A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET

In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) deg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electron devices 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291
Hauptverfasser: Qiu, Yingxin, Wang, Runsheng, Huang, Qianqian, Huang, Ru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1291
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1284
container_title IEEE transactions on electron devices
container_volume 61
creator Qiu, Yingxin
Wang, Runsheng
Huang, Qianqian
Huang, Ru
description In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TED.2014.2312330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TED_2014_2312330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6784029</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1620040779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3wUvAi5fOlx9NmuOYUweTIavnkKapdmxtTVph_70ZGx48vfe-fN7j8UHolsCEEFCP-fxpQoHwCWWEMgZnaETSVCZKcHGORgAkSxTL2CW6CmETR8E5HaH3KZ61u85409c_Dq_7odzjtsH9l8OLmNs-4LbCi6Z3vjLW4dybLhyIfGgat62bT_w8z7FpSvy2Wsf2Gl1UZhvczamO0UdMZ6_JcvWymE2XieVM9onIOC0EM2CLsqSqyKRSJVSguCDcFtQSZi03htiCg6osSEMqVmbAFSkrZ9kYPRzvdr79Hlzo9a4O1m23pnHtEDQRFICDlCqi9__QTTv4Jn6nScrTTIGQJFJwpKxvQ_Cu0p2vd8bvNQF9cKyjY31wrE-O48rdcaV2zv3hQmYcqGK_DpV1Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545890671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TED.2014.2312330</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETDAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Charge ; Charge neutrality level (CNL) ; Degradation ; Devices ; Energy distribution ; Fluctuation ; high-κ ; interface trap ; Junctions ; MOSFET ; MOSFET circuits ; MOSFETs ; Optimization ; performance degradation ; Photonic band gap ; random trap fluctuation (RTF) ; Silicon ; Tunneling ; tunneling FET (TFET) ; variability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6784029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6784029$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><title>IEEE transactions on electron devices</title><addtitle>TED</addtitle><description>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</description><subject>Charge</subject><subject>Charge neutrality level (CNL)</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Fluctuation</subject><subject>high-κ</subject><subject>interface trap</subject><subject>Junctions</subject><subject>MOSFET</subject><subject>MOSFET circuits</subject><subject>MOSFETs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>performance degradation</subject><subject>Photonic band gap</subject><subject>random trap fluctuation (RTF)</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Tunneling</subject><subject>tunneling FET (TFET)</subject><subject>variability</subject><issn>0018-9383</issn><issn>1557-9646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3wUvAi5fOlx9NmuOYUweTIavnkKapdmxtTVph_70ZGx48vfe-fN7j8UHolsCEEFCP-fxpQoHwCWWEMgZnaETSVCZKcHGORgAkSxTL2CW6CmETR8E5HaH3KZ61u85409c_Dq_7odzjtsH9l8OLmNs-4LbCi6Z3vjLW4dybLhyIfGgat62bT_w8z7FpSvy2Wsf2Gl1UZhvczamO0UdMZ6_JcvWymE2XieVM9onIOC0EM2CLsqSqyKRSJVSguCDcFtQSZi03htiCg6osSEMqVmbAFSkrZ9kYPRzvdr79Hlzo9a4O1m23pnHtEDQRFICDlCqi9__QTTv4Jn6nScrTTIGQJFJwpKxvQ_Cu0p2vd8bvNQF9cKyjY31wrE-O48rdcaV2zv3hQmYcqGK_DpV1Tg</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Qiu, Yingxin</creator><creator>Wang, Runsheng</creator><creator>Huang, Qianqian</creator><creator>Huang, Ru</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><author>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Charge</topic><topic>Charge neutrality level (CNL)</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Fluctuation</topic><topic>high-κ</topic><topic>interface trap</topic><topic>Junctions</topic><topic>MOSFET</topic><topic>MOSFET circuits</topic><topic>MOSFETs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>performance degradation</topic><topic>Photonic band gap</topic><topic>random trap fluctuation (RTF)</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Tunneling</topic><topic>tunneling FET (TFET)</topic><topic>variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on electron devices</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiu, Yingxin</au><au>Wang, Runsheng</au><au>Huang, Qianqian</au><au>Huang, Ru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on electron devices</jtitle><stitle>TED</stitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1284</spage><epage>1291</epage><pages>1284-1291</pages><issn>0018-9383</issn><eissn>1557-9646</eissn><coden>IETDAI</coden><abstract>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TED.2014.2312330</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0018-9383
ispartof IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291
issn 0018-9383
1557-9646
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TED_2014_2312330
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Charge
Charge neutrality level (CNL)
Degradation
Devices
Energy distribution
Fluctuation
high-κ
interface trap
Junctions
MOSFET
MOSFET circuits
MOSFETs
Optimization
performance degradation
Photonic band gap
random trap fluctuation (RTF)
Silicon
Tunneling
tunneling FET (TFET)
variability
title A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20the%20Impacts%20of%20Interface%20Traps%20on%20Tunneling%20FET%20and%20MOSFET&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20electron%20devices&rft.au=Qiu,%20Yingxin&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1284&rft.epage=1291&rft.pages=1284-1291&rft.issn=0018-9383&rft.eissn=1557-9646&rft.coden=IETDAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TED.2014.2312330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1620040779%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545890671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6784029&rfr_iscdi=true