Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy
The microstructure evolution and growth behavior of the Al 2 O 3 /Y 3 Al 5 O 12 ( YAG )/ZrO 2 ternary eutectic ceramics during directional solidification were well investigated. During directional solidification of the Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 ternary eutectic ceramics, { } Al 2 O 3 paralleled with {00...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.2176-2186 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2186 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 2176 |
| container_title | Journal of the American Ceramic Society |
| container_volume | 102 |
| creator | Wang, Xu Zhong, Yujie Sun, Qian Qi, Dongqing Yan, Fuxue Xian, Quangang Wang, Dong Du, Kui Wang, Jingyang |
| description | The microstructure evolution and growth behavior of the Al
2
O
3
/Y
3
Al
5
O
12
(
YAG
)/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics during directional solidification were well investigated. During directional solidification of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics, {
} Al
2
O
3
paralleled with {001}ZrO
2
while they did not parallel with {001}
YAG
at the same time in the competitive growth stage. All of the interfaces parallel to each other finally. The area percentage of the Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are 40.4 ± 0.2% and 30.8 ± 0.1%, respectively, higher than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
(28.8 ± 0.2%). The content of Al
2
O
3
and
YAG
phases are 39.9% and 41.1%, respectively, almost double of that of ZrO
2
. The interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
are shorter and more dispersed than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It was found that the interfacial energy of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are lower than that of Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It can be concluded that interfacial energy plays a decisive role in affecting the crystallographic orientation and interfaces distribution in the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
eutectic since the interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
with lower interfacial energy can be formed more easily during directional solidification. Therefore, the contents of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are higher. This study can provide theoretical guidance for interface design of multi‐phase materials. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jace.16057 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jace_16057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jace_16057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c767-95f6555415f0142378d055f8d53b042dc5417d576708700271ea9da3577bd0bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9Lw0AQxRdRMFYvfoI5C2l2k0w28RZCrUKhl170Erb7p25Jk7KbKj343btR5zLM-z0ezCPkkdE5C5PshdRzVlDkVyRiiCxOK1Zck4hSmsa8TOktufN-H05WlXlEfprhcNSjHe2Xhp0bvsdPGAzUHaSwhgwSeK-XkHy4dRD0adRytBKkduJgpQd1crbfgbJuAkMvOvBDZ5U1VopJeIaFMYFNobYftTNC2uDSvXa78z25MaLz-uF_z8jmZbFpXuPVevnW1KtY8oLHFZoCEXOGhrI8zXipKKIpFWZbmqdKBsQVBistefiTMy0qJTLkfKvoVmYz8vQXK93gvdOmPTp7EO7cMtpOvbVTb-1vb9kFcmhfcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wang, Xu ; Zhong, Yujie ; Sun, Qian ; Qi, Dongqing ; Yan, Fuxue ; Xian, Quangang ; Wang, Dong ; Du, Kui ; Wang, Jingyang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu ; Zhong, Yujie ; Sun, Qian ; Qi, Dongqing ; Yan, Fuxue ; Xian, Quangang ; Wang, Dong ; Du, Kui ; Wang, Jingyang</creatorcontrib><description>The microstructure evolution and growth behavior of the Al
2
O
3
/Y
3
Al
5
O
12
(
YAG
)/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics during directional solidification were well investigated. During directional solidification of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics, {
} Al
2
O
3
paralleled with {001}ZrO
2
while they did not parallel with {001}
YAG
at the same time in the competitive growth stage. All of the interfaces parallel to each other finally. The area percentage of the Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are 40.4 ± 0.2% and 30.8 ± 0.1%, respectively, higher than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
(28.8 ± 0.2%). The content of Al
2
O
3
and
YAG
phases are 39.9% and 41.1%, respectively, almost double of that of ZrO
2
. The interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
are shorter and more dispersed than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It was found that the interfacial energy of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are lower than that of Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It can be concluded that interfacial energy plays a decisive role in affecting the crystallographic orientation and interfaces distribution in the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
eutectic since the interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
with lower interfacial energy can be formed more easily during directional solidification. Therefore, the contents of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are higher. This study can provide theoretical guidance for interface design of multi‐phase materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-2916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jace.16057</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.2176-2186</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c767-95f6555415f0142378d055f8d53b042dc5417d576708700271ea9da3577bd0bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c767-95f6555415f0142378d055f8d53b042dc5417d576708700271ea9da3577bd0bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4748-8512 ; 0000-0001-9935-5984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Fuxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Quangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingyang</creatorcontrib><title>Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy</title><title>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</title><description>The microstructure evolution and growth behavior of the Al
2
O
3
/Y
3
Al
5
O
12
(
YAG
)/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics during directional solidification were well investigated. During directional solidification of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics, {
} Al
2
O
3
paralleled with {001}ZrO
2
while they did not parallel with {001}
YAG
at the same time in the competitive growth stage. All of the interfaces parallel to each other finally. The area percentage of the Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are 40.4 ± 0.2% and 30.8 ± 0.1%, respectively, higher than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
(28.8 ± 0.2%). The content of Al
2
O
3
and
YAG
phases are 39.9% and 41.1%, respectively, almost double of that of ZrO
2
. The interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
are shorter and more dispersed than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It was found that the interfacial energy of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are lower than that of Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It can be concluded that interfacial energy plays a decisive role in affecting the crystallographic orientation and interfaces distribution in the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
eutectic since the interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
with lower interfacial energy can be formed more easily during directional solidification. Therefore, the contents of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are higher. This study can provide theoretical guidance for interface design of multi‐phase materials.</description><issn>0002-7820</issn><issn>1551-2916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9Lw0AQxRdRMFYvfoI5C2l2k0w28RZCrUKhl170Erb7p25Jk7KbKj343btR5zLM-z0ezCPkkdE5C5PshdRzVlDkVyRiiCxOK1Zck4hSmsa8TOktufN-H05WlXlEfprhcNSjHe2Xhp0bvsdPGAzUHaSwhgwSeK-XkHy4dRD0adRytBKkduJgpQd1crbfgbJuAkMvOvBDZ5U1VopJeIaFMYFNobYftTNC2uDSvXa78z25MaLz-uF_z8jmZbFpXuPVevnW1KtY8oLHFZoCEXOGhrI8zXipKKIpFWZbmqdKBsQVBistefiTMy0qJTLkfKvoVmYz8vQXK93gvdOmPTp7EO7cMtpOvbVTb-1vb9kFcmhfcA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Wang, Xu</creator><creator>Zhong, Yujie</creator><creator>Sun, Qian</creator><creator>Qi, Dongqing</creator><creator>Yan, Fuxue</creator><creator>Xian, Quangang</creator><creator>Wang, Dong</creator><creator>Du, Kui</creator><creator>Wang, Jingyang</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-5984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy</title><author>Wang, Xu ; Zhong, Yujie ; Sun, Qian ; Qi, Dongqing ; Yan, Fuxue ; Xian, Quangang ; Wang, Dong ; Du, Kui ; Wang, Jingyang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c767-95f6555415f0142378d055f8d53b042dc5417d576708700271ea9da3577bd0bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Fuxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Quangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingyang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xu</au><au>Zhong, Yujie</au><au>Sun, Qian</au><au>Qi, Dongqing</au><au>Yan, Fuxue</au><au>Xian, Quangang</au><au>Wang, Dong</au><au>Du, Kui</au><au>Wang, Jingyang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2176</spage><epage>2186</epage><pages>2176-2186</pages><issn>0002-7820</issn><eissn>1551-2916</eissn><abstract>The microstructure evolution and growth behavior of the Al
2
O
3
/Y
3
Al
5
O
12
(
YAG
)/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics during directional solidification were well investigated. During directional solidification of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
ternary eutectic ceramics, {
} Al
2
O
3
paralleled with {001}ZrO
2
while they did not parallel with {001}
YAG
at the same time in the competitive growth stage. All of the interfaces parallel to each other finally. The area percentage of the Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are 40.4 ± 0.2% and 30.8 ± 0.1%, respectively, higher than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
(28.8 ± 0.2%). The content of Al
2
O
3
and
YAG
phases are 39.9% and 41.1%, respectively, almost double of that of ZrO
2
. The interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
are shorter and more dispersed than that of the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It was found that the interfacial energy of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are lower than that of Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
. It can be concluded that interfacial energy plays a decisive role in affecting the crystallographic orientation and interfaces distribution in the Al
2
O
3
/
YAG
/ZrO
2
eutectic since the interfaces of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
with lower interfacial energy can be formed more easily during directional solidification. Therefore, the contents of Al
2
O
3
/ZrO
2
and
YAG
/ZrO
2
interfaces are higher. This study can provide theoretical guidance for interface design of multi‐phase materials.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jace.16057</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-5984</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-7820 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.2176-2186 |
| issn | 0002-7820 1551-2916 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jace_16057 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| title | Competitive growth of Al 2 O 3 / YAG /ZrO 2 eutectic ceramics during directional solidification: Effect of interfacial energy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A08%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competitive%20growth%20of%20Al%202%20O%203%20/%20YAG%20/ZrO%202%20eutectic%20ceramics%20during%20directional%20solidification:%20Effect%20of%20interfacial%20energy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Ceramic%20Society&rft.au=Wang,%20Xu&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2176&rft.epage=2186&rft.pages=2176-2186&rft.issn=0002-7820&rft.eissn=1551-2916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jace.16057&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jace_16057%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |