Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective
This paper examines the US 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) alongside the EU's Net‐Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of 2023. We analyze their differential approaches to accelerating investment in clean technology, enhancing energy security and fortifying supply c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global policy 2024-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Global policy |
container_volume | |
creator | Suárez‐Cuesta, David Latorre, Maria C. |
description | This paper examines the US 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) alongside the EU's Net‐Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of 2023. We analyze their differential approaches to accelerating investment in clean technology, enhancing energy security and fortifying supply chains. Both regions share the objective of diminishing reliance on Chinese dominance in clean industries. The US seeks to stimulate private investment primarily via uncapped tax credits from 2022 to 2031, some of them subject to stringent domestic content requirements. The EU has reacted to the potential violation of World Trade Organization's rules and a possible green investment shift to the US In doing so, the EU is relying heavily on a regulatory strategy, with emphasis on the simplification of procedures. However, the EU's public funding model is vague and leaves details to the discretion of member states, risking fragmentation within the single market. Through the application of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model, we show that a 50% increase in demand for the IRA's uncapped tax credits could nearly triple US GDP outcomes by 2027. We highlight the contrast between the IRA's immediate fiscal incentives and the NZIA's regulatory approach, emphasising that the former are more attractive for firms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1758-5899.13448 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1758_5899_13448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_1758_5899_13448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-2b01891c1f97cd020ee52d0bc3a8fbd9630bc600d3ad7f420b12506224193f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtqwzAUREVpoSHNulv9gJMryQ-pOxPSNBAolHbRlZD1oC6OLCQnkL-vnZTMZoYZuHAPQs8ElmTUilQFzwouxJKwPOd3aHZr7m-ZwyNapPQLoxgXQMkMfW_7k41eeW2x8gaHvmv1GbeHMLoa2t4n3Ds8_Fi88667NPjDmqO-pFoPL7jGm2Psg1UeBxtTsON2sk_owaku2cW_z9HX6-Zz_Zbt37e7db3PNCnLIaMNEC6IJk5U2gAFawtqoNFMcdcYUbIxlwCGKVO5nEJDaAElpTkRzHFgc7S63tWxTylaJ0NsDyqeJQE5wZHT-3JCIS9w2B9bSVcC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Suárez‐Cuesta, David ; Latorre, Maria C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Cuesta, David ; Latorre, Maria C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the US 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) alongside the EU's Net‐Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of 2023. We analyze their differential approaches to accelerating investment in clean technology, enhancing energy security and fortifying supply chains. Both regions share the objective of diminishing reliance on Chinese dominance in clean industries. The US seeks to stimulate private investment primarily via uncapped tax credits from 2022 to 2031, some of them subject to stringent domestic content requirements. The EU has reacted to the potential violation of World Trade Organization's rules and a possible green investment shift to the US In doing so, the EU is relying heavily on a regulatory strategy, with emphasis on the simplification of procedures. However, the EU's public funding model is vague and leaves details to the discretion of member states, risking fragmentation within the single market. Through the application of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model, we show that a 50% increase in demand for the IRA's uncapped tax credits could nearly triple US GDP outcomes by 2027. We highlight the contrast between the IRA's immediate fiscal incentives and the NZIA's regulatory approach, emphasising that the former are more attractive for firms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13448</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Global policy, 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-2b01891c1f97cd020ee52d0bc3a8fbd9630bc600d3ad7f420b12506224193f803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8741-1897 ; 0000-0002-1749-9173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Cuesta, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre, Maria C.</creatorcontrib><title>Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective</title><title>Global policy</title><description>This paper examines the US 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) alongside the EU's Net‐Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of 2023. We analyze their differential approaches to accelerating investment in clean technology, enhancing energy security and fortifying supply chains. Both regions share the objective of diminishing reliance on Chinese dominance in clean industries. The US seeks to stimulate private investment primarily via uncapped tax credits from 2022 to 2031, some of them subject to stringent domestic content requirements. The EU has reacted to the potential violation of World Trade Organization's rules and a possible green investment shift to the US In doing so, the EU is relying heavily on a regulatory strategy, with emphasis on the simplification of procedures. However, the EU's public funding model is vague and leaves details to the discretion of member states, risking fragmentation within the single market. Through the application of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model, we show that a 50% increase in demand for the IRA's uncapped tax credits could nearly triple US GDP outcomes by 2027. We highlight the contrast between the IRA's immediate fiscal incentives and the NZIA's regulatory approach, emphasising that the former are more attractive for firms.</description><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtqwzAUREVpoSHNulv9gJMryQ-pOxPSNBAolHbRlZD1oC6OLCQnkL-vnZTMZoYZuHAPQs8ElmTUilQFzwouxJKwPOd3aHZr7m-ZwyNapPQLoxgXQMkMfW_7k41eeW2x8gaHvmv1GbeHMLoa2t4n3Ds8_Fi88667NPjDmqO-pFoPL7jGm2Psg1UeBxtTsON2sk_owaku2cW_z9HX6-Zz_Zbt37e7db3PNCnLIaMNEC6IJk5U2gAFawtqoNFMcdcYUbIxlwCGKVO5nEJDaAElpTkRzHFgc7S63tWxTylaJ0NsDyqeJQE5wZHT-3JCIS9w2B9bSVcC</recordid><startdate>20241007</startdate><enddate>20241007</enddate><creator>Suárez‐Cuesta, David</creator><creator>Latorre, Maria C.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-1897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-9173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241007</creationdate><title>Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective</title><author>Suárez‐Cuesta, David ; Latorre, Maria C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-2b01891c1f97cd020ee52d0bc3a8fbd9630bc600d3ad7f420b12506224193f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Cuesta, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre, Maria C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez‐Cuesta, David</au><au>Latorre, Maria C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2024-10-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the US 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) alongside the EU's Net‐Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of 2023. We analyze their differential approaches to accelerating investment in clean technology, enhancing energy security and fortifying supply chains. Both regions share the objective of diminishing reliance on Chinese dominance in clean industries. The US seeks to stimulate private investment primarily via uncapped tax credits from 2022 to 2031, some of them subject to stringent domestic content requirements. The EU has reacted to the potential violation of World Trade Organization's rules and a possible green investment shift to the US In doing so, the EU is relying heavily on a regulatory strategy, with emphasis on the simplification of procedures. However, the EU's public funding model is vague and leaves details to the discretion of member states, risking fragmentation within the single market. Through the application of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model, we show that a 50% increase in demand for the IRA's uncapped tax credits could nearly triple US GDP outcomes by 2027. We highlight the contrast between the IRA's immediate fiscal incentives and the NZIA's regulatory approach, emphasising that the former are more attractive for firms.</abstract><doi>10.1111/1758-5899.13448</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-1897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-9173</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-5880 |
ispartof | Global policy, 2024-10 |
issn | 1758-5880 1758-5899 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1758_5899_13448 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
title | Governance and policy implications of the Inflation Reduction Act: A European perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Governance%20and%20policy%20implications%20of%20the%20Inflation%20Reduction%20Act:%20A%20European%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez%E2%80%90Cuesta,%20David&rft.date=2024-10-07&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13448&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_1758_5899_13448%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |