Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks
This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 2021, Vol.70, p.1-10 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Ritzmann, Deborah Lodetti, Stefano de la Veg, David Khokhlov, Victor Gallarreta, Alexander Wright, Paul Meyer, Jan Fernandez, Igor Klingbeil, Dimitrij |
| description | This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other innovative techniques presented in the literature. This work is carried out within a novel framework that includes advanced and complex synthetic test signals, as well as real grid recordings that allow an accurate comparison of the performance of the tested methods. Specifically designed indices are employed to characterize the accuracy of the tested methods in the frequency and amplitude assessments. In light of that, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are identified. The results of this article contribute to the ongoing standardization work carried out by the IEC SC77A/WG9 with the purpose of defining a normative measurement method suitable for assessing grid disturbance levels in the range from 2 to 150 kHz. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIM.2020.3039302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2020_3039302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9264181</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2474855214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ec3952dfc40d66c0ce4e747ae0e00469e388eb20f75c56145c401c10686ee6403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFb3gpsB16lvPpNZSqhtoVUX7XqIkxdMazJ1JqHorzelxdW7i3Pvg0PIPYMJY2Ce1ovVhAOHiQBhBPALMmJKpYnRml-SEQDLEiOVviY3MW4BINUyHZFN7pt9EeroW-orusIi9gEbbLshd5--jLTygfKEKUh281-a-7bsXYclnTZ1jLVvI61b-u4PGOgrdgcfdvGWXFXFV8S78x2Tzct0nc-T5dtskT8vEyeE6BJ0wiheVk5CqbUDhxJTmRYICCC1QZFl-MGhSpVTmkk1gMwx0JlG1BLEmDyedvfBf_cYO7v1fWiHl5bLVGZKcSYHCk6UCz7GgJXdh7opwo9lYI_y7CDPHuXZs7yh8nCq1Ij4jxuuJcuY-AOPs2lB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474855214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Ritzmann, Deborah ; Lodetti, Stefano ; de la Veg, David ; Khokhlov, Victor ; Gallarreta, Alexander ; Wright, Paul ; Meyer, Jan ; Fernandez, Igor ; Klingbeil, Dimitrij</creator><creatorcontrib>Ritzmann, Deborah ; Lodetti, Stefano ; de la Veg, David ; Khokhlov, Victor ; Gallarreta, Alexander ; Wright, Paul ; Meyer, Jan ; Fernandez, Igor ; Klingbeil, Dimitrij</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other innovative techniques presented in the literature. This work is carried out within a novel framework that includes advanced and complex synthetic test signals, as well as real grid recordings that allow an accurate comparison of the performance of the tested methods. Specifically designed indices are employed to characterize the accuracy of the tested methods in the frequency and amplitude assessments. In light of that, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are identified. The results of this article contribute to the ongoing standardization work carried out by the IEC SC77A/WG9 with the purpose of defining a normative measurement method suitable for assessing grid disturbance levels in the range from 2 to 150 kHz.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3039302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEIMAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Compressed sensing ; Distortion measurement ; Frequency measurement ; Frequency ranges ; Harmonics ; high-frequency distortion ; IEC Standards ; Measurement methods ; measurement techniques ; OFDM ; Power measurement ; power quality ; Standardization ; supraharmonics ; Time-frequency analysis ; Voltage distortion</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2021, Vol.70, p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ec3952dfc40d66c0ce4e747ae0e00469e388eb20f75c56145c401c10686ee6403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ec3952dfc40d66c0ce4e747ae0e00469e388eb20f75c56145c401c10686ee6403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6884-5101 ; 0000-0002-5336-8824 ; 0000-0001-6095-3776 ; 0000-0002-9312-5886 ; 0000-0003-3831-3216 ; 0000-0003-4811-4173 ; 0000-0003-1882-3155 ; 0000-0001-6158-7122 ; 0000-0002-1199-2186</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9264181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,4010,27900,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ritzmann, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodetti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Veg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khokhlov, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallarreta, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingbeil, Dimitrij</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks</title><title>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</title><addtitle>TIM</addtitle><description>This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other innovative techniques presented in the literature. This work is carried out within a novel framework that includes advanced and complex synthetic test signals, as well as real grid recordings that allow an accurate comparison of the performance of the tested methods. Specifically designed indices are employed to characterize the accuracy of the tested methods in the frequency and amplitude assessments. In light of that, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are identified. The results of this article contribute to the ongoing standardization work carried out by the IEC SC77A/WG9 with the purpose of defining a normative measurement method suitable for assessing grid disturbance levels in the range from 2 to 150 kHz.