Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability

In the UK people with diabetes who do not attend annual review appointments often have higher haemoglobin A (HbA ) levels. We aim to determine the acceptability of self-collected posted capillary blood samples, and if they produce accurate and reliable HbA results. We include adult studies comparing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 2023-04, Vol.40 (4), p.e15033
Hauptverfasser: Colley, Jack, Dambha-Miller, Hajira, Stuart, Beth, Bartholomew, Jazz, Benton, Madeleine, Baykoca, Jeni, Price, Hermione
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e15033
container_title Diabetic medicine
container_volume 40
creator Colley, Jack
Dambha-Miller, Hajira
Stuart, Beth
Bartholomew, Jazz
Benton, Madeleine
Baykoca, Jeni
Price, Hermione
description In the UK people with diabetes who do not attend annual review appointments often have higher haemoglobin A (HbA ) levels. We aim to determine the acceptability of self-collected posted capillary blood samples, and if they produce accurate and reliable HbA results. We include adult studies comparing capillary blood to venous blood for measuring HbA . We exclude methods not suitable for postage. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar and OpenGrey were searched from inception to September 2021, as well as relevant conference abstracts. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Narrative synthesis was performed. Our search retrieved 3747 records. Following de-duplication and screening 30 articles were included. The mean difference (MD) and limits of agreement (LoA) between capillary and venous HbA were smaller and narrower respectively when micro/capillary tubes (micro/cap) were used for capillary blood storage compared to dried blood spots (capDBS) (micro/cap MD range -0.4 to 1.4 mmol/mol vs. capDBS MD range -4.3 to 7.2 mmol/mol, micro/cap LoA width 2.4 to 6 mmol/mol vs. capDBS LoA width 11.7 to 16.8 mmol/mol). After using self-collection kits, 83%-96% of participants reported satisfaction, 87%-99% found it easy and 69%-94% reported they would use it again. Microtubes/capillary tubes look promising as a method of self-collecting and posting capillary blood samples for the measurement of HbA based on the accuracy and reliability findings presented. DBS samples demonstrated comparatively poorer accuracy. Data on acceptability were limited and further research is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dme.15033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_dme_15033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36562666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c976-e751864961a1ff9edd901c18402a4250a92a2adad0953168f89db24eae8503b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQt0ik2InjxOyqCihSJTbdR048aY0Su7LdonwFv4z7gNmMdOfMXRyE7imZ0jjPqocpzUmWXaAxZZwlORP0Eo1JwdIkIwUdoRvvvwihqcjENRplPOcp53yMfha2B9xbo4N12qyxbfFGQm_Xna21wTNMGxy30rKGAP4lJn7wAXoZdIMd7DV8Y2kUNtK5mO0h3k3YgNceW4Nl0-ycbIanyHaxRHc6DMeHbaTBhAMB23C-3KKrVnYe7s57glZvr6v5Ill-vn_MZ8ukEQVPoMhpyZngVNK2FaCUILShJSOpZGlOpEhlKpVUROQZ5WVbClWnDCSUUVPNsgl6PNU2znrvoK22TvfSDRUl1cFpFZ1WR6eRfTix213dg_on_yRmv-0YdDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Colley, Jack ; Dambha-Miller, Hajira ; Stuart, Beth ; Bartholomew, Jazz ; Benton, Madeleine ; Baykoca, Jeni ; Price, Hermione</creator><creatorcontrib>Colley, Jack ; Dambha-Miller, Hajira ; Stuart, Beth ; Bartholomew, Jazz ; Benton, Madeleine ; Baykoca, Jeni ; Price, Hermione</creatorcontrib><description>In the UK people with diabetes who do not attend annual review appointments often have higher haemoglobin A (HbA ) levels. We aim to determine the acceptability of self-collected posted capillary blood samples, and if they produce accurate and reliable HbA results. We include adult studies comparing capillary blood to venous blood for measuring HbA . We exclude methods not suitable for postage. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar and OpenGrey were searched from inception to September 2021, as well as relevant conference abstracts. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Narrative synthesis was performed. Our search retrieved 3747 records. Following de-duplication and screening 30 articles were included. The mean difference (MD) and limits of agreement (LoA) between capillary and venous HbA were smaller and narrower respectively when micro/capillary tubes (micro/cap) were used for capillary blood storage compared to dried blood spots (capDBS) (micro/cap MD range -0.4 to 1.4 mmol/mol vs. capDBS MD range -4.3 to 7.2 mmol/mol, micro/cap LoA width 2.4 to 6 mmol/mol vs. capDBS LoA width 11.7 to 16.8 mmol/mol). After using self-collection kits, 83%-96% of participants reported satisfaction, 87%-99% found it easy and 69%-94% reported they would use it again. Microtubes/capillary tubes look promising as a method of self-collecting and posting capillary blood samples for the measurement of HbA based on the accuracy and reliability findings presented. DBS samples demonstrated comparatively poorer accuracy. Data on acceptability were limited and further research is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dme.15033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36562666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 2023-04, Vol.40 (4), p.e15033</ispartof><rights>2022 Diabetes UK.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c976-e751864961a1ff9edd901c18402a4250a92a2adad0953168f89db24eae8503b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c976-e751864961a1ff9edd901c18402a4250a92a2adad0953168f89db24eae8503b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0175-443X ; 0000-0003-3388-0975 ; 0000-0003-4969-4042 ; 0000-0001-5432-7437 ; 0000-0003-0308-7167 ; 0000-0002-0779-6334 ; 0000-0002-4710-6131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36562666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colley, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambha-Miller, Hajira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartholomew, Jazz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baykoca, Jeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Hermione</creatorcontrib><title>Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><description>In the UK people with diabetes who do not attend annual review appointments often have higher haemoglobin A (HbA ) levels. We aim to determine the acceptability of self-collected posted capillary blood samples, and if they produce accurate and reliable HbA results. We include adult studies comparing capillary blood to venous blood for measuring HbA . We exclude methods not suitable for postage. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar and OpenGrey were searched from inception to September 2021, as well as relevant conference abstracts. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Narrative synthesis was performed. Our search retrieved 3747 records. Following de-duplication and screening 30 articles were included. The mean difference (MD) and limits of agreement (LoA) between capillary and venous HbA were smaller and narrower respectively when micro/capillary tubes (micro/cap) were used for capillary blood storage compared to dried blood spots (capDBS) (micro/cap MD range -0.4 to 1.4 mmol/mol vs. capDBS MD range -4.3 to 7.2 mmol/mol, micro/cap LoA width 2.4 to 6 mmol/mol vs. capDBS LoA width 11.7 to 16.8 mmol/mol). After using self-collection kits, 83%-96% of participants reported satisfaction, 87%-99% found it easy and 69%-94% reported they would use it again. Microtubes/capillary tubes look promising as a method of self-collecting and posting capillary blood samples for the measurement of HbA based on the accuracy and reliability findings presented. DBS samples demonstrated comparatively poorer accuracy. Data on acceptability were limited and further research is needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQt0ik2InjxOyqCihSJTbdR048aY0Su7LdonwFv4z7gNmMdOfMXRyE7imZ0jjPqocpzUmWXaAxZZwlORP0Eo1JwdIkIwUdoRvvvwihqcjENRplPOcp53yMfha2B9xbo4N12qyxbfFGQm_Xna21wTNMGxy30rKGAP4lJn7wAXoZdIMd7DV8Y2kUNtK5mO0h3k3YgNceW4Nl0-ycbIanyHaxRHc6DMeHbaTBhAMB23C-3KKrVnYe7s57glZvr6v5Ill-vn_MZ8ukEQVPoMhpyZngVNK2FaCUILShJSOpZGlOpEhlKpVUROQZ5WVbClWnDCSUUVPNsgl6PNU2znrvoK22TvfSDRUl1cFpFZ1WR6eRfTix213dg_on_yRmv-0YdDE</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Colley, Jack</creator><creator>Dambha-Miller, Hajira</creator><creator>Stuart, Beth</creator><creator>Bartholomew, Jazz</creator><creator>Benton, Madeleine</creator><creator>Baykoca, Jeni</creator><creator>Price, Hermione</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-443X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-4042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-7167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-6334</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4710-6131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability</title><author>Colley, Jack ; Dambha-Miller, Hajira ; Stuart, Beth ; Bartholomew, Jazz ; Benton, Madeleine ; Baykoca, Jeni ; Price, Hermione</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c976-e751864961a1ff9edd901c18402a4250a92a2adad0953168f89db24eae8503b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colley, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dambha-Miller, Hajira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartholomew, Jazz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baykoca, Jeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Hermione</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colley, Jack</au><au>Dambha-Miller, Hajira</au><au>Stuart, Beth</au><au>Bartholomew, Jazz</au><au>Benton, Madeleine</au><au>Baykoca, Jeni</au><au>Price, Hermione</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e15033</spage><pages>e15033-</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><abstract>In the UK people with diabetes who do not attend annual review appointments often have higher haemoglobin A (HbA ) levels. We aim to determine the acceptability of self-collected posted capillary blood samples, and if they produce accurate and reliable HbA results. We include adult studies comparing capillary blood to venous blood for measuring HbA . We exclude methods not suitable for postage. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar and OpenGrey were searched from inception to September 2021, as well as relevant conference abstracts. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Narrative synthesis was performed. Our search retrieved 3747 records. Following de-duplication and screening 30 articles were included. The mean difference (MD) and limits of agreement (LoA) between capillary and venous HbA were smaller and narrower respectively when micro/capillary tubes (micro/cap) were used for capillary blood storage compared to dried blood spots (capDBS) (micro/cap MD range -0.4 to 1.4 mmol/mol vs. capDBS MD range -4.3 to 7.2 mmol/mol, micro/cap LoA width 2.4 to 6 mmol/mol vs. capDBS LoA width 11.7 to 16.8 mmol/mol). After using self-collection kits, 83%-96% of participants reported satisfaction, 87%-99% found it easy and 69%-94% reported they would use it again. Microtubes/capillary tubes look promising as a method of self-collecting and posting capillary blood samples for the measurement of HbA based on the accuracy and reliability findings presented. DBS samples demonstrated comparatively poorer accuracy. Data on acceptability were limited and further research is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36562666</pmid><doi>10.1111/dme.15033</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-443X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-4042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-7167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-6334</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4710-6131</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3071
ispartof Diabetic medicine, 2023-04, Vol.40 (4), p.e15033
issn 0742-3071
1464-5491
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_dme_15033
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Blood Specimen Collection
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
title Home monitoring of haemoglobin A 1c in diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on accuracy, reliability and patient acceptability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home%20monitoring%20of%20haemoglobin%20A%201c%20in%20diabetes:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20narrative%20synthesis%20on%20accuracy,%20reliability%20and%20patient%20acceptability&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Colley,%20Jack&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e15033&rft.pages=e15033-&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dme.15033&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36562666%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36562666&rfr_iscdi=true