Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions
Applicants seem to react negatively to artificial intelligence-based automated systems in personnel selection. This study investigates the impact of different pieces of information to alleviate applicant reactions in an automated interview setting. In a 2 (no process information vs. process informat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of selection and assessment 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.154-169 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 169 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 154 |
| container_title | International journal of selection and assessment |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Langer, Markus Baum, Kevin König, Cornelius J Hähne, Viviane Oster, Daniel Speith, Timo |
| description | Applicants seem to react negatively to artificial intelligence-based automated systems in personnel selection. This study investigates the impact of different pieces of information to alleviate applicant reactions in an automated interview setting. In a 2 (no process information vs. process information) × 2 (no process justification vs. process justification) between-subjects design, participants (N = 124) received respective information and watched a video showing an automated interview. Testing mediation effects via different applicant reaction variables indicated that process justification is better than process information which can even impair applicant reactions. However, information did not increase organizational attractiveness compared to not receiving any information. This study sheds light on what type of information contributes to positive and negative applicant reactions to automated systems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijsa.12325 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_ijsa_12325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2547053459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-99d4adfba38cf6d3e52e9386f5a7bf398954616c6c2ef0d36801edc39e3828953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtLAzEQxhdR8HnxLgS8KdU8NunGmxSfCB7Uc0izE0zdbtYka-l_b7ZV8STOZYaZ35fMfEVxSPAZyXHuZlGfEcoo3yh2SCmqEWWV3PxVbxe7Mc4wxoyN6U7x9tTpAGgOKL0CqiFp18QLdOsXq0ZadoC8Ra61Psx1cr5Feur7hHSffG5AnWcJwoeDRRywpofWQES66xpndJtQAG0GYdwvtqxuIhx85b3i5frqeXI7eni8uZtcPowM45KPpKxLXdupZpWxombAKUhWCcv1eGqZrCQvBRFGGAoW10xUmEBtmARW0Txke8Xx-t0u-PceYlIz34c2f6koL8eYs5LLTJ2sKRN8jAGs6oKb67BUBKvBTDWYqVZmZvh0DS9g6m00bjjyR5DdFJxjSmSuMMl09X964tLK14nv25Sl5EvqGlj-sZK6u3-6_F7uaK0B41sX1ZBi8kHREstSsE9HXqL3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547053459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Langer, Markus ; Baum, Kevin ; König, Cornelius J ; Hähne, Viviane ; Oster, Daniel ; Speith, Timo</creator><creatorcontrib>Langer, Markus ; Baum, Kevin ; König, Cornelius J ; Hähne, Viviane ; Oster, Daniel ; Speith, Timo</creatorcontrib><description>Applicants seem to react negatively to artificial intelligence-based automated systems in personnel selection. This study investigates the impact of different pieces of information to alleviate applicant reactions in an automated interview setting. In a 2 (no process information vs. process information) × 2 (no process justification vs. process justification) between-subjects design, participants (N = 124) received respective information and watched a video showing an automated interview. Testing mediation effects via different applicant reaction variables indicated that process justification is better than process information which can even impair applicant reactions. However, information did not increase organizational attractiveness compared to not receiving any information. This study sheds light on what type of information contributes to positive and negative applicant reactions to automated systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-2389</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0965-075X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>algorithms ; applicant reactions ; Automation ; Between-subjects design ; Business & Economics ; explainable artificial intelligence ; human‐computer‐interaction ; information ; Management ; Personnel selection ; Psychology ; Psychology, Applied ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>International journal of selection and assessment, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.154-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>23</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000655021900001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-99d4adfba38cf6d3e52e9386f5a7bf398954616c6c2ef0d36801edc39e3828953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-99d4adfba38cf6d3e52e9386f5a7bf398954616c6c2ef0d36801edc39e3828953</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8165-1803 ; 0000-0003-0477-8293 ; 0000-0002-6675-154X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijsa.12325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijsa.12325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,39262,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Cornelius J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hähne, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oster, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speith, Timo</creatorcontrib><title>Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions</title><title>International journal of selection and assessment</title><addtitle>INT J SELECT ASSESS</addtitle><description>Applicants seem to react negatively to artificial intelligence-based automated systems in personnel selection. This study investigates the impact of different pieces of information to alleviate applicant reactions in an automated interview setting. In a 2 (no process information vs. process information) × 2 (no process justification vs. process justification) between-subjects design, participants (N = 124) received respective information and watched a video showing an automated interview. Testing mediation effects via different applicant reaction variables indicated that process justification is better than process information which can even impair applicant reactions. However, information did not increase organizational attractiveness compared to not receiving any information. This study sheds light on what type of information contributes to positive and negative applicant reactions to automated systems.