Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture
It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S8...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems 2011-01, Vol.41 (1), p.4-13 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 13 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 4 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Covanich, W McFarlane, D |
| description | It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S88-based manufacturing system, can-under certain condition-be as reconfigurable as that of a HMS, such as holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)-based manufacturing system . This result is particularly interesting and this paper focuses on clarifying this issue. This is done by analyzing the control structure and the ease of reconfiguration of both HCBA and ISA S88-based manufacturing systems. It is found that both architectures possess similar level of ease of reconfiguration because both architectures are product-driven manufacturing control and their control functions are independent to product and production system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2060190 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TSMCC_2010_2060190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5559507</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2724347171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3faf48a035c70b26ce3539f477b7d4697fe34a6b411dc0cb894f646172a531db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CxxDpl_IrtZYmAVipikXYdOY5NU7VxcdwFf0_6EKuZke6ZGR2EHglMCAH9siw_i2JCYZgp5EA0XKEREUJllHN6PfSgeZZrKW_RXd9vAAjnmo3Qqgi7vYlt943T2uEidCmGLS5TPNh0iK7HweN5OcWlUhk2XYNnYRu61uIjGDrXpezV9K7B02jXbXIn6h7deLPt3cOljtHq_W1ZzLLF18e8mC4yy6hKGfPGc2WACSuhprl1TDDtuZS1bPjwrXeMm7zmhDQWbK009znPiaRGMNLUbIyez3v3MfwcXJ-qTTjEbjhZEWBAFPBcDSl6TtkY-j46X-1juzPxdwhVR33VSV911Fdd9A3Q0xlqnXP_gBBCC5DsDxHDamY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030180468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Covanich, W ; McFarlane, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Covanich, W ; McFarlane, D</creatorcontrib><description>It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S88-based manufacturing system, can-under certain condition-be as reconfigurable as that of a HMS, such as holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)-based manufacturing system . This result is particularly interesting and this paper focuses on clarifying this issue. This is done by analyzing the control structure and the ease of reconfiguration of both HCBA and ISA S88-based manufacturing systems. It is found that both architectures possess similar level of ease of reconfiguration because both architectures are product-driven manufacturing control and their control functions are independent to product and production system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-6977</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2060190</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCRFH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Complexity theory ; Computer architecture ; Ease of reconfiguration ; holonic ; holonic component-based architecture (HCBA) ; Industries ; ISA S88 ; Manufacturing systems ; Microprocessors ; Process control ; reconfigurability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2011-01, Vol.41 (1), p.4-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3faf48a035c70b26ce3539f477b7d4697fe34a6b411dc0cb894f646172a531db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3faf48a035c70b26ce3539f477b7d4697fe34a6b411dc0cb894f646172a531db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5559507$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5559507$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Covanich, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarlane, D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture</title><title>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</title><addtitle>TSMCC</addtitle><description>It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S88-based manufacturing system, can-under certain condition-be as reconfigurable as that of a HMS, such as holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)-based manufacturing system . This result is particularly interesting and this paper focuses on clarifying this issue. This is done by analyzing the control structure and the ease of reconfiguration of both HCBA and ISA S88-based manufacturing systems. It is found that both architectures possess similar level of ease of reconfiguration because both architectures are product-driven manufacturing control and their control functions are independent to product and production system.</description><subject>Complexity theory</subject><subject>Computer architecture</subject><subject>Ease of reconfiguration</subject><subject>holonic</subject><subject>holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)</subject><subject>Industries</subject><subject>ISA S88</subject><subject>Manufacturing systems</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Process control</subject><subject>reconfigurability</subject><issn>1094-6977</issn><issn>2168-2291</issn><issn>1558-2442</issn><issn>2168-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CxxDpl_IrtZYmAVipikXYdOY5NU7VxcdwFf0_6EKuZke6ZGR2EHglMCAH9siw_i2JCYZgp5EA0XKEREUJllHN6PfSgeZZrKW_RXd9vAAjnmo3Qqgi7vYlt943T2uEidCmGLS5TPNh0iK7HweN5OcWlUhk2XYNnYRu61uIjGDrXpezV9K7B02jXbXIn6h7deLPt3cOljtHq_W1ZzLLF18e8mC4yy6hKGfPGc2WACSuhprl1TDDtuZS1bPjwrXeMm7zmhDQWbK009znPiaRGMNLUbIyez3v3MfwcXJ-qTTjEbjhZEWBAFPBcDSl6TtkY-j46X-1juzPxdwhVR33VSV911Fdd9A3Q0xlqnXP_gBBCC5DsDxHDamY</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Covanich, W</creator><creator>McFarlane, D</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture</title><author>Covanich, W ; McFarlane, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3faf48a035c70b26ce3539f477b7d4697fe34a6b411dc0cb894f646172a531db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Complexity theory</topic><topic>Computer architecture</topic><topic>Ease of reconfiguration</topic><topic>holonic</topic><topic>holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)</topic><topic>Industries</topic><topic>ISA S88</topic><topic>Manufacturing systems</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Process control</topic><topic>reconfigurability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Covanich, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarlane, D</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Covanich, W</au><au>McFarlane, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle><stitle>TSMCC</stitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>4-13</pages><issn>1094-6977</issn><issn>2168-2291</issn><eissn>1558-2442</eissn><eissn>2168-2305</eissn><coden>ITCRFH</coden><abstract>It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S88-based manufacturing system, can-under certain condition-be as reconfigurable as that of a HMS, such as holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)-based manufacturing system . This result is particularly interesting and this paper focuses on clarifying this issue. This is done by analyzing the control structure and the ease of reconfiguration of both HCBA and ISA S88-based manufacturing systems. It is found that both architectures possess similar level of ease of reconfiguration because both architectures are product-driven manufacturing control and their control functions are independent to product and production system.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2060190</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1094-6977 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2011-01, Vol.41 (1), p.4-13 |
| issn | 1094-6977 2168-2291 1558-2442 2168-2305 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TSMCC_2010_2060190 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Complexity theory Computer architecture Ease of reconfiguration holonic holonic component-based architecture (HCBA) Industries ISA S88 Manufacturing systems Microprocessors Process control reconfigurability |
| title | Comparing the Control Structures of ISA S88- and Holonic Component-Based Architecture |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20Control%20Structures%20of%20ISA%20S88-%20and%20Holonic%20Component-Based%20Architecture&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20human-machine%20systems&rft.au=Covanich,%20W&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=4-13&rft.issn=1094-6977&rft.eissn=1558-2442&rft.coden=ITCRFH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2060190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2724347171%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030180468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5559507&rfr_iscdi=true |