Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation
A function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on information theory 2018-09, Vol.64 (9), p.6454-6459 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6459 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 6454 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on information theory |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Huang, Cupjin Tan, Zihan Yang, Shenghao Guang, Xuan |
description | A function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the intermediate nodes perform network coding. The computing rate of a network code is the average number of times that the target function is computed for one use of the network, i.e., each link in the network is used at most once. In the existing papers, two cut-set bounds were proposed on the computing rate. However, we in this paper show that these bounds are not valid for general network function computation problems. We analyze the reason of the invalidity and propose a general cut-set bound by using a new equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Moreover, some results in the existing papers were proved by applying the invalid upper bound. We also justify the validity of these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIT.2018.2827405 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIT_2018_2827405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8340115</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2090813918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4f621b4a0c3fb2a223e17afc5b4fd6603b11b1e5c894d8ecaa3467e5f9c794d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3wcuC562ZfOwm3nSxWih6sJ5DNk2g1d3UJIv43zdri6eZefPeDPwQugY8A8DybrVYzQgGMSOC1AzzEzQBzutSVpydognOq1IyJs7RRYzbPDIOZILuG991tk-x8H3RDKl8t6l49EO__lNebfrx4bOYD71Jm9Hiu92Q9NhfojOnv6K9OtYp-pg_rZqXcvn2vGgelqUhElLJXEWgZRob6lqiCaEWau0Mb5lbVxWmLUALlhsh2VpYozVlVW25k6bOCqFTdHu4uwv-e7Axqa0fQp9fKoIlFkAliOzCB5cJPsZgndqFTafDrwKsRkIqE1IjIXUklCM3h8jGWvtvF5RhAE73DuFhCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090813918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Huang, Cupjin ; Tan, Zihan ; Yang, Shenghao ; Guang, Xuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Cupjin ; Tan, Zihan ; Yang, Shenghao ; Guang, Xuan</creatorcontrib><description>A function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the intermediate nodes perform network coding. The computing rate of a network code is the average number of times that the target function is computed for one use of the network, i.e., each link in the network is used at most once. In the existing papers, two cut-set bounds were proposed on the computing rate. However, we in this paper show that these bounds are not valid for general network function computation problems. We analyze the reason of the invalidity and propose a general cut-set bound by using a new equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Moreover, some results in the existing papers were proved by applying the invalid upper bound. We also justify the validity of these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2018.2827405</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETTAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Computation ; Computational modeling ; computing capacity ; Electronic mail ; Encoding ; general cut-set bound ; information theory ; Integrated circuits ; Network coding ; Network function computation ; Nodes ; tightness ; Upper bound ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on information theory, 2018-09, Vol.64 (9), p.6454-6459</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4f621b4a0c3fb2a223e17afc5b4fd6603b11b1e5c894d8ecaa3467e5f9c794d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4f621b4a0c3fb2a223e17afc5b4fd6603b11b1e5c894d8ecaa3467e5f9c794d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1987-5643 ; 0000-0002-0928-421X ; 0000-0002-7466-8033</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8340115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8340115$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Cupjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shenghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guang, Xuan</creatorcontrib><title>Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation</title><title>IEEE transactions on information theory</title><addtitle>TIT</addtitle><description>A function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the intermediate nodes perform network coding. The computing rate of a network code is the average number of times that the target function is computed for one use of the network, i.e., each link in the network is used at most once. In the existing papers, two cut-set bounds were proposed on the computing rate. However, we in this paper show that these bounds are not valid for general network function computation problems. We analyze the reason of the invalidity and propose a general cut-set bound by using a new equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Moreover, some results in the existing papers were proved by applying the invalid upper bound. We also justify the validity of these results.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>computing capacity</subject><subject>Electronic mail</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>general cut-set bound</subject><subject>information theory</subject><subject>Integrated circuits</subject><subject>Network coding</subject><subject>Network function computation</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>tightness</subject><subject>Upper bound</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>0018-9448</issn><issn>1557-9654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3wcuC562ZfOwm3nSxWih6sJ5DNk2g1d3UJIv43zdri6eZefPeDPwQugY8A8DybrVYzQgGMSOC1AzzEzQBzutSVpydognOq1IyJs7RRYzbPDIOZILuG991tk-x8H3RDKl8t6l49EO__lNebfrx4bOYD71Jm9Hiu92Q9NhfojOnv6K9OtYp-pg_rZqXcvn2vGgelqUhElLJXEWgZRob6lqiCaEWau0Mb5lbVxWmLUALlhsh2VpYozVlVW25k6bOCqFTdHu4uwv-e7Axqa0fQp9fKoIlFkAliOzCB5cJPsZgndqFTafDrwKsRkIqE1IjIXUklCM3h8jGWvtvF5RhAE73DuFhCA</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Huang, Cupjin</creator><creator>Tan, Zihan</creator><creator>Yang, Shenghao</creator><creator>Guang, Xuan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-5643</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0928-421X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8033</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation</title><author>Huang, Cupjin ; Tan, Zihan ; Yang, Shenghao ; Guang, Xuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4f621b4a0c3fb2a223e17afc5b4fd6603b11b1e5c894d8ecaa3467e5f9c794d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>computing capacity</topic><topic>Electronic mail</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>general cut-set bound</topic><topic>information theory</topic><topic>Integrated circuits</topic><topic>Network coding</topic><topic>Network function computation</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>tightness</topic><topic>Upper bound</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Cupjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shenghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guang, Xuan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on information theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Cupjin</au><au>Tan, Zihan</au><au>Yang, Shenghao</au><au>Guang, Xuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on information theory</jtitle><stitle>TIT</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6454</spage><epage>6459</epage><pages>6454-6459</pages><issn>0018-9448</issn><eissn>1557-9654</eissn><coden>IETTAW</coden><abstract>A function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the intermediate nodes perform network coding. The computing rate of a network code is the average number of times that the target function is computed for one use of the network, i.e., each link in the network is used at most once. In the existing papers, two cut-set bounds were proposed on the computing rate. However, we in this paper show that these bounds are not valid for general network function computation problems. We analyze the reason of the invalidity and propose a general cut-set bound by using a new equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Moreover, some results in the existing papers were proved by applying the invalid upper bound. We also justify the validity of these results.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIT.2018.2827405</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-5643</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0928-421X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8033</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9448 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on information theory, 2018-09, Vol.64 (9), p.6454-6459 |
issn | 0018-9448 1557-9654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIT_2018_2827405 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Computation Computational modeling computing capacity Electronic mail Encoding general cut-set bound information theory Integrated circuits Network coding Network function computation Nodes tightness Upper bound Upper bounds |
title | Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comments%20on%20Cut-Set%20Bounds%20on%20Network%20Function%20Computation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20information%20theory&rft.au=Huang,%20Cupjin&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6454&rft.epage=6459&rft.pages=6454-6459&rft.issn=0018-9448&rft.eissn=1557-9654&rft.coden=IETTAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIT.2018.2827405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2090813918%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090813918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8340115&rfr_iscdi=true |