</description><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>applicant reactions</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Between-subjects design</subject><subject>Business & Economics</subject><subject>explainable artificial intelligence</subject><subject>human‐computer‐interaction</subject><subject>information</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Applied</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1468-2389</issn><issn>0965-075X</issn><issn>1468-2389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtLAzEQxhdR8HnxLgS8KdU8NunGmxSfCB7Uc0izE0zdbtYka-l_b7ZV8STOZYaZ35fMfEVxSPAZyXHuZlGfEcoo3yh2SCmqEWWV3PxVbxe7Mc4wxoyN6U7x9tTpAGgOKL0CqiFp18QLdOsXq0ZadoC8Ra61Psx1cr5Feur7hHSffG5AnWcJwoeDRRywpofWQES66xpndJtQAG0GYdwvtqxuIhx85b3i5frqeXI7eni8uZtcPowM45KPpKxLXdupZpWxombAKUhWCcv1eGqZrCQvBRFGGAoW10xUmEBtmARW0Txke8Xx-t0u-PceYlIz34c2f6koL8eYs5LLTJ2sKRN8jAGs6oKb67BUBKvBTDWYqVZmZvh0DS9g6m00bjjyR5DdFJxjSmSuMMl09X964tLK14nv25Sl5EvqGlj-sZK6u3-6_F7uaK0B41sX1ZBi8kHREstSsE9HXqL3</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Langer, Markus</creator><creator>Baum, Kevin</creator><creator>König, Cornelius J</creator><creator>Hähne, Viviane</creator><creator>Oster, Daniel</creator><creator>Speith, Timo</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-1803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-8293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-154X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions</title><author>Langer, Markus ; Baum, Kevin ; König, Cornelius J ; Hähne, Viviane ; Oster, Daniel ; Speith, Timo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-99d4adfba38cf6d3e52e9386f5a7bf398954616c6c2ef0d36801edc39e3828953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>applicant reactions</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Between-subjects design</topic><topic>Business & Economics</topic><topic>explainable artificial intelligence</topic><topic>human‐computer‐interaction</topic><topic>information</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Applied</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Cornelius J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hähne, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oster, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speith, Timo</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langer, Markus</au><au>Baum, Kevin</au><au>König, Cornelius J</au><au>Hähne, Viviane</au><au>Oster, Daniel</au><au>Speith, Timo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle><stitle>INT J SELECT ASSESS</stitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>154-169</pages><issn>1468-2389</issn><issn>0965-075X</issn><eissn>1468-2389</eissn><abstract>Applicants seem to react negatively to artificial intelligence-based automated systems in personnel selection. This study investigates the impact of different pieces of information to alleviate applicant reactions in an automated interview setting. In a 2 (no process information vs. process information) × 2 (no process justification vs. process justification) between-subjects design, participants (N = 124) received respective information and watched a video showing an automated interview. Testing mediation effects via different applicant reaction variables indicated that process justification is better than process information which can even impair applicant reactions. However, information did not increase organizational attractiveness compared to not receiving any information. This study sheds light on what type of information contributes to positive and negative applicant reactions to automated systems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ijsa.12325</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-1803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-8293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-154X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1468-2389 |
| ispartof | International journal of selection and assessment, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.154-169 |
| issn | 1468-2389 0965-075X 1468-2389 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_ijsa_12325 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | algorithms applicant reactions Automation Between-subjects design Business & Economics explainable artificial intelligence human‐computer‐interaction information Management Personnel selection Psychology Psychology, Applied Social Sciences |
| title | Spare me the details: How the type of information about automated interviews influences applicant reactions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T04%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spare%20me%20the%20details:%20How%20the%20type%20of%20information%20about%20automated%20interviews%20influences%20applicant%20reactions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20selection%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Langer,%20Markus&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=154-169&rft.issn=1468-2389&rft.eissn=1468-2389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijsa.12325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2547053459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547053459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |