Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications
With rapid electrification of transportation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a comprehensive understanding of criteria used in motor selection. This paper presents the design and comparative evaluation for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) with distributed winding...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on transportation electrification 2015-10, Vol.1 (3), p.245-254 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 254 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 245 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on transportation electrification |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Zhi Yang Fei Shang Brown, Ian P. Krishnamurthy, Mahesh |
| description | With rapid electrification of transportation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a comprehensive understanding of criteria used in motor selection. This paper presents the design and comparative evaluation for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) with distributed winding and concentrated winding, induction motor (IM), and switched reluctance motor (SRM) for an electric vehicle (EV) or hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) application. A fast finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach is addressed for IM design. To account for highly nonlinear motor parameters and achieve high motor efficiency, optimal current trajectories are obtained by extensive mapping for IPMSMs and IM. Optimal turn-ON and turn-OFF angles with current chopping control and angular position control are found for SRM. Additional comparison including noise vibration and harshness (NVH) is also highlighted. Simulation and analytical results show that each motor topology demonstrates its own unique characteristic for EVs/HEVs. Each motor's highest efficiency region is located at different torque-speed regions for the criteria defined. Stator geometry, pole/slot combination, and control strategy differentiate NVH performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TTE.2015.2470092 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TTE_2015_2470092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7210190</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TTE_2015_2470092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-3476d074eb5fcf0400bfe72c36fe889d13240eccb533a361a3219fcdd8670ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFPwjAUhRujiQR5N_GlP4Dhbbut2yNBFBKIRqavS2lvdQa2pSsa4p-3CDE-nZN7zzkPHyHXDEaMQX5bFNMRB5aMeCwBcn5GelwIHkmZ8fN__pIMuu4DIERFkrO0R74nzbZVTvnqE-nK78yeNpbOa4-uahx9QrdVNdaeLtVbjX4YXmanfdXUQ6pqQ1dfldfvaOgzbsJd1RrpsvGheufCZEdtsNPX3-ws6LhtN5VWh4HuilxYtelwcNI-ebmfFpNZtHh8mE_Gi0gLnvtIxDI1IGNcJ1ZbiAHWFiXXIrWYZblhgseAWq8TIZRImRKc5VYbk6USlBaiT-C4q13TdQ5t2bpqq9y-ZFAe-JWBX3ngV574hcrNsVIh4l9ccgYsB_EDZDhsvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zhi Yang ; Fei Shang ; Brown, Ian P. ; Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhi Yang ; Fei Shang ; Brown, Ian P. ; Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><description>With rapid electrification of transportation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a comprehensive understanding of criteria used in motor selection. This paper presents the design and comparative evaluation for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) with distributed winding and concentrated winding, induction motor (IM), and switched reluctance motor (SRM) for an electric vehicle (EV) or hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) application. A fast finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach is addressed for IM design. To account for highly nonlinear motor parameters and achieve high motor efficiency, optimal current trajectories are obtained by extensive mapping for IPMSMs and IM. Optimal turn-ON and turn-OFF angles with current chopping control and angular position control are found for SRM. Additional comparison including noise vibration and harshness (NVH) is also highlighted. Simulation and analytical results show that each motor topology demonstrates its own unique characteristic for EVs/HEVs. Each motor's highest efficiency region is located at different torque-speed regions for the criteria defined. Stator geometry, pole/slot combination, and control strategy differentiate NVH performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2332-7782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-7782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2015.2470092</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITTEBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>comparative study ; EV &HEV ; induction motor ; NVH ; permanent magnet motor ; Permanent magnet motors ; Reluctance motors ; Rotors ; Stator windings ; switched reluctance motor ; Torque ; Traction motors</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on transportation electrification, 2015-10, Vol.1 (3), p.245-254</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-3476d074eb5fcf0400bfe72c36fe889d13240eccb533a361a3219fcdd8670ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-3476d074eb5fcf0400bfe72c36fe889d13240eccb533a361a3219fcdd8670ac33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7210190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27923,27924,54757</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7210190$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhi Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei Shang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications</title><title>IEEE transactions on transportation electrification</title><addtitle>TTE</addtitle><description>With rapid electrification of transportation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a comprehensive understanding of criteria used in motor selection. This