Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?

Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Financial markets, institutions & instruments institutions & instruments, 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Mazboudi, Mohamad, Chahine, Salim, Fang, Yiwei, Cheng, Mingying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Financial markets, institutions & instruments
container_volume
creator Mazboudi, Mohamad
Chahine, Salim
Fang, Yiwei
Cheng, Mingying
description Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fmii.12208
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_fmii_12208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_fmii_12208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_fmii_122083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9tNzMTD1DIyMDCyYGTkMTMwtdAxNDMxYGTgNLM2NdCwMDCw4GruLiLAMDA0NjS0tOBmOXfIWMzPSMRw0TklPzSooSczJLKhWcXf2LFTLz0nJKU_OSUxUSS1MySxTyS0uS83NTi-15GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDlptriLOHbnJRfnFxUWpafEFRZm5iUWW8oUE8yFnxIGfFg51lTJJiABGzP1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Mazboudi, Mohamad ; Chahine, Salim ; Fang, Yiwei ; Cheng, Mingying</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazboudi, Mohamad ; Chahine, Salim ; Fang, Yiwei ; Cheng, Mingying</creatorcontrib><description>Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fmii.12208</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Financial markets, institutions &amp; instruments, 2024-09</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_fmii_122083</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-9620-0637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazboudi, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Mingying</creatorcontrib><title>Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?</title><title>Financial markets, institutions &amp; instruments</title><description>Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.</description><issn>0963-8008</issn><issn>1468-0416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzBAL9tNzMTD1DIyMDCyYGTkMTMwtdAxNDMxYGTgNLM2NdCwMDCw4GruLiLAMDA0NjS0tOBmOXfIWMzPSMRw0TklPzSooSczJLKhWcXf2LFTLz0nJKU_OSUxUSS1MySxTyS0uS83NTi-15GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDlptriLOHbnJRfnFxUWpafEFRZm5iUWW8oUE8yFnxIGfFg51lTJJiABGzP1g</recordid><startdate>20240909</startdate><enddate>20240909</enddate><creator>Mazboudi, Mohamad</creator><creator>Chahine, Salim</creator><creator>Fang, Yiwei</creator><creator>Cheng, Mingying</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9620-0637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240909</creationdate><title>Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?</title><author>Mazboudi, Mohamad ; Chahine, Salim ; Fang, Yiwei ; Cheng, Mingying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1111_fmii_122083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazboudi, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Mingying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Financial markets, institutions &amp; instruments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazboudi, Mohamad</au><au>Chahine, Salim</au><au>Fang, Yiwei</au><au>Cheng, Mingying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?</atitle><jtitle>Financial markets, institutions &amp; instruments</jtitle><date>2024-09-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0963-8008</issn><eissn>1468-0416</eissn><abstract>Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.</abstract><doi>10.1111/fmii.12208</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9620-0637</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-8008
ispartof Financial markets, institutions & instruments, 2024-09
issn 0963-8008
1468-0416
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_fmii_12208
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A26%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20high%E2%80%90centrality%20CEOs%20influence%20audit%20outcomes?&rft.jtitle=Financial%20markets,%20institutions%20&%20instruments&rft.au=Mazboudi,%20Mohamad&rft.date=2024-09-09&rft.issn=0963-8008&rft.eissn=1468-0416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fmii.12208&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_fmii_12208%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true