Outcome implication of sex‐related effective orifice area normalized to body size in aortic stenosis

Introduction Although several echocardiographic parameters have different values according to sex, there are no studies in echocardiographic variables of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Our aim was to evaluate the sex‐related prognosis of several echocardiographic parameters in AS. Methods Two hundre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-11, Vol.37 (11), p.1732-1740
Hauptverfasser: Gamaza, Sergio, Díaz‐Retamino, Enrique, Gaitero, José Carlos, Giráldez, Alberto, Zafra, Francisco Manuel, Martín‐Santana, Antonio, Oneto, Jesús
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Although several echocardiographic parameters have different values according to sex, there are no studies in echocardiographic variables of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Our aim was to evaluate the sex‐related prognosis of several echocardiographic parameters in AS. Methods Two hundred and twenty‐five patients with at least moderate AS (effective orifice area [EOA] ≤ 1.50 cm2) were prospectively enrolled. EOA was normalized to body surface area (BSA), height, and body mass index (BMI). Receiver operating characteristic curves, in women and men separately, were plotted to determine the best cutoff value for predicting cardiovascular death. Results The largest area under the curve (AUC) to predict cardiovascular death was EOA in men (AUC 0.74, P 
ISSN:0742-2822
1540-8175
DOI:10.1111/echo.14868