Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation
This paper is concerned with the analytical calculation of the interaction force between two permanent magnets (PMs) under relative rotation by means of the surface charge method, taking into account the non-unity relative permeability of the PMs. This model combines high accuracy and short calculat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on magnetics 2016-07, Vol.52 (7), p.1-4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on magnetics |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | van Dam, J. R. M. Paulides, J. J. H. Robertson, W. S. P. Dhaens, M. Lomonova, E. A. |
description | This paper is concerned with the analytical calculation of the interaction force between two permanent magnets (PMs) under relative rotation by means of the surface charge method, taking into account the non-unity relative permeability of the PMs. This model combines high accuracy and short calculation time. As the considered PM configuration is a free-space, unbounded problem, the results from the surface charge method are compared with its numerical counterpart, the boundary element method. The analytical expressions were validated by means of the measurement results obtained from a 3-D printed test setup. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517658 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TMAG_2016_2517658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7381678</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4102725941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9c9bf91facdcc48f373052ae8d17fb8a145e19a5ed28cf5cf021d49336f1b4af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9vEzEQxS0EEqH0AyAulrhw2eBZ73ptbiEKBakRiP65rib2uN1qsw62V6IXPjsOqThwsEaWf2_Gbx5jb0AsAYT5cL1dXSxrAWpZt9CpVj9jCzANVEIo85wthABdmUY1L9mrlB7KtWlBLNjv1YTjYx4sjvxqjh4t8fU9xjviW8r3wXEfIv8RMmZy_DvFPU40Zb7Fu4ly-sg_hXlyGB_5ZqT935eTbB32B4xDChPHyfHNrwPF4QiUQbc4Dg7zEKbX7IXHMdH5Uz1jN5831-sv1eW3i6_r1WVlpTK5MtbsvIHyO2dto73spGhrJO2g8zuNxQyBwZZcra1vrRc1uMZIqTzsGvTyjL0_9T3E8HOmlPv9kCyNY3ET5tSDrttWKpCqoO_-Qx_CHMuWCtUZY8qpdaHgRNkYUork-0OxV_bQg-iPifTHRPpjIv1TIkXz9qQZiOgf30kNqtPyDwutiT4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799979928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>van Dam, J. R. M. ; Paulides, J. J. H. ; Robertson, W. S. P. ; Dhaens, M. ; Lomonova, E. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dam, J. R. M. ; Paulides, J. J. H. ; Robertson, W. S. P. ; Dhaens, M. ; Lomonova, E. A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with the analytical calculation of the interaction force between two permanent magnets (PMs) under relative rotation by means of the surface charge method, taking into account the non-unity relative permeability of the PMs. This model combines high accuracy and short calculation time. As the considered PM configuration is a free-space, unbounded problem, the results from the surface charge method are compared with its numerical counterpart, the boundary element method. The analytical expressions were validated by means of the measurement results obtained from a 3-D printed test setup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517658</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMGAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Analytical models ; Boundary element method ; electromagnetic fields ; electromagnetic forces ; Exact solutions ; Finite element analysis ; Force ; Magnetism ; Magnetostatics ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical model ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Permanent magnets ; Permeability ; Structural beams ; Surface charge</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2016-07, Vol.52 (7), p.1-4</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9c9bf91facdcc48f373052ae8d17fb8a145e19a5ed28cf5cf021d49336f1b4af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9c9bf91facdcc48f373052ae8d17fb8a145e19a5ed28cf5cf021d49336f1b4af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7381678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7381678$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dam, J. R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulides, J. J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, W. S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaens, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomonova, E. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation</title><title>IEEE transactions on magnetics</title><addtitle>TMAG</addtitle><description>This paper is concerned with the analytical calculation of the interaction force between two permanent magnets (PMs) under relative rotation by means of the surface charge method, taking into account the non-unity relative permeability of the PMs. This model combines high accuracy and short calculation time. As the considered PM configuration is a free-space, unbounded problem, the results from the surface charge method are compared with its numerical counterpart, the boundary element method. The analytical expressions were validated by means of the measurement results obtained from a 3-D printed test setup.