A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET
In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) deg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on electron devices 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1284 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on electron devices |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Qiu, Yingxin Wang, Runsheng Huang, Qianqian Huang, Ru |
description | In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TED.2014.2312330 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TED_2014_2312330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6784029</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1620040779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3wUvAi5fOlx9NmuOYUweTIavnkKapdmxtTVph_70ZGx48vfe-fN7j8UHolsCEEFCP-fxpQoHwCWWEMgZnaETSVCZKcHGORgAkSxTL2CW6CmETR8E5HaH3KZ61u85409c_Dq_7odzjtsH9l8OLmNs-4LbCi6Z3vjLW4dybLhyIfGgat62bT_w8z7FpSvy2Wsf2Gl1UZhvczamO0UdMZ6_JcvWymE2XieVM9onIOC0EM2CLsqSqyKRSJVSguCDcFtQSZi03htiCg6osSEMqVmbAFSkrZ9kYPRzvdr79Hlzo9a4O1m23pnHtEDQRFICDlCqi9__QTTv4Jn6nScrTTIGQJFJwpKxvQ_Cu0p2vd8bvNQF9cKyjY31wrE-O48rdcaV2zv3hQmYcqGK_DpV1Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545890671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TED.2014.2312330</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETDAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Charge ; Charge neutrality level (CNL) ; Degradation ; Devices ; Energy distribution ; Fluctuation ; high-κ ; interface trap ; Junctions ; MOSFET ; MOSFET circuits ; MOSFETs ; Optimization ; performance degradation ; Photonic band gap ; random trap fluctuation (RTF) ; Silicon ; Tunneling ; tunneling FET (TFET) ; variability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6784029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6784029$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><title>IEEE transactions on electron devices</title><addtitle>TED</addtitle><description>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</description><subject>Charge</subject><subject>Charge neutrality level (CNL)</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Fluctuation</subject><subject>high-κ</subject><subject>interface trap</subject><subject>Junctions</subject><subject>MOSFET</subject><subject>MOSFET circuits</subject><subject>MOSFETs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>performance degradation</subject><subject>Photonic band gap</subject><subject>random trap fluctuation (RTF)</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Tunneling</subject><subject>tunneling FET (TFET)</subject><subject>variability</subject><issn>0018-9383</issn><issn>1557-9646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3wUvAi5fOlx9NmuOYUweTIavnkKapdmxtTVph_70ZGx48vfe-fN7j8UHolsCEEFCP-fxpQoHwCWWEMgZnaETSVCZKcHGORgAkSxTL2CW6CmETR8E5HaH3KZ61u85409c_Dq_7odzjtsH9l8OLmNs-4LbCi6Z3vjLW4dybLhyIfGgat62bT_w8z7FpSvy2Wsf2Gl1UZhvczamO0UdMZ6_JcvWymE2XieVM9onIOC0EM2CLsqSqyKRSJVSguCDcFtQSZi03htiCg6osSEMqVmbAFSkrZ9kYPRzvdr79Hlzo9a4O1m23pnHtEDQRFICDlCqi9__QTTv4Jn6nScrTTIGQJFJwpKxvQ_Cu0p2vd8bvNQF9cKyjY31wrE-O48rdcaV2zv3hQmYcqGK_DpV1Tg</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Qiu, Yingxin</creator><creator>Wang, Runsheng</creator><creator>Huang, Qianqian</creator><creator>Huang, Ru</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</title><author>Qiu, Yingxin ; Wang, Runsheng ; Huang, Qianqian ; Huang, Ru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-6842b63a0cbdd29b8799d0f094614cb2c13cc4aa1cb409fc07a1f3d80491dfec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Charge</topic><topic>Charge neutrality level (CNL)</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Fluctuation</topic><topic>high-κ</topic><topic>interface trap</topic><topic>Junctions</topic><topic>MOSFET</topic><topic>MOSFET circuits</topic><topic>MOSFETs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>performance degradation</topic><topic>Photonic band gap</topic><topic>random trap fluctuation (RTF)</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Tunneling</topic><topic>tunneling FET (TFET)</topic><topic>variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yingxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ru</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on electron devices</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiu, Yingxin</au><au>Wang, Runsheng</au><au>Huang, Qianqian</au><au>Huang, Ru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on electron devices</jtitle><stitle>TED</stitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1284</spage><epage>1291</epage><pages>1284-1291</pages><issn>0018-9383</issn><eissn>1557-9646</eissn><coden>IETDAI</coden><abstract>In this paper, the impacts of interface traps on tunneling FET (TFET) are examined in terms of different trap energies and distributions, charge neutrality level (CNL), and effects of random trap fluctuation, in comparison with MOSFET. It is found that the V th shifts and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation induced by interface traps in TFET and MOSFET have the same trends, but the impacts on I ON are different because of the novel conduction mechanism of TFETs when compared with MOSFETs. Moreover, nTFET is intrinsically more immune (or susceptible) to V th shift induced by acceptor(or donor-) type interface traps than nMOSFET. Therefore, reducing the potential degradation induced by the interface traps can be achieved by optimizing the position of CNL. The results indicate that nTFET is more immune to the V th shift than nMOSFET with CNL below a critical energy. In addition, the trap-induced SS degradation of TFET is severer than MOSFET in electrostatics. Moreover, it is found that the I ON , V th , and IOFF fluctuations in nMOSFET and nTFET are also dependent on the position of CNL. With CNL below the critical energy, the I ON fluctuation and V th fluctuation of nTFET are smaller than those of nMOSFET. The results are helpful for the interface optimization of TFETs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TED.2014.2312330</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9383 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2014-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1284-1291 |
issn | 0018-9383 1557-9646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TED_2014_2312330 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Charge Charge neutrality level (CNL) Degradation Devices Energy distribution Fluctuation high-κ interface trap Junctions MOSFET MOSFET circuits MOSFETs Optimization performance degradation Photonic band gap random trap fluctuation (RTF) Silicon Tunneling tunneling FET (TFET) variability |
title | A Comparative Study on the Impacts of Interface Traps on Tunneling FET and MOSFET |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20the%20Impacts%20of%20Interface%20Traps%20on%20Tunneling%20FET%20and%20MOSFET&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20electron%20devices&rft.au=Qiu,%20Yingxin&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1284&rft.epage=1291&rft.pages=1284-1291&rft.issn=0018-9383&rft.eissn=1557-9646&rft.coden=IETDAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TED.2014.2312330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1620040779%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545890671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6784029&rfr_iscdi=true |