A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26

A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26

In their advocacy of the rank‐transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendeş and Yiğit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1–26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT techniqu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Statistica Neerlandica 2013-11, Vol.67 (4), p.397-399
Hauptverfasser: Shah, Denis A., Madden, Laurence V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
factorial design
non-parametric statistics
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 4
container_start_page 397
container_title Statistica Neerlandica
container_volume 67
creator Shah, Denis A.
Madden, Laurence V.
description In their advocacy of the rank‐transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendeş and Yiğit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1–26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT technique not be used, and important advances that have been made for properly analyzing data in a non‐parametric setting. Applied data analysts are at risk of being misled by Mendeş and Yiğit, when statistically sound techniques are available for the proper non‐parametric analysis of data from factorial designs. The appropriate methods express hypotheses in terms of normalized distribution functions, and the test statistics account for variance heterogeneity.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/stan.12013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_stan_12013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_VCBNP63D_G</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-6b6bbde8b63c5031fcb8dffd03d00d65d0ce255f554bd4e0a2c247f6901029923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi1UJNLChSeYWwFly3i96-1yCwFCpRKQmhZxsrz2GLlNdyPbUpun6TvwDOW98DbAsb54NP7-f8Y_Yy85HvF83sak-yNeIhdP2IRXsinauqn22ARRtAVWWD5j-zFeIvKmreSE_ZqBGa6vqU8w9PCFeku_70D3Fn74-zuf4NVo9noKh6vthuAEKIQhPACJYoLNcEMBBgfWO0dh9Bn7EVymxsr3P8H3iYI2yecRlDGT330PLreG4PUa6HZDwY9bxMMpnCWdfFYaDUuisM7Dcj0F2bzjRSmfs6dOryO9-HsfsPNPH1fzz8Xp18XJfHZaGMG5KGQnu87ScSeFqVFwZ7pj65xFYRGtrC0aKuva1XXV2YpQl6asGidb5Fi2bSkO2JudrwlDjIGc2uQdddgqjmpMW41pq4e0M8x38I1f0_YRUp2tZst_mmKnyZ-l2_8aHa6UbERTq-_LhbqYv19-k-KDWog_77GTYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Shah, Denis A. ; Madden, Laurence V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shah, Denis A. ; Madden, Laurence V.</creatorcontrib><description>In their advocacy of the rank‐transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendeş and Yiğit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1–26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT technique not be used, and important advances that have been made for properly analyzing data in a non‐parametric setting. Applied data analysts are at risk of being misled by Mendeş and Yiğit, when statistically sound techniques are available for the proper non‐parametric analysis of data from factorial designs. The appropriate methods express hypotheses in terms of normalized distribution functions, and the test statistics account for variance heterogeneity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-0402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/stan.12013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>factorial design ; non-parametric statistics</subject><ispartof>Statistica Neerlandica, 2013-11, Vol.67 (4), p.397-399</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. Statistica Neerlandica © 2013 VVS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-6b6bbde8b63c5031fcb8dffd03d00d65d0ce255f554bd4e0a2c247f6901029923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-6b6bbde8b63c5031fcb8dffd03d00d65d0ce255f554bd4e0a2c247f6901029923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fstan.12013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fstan.12013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shah, Denis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madden, Laurence V.</creatorcontrib><title>A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26</title><title>Statistica Neerlandica</title><addtitle>Statistica Neerlandica</addtitle><description>In their advocacy of the rank‐transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendeş and Yiğit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1–26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT technique not be used, and important advances that have been made for properly analyzing data in a non‐parametric setting. Applied data analysts are at risk of being misled by Mendeş and Yiğit, when statistically sound techniques are available for the proper non‐parametric analysis of data from factorial designs. The appropriate methods express hypotheses in terms of normalized distribution functions, and the test statistics account for variance heterogeneity.</description><subject>factorial design</subject><subject>non-parametric statistics</subject><issn>0039-0402</issn><issn>1467-9574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi1UJNLChSeYWwFly3i96-1yCwFCpRKQmhZxsrz2GLlNdyPbUpun6TvwDOW98DbAsb54NP7-f8Y_Yy85HvF83sak-yNeIhdP2IRXsinauqn22ARRtAVWWD5j-zFeIvKmreSE_ZqBGa6vqU8w9PCFeku_70D3Fn74-zuf4NVo9noKh6vthuAEKIQhPACJYoLNcEMBBgfWO0dh9Bn7EVymxsr3P8H3iYI2yecRlDGT330PLreG4PUa6HZDwY9bxMMpnCWdfFYaDUuisM7Dcj0F2bzjRSmfs6dOryO9-HsfsPNPH1fzz8Xp18XJfHZaGMG5KGQnu87ScSeFqVFwZ7pj65xFYRGtrC0aKuva1XXV2YpQl6asGidb5Fi2bSkO2JudrwlDjIGc2uQdddgqjmpMW41pq4e0M8x38I1f0_YRUp2tZst_mmKnyZ-l2_8aHa6UbERTq-_LhbqYv19-k-KDWog_77GTYA</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Shah, Denis A.</creator><creator>Madden, Laurence V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26</title><author>Shah, Denis A. ; Madden, Laurence V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-6b6bbde8b63c5031fcb8dffd03d00d65d0ce255f554bd4e0a2c247f6901029923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>factorial design</topic><topic>non-parametric statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shah, Denis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madden, Laurence V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Statistica Neerlandica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shah, Denis A.</au><au>Madden, Laurence V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26</atitle><jtitle>Statistica Neerlandica</jtitle><addtitle>Statistica Neerlandica</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>397-399</pages><issn>0039-0402</issn><eissn>1467-9574</eissn><abstract>In their advocacy of the rank‐transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendeş and Yiğit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1–26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT technique not be used, and important advances that have been made for properly analyzing data in a non‐parametric setting. Applied data analysts are at risk of being misled by Mendeş and Yiğit, when statistically sound techniques are available for the proper non‐parametric analysis of data from factorial designs. The appropriate methods express hypotheses in terms of normalized distribution functions, and the test statistics account for variance heterogeneity.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/stan.12013</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-0402
ispartof Statistica Neerlandica, 2013-11, Vol.67 (4), p.397-399
issn 0039-0402
1467-9574
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_stan_12013
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects factorial design
non-parametric statistics
title A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), 'Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments', Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1-26
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A09%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comment%20on%20Mende%C5%9F%20and%20Yi%C4%9Fit%20(2013),%20'Type%20I%20error%20and%20test%20power%20of%20different%20tests%20for%20testing%20interaction%20effects%20in%20factorial%20experiments',%20Statistica%20Neerlandica,%2067:1-26&rft.jtitle=Statistica%20Neerlandica&rft.au=Shah,%20Denis%20A.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=397-399&rft.issn=0039-0402&rft.eissn=1467-9574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/stan.12013&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_VCBNP63D_G%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true