Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?

The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of development economics 2002-06, Vol.6 (2), p.151-162
1. Verfasser: Bhagwati, Jagdish N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Review of development economics
container_volume 6
creator Bhagwati, Jagdish N.
description The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and development. When compared to authoritarian regimes, democracy is more likely to foster an environment that facilitates the innovative and entrepreneurial process so essential for sustained development. On the other hand, democracy is better for development only when accompanied by an expansion of markets and competition. Democracy without markets is unlikely to deliver significant growth. In this context, liberalized international trade can act in a productive symbiosis with democratic institutions to promote development by facilitating bilateral flows of ideas, knowledge, goods, services, and technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9361.00147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1467_9361_00147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_KJKG944F_H</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2998-541adb9fc6be249396cdeb287e2e3d95315ef29390ae8cc93e289bd055dfb1383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZpsfSLHjR2I2CCV9QCsqFRBLy3EmwpA0lR0e-XsSirplNjO6mjOjexG6JHhC-roiTMShpIJMMCYsPkKjg3Lcz1TQUAghT9GZ928YY0kIH6E0g7oxTpsu0NsiyOATqmZXw7a9DlL3AVWQ2QrqWgeNCx67OrdNa02wgUq3ttn6V7u7OUcnpa48XPz1MXqeTZ_SRbhaz-_S21VoIimTkDOii1yWRuQQMUmlMAXkURJDBLSQnBIOZdTrWENijKQQJTIvMOdFmROa0DG62t81rvHeQal2ztbadYpgNWSgBsdqcKx-M-gJtie-ehPdf-tqs86mhA2Pwj1mfQvfB0y7dyViGnP18jBXy_vlXDI2Uwv6A9LObPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and development. When compared to authoritarian regimes, democracy is more likely to foster an environment that facilitates the innovative and entrepreneurial process so essential for sustained development. On the other hand, democracy is better for development only when accompanied by an expansion of markets and competition. Democracy without markets is unlikely to deliver significant growth. In this context, liberalized international trade can act in a productive symbiosis with democratic institutions to promote development by facilitating bilateral flows of ideas, knowledge, goods, services, and technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-6669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Review of development economics, 2002-06, Vol.6 (2), p.151-162</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2998-541adb9fc6be249396cdeb287e2e3d95315ef29390ae8cc93e289bd055dfb1383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9361.00147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9361.00147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?</title><title>Review of development economics</title><description>The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and development. When compared to authoritarian regimes, democracy is more likely to foster an environment that facilitates the innovative and entrepreneurial process so essential for sustained development. On the other hand, democracy is better for development only when accompanied by an expansion of markets and competition. Democracy without markets is unlikely to deliver significant growth. In this context, liberalized international trade can act in a productive symbiosis with democratic institutions to promote development by facilitating bilateral flows of ideas, knowledge, goods, services, and technology.</description><issn>1363-6669</issn><issn>1467-9361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZpsfSLHjR2I2CCV9QCsqFRBLy3EmwpA0lR0e-XsSirplNjO6mjOjexG6JHhC-roiTMShpIJMMCYsPkKjg3Lcz1TQUAghT9GZ928YY0kIH6E0g7oxTpsu0NsiyOATqmZXw7a9DlL3AVWQ2QrqWgeNCx67OrdNa02wgUq3ttn6V7u7OUcnpa48XPz1MXqeTZ_SRbhaz-_S21VoIimTkDOii1yWRuQQMUmlMAXkURJDBLSQnBIOZdTrWENijKQQJTIvMOdFmROa0DG62t81rvHeQal2ztbadYpgNWSgBsdqcKx-M-gJtie-ehPdf-tqs86mhA2Pwj1mfQvfB0y7dyViGnP18jBXy_vlXDI2Uwv6A9LObPs</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?</title><author>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2998-541adb9fc6be249396cdeb287e2e3d95315ef29390ae8cc93e289bd055dfb1383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhagwati, Jagdish N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?</atitle><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>151-162</pages><issn>1363-6669</issn><eissn>1467-9361</eissn><abstract>The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and development. When compared to authoritarian regimes, democracy is more likely to foster an environment that facilitates the innovative and entrepreneurial process so essential for sustained development. On the other hand, democracy is better for development only when accompanied by an expansion of markets and competition. Democracy without markets is unlikely to deliver significant growth. In this context, liberalized international trade can act in a productive symbiosis with democratic institutions to promote development by facilitating bilateral flows of ideas, knowledge, goods, services, and technology.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9361.00147</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1363-6669
ispartof Review of development economics, 2002-06, Vol.6 (2), p.151-162
issn 1363-6669
1467-9361
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1467_9361_00147
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
title Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy%20and%20Development:%20Cruel%20Dilemma%20or%20Symbiotic%20Relationship?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20development%20economics&rft.au=Bhagwati,%20Jagdish%20N.&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=151-162&rft.issn=1363-6669&rft.eissn=1467-9361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9361.00147&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_KJKG944F_H%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true