H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni

This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of religious ethics 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759
1. Verfasser: Sells, Michael A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 759
container_issue 4
container_start_page 723
container_title The Journal of religious ethics
container_volume 43
creator Sells, Michael A.
description This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni, the former mufti of J erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the N azi genocide against J ews, and the associated suggestions of wider A rab and M uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the H usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of A dolf E ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within A merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes H olocaust recognition within A merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible H olocaust historiography.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jore.12119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_12119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jore_12119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9rPyiVD1DI0NDSyYGTkMTM3NdS3NLUxYGTgNjCxNdSzNLEw4GruLiLAMDAzNLC3NOBgEPhfyc_OTE0uISBcek0uJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOXmGuLsoZtclF9cXJSaFl9QlJmbWFQZb2gQD7IzHmRnPNhOY5IUAwDrijFy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Sells, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni, the former mufti of J erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the N azi genocide against J ews, and the associated suggestions of wider A rab and M uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the H usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of A dolf E ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within A merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes H olocaust recognition within A merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible H olocaust historiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0384-9694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jore.12119</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of religious ethics, 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</title><title>The Journal of religious ethics</title><description>This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni, the former mufti of J erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the N azi genocide against J ews, and the associated suggestions of wider A rab and M uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the H usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of A dolf E ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within A merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes H olocaust recognition within A merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible H olocaust historiography.</description><issn>0384-9694</issn><issn>1467-9795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9rPyiVD1DI0NDSyYGTkMTM3NdS3NLUxYGTgNjCxNdSzNLEw4GruLiLAMDAzNLC3NOBgEPhfyc_OTE0uISBcek0uJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOXmGuLsoZtclF9cXJSaFl9QlJmbWFQZb2gQD7IzHmRnPNhOY5IUAwDrijFy</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Sells, Michael A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>H olocaust Abuse</title><author>Sells, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of religious ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sells, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of religious ethics</jtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>723-759</pages><issn>0384-9694</issn><eissn>1467-9795</eissn><abstract>This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni, the former mufti of J erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the N azi genocide against J ews, and the associated suggestions of wider A rab and M uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the H usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of A dolf E ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within A merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes H olocaust recognition within A merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible H olocaust historiography.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jore.12119</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0384-9694
ispartof The Journal of religious ethics, 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759
issn 0384-9694
1467-9795
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_12119
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR
title H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=H%20olocaust%20Abuse:%20The%20Case%20of%20H%20ajj%20M%20uhammad%20A%20min%20al%E2%80%90%20H%20usayni&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20religious%20ethics&rft.au=Sells,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=723-759&rft.issn=0384-9694&rft.eissn=1467-9795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jore.12119&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jore_12119%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true