Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation

CHA DS -VASc and CHADS are computationally simple risk prediction tools used to guide anticoagulation decisions for stroke prophylaxis, but they have modest risk discrimination ability and use static dichotomous variables. The Intermountain Mortality Risk Scores (IMRS) are dynamic decision tools usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2019-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1452-1461
Hauptverfasser: Horne, Benjamin D, Jacobs, Victoria, May, Heidi T, Graves, Kevin G, Bunch, T Jared
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1461
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1452
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 30
creator Horne, Benjamin D
Jacobs, Victoria
May, Heidi T
Graves, Kevin G
Bunch, T Jared
description CHA DS -VASc and CHADS are computationally simple risk prediction tools used to guide anticoagulation decisions for stroke prophylaxis, but they have modest risk discrimination ability and use static dichotomous variables. The Intermountain Mortality Risk Scores (IMRS) are dynamic decision tools using standard clinical laboratory tests. This study derived new stroke prediction scores using variables from both CHA DS -VASc and IMRS. In outpatients with first atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis at the Intermountain Healthcare (females, n = 26 063 males, n = 29 807), sex-specific "IMRS-VASc" scores were derived using variables from CHA DS -VASc, warfarin use, the complete blood count, and the comprehensive metabolic profile. Validation was performed in an independent Intermountain outpatient AF cohort (females, n = 11 021; males, n = 12 641). Stroke occurred among 3.1% and 3.1% of females and 2.3% and 2.5% of males in derivation and validation groups, respectively. IMRS-VASc stratified stroke with similar ability in derivation (c-statistics, females: c = 0.703, males: c = 0.697) and validation groups (females: c = 0.681, males: c = 0.685). CHA DS -VASc (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.605; males: c = 0.616 and c = 0.613 in derivation and validation, respectively) and CHADS (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.608; males: c = 0.620 and c = 0.621 in derivation and validation, respectively) were substantially weaker stroke predictors. IMRS was the strongest mortality predictor (females: c = 0.783 and c = 0.782; males: c = 0.796 and c = 0.794 in derivation and validation, respectively) and all scores were poor at predicting bleeding risk. A temporally dynamic risk score, IMRS-VASc was derived and validated as a predictor of stroke in outpatients with AF. IMRS-VASc requires further validation and the evaluation of its use in guiding care and treatment decisions for patients with AF.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.13999
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jce_13999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31115939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c979-43e215ba778ff7656179500d48d2dfd2ead2df75a71f085e54d0fb5425cbf2c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCIlsKBH0C-ckix4zhOjlV5SpU4tOIaOfa6GJK4sl0h_ojPxCmPPeystLMzq0HokpI5TXXzpmBOWV3XR2hKeUGyipbiOM2k4BmrBJugsxDeCKGsJPwUTVi64jWrp-hrsd_2METQ2KbedXYLgwKsQdlg3YCjcx02zuMQvXsHvPOgrYrjSrm-tQMEbKSKzif0rsfLxwXO8e06texlsVZYDhrHVzjo-97thyjtgL0N7zgo5-GgvpPRpjcC_rDxFcvorUy2tvW26-Todo5OjOwCXPziDG3u7zbLx2z1_PC0XKwyVYs6KxjklLdSiMoYUfKSipoTootK59roHOSIgktBDak48EIT0_Ii56o1uSrZDF3_yCrvQvBgmp23vfSfDSXNGHaTwm4OYSfu1Q93t2970P_Mv3TZNy8ifWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Horne, Benjamin D ; Jacobs, Victoria ; May, Heidi T ; Graves, Kevin G ; Bunch, T Jared</creator><creatorcontrib>Horne, Benjamin D ; Jacobs, Victoria ; May, Heidi T ; Graves, Kevin G ; Bunch, T Jared</creatorcontrib><description>CHA DS -VASc and CHADS are computationally simple risk prediction tools used to guide anticoagulation decisions for stroke prophylaxis, but they have modest risk discrimination ability and use static dichotomous variables. The Intermountain Mortality Risk Scores (IMRS) are dynamic decision tools using standard clinical laboratory tests. This study derived new stroke prediction scores using variables from both CHA DS -VASc and IMRS. In outpatients with first atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis at the Intermountain Healthcare (females, n = 26 063 males, n = 29 807), sex-specific "IMRS-VASc" scores were derived using variables from CHA DS -VASc, warfarin use, the complete blood count, and the comprehensive metabolic profile. Validation was performed in an independent Intermountain outpatient AF cohort (females, n = 11 021; males, n = 12 641). Stroke occurred among 3.1% and 3.1% of females and 2.3% and 2.5% of males in derivation and validation groups, respectively. IMRS-VASc stratified stroke with similar ability in derivation (c-statistics, females: c = 0.703, males: c = 0.697) and validation groups (females: c = 0.681, males: c = 0.685). CHA DS -VASc (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.605; males: c = 0.616 and c = 0.613 in derivation and validation, respectively) and CHADS (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.608; males: c = 0.620 and c = 0.621 in derivation and validation, respectively) were substantially weaker stroke predictors. IMRS was the strongest mortality predictor (females: c = 0.783 and c = 0.782; males: c = 0.796 and c = 0.794 in derivation and validation, respectively) and all scores were poor at predicting bleeding risk. A temporally dynamic risk score, IMRS-VASc was derived and validated as a predictor of stroke in outpatients with AF. IMRS-VASc requires further validation and the evaluation of its use in guiding care and treatment decisions for patients with AF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.13999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31115939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2019-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1452-1461</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c979-43e215ba778ff7656179500d48d2dfd2ead2df75a71f085e54d0fb5425cbf2c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c979-43e215ba778ff7656179500d48d2dfd2ead2df75a71f085e54d0fb5425cbf2c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5349-0136 ; 0000-0002-2656-0263</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horne, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Heidi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kevin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunch, T Jared</creatorcontrib><title>Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>CHA DS -VASc and CHADS are computationally simple risk prediction tools used to guide anticoagulation decisions for stroke prophylaxis, but they have modest risk discrimination ability and use static dichotomous variables. The Intermountain Mortality Risk Scores (IMRS) are dynamic decision tools using standard clinical laboratory tests. This study derived new stroke prediction scores using variables from both CHA DS -VASc and IMRS. In outpatients with first atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis at the Intermountain Healthcare (females, n = 26 063 males, n = 29 807), sex-specific "IMRS-VASc" scores were derived using variables from CHA DS -VASc, warfarin use, the complete blood count, and the comprehensive metabolic profile. Validation was performed in an independent Intermountain outpatient AF cohort (females, n = 11 021; males, n = 12 641). Stroke occurred among 3.1% and 3.1% of females and 2.3% and 2.5% of males in derivation and validation groups, respectively. IMRS-VASc stratified stroke with similar ability in derivation (c-statistics, females: c = 0.703, males: c = 0.697) and validation groups (females: c = 0.681, males: c = 0.685). CHA DS -VASc (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.605; males: c = 0.616 and c = 0.613 in derivation and validation, respectively) and CHADS (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.608; males: c = 0.620 and c = 0.621 in derivation and validation, respectively) were substantially weaker stroke predictors. IMRS was the strongest mortality predictor (females: c = 0.783 and c = 0.782; males: c = 0.796 and c = 0.794 in derivation and validation, respectively) and all scores were poor at predicting bleeding risk. A temporally dynamic risk score, IMRS-VASc was derived and validated as a predictor of stroke in outpatients with AF. IMRS-VASc requires further validation and the evaluation of its use in guiding care and treatment decisions for patients with AF.