Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications

Research suggests that restrictive measures are widely used on adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. In the Netherlands, restrictive measures are defined as all measures that limit the freedom of a person. In most countries, legislation and policies that seek to reduce the use of restrict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities 2018-03, Vol.15 (1), p.26-35
Hauptverfasser: Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T., de Veer, Anke J. E., Francke, Anneke L., Embregts, Petri J. C. M., van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka, Frederiks, Brenda J. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities
container_volume 15
creator Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T.
de Veer, Anke J. E.
Francke, Anneke L.
Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka
Frederiks, Brenda J. M.
description Research suggests that restrictive measures are widely used on adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. In the Netherlands, restrictive measures are defined as all measures that limit the freedom of a person. In most countries, legislation and policies that seek to reduce the use of restrictive measures focus on seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints. The study aimed to investigate the extent to which restrictive practices are used in the care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities while also exploring the attitudes of support staff toward these interventions. A survey study was done among a nationally representative Dutch research sample consisting of support staff. A structured questionnaire was completed by 195 staff members (response of 68.7%) working in settings providing care for people with intellectual disabilities. The measures generally used by staff members who work with adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities involved restricting the freedom of movement and so‐called social restrictions (such as limiting the use of mobile phones). Nearly all respondents considered restrictive measures to be justified in the case of danger, physical aggression, or sexually abusive behavior (87.8–96.8%). Frequently mentioned reasons for using restrictive measures were averting or avoiding danger (90.4 and 83.0%, respectively) and calming the adolescent (63.8%). Although seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints were generally considered most intrusive, staff members were aware that social restrictions could also be instrusive. The fact that current policies do not address these measures makes support staff question the lawfulness of their actions. As well as staff training to reduce the use of restrictive measures, rules, and legislation are also needed to clarify the options and limits to using such measures in the professional care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jppi.12223
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JPPI12223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-3b07e4dc27bcd4bbcca1262bad16d802a24e885dfed23876c7d651606b351c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAURS0EEqWw4Qu8RkrxkKnsqjIFFVFREMvIsV-oKzexbAeUv-CTSSliydvctzj3Lg5C55RM6HCXG2v1hDLG-AEa0SymEaWcHP79jB2jE-83hLBpkqQj9DWz1vS6ecfP4IPTMugPwI8gfOfAY93gsAY8Fw5wW-OZag14CU3w-E2HNX7URuGiCWAMyNAJg6-1F5U2OmjwV3gWgg6dGpaG9qqztnUBr4KoaywahZet0bLHxdYOKYJuG3-KjmphPJz95hi93t68zO-jxdNdMZ8tIsnJlEe8IhnESrKskiquKikFZSmrhKKpygkTLIY8T1QNivE8S2Wm0oSmJK14QmUs-Rhd7Hela713UJfW6a1wfUlJuXNZ7lyWPy4HmO7hT22g_4csH5bLYt_5BrtbejY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T. ; de Veer, Anke J. E. ; Francke, Anneke L. ; Embregts, Petri J. C. M. ; van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka ; Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T. ; de Veer, Anke J. E. ; Francke, Anneke L. ; Embregts, Petri J. C. M. ; van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka ; Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Research suggests that restrictive measures are widely used on adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. In the Netherlands, restrictive measures are defined as all measures that limit the freedom of a person. In most countries, legislation and policies that seek to reduce the use of restrictive measures focus on seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints. The study aimed to investigate the extent to which restrictive practices are used in the care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities while also exploring the attitudes of support staff toward these interventions. A survey study was done among a nationally representative Dutch research sample consisting of support staff. A structured questionnaire was completed by 195 staff members (response of 68.7%) working in settings providing care for people with intellectual disabilities. The measures generally used by staff members who work with adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities involved restricting the freedom of movement and so‐called social restrictions (such as limiting the use of mobile phones). Nearly all respondents considered restrictive measures to be justified in the case of danger, physical aggression, or sexually abusive behavior (87.8–96.8%). Frequently mentioned reasons for using restrictive measures were averting or avoiding danger (90.4 and 83.0%, respectively) and calming the adolescent (63.8%). Although seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints were generally considered most intrusive, staff members were aware that social restrictions could also be instrusive. The fact that current policies do not address these measures makes support staff question the lawfulness of their actions. As well as staff training to reduce the use of restrictive measures, rules, and legislation are also needed to clarify the options and limits to using such measures in the professional care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-1122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-1130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12223</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>adolescents ; mild intellectual disabilities ; policy implications ; restrictive measures ; staff perceptions</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2018-03, Vol.15 (1), p.26-35</ispartof><rights>2018 International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-3b07e4dc27bcd4bbcca1262bad16d802a24e885dfed23876c7d651606b351c4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-3b07e4dc27bcd4bbcca1262bad16d802a24e885dfed23876c7d651606b351c4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjppi.12223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjppi.12223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Veer, Anke J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francke, Anneke L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embregts, Petri J. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications</title><title>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</title><description>Research suggests that restrictive measures are widely used on adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. In the Netherlands, restrictive measures are defined as all measures that limit the freedom of a person. In most countries, legislation and policies that seek to reduce the use of restrictive measures focus on seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints. The study aimed to investigate the extent to which restrictive practices are used in the care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities while also exploring the attitudes of support staff toward these interventions. A survey study was done among a nationally representative Dutch research sample consisting of support staff. A structured questionnaire was completed by 195 staff members (response of 68.7%) working in settings providing care for people with intellectual disabilities. The measures generally used by staff members who work with adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities involved restricting the freedom of movement and so‐called social restrictions (such as limiting the use of mobile phones). Nearly all respondents considered restrictive measures to be justified in the case of danger, physical aggression, or sexually abusive behavior (87.8–96.8%). Frequently mentioned reasons for using restrictive measures were averting or avoiding danger (90.4 and 83.0%, respectively) and calming the adolescent (63.8%). Although seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints were generally considered most intrusive, staff members were aware that social restrictions could also be instrusive. The fact that current policies do not address these measures makes support staff question the lawfulness of their actions. As well as staff training to reduce the use of restrictive measures, rules, and legislation are also needed to clarify the options and limits to using such measures in the professional care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.</description><subject>adolescents</subject><subject>mild intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>policy implications</subject><subject>restrictive measures</subject><subject>staff perceptions</subject><issn>1741-1122</issn><issn>1741-1130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAURS0EEqWw4Qu8RkrxkKnsqjIFFVFREMvIsV-oKzexbAeUv-CTSSliydvctzj3Lg5C55RM6HCXG2v1hDLG-AEa0SymEaWcHP79jB2jE-83hLBpkqQj9DWz1vS6ecfP4IPTMugPwI8gfOfAY93gsAY8Fw5wW-OZag14CU3w-E2HNX7URuGiCWAMyNAJg6-1F5U2OmjwV3gWgg6dGpaG9qqztnUBr4KoaywahZet0bLHxdYOKYJuG3-KjmphPJz95hi93t68zO-jxdNdMZ8tIsnJlEe8IhnESrKskiquKikFZSmrhKKpygkTLIY8T1QNivE8S2Wm0oSmJK14QmUs-Rhd7Hela713UJfW6a1wfUlJuXNZ7lyWPy4HmO7hT22g_4csH5bLYt_5BrtbejY</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T.</creator><creator>de Veer, Anke J. E.</creator><creator>Francke, Anneke L.</creator><creator>Embregts, Petri J. C. M.</creator><creator>van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka</creator><creator>Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications</title><author>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T. ; de Veer, Anke J. E. ; Francke, Anneke L. ; Embregts, Petri J. C. M. ; van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka ; Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-3b07e4dc27bcd4bbcca1262bad16d802a24e885dfed23876c7d651606b351c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>adolescents</topic><topic>mild intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>policy implications</topic><topic>restrictive measures</topic><topic>staff perceptions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Veer, Anke J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francke, Anneke L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embregts, Petri J. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dörenberg, Vivianne E. T.</au><au>de Veer, Anke J. E.</au><au>Francke, Anneke L.</au><au>Embregts, Petri J. C. M.</au><au>van Nieuwenhuijzen, Maroesjka</au><au>Frederiks, Brenda J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>26-35</pages><issn>1741-1122</issn><eissn>1741-1130</eissn><abstract>Research suggests that restrictive measures are widely used on adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. In the Netherlands, restrictive measures are defined as all measures that limit the freedom of a person. In most countries, legislation and policies that seek to reduce the use of restrictive measures focus on seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints. The study aimed to investigate the extent to which restrictive practices are used in the care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities while also exploring the attitudes of support staff toward these interventions. A survey study was done among a nationally representative Dutch research sample consisting of support staff. A structured questionnaire was completed by 195 staff members (response of 68.7%) working in settings providing care for people with intellectual disabilities. The measures generally used by staff members who work with adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities involved restricting the freedom of movement and so‐called social restrictions (such as limiting the use of mobile phones). Nearly all respondents considered restrictive measures to be justified in the case of danger, physical aggression, or sexually abusive behavior (87.8–96.8%). Frequently mentioned reasons for using restrictive measures were averting or avoiding danger (90.4 and 83.0%, respectively) and calming the adolescent (63.8%). Although seclusion and mechanical and physical restraints were generally considered most intrusive, staff members were aware that social restrictions could also be instrusive. The fact that current policies do not address these measures makes support staff question the lawfulness of their actions. As well as staff training to reduce the use of restrictive measures, rules, and legislation are also needed to clarify the options and limits to using such measures in the professional care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jppi.12223</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-1122
ispartof Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2018-03, Vol.15 (1), p.26-35
issn 1741-1122
1741-1130
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12223
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects adolescents
mild intellectual disabilities
policy implications
restrictive measures
staff perceptions
title Applying Restrictive Measures in the Care of Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Attitudes of Support Staff and Policy Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A32%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applying%20Restrictive%20Measures%20in%20the%20Care%20of%20Adolescents%20With%20Mild%20Intellectual%20Disabilities:%20Attitudes%20of%20Support%20Staff%20and%20Policy%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20and%20practice%20in%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.au=D%C3%B6renberg,%20Vivianne%20E.%20T.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=26-35&rft.issn=1741-1122&rft.eissn=1741-1130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jppi.12223&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJPPI12223%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true