H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni
This essay reconsiders the category of “ H olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in H olocaust historiography within A merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of religious ethics 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 759 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 723 |
container_title | The Journal of religious ethics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Sells, Michael A. |
description | This essay reconsiders the category of “
H
olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in
H
olocaust historiography within
A
merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that
H
ajj
M
uhammad
A
min al‐
H
usayni, the former mufti of
J
erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the
N
azi genocide against
J
ews, and the associated suggestions of wider
A
rab and
M
uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the
H
usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of
A
dolf
E
ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within
A
merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes
H
olocaust recognition within
A
merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible
H
olocaust historiography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jore.12119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_12119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jore_12119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9rPyiVD1DI0NDSyYGTkMTM3NdS3NLUxYGTgNjCxNdSzNLEw4GruLiLAMDAzNLC3NOBgEPhfyc_OTE0uISBcek0uJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOXmGuLsoZtclF9cXJSaFl9QlJmbWFQZb2gQD7IzHmRnPNhOY5IUAwDrijFy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Sells, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay reconsiders the category of “
H
olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in
H
olocaust historiography within
A
merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that
H
ajj
M
uhammad
A
min al‐
H
usayni, the former mufti of
J
erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the
N
azi genocide against
J
ews, and the associated suggestions of wider
A
rab and
M
uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the
H
usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of
A
dolf
E
ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within
A
merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes
H
olocaust recognition within
A
merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible
H
olocaust historiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0384-9694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jore.12119</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of religious ethics, 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</title><title>The Journal of religious ethics</title><description>This essay reconsiders the category of “
H
olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in
H
olocaust historiography within
A
merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that
H
ajj
M
uhammad
A
min al‐
H
usayni, the former mufti of
J
erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the
N
azi genocide against
J
ews, and the associated suggestions of wider
A
rab and
M
uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the
H
usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of
A
dolf
E
ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within
A
merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes
H
olocaust recognition within
A
merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible
H
olocaust historiography.</description><issn>0384-9694</issn><issn>1467-9795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9rPyiVD1DI0NDSyYGTkMTM3NdS3NLUxYGTgNjCxNdSzNLEw4GruLiLAMDAzNLC3NOBgEPhfyc_OTE0uISBcek0uJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOXmGuLsoZtclF9cXJSaFl9QlJmbWFQZb2gQD7IzHmRnPNhOY5IUAwDrijFy</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Sells, Michael A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>H olocaust Abuse</title><author>Sells, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_121193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sells, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of religious ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sells, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of religious ethics</jtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>723-759</pages><issn>0384-9694</issn><eissn>1467-9795</eissn><abstract>This essay reconsiders the category of “
H
olocaust denial” as the marked indicator of ethical transgression in
H
olocaust historiography within
A
merican civil religion. It maintains that the present category excludes and thereby enables other violations of responsible Holocaust historiography. To demonstrate the nature and gravity of such violations, the essay engages the widespread claim that
H
ajj
M
uhammad
A
min al‐
H
usayni, the former mufti of
J
erusalem, was an instigator, promoter, or “driving spirit” of the
N
azi genocide against
J
ews, and the associated suggestions of wider
A
rab and
M
uslim complicity. The essay uncovers the history of the
H
usayni narrative in question, the dramatic circumstances in which it emerged, its role in the 1961 trial of
A
dolf
E
ichmann, and its rediscovery and misuse within
A
merican popular and political circles over the past two decades. Such misuse, it concludes, corrodes
H
olocaust recognition within
A
merican civil religion and demonstrates the need for a revision of the socially accepted ethical boundary for responsible
H
olocaust historiography.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jore.12119</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0384-9694 |
ispartof | The Journal of religious ethics, 2015-12, Vol.43 (4), p.723-759 |
issn | 0384-9694 1467-9795 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jore_12119 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR |
title | H olocaust Abuse: The Case of H ajj M uhammad A min al‐ H usayni |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=H%20olocaust%20Abuse:%20The%20Case%20of%20H%20ajj%20M%20uhammad%20A%20min%20al%E2%80%90%20H%20usayni&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20religious%20ethics&rft.au=Sells,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=723-759&rft.issn=0384-9694&rft.eissn=1467-9795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jore.12119&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jore_12119%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |