Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue
The primary function of the P latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the P latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Metaphilosophy 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Metaphilosophy |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Futter, Dylan Brian |
description | The primary function of the
P
latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the
P
latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the
P
latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/meta.12132 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_meta_12132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz7FOwzAUhWELgUQpLDyBZ6SUe-3EidlQoQWpEh0q1ujGuSFGaVzZYeDtaYF_OduRPiFuERZ47H7PEy1QoVZnYoa5KTNrS30uZgDKZAimuhRXKX3CsaKEmbDvFD1NPoxJ-lFuez-EFA69dzTINY-RH-TUs9zKgaYweiefPA3h44uvxUVHQ-Kb_52L3ep5t3zJNm_r1-XjJnOlUVnHRlvDjEojOUcAujDcFJA3tlJNpV1LjrEjhZWFzmrFrbGu5ZYLY5tcz8Xd362LIaXIXX2Ifk_xu0aoT-b6ZK5_zfoHcMRKFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Futter, Dylan Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><description>The primary function of the
P
latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the
P
latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the
P
latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/meta.12132</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Metaphilosophy, 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><title>Metaphilosophy</title><description>The primary function of the
P
latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the
P
latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the
P
latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</description><issn>0026-1068</issn><issn>1467-9973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz7FOwzAUhWELgUQpLDyBZ6SUe-3EidlQoQWpEh0q1ujGuSFGaVzZYeDtaYF_OduRPiFuERZ47H7PEy1QoVZnYoa5KTNrS30uZgDKZAimuhRXKX3CsaKEmbDvFD1NPoxJ-lFuez-EFA69dzTINY-RH-TUs9zKgaYweiefPA3h44uvxUVHQ-Kb_52L3ep5t3zJNm_r1-XjJnOlUVnHRlvDjEojOUcAujDcFJA3tlJNpV1LjrEjhZWFzmrFrbGu5ZYLY5tcz8Xd362LIaXIXX2Ifk_xu0aoT-b6ZK5_zfoHcMRKFg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Futter, Dylan Brian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</title><author>Futter, Dylan Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762-fe6396ee1231acca00356eb504b982b83cdace1fa21890f932ed69cdede569b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Futter, Dylan Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Metaphilosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Futter, Dylan Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue</atitle><jtitle>Metaphilosophy</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>246-262</pages><issn>0026-1068</issn><eissn>1467-9973</eissn><abstract>The primary function of the
P
latonic dialogue is not the communication of philosophical doctrines but the transformation of the reader's character. This article takes up the question of how, or by what means, the
P
latonic dialogue accomplishes its transformative goal. An answer is developed as follows. First, the style of reading associated with analytical philosophy is not transformative, on account of its hermeneutical attachment and epistemic equality in the relationship between reader and author. Secondly, the style of reading associated with the genre of commentary is transformative because it is governed by a principle of authority. When the commentary model is applied to the
P
latonic dialogue, it can be seen that the dialogue mimics the function of the authority principle in transforming the reader into a commentator, that is, someone who reads from a position of detachment and accepts responsibility for himself as moral and epistemic agent.</abstract><doi>10.1111/meta.12132</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-1068 |
ispartof | Metaphilosophy, 2015-04, Vol.46 (2), p.246-262 |
issn | 0026-1068 1467-9973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12132 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
title | Variations in Philosophical Genre: the P latonic Dialogue |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20Philosophical%20Genre:%20the%20P%20latonic%20Dialogue&rft.jtitle=Metaphilosophy&rft.au=Futter,%20Dylan%20Brian&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=246-262&rft.issn=0026-1068&rft.eissn=1467-9973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/meta.12132&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_meta_12132%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |