Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring

Many operations use hardware-based continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to track boiler emissions. This hardware approach uses pumps, filters, and analyzing instruments to draw emissions from the combustion equipment and measure their levels. Using hardware can be costly and time consuming...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on industry applications 2017-03, Vol.53 (2), p.1717-1721
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Keith, Cole, Dawn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1721
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1717
container_title IEEE transactions on industry applications
container_volume 53
creator Smith, Keith
Cole, Dawn
description Many operations use hardware-based continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to track boiler emissions. This hardware approach uses pumps, filters, and analyzing instruments to draw emissions from the combustion equipment and measure their levels. Using hardware can be costly and time consuming as it requires daily deployments of calibration gases to confirm the system is providing accurate measurements. And when CEMs fail, data blackouts can occur. In addition, the lifespan of hardware is short, averaging eight to ten years. Due to these factors, more and more industrial operators are abandoning hardware in favor of software for emissions monitoring. This software approach is often referred to as a predictive emissions monitoring system. This paper compares the hardware and software approaches, and features a boiler application case study to showcase the financial advantages of the software approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TIA.2016.2639456
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIA_2016_2639456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7782789</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TIA_2016_2639456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-3a8299873371c4fb3c65d0e601876fba973f6065fbf8242f7f09e93a67bf43d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j09LxDAUxIMoWFfvgpd-gdaXvDTpO5ZldRdWPLh6LWmbaMVtlqQifnu7f_A0DMwM82PslkPOOdD9ZlXlArjKhUKShTpjCSekjFDpc5YAEGZEJC_ZVYyfAFwWXCaMXrwbf0yw6ZsN8TumSxO6g692u-BN-5GOPl1s-xh7P8T0yQ_96EM_vF-zC2e-or056Yy9Piw282W2fn5czat11k5PxgxNKYhKjah5K12DrSo6sAp4qZVrDGl0ClThGlcKKZx2QJbQKN04iZ3AGYPjbht8jMG6ehf6rQm_NYd6j15P6PUevT6hT5W7Y6W31v7HtS6FLgn_AN5EVJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Smith, Keith ; Cole, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Keith ; Cole, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>Many operations use hardware-based continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to track boiler emissions. This hardware approach uses pumps, filters, and analyzing instruments to draw emissions from the combustion equipment and measure their levels. Using hardware can be costly and time consuming as it requires daily deployments of calibration gases to confirm the system is providing accurate measurements. And when CEMs fail, data blackouts can occur. In addition, the lifespan of hardware is short, averaging eight to ten years. Due to these factors, more and more industrial operators are abandoning hardware in favor of software for emissions monitoring. This software approach is often referred to as a predictive emissions monitoring system. This paper compares the hardware and software approaches, and features a boiler application case study to showcase the financial advantages of the software approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-9994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2639456</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITIACR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Boiler emissions ; Boilers ; Companies ; continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) ; emissions monitoring ; environmental compliance ; Hardware ; Monitoring ; predictive emissions monitoring system (PEMS) ; Sensor systems ; Software</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on industry applications, 2017-03, Vol.53 (2), p.1717-1721</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-3a8299873371c4fb3c65d0e601876fba973f6065fbf8242f7f09e93a67bf43d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7782789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7782789$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring</title><title>IEEE transactions on industry applications</title><addtitle>TIA</addtitle><description>Many operations use hardware-based continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to track boiler emissions. This hardware approach uses pumps, filters, and analyzing instruments to draw emissions from the combustion equipment and measure their levels. Using hardware can be costly and time consuming as it requires daily deployments of calibration gases to confirm the system is providing accurate measurements. And when CEMs fail, data blackouts can occur. In addition, the lifespan of hardware is short, averaging eight to ten years. Due to these factors, more and more industrial operators are abandoning hardware in favor of software for emissions monitoring. This software approach is often referred to as a predictive emissions monitoring system. This paper compares the hardware and software approaches, and features a boiler application case study to showcase the financial advantages of the software approach.</description><subject>Boiler emissions</subject><subject>Boilers</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS)</subject><subject>emissions monitoring</subject><subject>environmental compliance</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>predictive emissions monitoring system (PEMS)</subject><subject>Sensor systems</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0093-9994</issn><issn>1939-9367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j09LxDAUxIMoWFfvgpd-gdaXvDTpO5ZldRdWPLh6LWmbaMVtlqQifnu7f_A0DMwM82PslkPOOdD9ZlXlArjKhUKShTpjCSekjFDpc5YAEGZEJC_ZVYyfAFwWXCaMXrwbf0yw6ZsN8TumSxO6g692u-BN-5GOPl1s-xh7P8T0yQ_96EM_vF-zC2e-or056Yy9Piw282W2fn5czat11k5PxgxNKYhKjah5K12DrSo6sAp4qZVrDGl0ClThGlcKKZx2QJbQKN04iZ3AGYPjbht8jMG6ehf6rQm_NYd6j15P6PUevT6hT5W7Y6W31v7HtS6FLgn_AN5EVJA</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Smith, Keith</creator><creator>Cole, Dawn</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring</title><author>Smith, Keith ; Cole, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-3a8299873371c4fb3c65d0e601876fba973f6065fbf8242f7f09e93a67bf43d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boiler emissions</topic><topic>Boilers</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS)</topic><topic>emissions monitoring</topic><topic>environmental compliance</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>predictive emissions monitoring system (PEMS)</topic><topic>Sensor systems</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industry applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Keith</au><au>Cole, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industry applications</jtitle><stitle>TIA</stitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1717</spage><epage>1721</epage><pages>1717-1721</pages><issn>0093-9994</issn><eissn>1939-9367</eissn><coden>ITIACR</coden><abstract>Many operations use hardware-based continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to track boiler emissions. This hardware approach uses pumps, filters, and analyzing instruments to draw emissions from the combustion equipment and measure their levels. Using hardware can be costly and time consuming as it requires daily deployments of calibration gases to confirm the system is providing accurate measurements. And when CEMs fail, data blackouts can occur. In addition, the lifespan of hardware is short, averaging eight to ten years. Due to these factors, more and more industrial operators are abandoning hardware in favor of software for emissions monitoring. This software approach is often referred to as a predictive emissions monitoring system. This paper compares the hardware and software approaches, and features a boiler application case study to showcase the financial advantages of the software approach.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIA.2016.2639456</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0093-9994
ispartof IEEE transactions on industry applications, 2017-03, Vol.53 (2), p.1717-1721
issn 0093-9994
1939-9367
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIA_2016_2639456
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Boiler emissions
Boilers
Companies
continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS)
emissions monitoring
environmental compliance
Hardware
Monitoring
predictive emissions monitoring system (PEMS)
Sensor systems
Software
title Software Versus Hardware Approach to Emissions Monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Software%20Versus%20Hardware%20Approach%20to%20Emissions%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20industry%20applications&rft.au=Smith,%20Keith&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1717&rft.epage=1721&rft.pages=1717-1721&rft.issn=0093-9994&rft.eissn=1939-9367&rft.coden=ITIACR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIA.2016.2639456&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TIA_2016_2639456%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7782789&rfr_iscdi=true