Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency

This investigation presented presents the drying characteristics, and aimed to predict the drying kinetics of tomato slices (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) using convection and microwave methods. Hot air drying was carried out in a ventilated oven at 50, 60, 80, and 100°C temperatures and microwave...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food process engineering 2022-09, Vol.45 (9), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Guemouni, Sara, Mouhoubi, Khokha, Brahmi, Fatiha, Dahmoune, Farid, Belbahi, Amine, Benyoub, Cylia, Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel, Atmani, Karim, Bakhouche, Hicham, Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila, Madani, Khodir
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 9
container_start_page
container_title Journal of food process engineering
container_volume 45
creator Guemouni, Sara
Mouhoubi, Khokha
Brahmi, Fatiha
Dahmoune, Farid
Belbahi, Amine
Benyoub, Cylia
Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel
Atmani, Karim
Bakhouche, Hicham
Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila
Madani, Khodir
description This investigation presented presents the drying characteristics, and aimed to predict the drying kinetics of tomato slices (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) using convection and microwave methods. Hot air drying was carried out in a ventilated oven at 50, 60, 80, and 100°C temperatures and microwave drying was performed in domestic microwave using 300, 500, 800, and 900 W powers. Twenty‐two mathematical models were undertaken to predict the drying kinetics and the best model was chosen based on the highest R2 values and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and χ2 values. Drying kinetics, drying rate variation, diffusivity and energy consumption of both methods were evaluated. Fernando and Amarasinghe model and Sledz model were the best models for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. Effective moisture diffusivity varied from 0.28 × 10−9 to 2.81 × 10−9 and from 1.32 × 10−9 to 21.52 × 10−9, while the activation energy was 27.64 kJ/mol and 5.71 W/g for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. The energy consumption increases with increasing temperature or power, the reverse was observed for energy efficiency. Microwave drying process has the advantage of drying time reduction, low‐energy consumption, and high‐drying efficiency at a moderate high‐power level (900 W). Hence, it is recommended to apply this innovative process for drying tomato slices. In this study by using more than 20 models, for the first time, we demonstrated that microwave‐assisted drying of tomato slices was more effective than forced convection drying. It revealed a shorter drying time, high‐drying rates, and high diffusivity with low‐energy consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jfpe.14113
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jfpe_14113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JFPE14113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2733-4efbe5f955c78cdc5be83722fa10757614648e28e78a228631c4eea2d2fa1be03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8Rk3xMzZLVLUFVAkWsI5cZ1y5JHYVh1b5e5KGNbOZ17kjzUXonpI57eNx7w4wp4JSfoEmVAmZCcnJJZoQ2tdaq_wa3aS0J4RLSdgE7RcxHMG2_gjYhBLX3jbxZPqubDofdvjbB2i9TeM2llAN0-hwG2vTRpwqbyHNMARodh22MaSf-tD6GGZnCTjnrYdgu1t05UyV4O4vT9HXavm5eMk27-vXxfMms0xxnglwW5DuSUqrtC2t3ILmijFnKFFS5VTkQgPToLRhTOecWgFgWDkQWyB8ih7Gu_0nKTXgikPja9N0BSXF4FIxuFScXephOsInX0H3D1m8rT6Wo-YXb-BsQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Guemouni, Sara ; Mouhoubi, Khokha ; Brahmi, Fatiha ; Dahmoune, Farid ; Belbahi, Amine ; Benyoub, Cylia ; Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel ; Atmani, Karim ; Bakhouche, Hicham ; Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila ; Madani, Khodir</creator><creatorcontrib>Guemouni, Sara ; Mouhoubi, Khokha ; Brahmi, Fatiha ; Dahmoune, Farid ; Belbahi, Amine ; Benyoub, Cylia ; Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel ; Atmani, Karim ; Bakhouche, Hicham ; Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila ; Madani, Khodir</creatorcontrib><description>This investigation presented presents the drying characteristics, and aimed to predict the drying kinetics of tomato slices (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) using convection and microwave methods. Hot air drying was carried out in a ventilated oven at 50, 60, 80, and 100°C temperatures and microwave drying was performed in domestic microwave using 300, 500, 800, and 900 W powers. Twenty‐two mathematical models were undertaken to predict the drying kinetics and the best model was chosen based on the highest R2 values and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and χ2 values. Drying kinetics, drying rate variation, diffusivity and energy consumption of both methods were evaluated. Fernando and Amarasinghe model and Sledz model were the best models for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. Effective moisture