Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations

This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of common market studies 2024-05
Hauptverfasser: Moloney, David, Jensen, Mads Dagnis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of common market studies
container_volume
creator Moloney, David
Jensen, Mads Dagnis
description This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jcms.13624
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcms_13624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jcms_13624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0DtPwzAYhWELgUQoLPwCz0gpn69x2KBqIVIFiMscubbTukrjyDZS---hwFne7QwPQtcEpuRnt1uzS1PCJOUnqCBcqlLUUpyiAoCSslZKnqOLlLYAQASIAjUP0e19xm8bPaZgD3d4vh_7EP2wxq86ZxeHhEOHm5S-HH7XvXeDcdgPOG8cfnbrkL3OPgzpEp11uk_u6r8T9LmYf8yeyuXLYzO7X5aGUplLSanhpGOVUkyCWamq45RSQZQAqTinZmUr45wFS51ila47INpqZbU0XFVsgm7-fk0MKUXXtWP0Ox0PLYH2iNAeEdpfBPYNUyhP0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creator><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><description>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13624</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2024-05</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4226-4114 ; 0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</description><issn>0021-9886</issn><issn>1468-5965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0DtPwzAYhWELgUQoLPwCz0gpn69x2KBqIVIFiMscubbTukrjyDZS---hwFne7QwPQtcEpuRnt1uzS1PCJOUnqCBcqlLUUpyiAoCSslZKnqOLlLYAQASIAjUP0e19xm8bPaZgD3d4vh_7EP2wxq86ZxeHhEOHm5S-HH7XvXeDcdgPOG8cfnbrkL3OPgzpEp11uk_u6r8T9LmYf8yeyuXLYzO7X5aGUplLSanhpGOVUkyCWamq45RSQZQAqTinZmUr45wFS51ila47INpqZbU0XFVsgm7-fk0MKUXXtWP0Ox0PLYH2iNAeEdpfBPYNUyhP0A</recordid><startdate>20240505</startdate><enddate>20240505</enddate><creator>Moloney, David</creator><creator>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240505</creationdate><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><author>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moloney, David</au><au>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2024-05-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0021-9886</issn><eissn>1468-5965</eissn><abstract>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jcms.13624</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9886
ispartof Journal of common market studies, 2024-05
issn 0021-9886
1468-5965
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcms_13624
source Wiley Journals
title Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brexit%20Rhapsody:%20Exploring%20Patterns%20of%20Issue%20Salience%20in%20the%20Negotiations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Moloney,%20David&rft.date=2024-05-05&rft.issn=0021-9886&rft.eissn=1468-5965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcms.13624&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jcms_13624%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true