FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims

This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE MICRO 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81
1. Verfasser: Stern, Richard H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 4
container_start_page 72
container_title IEEE MICRO
container_volume 37
creator Stern, Richard H.
description This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/MM.2017.3211106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MM_2017_3211106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8013505</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1930882484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwM7BYYmAh7fmRh9mqiAJSI4paViynsUtKHsVOhvLXY5SK6XS673en-xC6JjAhBMQ0yyYUSDxhlPg-OkEjIlgccMLZKRoBjWlAYkbP0YVzOwAIKSQj9DFfp1g1BZ7t95XGq17jt15Vm7ausWktTnVV4eVn2_hZ5zlli_JHdWXb4NVXX1VFv91qe7jHS2U7TB-GPXcOp5Uqa3eJzoyqnL461jF6nz-u0-dg8fr0ks4WwYYmoguMASEMVyQpRExNDkKpiEcxFxHlSvDIP6GNYDqHnCvFNAijEgG5yTkNw5yN0e2wd2_b7167Tu7a3jb-pPQWIEkoT7inpgO1sa1zVhu5t2Wt7EESkH8SZZbJP4nyKNEnboZEqbX-pxMgLISQ_QI1OGtm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930882484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Stern, Richard H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><description>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-1732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MM.2017.3211106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMIDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Alamitos: IEEE</publisher><subject>antitrust ; Apple ; breach of contract ; Cellular phones ; Companies ; Legal aspects ; Licenses ; Long Term Evolution ; Multiaccess communication ; Qualcomm ; rebate ; skullduggery ; Standardization</subject><ispartof>IEEE MICRO, 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8013505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8013505$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><title>IEEE MICRO</title><addtitle>MM</addtitle><description>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</description><subject>antitrust</subject><subject>Apple</subject><subject>breach of contract</subject><subject>Cellular phones</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Legal aspects</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Long Term Evolution</subject><subject>Multiaccess communication</subject><subject>Qualcomm</subject><subject>rebate</subject><subject>skullduggery</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><issn>0272-1732</issn><issn>1937-4143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EEqUwM7BYYmAh7fmRh9mqiAJSI4paViynsUtKHsVOhvLXY5SK6XS673en-xC6JjAhBMQ0yyYUSDxhlPg-OkEjIlgccMLZKRoBjWlAYkbP0YVzOwAIKSQj9DFfp1g1BZ7t95XGq17jt15Vm7ausWktTnVV4eVn2_hZ5zlli_JHdWXb4NVXX1VFv91qe7jHS2U7TB-GPXcOp5Uqa3eJzoyqnL461jF6nz-u0-dg8fr0ks4WwYYmoguMASEMVyQpRExNDkKpiEcxFxHlSvDIP6GNYDqHnCvFNAijEgG5yTkNw5yN0e2wd2_b7167Tu7a3jb-pPQWIEkoT7inpgO1sa1zVhu5t2Wt7EESkH8SZZbJP4nyKNEnboZEqbX-pxMgLISQ_QI1OGtm</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Stern, Richard H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</title><author>Stern, Richard H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ff099f4a18d972fb09aa646749624a946143ef93eb0b4aa3e09fa890bfb4255b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>antitrust</topic><topic>Apple</topic><topic>breach of contract</topic><topic>Cellular phones</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Legal aspects</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Long Term Evolution</topic><topic>Multiaccess communication</topic><topic>Qualcomm</topic><topic>rebate</topic><topic>skullduggery</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE MICRO</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stern, Richard H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims</atitle><jtitle>IEEE MICRO</jtitle><stitle>MM</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>72-81</pages><issn>0272-1732</issn><eissn>1937-4143</eissn><coden>IEMIDZ</coden><abstract>This article, the second in a multipart series, discusses Apple's complaint against Qualcomm-namely, that Qualcomm breached its contract to pay Apple a billion dollars in rebates, and engaged in anticompetitive practices injuring Apple.</abstract><cop>Los Alamitos</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MM.2017.3211106</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0272-1732
ispartof IEEE MICRO, 2017, Vol.37 (4), p.72-81
issn 0272-1732
1937-4143
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MM_2017_3211106
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects antitrust
Apple
breach of contract
Cellular phones
Companies
Legal aspects
Licenses
Long Term Evolution
Multiaccess communication
Qualcomm
rebate
skullduggery
Standardization
title FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 2: Apple's Claims
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A48%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FTC%20and%20Apple%20Sue%20Qualcomm%20for%20Cell%20Phone%20Standardization%20Skullduggery,%20Part%202:%20Apple's%20Claims&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20MICRO&rft.au=Stern,%20Richard%20H.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=72-81&rft.issn=0272-1732&rft.eissn=1937-4143&rft.coden=IEMIDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MM.2017.3211106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1930882484%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930882484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8013505&rfr_iscdi=true