diffusivity varied from 0.28 × 10−9 to 2.81 × 10−9 and from 1.32 × 10−9 to 21.52 × 10−9, while the activation energy was 27.64 kJ/mol and 5.71 W/g for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. The energy consumption increases with increasing temperature or power, the reverse was observed for energy efficiency. Microwave drying process has the advantage of drying time reduction, low‐energy consumption, and high‐drying efficiency at a moderate high‐power level (900 W). Hence, it is recommended to apply this innovative process for drying tomato slices. In this study by using more than 20 models, for the first time, we demonstrated that microwave‐assisted drying of tomato slices was more effective than forced convection drying. It revealed a shorter drying time, high‐drying rates, and high diffusivity with low‐energy consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-8876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-4530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.14113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>convection and microwave methods ; drying characteristics ; Fernando and Amarasinghe model ; Lycopersicon esculentum MILL ; Sledz model</subject><ispartof>Journal of food process engineering, 2022-09, Vol.45 (9), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2733-4efbe5f955c78cdc5be83722fa10757614648e28e78a228631c4eea2d2fa1be03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2733-4efbe5f955c78cdc5be83722fa10757614648e28e78a228631c4eea2d2fa1be03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2826-8987</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfpe.14113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfpe.14113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>781,785,1418,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guemouni, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouhoubi, Khokha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahmi, Fatiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahmoune, Farid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belbahi, Amine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyoub, Cylia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmani, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhouche, Hicham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madani, Khodir</creatorcontrib><title>Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency</title><title>Journal of food process engineering</title><description>This investigation presented presents the drying characteristics, and aimed to predict the drying kinetics of tomato slices (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) using convection and microwave methods. Hot air drying was carried out in a ventilated oven at 50, 60, 80, and 100°C temperatures and microwave drying was performed in domestic microwave using 300, 500, 800, and 900 W powers. Twenty‐two mathematical models were undertaken to predict the drying kinetics and the best model was chosen based on the highest R2 values and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and χ2 values. Drying kinetics, drying rate variation, diffusivity and energy consumption of both methods were evaluated. Fernando and Amarasinghe model and Sledz model were the best models for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. Effective moisture diffusivity varied from 0.28 × 10−9 to 2.81 × 10−9 and from 1.32 × 10−9 to 21.52 × 10−9, while the activation energy was 27.64 kJ/mol and 5.71 W/g for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. The energy consumption increases with increasing temperature or power, the reverse was observed for energy efficiency. Microwave drying process has the advantage of drying time reduction, low‐energy consumption, and high‐drying efficiency at a moderate high‐power level (900 W). Hence, it is recommended to apply this innovative process for drying tomato slices. In this study by using more than 20 models, for the first time, we demonstrated that microwave‐assisted drying of tomato slices was more effective than forced convection drying. It revealed a shorter drying time, high‐drying rates, and high diffusivity with low‐energy consumption.</description><subject>convection and microwave methods</subject><subject>drying characteristics</subject><subject>Fernando and Amarasinghe model</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum MILL</subject><subject>Sledz model</subject><issn>0145-8876</issn><issn>1745-4530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8Rk3xMzZLVLUFVAkWsI5cZ1y5JHYVh1b5e5KGNbOZ17kjzUXonpI57eNx7w4wp4JSfoEmVAmZCcnJJZoQ2tdaq_wa3aS0J4RLSdgE7RcxHMG2_gjYhBLX3jbxZPqubDofdvjbB2i9TeM2llAN0-hwG2vTRpwqbyHNMARodh22MaSf-tD6GGZnCTjnrYdgu1t05UyV4O4vT9HXavm5eMk27-vXxfMms0xxnglwW5DuSUqrtC2t3ILmijFnKFFS5VTkQgPToLRhTOecWgFgWDkQWyB8ih7Gu_0nKTXgikPja9N0BSXF4FIxuFScXephOsInX0H3D1m8rT6Wo-YXb-BsQQ</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Guemouni, Sara</creator><creator>Mouhoubi, Khokha</creator><creator>Brahmi, Fatiha</creator><creator>Dahmoune, Farid</creator><creator>Belbahi, Amine</creator><creator>Benyoub, Cylia</creator><creator>Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel</creator><creator>Atmani, Karim</creator><creator>Bakhouche, Hicham</creator><creator>Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila</creator><creator>Madani, Khodir</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-8987</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency</title><author>Guemouni, Sara ; Mouhoubi, Khokha ; Brahmi, Fatiha ; Dahmoune, Farid ; Belbahi, Amine ; Benyoub, Cylia ; Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel ; Atmani, Karim ; Bakhouche, Hicham ; Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila ; Madani, Khodir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2733-4efbe5f955c78cdc5be83722fa10757614648e28e78a228631c4eea2d2fa1be03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>convection and microwave methods</topic><topic>drying characteristics</topic><topic>Fernando and Amarasinghe model</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum MILL</topic><topic>Sledz model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guemouni, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouhoubi, Khokha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahmi, Fatiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahmoune, Farid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belbahi, Amine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyoub, Cylia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmani, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhouche, Hicham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madani, Khodir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of food process engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guemouni, Sara</au><au>Mouhoubi, Khokha</au><au>Brahmi, Fatiha</au><au>Dahmoune, Farid</au><au>Belbahi, Amine</au><au>Benyoub, Cylia</au><au>Adjeroud‐Abdellatif, Nawel</au><au>Atmani, Karim</au><au>Bakhouche, Hicham</au><au>Boulekbache‐Makhlouf, Lila</au><au>Madani, Khodir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food process engineering</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0145-8876</issn><eissn>1745-4530</eissn><abstract>This investigation presented presents the drying characteristics, and aimed to predict the drying kinetics of tomato slices (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) using convection and microwave methods. Hot air drying was carried out in a ventilated oven at 50, 60, 80, and 100°C temperatures and microwave drying was performed in domestic microwave using 300, 500, 800, and 900 W powers. Twenty‐two mathematical models were undertaken to predict the drying kinetics and the best model was chosen based on the highest R2 values and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and χ2 values. Drying kinetics, drying rate variation, diffusivity and energy consumption of both methods were evaluated. Fernando and Amarasinghe model and Sledz model were the best models for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. Effective moisture diffusivity varied from 0.28 × 10−9 to 2.81 × 10−9 and from 1.32 × 10−9 to 21.52 × 10−9, while the activation energy was 27.64 kJ/mol and 5.71 W/g for convective and microwave drying processes, respectively. The energy consumption increases with increasing temperature or power, the reverse was observed for energy efficiency. Microwave drying process has the advantage of drying time reduction, low‐energy consumption, and high‐drying efficiency at a moderate high‐power level (900 W). Hence, it is recommended to apply this innovative process for drying tomato slices. In this study by using more than 20 models, for the first time, we demonstrated that microwave‐assisted drying of tomato slices was more effective than forced convection drying. It revealed a shorter drying time, high‐drying rates, and high diffusivity with low‐energy consumption.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jfpe.14113</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-8987</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-8876
ispartof Journal of food process engineering, 2022-09, Vol.45 (9), p.n/a
issn 0145-8876
1745-4530
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jfpe_14113
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects convection and microwave methods
drying characteristics
Fernando and Amarasinghe model
Lycopersicon esculentum MILL
Sledz model
title Convective and microwave drying kinetics and modeling of tomato slices, energy consumption, and efficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T10%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convective%20and%20microwave%20drying%20kinetics%20and%20modeling%20of%20tomato%20slices,%20energy%20consumption,%20and%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20process%20engineering&rft.au=Guemouni,%20Sara&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0145-8876&rft.eissn=1745-4530&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfpe.14113&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJFPE14113%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true