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>electromagnetic forces</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Force</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Magnetostatics</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Permanent magnets</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Structural beams</subject><subject>Surface charge</subject><issn>0018-9464</issn><issn>1941-0069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9vEzEQxS0EEqH0AyAulrhw2eBZ73ptbiEKBakRiP65rib2uN1qsw62V6IXPjsOqThwsEaWf2_Gbx5jb0AsAYT5cL1dXSxrAWpZt9CpVj9jCzANVEIo85wthABdmUY1L9mrlB7KtWlBLNjv1YTjYx4sjvxqjh4t8fU9xjviW8r3wXEfIv8RMmZy_DvFPU40Zb7Fu4ly-sg_hXlyGB_5ZqT935eTbB32B4xDChPHyfHNrwPF4QiUQbc4Dg7zEKbX7IXHMdH5Uz1jN5831-sv1eW3i6_r1WVlpTK5MtbsvIHyO2dto73spGhrJO2g8zuNxQyBwZZcra1vrRc1uMZIqTzsGvTyjL0_9T3E8HOmlPv9kCyNY3ET5tSDrttWKpCqoO_-Qx_CHMuWCtUZY8qpdaHgRNkYUork-0OxV_bQg-iPifTHRPpjIv1TIkXz9qQZiOgf30kNqtPyDwutiT4</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>van Dam, J. R. M.</creator><creator>Paulides, J. J. H.</creator><creator>Robertson, W. S. P.</creator><creator>Dhaens, M.</creator><creator>Lomonova, E. A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation</title><author>van Dam, J. R. M. ; Paulides, J. J. H. ; Robertson, W. S. P. ; Dhaens, M. ; Lomonova, E. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9c9bf91facdcc48f373052ae8d17fb8a145e19a5ed28cf5cf021d49336f1b4af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>electromagnetic forces</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Force</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Magnetostatics</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Permanent magnets</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Structural beams</topic><topic>Surface charge</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dam, J. R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulides, J. J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, W. S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaens, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomonova, E. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dam, J. R. M.</au><au>Paulides, J. J. H.</au><au>Robertson, W. S. P.</au><au>Dhaens, M.</au><au>Lomonova, E. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle><stitle>TMAG</stitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>0018-9464</issn><eissn>1941-0069</eissn><coden>IEMGAQ</coden><abstract>This paper is concerned with the analytical calculation of the interaction force between two permanent magnets (PMs) under relative rotation by means of the surface charge method, taking into account the non-unity relative permeability of the PMs. This model combines high accuracy and short calculation time. As the considered PM configuration is a free-space, unbounded problem, the results from the surface charge method are compared with its numerical counterpart, the boundary element method. The analytical expressions were validated by means of the measurement results obtained from a 3-D printed test setup.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517658</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9464 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2016-07, Vol.52 (7), p.1-4 |
issn | 0018-9464 1941-0069 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TMAG_2016_2517658 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | 3D printing Analytical models Boundary element method electromagnetic fields electromagnetic forces Exact solutions Finite element analysis Force Magnetism Magnetostatics Mathematical analysis Mathematical model Mathematical models Numerical models Permanent magnets Permeability Structural beams Surface charge |
title | Analytical Surface Charge Method for Rotated Permanent Magnets: Boundary Element Method Comparison and Experimental Validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analytical%20Surface%20Charge%20Method%20for%20Rotated%20Permanent%20Magnets:%20Boundary%20Element%20Method%20Comparison%20and%20Experimental%20Validation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20magnetics&rft.au=van%20Dam,%20J.%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=0018-9464&rft.eissn=1941-0069&rft.coden=IEMGAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517658&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E4102725941%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799979928&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7381678&rfr_iscdi=true |