Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks
Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE communications letters 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2287 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2284 |
container_title | IEEE communications letters |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Choi, Sang-Il Koh, Seok-Joo |
description | Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_LCOMM_2016_2601318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7547316</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1839154861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cV3snaGddonEBwkIC9i4mZTOLQ7CVNtB5d87OMTNfeSec27yEXINvAfA9d14OJ1MegkH2UskhxTUCemAEIolTTltZq40yzKtzslFjGvOuUoEdMjrIiL1js6C_9nTiV-WG6Sj2Zekzod2L-vmYCqzwi1WNS0rOvSDGbs3EQs6qmoMFdbMOzZ_K6tVpC9Yf_vwHi_JmTObiFfH3iWLx4f58JmNp0-j4WDMbKJFzRxYV5hMG5mk6VJqYYAvrU3BadQ8ExattUZzXujCKiesVBlaAFn0DbqCp11y2-Z-BP-5w1jna78LVfMyB5VqEH0loVElrcoGH2NAl3-EcmvCPgeeHxjmfwzzA8P8yLAx3bSmEhH_DZnoZynI9BcrDG2b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839154861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-7798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICLEF6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Anchors ; CoAP ; Computer networks ; Data transmission ; Delay ; Delays ; Electronic devices ; Gateways ; Handover ; Internet of Things ; IP (Internet Protocol) ; Messages ; Mobile radio mobility management ; mobile sensor devices ; Mobility management ; Performance evaluation ; PMIPv6 ; Remote control ; Remote sensors</subject><ispartof>IEEE communications letters, 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7547316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7547316$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><title>IEEE communications letters</title><addtitle>COML</addtitle><description>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</description><subject>Anchors</subject><subject>CoAP</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Delays</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Gateways</subject><subject>Handover</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>IP (Internet Protocol)</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Mobile radio mobility management</subject><subject>mobile sensor devices</subject><subject>Mobility management</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>PMIPv6</subject><subject>Remote control</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><issn>1089-7798</issn><issn>1558-2558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cV3snaGddonEBwkIC9i4mZTOLQ7CVNtB5d87OMTNfeSec27yEXINvAfA9d14OJ1MegkH2UskhxTUCemAEIolTTltZq40yzKtzslFjGvOuUoEdMjrIiL1js6C_9nTiV-WG6Sj2Zekzod2L-vmYCqzwi1WNS0rOvSDGbs3EQs6qmoMFdbMOzZ_K6tVpC9Yf_vwHi_JmTObiFfH3iWLx4f58JmNp0-j4WDMbKJFzRxYV5hMG5mk6VJqYYAvrU3BadQ8ExattUZzXujCKiesVBlaAFn0DbqCp11y2-Z-BP-5w1jna78LVfMyB5VqEH0loVElrcoGH2NAl3-EcmvCPgeeHxjmfwzzA8P8yLAx3bSmEhH_DZnoZynI9BcrDG2b</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Choi, Sang-Il</creator><creator>Koh, Seok-Joo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><author>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anchors</topic><topic>CoAP</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Delays</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Gateways</topic><topic>Handover</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>IP (Internet Protocol)</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Mobile radio mobility management</topic><topic>mobile sensor devices</topic><topic>Mobility management</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>PMIPv6</topic><topic>Remote control</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE communications letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Sang-Il</au><au>Koh, Seok-Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE communications letters</jtitle><stitle>COML</stitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2284</spage><epage>2287</epage><pages>2284-2287</pages><issn>1089-7798</issn><eissn>1558-2558</eissn><coden>ICLEF6</coden><abstract>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1089-7798 |
ispartof | IEEE communications letters, 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287 |
issn | 1089-7798 1558-2558 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_LCOMM_2016_2601318 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Anchors CoAP Computer networks Data transmission Delay Delays Electronic devices Gateways Handover Internet of Things IP (Internet Protocol) Messages Mobile radio mobility management mobile sensor devices Mobility management Performance evaluation PMIPv6 Remote control Remote sensors |
title | Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Proxy%20Mobile%20IPv6%20for%20Mobility%20Management%20in%20CoAP-Based%20Internet-of-Things%20Networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20communications%20letters&rft.au=Choi,%20Sang-Il&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2284&rft.epage=2287&rft.pages=2284-2287&rft.issn=1089-7798&rft.eissn=1558-2558&rft.coden=ICLEF6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1839154861%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839154861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7547316&rfr_iscdi=true |