A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting
This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates rega...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration (London) 2024-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Public administration (London) |
container_volume | |
creator | McDonald, Bruce D. Ferry, Laurence McCandless, Sean A. Jordan, Meagan M. Steccolini, Ileana Bartle, John R. Ahrens, Thomas Haslam, Jim Joyce, Philip G. Polzer, Tobias |
description | This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/padm.13039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_padm_13039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_padm_13039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-bf2c149b06701d8d111cb4f6b8671b386a535a0c6d042115955831c09eab173b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz81OwzAQBGALgUQoXHgCn5ESdrO2Ex9LKT9SJZCAs2U7TglK45Ckh7w9LTCXuY3mY-waIcNDbntb7TIkIH3CEhSqSHWu9SlLAIhSynV5zi7G8QsAhJIiYdmSv8Z27j9j13h-H5ydAo8df4u-sS1ff--baeZ3-2obpqbbXrKz2rZjuPrvBft4WL-vntLNy-PzarlJPUo1pa7OPQrtQBWAVVkdrnknauVKVaCjUllJ0oJXFYgcUWopS0IPOliHBTlasJu_XT_EcRxCbfqh2dlhNgjmKDVHqfmV0g-JFUS5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>McDonald, Bruce D. ; Ferry, Laurence ; McCandless, Sean A. ; Jordan, Meagan M. ; Steccolini, Ileana ; Bartle, John R. ; Ahrens, Thomas ; Haslam, Jim ; Joyce, Philip G. ; Polzer, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Bruce D. ; Ferry, Laurence ; McCandless, Sean A. ; Jordan, Meagan M. ; Steccolini, Ileana ; Bartle, John R. ; Ahrens, Thomas ; Haslam, Jim ; Joyce, Philip G. ; Polzer, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/padm.13039</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Public administration (London), 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-bf2c149b06701d8d111cb4f6b8671b386a535a0c6d042115955831c09eab173b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6686-4528 ; 0000-0002-7558-5619 ; 0000-0003-1820-7467 ; 0000-0001-8963-8606 ; 0000-0003-4346-2742 ; 0000-0002-1695-5958 ; 0000-0002-9014-4010 ; 0000-0001-5235-3412 ; 0000-0002-1574-5238 ; 0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Bruce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Sean A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Meagan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steccolini, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartle, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzer, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting</title><title>Public administration (London)</title><description>This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.</description><issn>0033-3298</issn><issn>1467-9299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz81OwzAQBGALgUQoXHgCn5ESdrO2Ex9LKT9SJZCAs2U7TglK45Ckh7w9LTCXuY3mY-waIcNDbntb7TIkIH3CEhSqSHWu9SlLAIhSynV5zi7G8QsAhJIiYdmSv8Z27j9j13h-H5ydAo8df4u-sS1ff--baeZ3-2obpqbbXrKz2rZjuPrvBft4WL-vntLNy-PzarlJPUo1pa7OPQrtQBWAVVkdrnknauVKVaCjUllJ0oJXFYgcUWopS0IPOliHBTlasJu_XT_EcRxCbfqh2dlhNgjmKDVHqfmV0g-JFUS5</recordid><startdate>20241013</startdate><enddate>20241013</enddate><creator>McDonald, Bruce D.</creator><creator>Ferry, Laurence</creator><creator>McCandless, Sean A.</creator><creator>Jordan, Meagan M.</creator><creator>Steccolini, Ileana</creator><creator>Bartle, John R.</creator><creator>Ahrens, Thomas</creator><creator>Haslam, Jim</creator><creator>Joyce, Philip G.</creator><creator>Polzer, Tobias</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-5619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-7467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-8606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-2742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-5958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-4010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-3412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-5238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241013</creationdate><title>A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting</title><author>McDonald, Bruce D. ; Ferry, Laurence ; McCandless, Sean A. ; Jordan, Meagan M. ; Steccolini, Ileana ; Bartle, John R. ; Ahrens, Thomas ; Haslam, Jim ; Joyce, Philip G. ; Polzer, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-bf2c149b06701d8d111cb4f6b8671b386a535a0c6d042115955831c09eab173b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Bruce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Sean A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Meagan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steccolini, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartle, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzer, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Bruce D.</au><au>Ferry, Laurence</au><au>McCandless, Sean A.</au><au>Jordan, Meagan M.</au><au>Steccolini, Ileana</au><au>Bartle, John R.</au><au>Ahrens, Thomas</au><au>Haslam, Jim</au><au>Joyce, Philip G.</au><au>Polzer, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting</atitle><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle><date>2024-10-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0033-3298</issn><eissn>1467-9299</eissn><abstract>This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.</abstract><doi>10.1111/padm.13039</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-5619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-7467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-8606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-2742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-5958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-4010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-3412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-5238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3298 |
ispartof | Public administration (London), 2024-10 |
issn | 0033-3298 1467-9299 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_padm_13039 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
title | A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A15%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Polyphonic%20Debate%20on%20Social%20Equity%20Budgeting&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20(London)&rft.au=McDonald,%20Bruce%C2%A0D.&rft.date=2024-10-13&rft.issn=0033-3298&rft.eissn=1467-9299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/padm.13039&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_padm_13039%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |