Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia

The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia . While A cacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecology 2013-09, Vol.101 (5), p.1103-1113
Hauptverfasser: Wandrag, Elizabeth M., Sheppard, Andy, Duncan, Richard P., Hulme, Philip E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1113
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1103
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 101
creator Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
Sheppard, Andy
Duncan, Richard P.
Hulme, Philip E.
description The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia . While A cacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. We examine three A ustralian A cacia species that have been introduced to N ew Z ealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. In both A ustralia and N ew Z ealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of A cacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from A cacia trees (Host−). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in A ustralia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host− soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host− soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host− soils would be less marked in A cacia that were more widespread in N ew Z ealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host− than Host+ soils in N ew Z ealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host− soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. Synthesis . In N ew Zealand, A cacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in N ew Zealand.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2745.12126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_12126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_1365_2745_12126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c866-5e6b392680c134e8d2db8e6b4f5126b81b7b94341a4a187e7b1ee338b446bd0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtqwzAUREVpoW7adbf6ASd6WVKWIfQFgULJ3lzJ10TFjyA5hvTrazclsxkYmIE5hDxztuSTVlzqIhdGFUsuuNA3JLsmtyRjTIicKWPuyUNK34wxbQqWEfeF1cljRWGE0IALTRjOtK9pPISf3gWgTWjDkOhwQHrEWPexhc4jdaeBdv1AQzdCCiN2mNLcC90Q-8vkhnrwAR7JXQ1Nwqd_X5D968t--57vPt8-tptd7q3WeYHaybXQlnkuFdpKVM5OmaqL6Y2z3Bm3VlJxUMCtQeM4opTWKaVdxUAuyOoy62OfUsS6PMbQQjyXnJUzoXLmUc48yj9C8hcBbVm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Sheppard, Andy ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Hulme, Philip E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Sheppard, Andy ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia . While A cacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. We examine three A ustralian A cacia species that have been introduced to N ew Z ealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. In both A ustralia and N ew Z ealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of A cacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from A cacia trees (Host−). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in A ustralia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host− soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host− soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host− soils would be less marked in A cacia that were more widespread in N ew Z ealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host− than Host+ soils in N ew Z ealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host− soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. Synthesis . In N ew Zealand, A cacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in N ew Zealand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12126</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2013-09, Vol.101 (5), p.1103-1113</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c866-5e6b392680c134e8d2db8e6b4f5126b81b7b94341a4a187e7b1ee338b446bd0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c866-5e6b392680c134e8d2db8e6b4f5126b81b7b94341a4a187e7b1ee338b446bd0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia . While A cacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. We examine three A ustralian A cacia species that have been introduced to N ew Z ealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. In both A ustralia and N ew Z ealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of A cacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from A cacia trees (Host−). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in A ustralia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host− soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host− soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host− soils would be less marked in A cacia that were more widespread in N ew Z ealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host− than Host+ soils in N ew Z ealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host− soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. Synthesis . In N ew Zealand, A cacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in N ew Zealand.</description><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtqwzAUREVpoW7adbf6ASd6WVKWIfQFgULJ3lzJ10TFjyA5hvTrazclsxkYmIE5hDxztuSTVlzqIhdGFUsuuNA3JLsmtyRjTIicKWPuyUNK34wxbQqWEfeF1cljRWGE0IALTRjOtK9pPISf3gWgTWjDkOhwQHrEWPexhc4jdaeBdv1AQzdCCiN2mNLcC90Q-8vkhnrwAR7JXQ1Nwqd_X5D968t--57vPt8-tptd7q3WeYHaybXQlnkuFdpKVM5OmaqL6Y2z3Bm3VlJxUMCtQeM4opTWKaVdxUAuyOoy62OfUsS6PMbQQjyXnJUzoXLmUc48yj9C8hcBbVm8</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Sheppard, Andy</creator><creator>Duncan, Richard P.</creator><creator>Hulme, Philip E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia</title><author>Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Sheppard, Andy ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Hulme, Philip E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c866-5e6b392680c134e8d2db8e6b4f5126b81b7b94341a4a187e7b1ee338b446bd0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Sheppard, Andy</au><au>Duncan, Richard P.</au><au>Hulme, Philip E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1103</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1103-1113</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia . While A cacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. We examine three A ustralian A cacia species that have been introduced to N ew Z ealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. In both A ustralia and N ew Z ealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of A cacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from A cacia trees (Host−). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in A ustralia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host− soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host− soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host− soils would be less marked in A cacia that were more widespread in N ew Z ealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host− than Host+ soils in N ew Z ealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host− soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. Synthesis . In N ew Zealand, A cacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in N ew Zealand.</abstract><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.12126</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2013-09, Vol.101 (5), p.1103-1113
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_12126
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced A cacia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A46%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20availability%20of%20rhizobia%20limits%20the%20performance%20but%20not%20invasiveness%20of%20introduced%20A%20cacia&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Wandrag,%20Elizabeth%20M.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1103&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1103-1113&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12126&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_1365_2745_12126%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true