</description><subject>Compressed sensing</subject><subject>Distortion measurement</subject><subject>Frequency measurement</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Harmonics</subject><subject>high-frequency distortion</subject><subject>IEC Standards</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>measurement techniques</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Power measurement</subject><subject>power quality</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>supraharmonics</subject><subject>Time-frequency analysis</subject><subject>Voltage distortion</subject><issn>0018-9456</issn><issn>1557-9662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFb3gpsB16lvPpNZSqhtoVUX7XqIkxdMazJ1JqHorzelxdW7i3Pvg0PIPYMJY2Ce1ovVhAOHiQBhBPALMmJKpYnRml-SEQDLEiOVviY3MW4BINUyHZFN7pt9EeroW-orusIi9gEbbLshd5--jLTygfKEKUh281-a-7bsXYclnTZ1jLVvI61b-u4PGOgrdgcfdvGWXFXFV8S78x2Tzct0nc-T5dtskT8vEyeE6BJ0wiheVk5CqbUDhxJTmRYICCC1QZFl-MGhSpVTmkk1gMwx0JlG1BLEmDyedvfBf_cYO7v1fWiHl5bLVGZKcSYHCk6UCz7GgJXdh7opwo9lYI_y7CDPHuXZs7yh8nCq1Ij4jxuuJcuY-AOPs2lB</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Ritzmann, Deborah</creator><creator>Lodetti, Stefano</creator><creator>de la Veg, David</creator><creator>Khokhlov, Victor</creator><creator>Gallarreta, Alexander</creator><creator>Wright, Paul</creator><creator>Meyer, Jan</creator><creator>Fernandez, Igor</creator><creator>Klingbeil, Dimitrij</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-5101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5336-8824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-3776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-3216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-4173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-3155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-7122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-2186</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks</title><author>Ritzmann, Deborah ; Lodetti, Stefano ; de la Veg, David ; Khokhlov, Victor ; Gallarreta, Alexander ; Wright, Paul ; Meyer, Jan ; Fernandez, Igor ; Klingbeil, Dimitrij</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ec3952dfc40d66c0ce4e747ae0e00469e388eb20f75c56145c401c10686ee6403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Compressed sensing</topic><topic>Distortion measurement</topic><topic>Frequency measurement</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Harmonics</topic><topic>high-frequency distortion</topic><topic>IEC Standards</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>measurement techniques</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Power measurement</topic><topic>power quality</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>supraharmonics</topic><topic>Time-frequency analysis</topic><topic>Voltage distortion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ritzmann, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodetti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Veg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khokhlov, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallarreta, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingbeil, Dimitrij</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ritzmann, Deborah</au><au>Lodetti, Stefano</au><au>de la Veg, David</au><au>Khokhlov, Victor</au><au>Gallarreta, Alexander</au><au>Wright, Paul</au><au>Meyer, Jan</au><au>Fernandez, Igor</au><au>Klingbeil, Dimitrij</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle><stitle>TIM</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0018-9456</issn><eissn>1557-9662</eissn><coden>IEIMAO</coden><abstract>This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other innovative techniques presented in the literature. This work is carried out within a novel framework that includes advanced and complex synthetic test signals, as well as real grid recordings that allow an accurate comparison of the performance of the tested methods. Specifically designed indices are employed to characterize the accuracy of the tested methods in the frequency and amplitude assessments. In light of that, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are identified. The results of this article contribute to the ongoing standardization work carried out by the IEC SC77A/WG9 with the purpose of defining a normative measurement method suitable for assessing grid disturbance levels in the range from 2 to 150 kHz.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIM.2020.3039302</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-5101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5336-8824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-3776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-3216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-4173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-3155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-7122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-2186</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9456 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2021, Vol.70, p.1-10 |
| issn | 0018-9456 1557-9662 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2020_3039302 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Compressed sensing Distortion measurement Frequency measurement Frequency ranges Harmonics high-frequency distortion IEC Standards Measurement methods measurement techniques OFDM Power measurement power quality Standardization supraharmonics Time-frequency analysis Voltage distortion |
| title | Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2-150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Measurement%20Methods%20for%202-150-kHz%20Conducted%20Emissions%20in%20Power%20Networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20instrumentation%20and%20measurement&rft.au=Ritzmann,%20Deborah&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0018-9456&rft.eissn=1557-9662&rft.coden=IEIMAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIM.2020.3039302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474855214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474855214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9264181&rfr_iscdi=true |