Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations
This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of common market studies 2024-05 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of common market studies |
container_volume | |
creator | Moloney, David Jensen, Mads Dagnis |
description | This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcms.13624 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcms_13624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jcms_13624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0DtPwzAYhWELgUQoLPwCz0gpn69x2KBqIVIFiMscubbTukrjyDZS---hwFne7QwPQtcEpuRnt1uzS1PCJOUnqCBcqlLUUpyiAoCSslZKnqOLlLYAQASIAjUP0e19xm8bPaZgD3d4vh_7EP2wxq86ZxeHhEOHm5S-HH7XvXeDcdgPOG8cfnbrkL3OPgzpEp11uk_u6r8T9LmYf8yeyuXLYzO7X5aGUplLSanhpGOVUkyCWamq45RSQZQAqTinZmUr45wFS51ila47INpqZbU0XFVsgm7-fk0MKUXXtWP0Ox0PLYH2iNAeEdpfBPYNUyhP0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creator><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><description>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13624</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2024-05</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4226-4114 ; 0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</description><issn>0021-9886</issn><issn>1468-5965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0DtPwzAYhWELgUQoLPwCz0gpn69x2KBqIVIFiMscubbTukrjyDZS---hwFne7QwPQtcEpuRnt1uzS1PCJOUnqCBcqlLUUpyiAoCSslZKnqOLlLYAQASIAjUP0e19xm8bPaZgD3d4vh_7EP2wxq86ZxeHhEOHm5S-HH7XvXeDcdgPOG8cfnbrkL3OPgzpEp11uk_u6r8T9LmYf8yeyuXLYzO7X5aGUplLSanhpGOVUkyCWamq45RSQZQAqTinZmUr45wFS51ila47INpqZbU0XFVsgm7-fk0MKUXXtWP0Ox0PLYH2iNAeEdpfBPYNUyhP0A</recordid><startdate>20240505</startdate><enddate>20240505</enddate><creator>Moloney, David</creator><creator>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240505</creationdate><title>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</title><author>Moloney, David ; Jensen, Mads Dagnis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-622c41f3788360cb87f42225185068442cbd7ceed0d2e837a9f01ada8da6c4873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moloney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moloney, David</au><au>Jensen, Mads Dagnis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2024-05-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0021-9886</issn><eissn>1468-5965</eissn><abstract>This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jcms.13624</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-370X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9886 |
ispartof | Journal of common market studies, 2024-05 |
issn | 0021-9886 1468-5965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcms_13624 |
source | Wiley Journals |
title | Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brexit%20Rhapsody:%20Exploring%20Patterns%20of%20Issue%20Salience%20in%20the%20Negotiations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Moloney,%20David&rft.date=2024-05-05&rft.issn=0021-9886&rft.eissn=1468-5965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcms.13624&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jcms_13624%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |