Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer

Recent work has established that when transmitter Alice wishes to communicate reliably to recipient Bob without detection by warden Willie, with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels between all parties, communication is limited to O(√n) bits in n channel uses. However, this assumes that Wil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on wireless communications 2017-09, Vol.16 (9), p.6193-6206
Hauptverfasser: Sobers, Tamara V., Bash, Boulat A., Guha, Saikat, Towsley, Don, Goeckel, Dennis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6206
container_issue 9
container_start_page 6193
container_title IEEE transactions on wireless communications
container_volume 16
creator Sobers, Tamara V.
Bash, Boulat A.
Guha, Saikat
Towsley, Don
Goeckel, Dennis
description Recent work has established that when transmitter Alice wishes to communicate reliably to recipient Bob without detection by warden Willie, with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels between all parties, communication is limited to O(√n) bits in n channel uses. However, this assumes that Willie has an accurate statistical characterization of the channel. When Willie has uncertainty about such and his receiver is limited to a threshold test on the received power, Alice can transmit covertly with a power that does not decrease with n, thus conveying O(n) bits covertly and reliably in n uses of an AWGN channel. Here, we consider covert communication of O(n) bits in n channel uses while generalizing the environment and removing any restrictions on Willie's receiver. We assume that an uninformed "jammer" is present to help Alice, and we consider AWGN and block fading channels. In some scenarios, Willie's optimal detector is a threshold test on the received power. When the channel between the jammer and Willie has multiple fading blocks per codeword, a threshold test on the received power is not optimal. However, we establish that Alice can remain covert with a transmit power that does not decrease with n even when Willie employs an optimal detector.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TWC.2017.2720736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TWC_2017_2720736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7964713</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TWC_2017_2720736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f4831b0198475db8719056f10e02c38932f6976ad0a611b6706def8b216b547f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tLxDAUhYMoOI7uBTf5A633Js2j4EaKTwZ0MYPLkrY3WLGpJFXw39syg6tzFuc78DF2iZAjQnm9fatyAWhyYQQYqY_YCpWymRCFPV661BkKo0_ZWUofMC-1Uit2U40_FCdejcPwHfrWTf0YeB_49E78NVKi0BIfPXeB70If_BgH6vizGwaK5-zEu89EF4dcs9393bZ6zDYvD0_V7SZrpcEp84WV2ACWtjCqa6zBEpT2CASilbaUwuvSaNeB04iNNqA78rYRqBtVGC_XDPa_bRxTiuTrr9gPLv7WCPViX8_29WJfH-xn5GqP9ET0PzelLgxK-QdHqlRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Sobers, Tamara V. ; Bash, Boulat A. ; Guha, Saikat ; Towsley, Don ; Goeckel, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Sobers, Tamara V. ; Bash, Boulat A. ; Guha, Saikat ; Towsley, Don ; Goeckel, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Recent work has established that when transmitter Alice wishes to communicate reliably to recipient Bob without detection by warden Willie, with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels between all parties, communication is limited to O(√n) bits in n channel uses. However, this assumes that Willie has an accurate statistical characterization of the channel. When Willie has uncertainty about such and his receiver is limited to a threshold test on the received power, Alice can transmit covertly with a power that does not decrease with n, thus conveying O(n) bits covertly and reliably in n uses of an AWGN channel. Here, we consider covert communication of O(n) bits in n channel uses while generalizing the environment and removing any restrictions on Willie's receiver. We assume that an uninformed "jammer" is present to help Alice, and we consider AWGN and block fading channels. In some scenarios, Willie's optimal detector is a threshold test on the received power. When the channel between the jammer and Willie has multiple fading blocks per codeword, a threshold test on the received power is not optimal. However, we establish that Alice can remain covert with a transmit power that does not decrease with n even when Willie employs an optimal detector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-1276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2017.2720736</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITWCAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>AWGN channels ; Detectors ; Fading channels ; Jamming ; Low probability of detection communication ; physical layer security ; Receivers ; Uncertainty ; Wireless communication ; wireless covert communication</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on wireless communications, 2017-09, Vol.16 (9), p.6193-6206</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f4831b0198475db8719056f10e02c38932f6976ad0a611b6706def8b216b547f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f4831b0198475db8719056f10e02c38932f6976ad0a611b6706def8b216b547f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1205-3906 ; 0000-0002-8061-0786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7964713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27923,27924,54757</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7964713$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sobers, Tamara V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bash, Boulat A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guha, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towsley, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeckel, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer</title><title>IEEE transactions on wireless communications</title><addtitle>TWC</addtitle><description>Recent work has established that when transmitter Alice wishes to communicate reliably to recipient Bob without detection by warden Willie, with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels between all