriosclerosis</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>kidney biopsy</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>transplant outcomes</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>zero‐time biopsy</subject><issn>0934-0874</issn><issn>1432-2277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUxgdR7LW68A0CbhSZNpM_k8yyjFULBUHqeshNztzmOjepSYYyrnyEbvqCPonneosLQfBsEk5-5zsf-arqZUNPGqzTkvxJwzvOH1WrRnBWM6bU42pFOy5qqpU4qp7lvKWUMi3p0-qIC9oppfSquj8jX70LsBDnszXJEQfWZx8DySWZApuFrE0GR7DzHVL8-eOu-B2Qa59LnCI-m2CmJftMbJwnRyYwjpSIbTKH7ZyLHz2O-2AToBBeSLkGEtMGiTKn4OJtIPtVxOxi2JDz_t3z6slopgwvHs7j6sv786v-Y3356cNFf3ZZW84prx03tGVGm7VkVjVCj51gjbWjapgwCrSTXAspaas1463TSjadHgFGIYXUlB9Xrw-6Nyl-myGXYYe_ANNkAsQ5D0zyjuEKyhF99Re6jWge3SHVUsFb1TZIvTlQNsWcE4zDTfI7k5ahocM-qwGzGn5nhezbA3sL6zhm6yFY-MNjWK2iUuNyrL2y_n-698UUzLCPcyg4evow6idY_u1ouPp8cbD2C7dgtfY</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Luque, Yosu</creator><creator>Jamme, Matthieu</creator><creator>Aubert, Olivier</creator><creator>Roux, Arthur</creator><creator>Martinez, Frank</creator><creator>Amrouche, Lucile</creator><creator>Tinel, Claire</creator><creator>Galmiche, Louise</creator><creator>Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul</creator><creator>Audenet, François</creator><creator>Legendre, Christophe</creator><creator>Anglicheau, Dany</creator><creator>Rabant, Marion</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-6571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-6478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-7570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD</title><author>Luque, Yosu ; Jamme, Matthieu ; Aubert, Olivier ; Roux, Arthur ; Martinez, Frank ; Amrouche, Lucile ; Tinel, Claire ; Galmiche, Louise ; Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul ; Audenet, François ; Legendre, Christophe ; Anglicheau, Dany ; Rabant, Marion</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-d3a062a8ab52c7148f9421ccf7124a7e8d5384550688236d875198feef4545803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arteriosclerosis</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>kidney biopsy</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>transplant outcomes</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>zero‐time biopsy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luque, Yosu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamme, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aubert, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrouche, Lucile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinel, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galmiche, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audenet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legendre, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglicheau, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabant, Marion</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luque, Yosu</au><au>Jamme, Matthieu</au><au>Aubert, Olivier</au><au>Roux, Arthur</au><au>Martinez, Frank</au><au>Amrouche, Lucile</au><au>Tinel, Claire</au><au>Galmiche, Louise</au><au>Duong Van Huyen, Jean‐Paul</au><au>Audenet, François</au><au>Legendre, Christophe</au><au>Anglicheau, Dany</au><au>Rabant, Marion</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD</atitle><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle><stitle>TRANSPL INT</stitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1506</spage><epage>1516</epage><pages>1506-1516</pages><issn>0934-0874</issn><eissn>1432-2277</eissn><abstract>Summary The utility of zero‐time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero‐time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single‐centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero‐time KB among ECD. Ninety‐two zero‐time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero‐time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P &lt; 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P &lt; 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero‐time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD. When performed, zero‐time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero‐time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>34097778</pmid><doi>10.1111/tri.13933</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-6571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-6478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-7570</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-0874
ispartof Transplant international, 2021-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1506-1516
issn 0934-0874
1432-2277
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_tri_13933
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Arteriosclerosis
Decision analysis
Fibrosis
Histology
histopathology
kidney biopsy
Kidney transplantation
Kidney transplants
Kidneys
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Science & Technology
Surgery
Survival
transplant outcomes
Transplantation
zero‐time biopsy
title A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero‐time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T07%3A46%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20kidney%20discard%20decision%20strategy%20based%20on%20zero%E2%80%90time%20histology%20analysis%20could%20lead%20to%20an%20unjustified%20increase%20in%20the%20organ%20turndown%20rate%20among%20ECD&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20international&rft.au=Luque,%20Yosu&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1506&rft.epage=1516&rft.pages=1506-1516&rft.issn=0934-0874&rft.eissn=1432-2277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tri.13933&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539206203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560436761&rft_id=info:pmid/34097778&rfr_iscdi=true