</description><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCIlsKBH0C-ckix4zhOjlV5SpU4tOIaOfa6GJK4sl0h_ojPxCmPPeystLMzq0HokpI5TXXzpmBOWV3XR2hKeUGyipbiOM2k4BmrBJugsxDeCKGsJPwUTVi64jWrp-hrsd_2METQ2KbedXYLgwKsQdlg3YCjcx02zuMQvXsHvPOgrYrjSrm-tQMEbKSKzif0rsfLxwXO8e06texlsVZYDhrHVzjo-97thyjtgL0N7zgo5-GgvpPRpjcC_rDxFcvorUy2tvW26-Todo5OjOwCXPziDG3u7zbLx2z1_PC0XKwyVYs6KxjklLdSiMoYUfKSipoTootK59roHOSIgktBDak48EIT0_Ii56o1uSrZDF3_yCrvQvBgmp23vfSfDSXNGHaTwm4OYSfu1Q93t2970P_Mv3TZNy8ifWw</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Horne, Benjamin D</creator><creator>Jacobs, Victoria</creator><creator>May, Heidi T</creator><creator>Graves, Kevin G</creator><creator>Bunch, T Jared</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5349-0136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0263</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation</title><author>Horne, Benjamin D ; Jacobs, Victoria ; May, Heidi T ; Graves, Kevin G ; Bunch, T Jared</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c979-43e215ba778ff7656179500d48d2dfd2ead2df75a71f085e54d0fb5425cbf2c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horne, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Heidi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kevin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunch, T Jared</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horne, Benjamin D</au><au>Jacobs, Victoria</au><au>May, Heidi T</au><au>Graves, Kevin G</au><au>Bunch, T Jared</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1452</spage><epage>1461</epage><pages>1452-1461</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>CHA DS -VASc and CHADS are computationally simple risk prediction tools used to guide anticoagulation decisions for stroke prophylaxis, but they have modest risk discrimination ability and use static dichotomous variables. The Intermountain Mortality Risk Scores (IMRS) are dynamic decision tools using standard clinical laboratory tests. This study derived new stroke prediction scores using variables from both CHA DS -VASc and IMRS. In outpatients with first atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis at the Intermountain Healthcare (females, n = 26 063 males, n = 29 807), sex-specific "IMRS-VASc" scores were derived using variables from CHA DS -VASc, warfarin use, the complete blood count, and the comprehensive metabolic profile. Validation was performed in an independent Intermountain outpatient AF cohort (females, n = 11 021; males, n = 12 641). Stroke occurred among 3.1% and 3.1% of females and 2.3% and 2.5% of males in derivation and validation groups, respectively. IMRS-VASc stratified stroke with similar ability in derivation (c-statistics, females: c = 0.703, males: c = 0.697) and validation groups (females: c = 0.681, males: c = 0.685). CHA DS -VASc (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.605; males: c = 0.616 and c = 0.613 in derivation and validation, respectively) and CHADS (females: c = 0.581 and c = 0.608; males: c = 0.620 and c = 0.621 in derivation and validation, respectively) were substantially weaker stroke predictors. IMRS was the strongest mortality predictor (females: c = 0.783 and c = 0.782; males: c = 0.796 and c = 0.794 in derivation and validation, respectively) and all scores were poor at predicting bleeding risk. A temporally dynamic risk score, IMRS-VASc was derived and validated as a predictor of stroke in outpatients with AF. IMRS-VASc requires further validation and the evaluation of its use in guiding care and treatment decisions for patients with AF.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31115939</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.13999</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5349-0136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0263</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3873
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2019-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1452-1461
issn 1045-3873
1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jce_13999
source Wiley Journals
title Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmented%20intelligence%20decision%20tool%20for%20stroke%20prediction%20combines%20factors%20from%20CHA%202%20DS%202%20-VASc%20and%20the%20intermountain%20risk%20score%20for%20patients%20with%20atrial%20fibrillation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Horne,%20Benjamin%20D&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1452&rft.epage=1461&rft.pages=1452-1461&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.13999&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31115939%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31115939&rfr_iscdi=true