(In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities

This paper examines the place of ethnicity in local authority foster care in the context of the sufficiency duty to secure adequate local placements for looked after children. The analysis draws on two main sources, namely O ffice for S tandards in E ducation, C hildren's S ervices and S kills...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child & family social work 2016-11, Vol.21 (4), p.492-501
1. Verfasser: Kirton, Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 501
container_issue 4
container_start_page 492
container_title Child & family social work
container_volume 21
creator Kirton, Derek
description This paper examines the place of ethnicity in local authority foster care in the context of the sufficiency duty to secure adequate local placements for looked after children. The analysis draws on two main sources, namely O ffice for S tandards in E ducation, C hildren's S ervices and S kills ( OFSTED's ) annual survey of fostering agencies and inspection reports for around half the local authority fostering services in E ngland. Sufficiency is gauged in two main ways, comparing numbers of black and minority ethnic ( BME ) foster carers first with numbers of BME looked after children and second, with local adult (age 25–64) populations. Statistical analysis shows very wide variation on both measures and a significant minority of authorities that perform poorly in terms of the ethnic diversity of their foster carers. Inspection reports also vary widely in the degree and nature of attention given to issues of ethnicity with many offering limited (and sometimes no) challenge to poor performance. These findings are discussed within the broader context of recent trends towards de‐emphasizing the significance of ethnicity in child welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cfs.12166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_cfs_12166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_cfs_12166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c746-61d9439f902235417c61158719da651967c739ab7346f2b44d9c4450e7138c423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqUw8A880iHFzx_PNQtCVaGVKjHQPXIdmxiFBNnu0H9PWrjLvWe5wyHkHtgcxjy6kOfAAfGCTECgqjhneHnaCiutGLsmNzl_McYUNzgh64dNP_s4hBBd9H15fqK-tP0I5Uht39Aw5OITdTZ5Gnu6ov1nF3NLu8HZjtpDaYcUS_T5llwF22V_999Tsntd7Zbravv-tlm-bCunJVYIjZHCBMM4F0qCdgigFhpMY1GBQe20MHavhcTA91I2xkmpmNcgFk5yMSWzv1uXhpyTD_VPit82HWtg9clAPRqozwbEL-hITBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>(In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Kirton, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the place of ethnicity in local authority foster care in the context of the sufficiency duty to secure adequate local placements for looked after children. The analysis draws on two main sources, namely O ffice for S tandards in E ducation, C hildren's S ervices and S kills ( OFSTED's ) annual survey of fostering agencies and inspection reports for around half the local authority fostering services in E ngland. Sufficiency is gauged in two main ways, comparing numbers of black and minority ethnic ( BME ) foster carers first with numbers of BME looked after children and second, with local adult (age 25–64) populations. Statistical analysis shows very wide variation on both measures and a significant minority of authorities that perform poorly in terms of the ethnic diversity of their foster carers. Inspection reports also vary widely in the degree and nature of attention given to issues of ethnicity with many offering limited (and sometimes no) challenge to poor performance. These findings are discussed within the broader context of recent trends towards de‐emphasizing the significance of ethnicity in child welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-7500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12166</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Child &amp; family social work, 2016-11, Vol.21 (4), p.492-501</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c746-61d9439f902235417c61158719da651967c739ab7346f2b44d9c4450e7138c423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c746-61d9439f902235417c61158719da651967c739ab7346f2b44d9c4450e7138c423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>(In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities</title><title>Child &amp; family social work</title><description>This paper examines the place of ethnicity in local authority foster care in the context of the sufficiency duty to secure adequate local placements for looked after children. The analysis draws on two main sources, namely O ffice for S tandards in E ducation, C hildren's S ervices and S kills ( OFSTED's ) annual survey of fostering agencies and inspection reports for around half the local authority fostering services in E ngland. Sufficiency is gauged in two main ways, comparing numbers of black and minority ethnic ( BME ) foster carers first with numbers of BME looked after children and second, with local adult (age 25–64) populations. Statistical analysis shows very wide variation on both measures and a significant minority of authorities that perform poorly in terms of the ethnic diversity of their foster carers. Inspection reports also vary widely in the degree and nature of attention given to issues of ethnicity with many offering limited (and sometimes no) challenge to poor performance. These findings are discussed within the broader context of recent trends towards de‐emphasizing the significance of ethnicity in child welfare.</description><issn>1356-7500</issn><issn>1365-2206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqUw8A880iHFzx_PNQtCVaGVKjHQPXIdmxiFBNnu0H9PWrjLvWe5wyHkHtgcxjy6kOfAAfGCTECgqjhneHnaCiutGLsmNzl_McYUNzgh64dNP_s4hBBd9H15fqK-tP0I5Uht39Aw5OITdTZ5Gnu6ov1nF3NLu8HZjtpDaYcUS_T5llwF22V_999Tsntd7Zbravv-tlm-bCunJVYIjZHCBMM4F0qCdgigFhpMY1GBQe20MHavhcTA91I2xkmpmNcgFk5yMSWzv1uXhpyTD_VPit82HWtg9clAPRqozwbEL-hITBU</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Kirton, Derek</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>(In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities</title><author>Kirton, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c746-61d9439f902235417c61158719da651967c739ab7346f2b44d9c4450e7138c423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Child &amp; family social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirton, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>(In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities</atitle><jtitle>Child &amp; family social work</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>492-501</pages><issn>1356-7500</issn><eissn>1365-2206</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the place of ethnicity in local authority foster care in the context of the sufficiency duty to secure adequate local placements for looked after children. The analysis draws on two main sources, namely O ffice for S tandards in E ducation, C hildren's S ervices and S kills ( OFSTED's ) annual survey of fostering agencies and inspection reports for around half the local authority fostering services in E ngland. Sufficiency is gauged in two main ways, comparing numbers of black and minority ethnic ( BME ) foster carers first with numbers of BME looked after children and second, with local adult (age 25–64) populations. Statistical analysis shows very wide variation on both measures and a significant minority of authorities that perform poorly in terms of the ethnic diversity of their foster carers. Inspection reports also vary widely in the degree and nature of attention given to issues of ethnicity with many offering limited (and sometimes no) challenge to poor performance. These findings are discussed within the broader context of recent trends towards de‐emphasizing the significance of ethnicity in child welfare.</abstract><doi>10.1111/cfs.12166</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-7500
ispartof Child & family social work, 2016-11, Vol.21 (4), p.492-501
issn 1356-7500
1365-2206
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_cfs_12166
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
title (In)Sufficient?: ethnicity and foster care in E nglish local authorities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=(In)Sufficient?:%20ethnicity%20and%20foster%20care%20in%20E%20nglish%20local%20authorities&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20family%20social%20work&rft.au=Kirton,%20Derek&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=492-501&rft.issn=1356-7500&rft.eissn=1365-2206&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cfs.12166&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_cfs_12166%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true