Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review

Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success and difficulties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on learning technologies 2024-01, Vol.17, p.1-14
Hauptverfasser: Sunar, Ayse Saliha, Khalid, Md Saifuddin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE transactions on learning technologies
container_volume 17
creator Sunar, Ayse Saliha
Khalid, Md Saifuddin
description Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success and difficulties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact. To address the problems, researchers use natural language processing techniques that apply the fields of machine learning, statistics and artificial intelligence to the feedback datasets for various purposes. These purposes include predicting sentiment, opinion research, insights into students' views of the course, and so on. The aim of this study is to identify themes and categories in academic research reports that use natural language processing for student feedback. Previous review studies have focused exclusively on sentiment analysis and specific techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. Our study put forward a comprehensive synthesis of various aspects, from the data to the methods used, to the data translation and labelling efforts, and to the categorisation of prediction/analysis targets in the literature. The synthesis includes two tables that allow the reader to compare the studies themselves and present the identified themes and categorisations in one figure and text. The methods, tools and data of 28 peer-reviewed papers are synthesised in 20 categories under six themes: aim and categorisation, methods and models, and tools and data (Size and Context, Language, and Labelling). Our research findings presented in this paper can inform researchers in the field in structuring their research ideas and methods, and in identifying gaps and needs in the literature for further development.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TLT.2023.3330531
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TLT_2023_3330531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10310166</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2912942997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b1eedc7ea13d5c3ade83f9915150bd8fc551a17f26b1f51de63159abb9ce8f173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFPwjAUxhujiYjePXho4sHTsK-l2-qNGFESokbg3HTdKxnChm2n4b93BA6c3nf4fd9LfoTcAhsAMPU4n84HnHExEEIwKeCM9EAJlYDI-flJviRXIawYS3mmeI8s3k1svVnTqamXrVki_fSNxRCqekkbR2exLbGOD4GOEcvC2G8aGzqpQ_StjY0PT3REZ7sQcWNiZekX_lb4d00unFkHvDnePlmMX-bPb8n043XyPJomVohhTAroNm2GBkQprTAl5sIpBRIkK8rcWSnBQOZ4WoCTUGIqQCpTFMpi7iATfXJ_2N365qfFEPWqaX3dvdRcAVdDrtSeYgfK-iYEj05vfbUxfqeB6b083cnTe3n6KK-r3B0qFSKe4AIYpKn4B4DDa4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2912942997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Sunar, Ayse Saliha ; Khalid, Md Saifuddin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunar, Ayse Saliha ; Khalid, Md Saifuddin</creatorcontrib><description>Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success and difficulties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact. To address the problems, researchers use natural language processing techniques that apply the fields of machine learning, statistics and artificial intelligence to the feedback datasets for various purposes. These purposes include predicting sentiment, opinion research, insights into students' views of the course, and so on. The aim of this study is to identify themes and categories in academic research reports that use natural language processing for student feedback. Previous review studies have focused exclusively on sentiment analysis and specific techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. Our study put forward a comprehensive synthesis of various aspects, from the data to the methods used, to the data translation and labelling efforts, and to the categorisation of prediction/analysis targets in the literature. The synthesis includes two tables that allow the reader to compare the studies themselves and present the identified themes and categorisations in one figure and text. The methods, tools and data of 28 peer-reviewed papers are synthesised in 20 categories under six themes: aim and categorisation, methods and models, and tools and data (Size and Context, Language, and Labelling). Our research findings presented in this paper can inform researchers in the field in structuring their research ideas and methods, and in identifying gaps and needs in the literature for further development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2372-0050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3330531</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITLTAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Artificial intelligence ; category prediction ; Classification ; classroom intervention ; Data mining ; Deep learning ; Education ; Feedback ; Internet ; Labeling ; Labelling ; Learning Processes ; Machine learning ; Natural language processing ; Sentiment analysis ; sentiment prediction ; Students ; students' feedback ; Synthesis ; Systematics ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 2024-01, Vol.17, p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b1eedc7ea13d5c3ade83f9915150bd8fc551a17f26b1f51de63159abb9ce8f173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b1eedc7ea13d5c3ade83f9915150bd8fc551a17f26b1f51de63159abb9ce8f173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0836-5616 ; 0000-0002-3731-2564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10310166$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10310166$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunar, Ayse Saliha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalid, Md Saifuddin</creatorcontrib><title>Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review</title><title>IEEE transactions on learning technologies</title><addtitle>TLT</addtitle><description>Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success and difficulties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact. To address the problems, researchers use natural language processing techniques that apply the fields of machine learning, statistics and artificial intelligence to the feedback datasets for various purposes. These purposes include predicting sentiment, opinion research, insights