paper presents the design and comparative evaluation for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) with distributed winding and concentrated winding, induction motor (IM), and switched reluctance motor (SRM) for an electric vehicle (EV) or hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) application. A fast finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach is addressed for IM design. To account for highly nonlinear motor parameters and achieve high motor efficiency, optimal current trajectories are obtained by extensive mapping for IPMSMs and IM. Optimal turn-ON and turn-OFF angles with current chopping control and angular position control are found for SRM. Additional comparison including noise vibration and harshness (NVH) is also highlighted. Simulation and analytical results show that each motor topology demonstrates its own unique characteristic for EVs/HEVs. Each motor's highest efficiency region is located at different torque-speed regions for the criteria defined. Stator geometry, pole/slot combination, and control strategy differentiate NVH performance.</description><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>EV &HEV</subject><subject>induction motor</subject><subject>NVH</subject><subject>permanent magnet motor</subject><subject>Permanent magnet motors</subject><subject>Reluctance motors</subject><subject>Rotors</subject><subject>Stator windings</subject><subject>switched reluctance motor</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Traction motors</subject><issn>2332-7782</issn><issn>2332-7782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFFPwjAUhRujiQR5N_GlP4Dhbbut2yNBFBKIRqavS2lvdQa2pSsa4p-3CDE-nZN7zzkPHyHXDEaMQX5bFNMRB5aMeCwBcn5GelwIHkmZ8fN__pIMuu4DIERFkrO0R74nzbZVTvnqE-nK78yeNpbOa4-uahx9QrdVNdaeLtVbjX4YXmanfdXUQ6pqQ1dfldfvaOgzbsJd1RrpsvGheufCZEdtsNPX3-ws6LhtN5VWh4HuilxYtelwcNI-ebmfFpNZtHh8mE_Gi0gLnvtIxDI1IGNcJ1ZbiAHWFiXXIrWYZblhgseAWq8TIZRImRKc5VYbk6USlBaiT-C4q13TdQ5t2bpqq9y-ZFAe-JWBX3ngV574hcrNsVIh4l9ccgYsB_EDZDhsvQ</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Zhi Yang</creator><creator>Fei Shang</creator><creator>Brown, Ian P.</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications</title><author>Zhi Yang ; Fei Shang ; Brown, Ian P. ; Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-3476d074eb5fcf0400bfe72c36fe889d13240eccb533a361a3219fcdd8670ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>EV &HEV</topic><topic>induction motor</topic><topic>NVH</topic><topic>permanent magnet motor</topic><topic>Permanent magnet motors</topic><topic>Reluctance motors</topic><topic>Rotors</topic><topic>Stator windings</topic><topic>switched reluctance motor</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Traction motors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhi Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei Shang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on transportation electrification</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhi Yang</au><au>Fei Shang</au><au>Brown, Ian P.</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Mahesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on transportation electrification</jtitle><stitle>TTE</stitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>245-254</pages><issn>2332-7782</issn><eissn>2332-7782</eissn><coden>ITTEBP</coden><abstract>With rapid electrification of transportation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a comprehensive understanding of criteria used in motor selection. This paper presents the design and comparative evaluation for an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) with distributed winding and concentrated winding, induction motor (IM), and switched reluctance motor (SRM) for an electric vehicle (EV) or hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) application. A fast finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach is addressed for IM design. To account for highly nonlinear motor parameters and achieve high motor efficiency, optimal current trajectories are obtained by extensive mapping for IPMSMs and IM. Optimal turn-ON and turn-OFF angles with current chopping control and angular position control are found for SRM. Additional comparison including noise vibration and harshness (NVH) is also highlighted. Simulation and analytical results show that each motor topology demonstrates its own unique characteristic for EVs/HEVs. Each motor's highest efficiency region is located at different torque-speed regions for the criteria defined. Stator geometry, pole/slot combination, and control strategy differentiate NVH performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TTE.2015.2470092</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 2332-7782 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on transportation electrification, 2015-10, Vol.1 (3), p.245-254 |
| issn | 2332-7782 2332-7782 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TTE_2015_2470092 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | comparative study EV &HEV induction motor NVH permanent magnet motor Permanent magnet motors Reluctance motors Rotors Stator windings switched reluctance motor Torque Traction motors |
| title | Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A49%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Interior%20Permanent%20Magnet,%20Induction,%20and%20Switched%20Reluctance%20Motor%20Drives%20for%20EV%20and%20HEV%20Applications&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20transportation%20electrification&rft.au=Zhi%20Yang&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=245-254&rft.issn=2332-7782&rft.eissn=2332-7782&rft.coden=ITTEBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TTE.2015.2470092&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TTE_2015_2470092%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7210190&rfr_iscdi=true |