FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims
This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE MICRO 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | IEEE MICRO |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Stern, Richard H. |
description | This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MM.2017.3211106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MM_2017_3211106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8013505</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1930882484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwM7BYYmAh7fmRh9mqiAJSI4paViynsUtKHsVOhvLXY5SK6XS673en-xC6JjAhBMQ0yyYUSDxhlPg-OkEjIlgccMLZKRoBjWlAYkbP0YVzOwAIKSQj9DFfp1g1BZ7t95XGq17jt15Vm7ausWktTnVV4eVn2_hZ5zlli_JHdWXb4NVXX1VFv91qe7jHS2U7TB-GPXcOp5Uqa3eJzoyqnL461jF6nz-u0-dg8fr0ks4WwYYmoguMASEMVyQpRExNDkKpiEcxFxHlSvDIP6GNYDqHnCvFNAijEgG5yTkNw5yN0e2wd2_b7167Tu7a3jb-pPQWIEkoT7inpgO1sa1zVhu5t2Wt7EESkH8SZZbJP4nyKNEnboZEqbX-pxMgLISQ_QI1OGtm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930882484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Stern, Richard H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><description>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-1732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MM.2017.3211106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMIDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Alamitos: IEEE</publisher><subject>antitrust ; Apple ; breach of contract ; Cellular phones ; Companies ; Legal aspects ; Licenses ; Long Term Evolution ; Multiaccess communication ; Qualcomm ; rebate ; skullduggery ; Standardization</subject><ispartof>IEEE MICRO, 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8013505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8013505$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><title>IEEE MICRO</title><addtitle>MM</addtitle><description>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</description><subject>antitrust</subject><subject>Apple</subject><subject>breach of contract</subject><subject>Cellular phones</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Legal aspects</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Long Term Evolution</subject><subject>Multiaccess communication</subject><subject>Qualcomm</subject><subject>rebate</subject><subject>skullduggery</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><issn>0272-1732</issn><issn>1937-4143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwM7BYYmAh7fmRh9mqiAJSI4paViynsUtKHsVOhvLXY5SK6XS673en-xC6JjAhBMQ0yyYUSDxhlPg-OkEjIlgccMLZKRoBjWlAYkbP0YVzOwAIKSQj9DFfp1g1BZ7t95XGq17jt15Vm7ausWktTnVV4eVn2_hZ5zlli_JHdWXb4NVXX1VFv91qe7jHS2U7TB-GPXcOp5Uqa3eJzoyqnL461jF6nz-u0-dg8fr0ks4WwYYmoguMASEMVyQpRExNDkKpiEcxFxHlSvDIP6GNYDqHnCvFNAijEgG5yTkNw5yN0e2wd2_b7167Tu7a3jb-pPQWIEkoT7inpgO1sa1zVhu5t2Wt7EESkH8SZZbJP4nyKNEnboZEqbX-pxMgLISQ_QI1OGtm</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Stern, Richard H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><author>Stern, Richard H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>antitrust</topic><topic>Apple</topic><topic>breach of contract</topic><topic>Cellular phones</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Legal aspects</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Long Term Evolution</topic><topic>Multiaccess communication</topic><topic>Qualcomm</topic><topic>rebate</topic><topic>skullduggery</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE MICRO</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stern, Richard H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</atitle><jtitle>IEEE MICRO</jtitle><stitle>MM</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>72-81</pages><issn>0272-1732</issn><eissn>1937-4143</eissn><coden>IEMIDZ</coden><abstract>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</abstract><cop>Los Alamitos</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MM.2017.3211106</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-1732 |
ispartof | IEEE MICRO, 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81 |
issn | 0272-1732 1937-4143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MM_2017_3211106 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | antitrust Apple breach of contract Cellular phones Companies Legal aspects Licenses Long Term Evolution Multiaccess communication Qualcomm rebate skullduggery Standardization |
title | FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A48%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FTC%20and%20Apple%20Sue%20Qualcomm%20for%20Cell%20Phone%20Standardization%20Skullduggery,%20Part%202:%20Apple's%20Claims&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20MICRO&rft.au=Stern,%20Richard%20H.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=72-81&rft.issn=0272-1732&rft.eissn=1937-4143&rft.coden=IEMIDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MM.2017.3211106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1930882484%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930882484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8013505&rfr_iscdi=true |