parties, communication is limited to O(√n) bits in n channel uses. However, this assumes that Willie has an accurate statistical characterization of the channel. When Willie has uncertainty about such and his receiver is limited to a threshold test on the received power, Alice can transmit covertly with a power that does not decrease with n, thus conveying O(n) bits covertly and reliably in n uses of an AWGN channel. Here, we consider covert communication of O(n) bits in n channel uses while generalizing the environment and removing any restrictions on Willie's receiver. We assume that an uninformed "jammer" is present to help Alice, and we consider AWGN and block fading channels. In some scenarios, Willie's optimal detector is a threshold test on the received power. When the channel between the jammer and Willie has multiple fading blocks per codeword, a threshold test on the received power is not optimal. However, we establish that Alice can remain covert with a transmit power that does not decrease with n even when Willie employs an optimal detector.</description><subject>AWGN channels</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Fading channels</subject><subject>Jamming</subject><subject>Low probability of detection communication</subject><subject>physical layer security</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><subject>wireless covert communication</subject><issn>1536-1276</issn><issn>1558-2248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j0tLxDAUhYMoOI7uBTf5A633Js2j4EaKTwZ0MYPLkrY3WLGpJFXw39syg6tzFuc78DF2iZAjQnm9fatyAWhyYQQYqY_YCpWymRCFPV661BkKo0_ZWUofMC-1Uit2U40_FCdejcPwHfrWTf0YeB_49E78NVKi0BIfPXeB70If_BgH6vizGwaK5-zEu89EF4dcs9393bZ6zDYvD0_V7SZrpcEp84WV2ACWtjCqa6zBEpT2CASilbaUwuvSaNeB04iNNqA78rYRqBtVGC_XDPa_bRxTiuTrr9gPLv7WCPViX8_29WJfH-xn5GqP9ET0PzelLgxK-QdHqlRg</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Sobers, Tamara V.</creator><creator>Bash, Boulat A.</creator><creator>Guha, Saikat</creator><creator>Towsley, Don</creator><creator>Goeckel, Dennis</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-3906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-0786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer</title><author>Sobers, Tamara V. ; Bash, Boulat A. ; Guha, Saikat ; Towsley, Don ; Goeckel, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f4831b0198475db8719056f10e02c38932f6976ad0a611b6706def8b216b547f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>AWGN channels</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Fading channels</topic><topic>Jamming</topic><topic>Low probability of detection communication</topic><topic>physical layer security</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><topic>wireless covert communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sobers, Tamara V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bash, Boulat A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guha, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towsley, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeckel, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on wireless communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sobers, Tamara V.</au><au>Bash, Boulat A.</au><au>Guha, Saikat</au><au>Towsley, Don</au><au>Goeckel, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on wireless communications</jtitle><stitle>TWC</stitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6193</spage><epage>6206</epage><pages>6193-6206</pages><issn>1536-1276</issn><eissn>1558-2248</eissn><coden>ITWCAX</coden><abstract>Recent work has established that when transmitter Alice wishes to communicate reliably to recipient Bob without detection by warden Willie, with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels between all parties, communication is limited to O(√n) bits in n channel uses. However, this assumes that Willie has an accurate statistical characterization of the channel. When Willie has uncertainty about such and his receiver is limited to a threshold test on the received power, Alice can transmit covertly with a power that does not decrease with n, thus conveying O(n) bits covertly and reliably in n uses of an AWGN channel. Here, we consider covert communication of O(n) bits in n channel uses while generalizing the environment and removing any restrictions on Willie's receiver. We assume that an uninformed "jammer" is present to help Alice, and we consider AWGN and block fading channels. In some scenarios, Willie's optimal detector is a threshold test on the received power. When the channel between the jammer and Willie has multiple fading blocks per codeword, a threshold test on the received power is not optimal. However, we establish that Alice can remain covert with a transmit power that does not decrease with n even when Willie employs an optimal detector.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TWC.2017.2720736</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-3906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-0786</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1536-1276
ispartof IEEE transactions on wireless communications, 2017-09, Vol.16 (9), p.6193-6206
issn 1536-1276
1558-2248
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TWC_2017_2720736
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects AWGN channels
Detectors
Fading channels
Jamming
Low probability of detection communication
physical layer security
Receivers
Uncertainty
Wireless communication
wireless covert communication
title Covert Communication in the Presence of an Uninformed Jammer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A42%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Covert%20Communication%20in%20the%20Presence%20of%20an%20Uninformed%20Jammer&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20wireless%20communications&rft.au=Sobers,%20Tamara%20V.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6193&rft.epage=6206&rft.pages=6193-6206&rft.issn=1536-1276&rft.eissn=1558-2248&rft.coden=ITWCAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TWC.2017.2720736&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TWC_2017_2720736%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7964713&rfr_iscdi=true