Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue

The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metaphilosophy 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262
1. Verfasser: Futter, Dylan Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 2
container_start_page 246
container_title Metaphilosophy
container_volume 46
creator Futter, Dylan Brian
description The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the P latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/meta.12132
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_meta_12132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz7FOwzAUhWELgUQpLDyBZ6SUe-3EidlQoQWpEh0q1ujGuSFGaVzZYeDtaYF_OduRPiFuERZ47H7PEy1QoVZnYoa5KTNrS30uZgDKZAimuhRXKX3CsaKEmbDvFD1NPoxJ-lFuez-EFA69dzTINY-RH-TUs9zKgaYweiefPA3h44uvxUVHQ-Kb_52L3ep5t3zJNm_r1-XjJnOlUVnHRlvDjEojOUcAujDcFJA3tlJNpV1LjrEjhZWFzmrFrbGu5ZYLY5tcz8Xd362LIaXIXX2Ifk_xu0aoT-b6ZK5_zfoHcMRKFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Futter, Dylan Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><description>The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the P latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/meta.12132</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Metaphilosophy, 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><title>Metaphilosophy</title><description>The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the P latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</description><issn>0026-1068</issn><issn>1467-9973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz7FOwzAUhWELgUQpLDyBZ6SUe-3EidlQoQWpEh0q1ujGuSFGaVzZYeDtaYF_OduRPiFuERZ47H7PEy1QoVZnYoa5KTNrS30uZgDKZAimuhRXKX3CsaKEmbDvFD1NPoxJ-lFuez-EFA69dzTINY-RH-TUs9zKgaYweiefPA3h44uvxUVHQ-Kb_52L3ep5t3zJNm_r1-XjJnOlUVnHRlvDjEojOUcAujDcFJA3tlJNpV1LjrEjhZWFzmrFrbGu5ZYLY5tcz8Xd362LIaXIXX2Ifk_xu0aoT-b6ZK5_zfoHcMRKFg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Futter, Dylan Brian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><author>Futter, Dylan Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Metaphilosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Futter, Dylan Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</atitle><jtitle>Metaphilosophy</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>246-262</pages><issn>0026-1068</issn><eissn>1467-9973</eissn><abstract>The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the P latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</abstract><doi>10.1111/meta.12132</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1068
ispartof Metaphilosophy, 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262
issn 0026-1068
1467-9973
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12132
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20Philosophical%20Genre:%20the%20P%20latonic%20Dialogue&rft.jtitle=Metaphilosophy&rft.au=Futter,%20Dylan%20Brian&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=246-262&rft.issn=0026-1068&rft.eissn=1467-9973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/meta.12132&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_meta_12132%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true