into students' views of the course, and so on. The aim of this study is to identify themes and categories in academic research reports that use natural language processing for student feedback. Previous review studies have focused exclusively on sentiment analysis and specific techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. Our study put forward a comprehensive synthesis of various aspects, from the data to the methods used, to the data translation and labelling efforts, and to the categorisation of prediction/analysis targets in the literature. The synthesis includes two tables that allow the reader to compare the studies themselves and present the identified themes and categorisations in one figure and text. The methods, tools and data of 28 peer-reviewed papers are synthesised in 20 categories under six themes: aim and categorisation, methods and models, and tools and data (Size and Context, Language, and Labelling). Our research findings presented in this paper can inform researchers in the field in structuring their research ideas and methods, and in identifying gaps and needs in the literature for further development.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>category prediction</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>classroom intervention</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Labelling</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>sentiment prediction</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>students' feedback</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>1939-1382</issn><issn>1939-1382</issn><issn>2372-0050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFPwjAUxhujiYjePXho4sHTsK-l2-qNGFESokbg3HTdKxnChm2n4b93BA6c3nf4fd9LfoTcAhsAMPU4n84HnHExEEIwKeCM9EAJlYDI-flJviRXIawYS3mmeI8s3k1svVnTqamXrVki_fSNxRCqekkbR2exLbGOD4GOEcvC2G8aGzqpQ_StjY0PT3REZ7sQcWNiZekX_lb4d00unFkHvDnePlmMX-bPb8n043XyPJomVohhTAroNm2GBkQprTAl5sIpBRIkK8rcWSnBQOZ4WoCTUGIqQCpTFMpi7iATfXJ_2N365qfFEPWqaX3dvdRcAVdDrtSeYgfK-iYEj05vfbUxfqeB6b083cnTe3n6KK-r3B0qFSKe4AIYpKn4B4DDa4A</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Sunar, Ayse Saliha</creator><creator>Khalid, Md Saifuddin</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-5616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-2564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review</title><author>Sunar, Ayse Saliha ; Khalid, Md Saifuddin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b1eedc7ea13d5c3ade83f9915150bd8fc551a17f26b1f51de63159abb9ce8f173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>category prediction</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>classroom intervention</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Labelling</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>sentiment prediction</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>students' feedback</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunar, Ayse Saliha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalid, Md Saifuddin</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on learning technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunar, Ayse Saliha</au><au>Khalid, Md Saifuddin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on learning technologies</jtitle><stitle>TLT</stitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>1939-1382</issn><eissn>1939-1382</eissn><eissn>2372-0050</eissn><coden>ITLTAT</coden><abstract>Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success and difficulties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact. To address the problems, researchers use natural language processing techniques that apply the fields of machine learning, statistics and artificial intelligence to the feedback datasets for various purposes. These purposes include predicting sentiment, opinion research, insights into students' views of the course, and so on. The aim of this study is to identify themes and categories in academic research reports that use natural language processing for student feedback. Previous review studies have focused exclusively on sentiment analysis and specific techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. Our study put forward a comprehensive synthesis of various aspects, from the data to the methods used, to the data translation and labelling efforts, and to the categorisation of prediction/analysis targets in the literature. The synthesis includes two tables that allow the reader to compare the studies themselves and present the identified themes and categorisations in one figure and text. The methods, tools and data of 28 peer-reviewed papers are synthesised in 20 categories under six themes: aim and categorisation, methods and models, and tools and data (Size and Context, Language, and Labelling). Our research findings presented in this paper can inform researchers in the field in structuring their research ideas and methods, and in identifying gaps and needs in the literature for further development.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TLT.2023.3330531</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-5616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-2564</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1939-1382
ispartof IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 2024-01, Vol.17, p.1-14
issn 1939-1382
1939-1382
2372-0050
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TLT_2023_3330531
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Analytical models
Artificial intelligence
category prediction
Classification
classroom intervention
Data mining
Deep learning
Education
Feedback
Internet
Labeling
Labelling
Learning Processes
Machine learning
Natural language processing
Sentiment analysis
sentiment prediction
Students
students' feedback
Synthesis
Systematics
Teachers
title Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A40%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20Language%20Processing%20of%20Student's%20Feedback%20to%20Instructors:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20learning%20technologies&rft.au=Sunar,%20Ayse%20Saliha&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=1939-1382&rft.eissn=1939-1382&rft.coden=ITLTAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TLT.2023.3330531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2912942997%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2912942997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10310166&rfr_iscdi=true