Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks

Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE communications letters 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Sang-Il, Koh, Seok-Joo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2287
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2284
container_title IEEE communications letters
container_volume 20
creator Choi, Sang-Il
Koh, Seok-Joo
description Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_LCOMM_2016_2601318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7547316</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1839154861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cV3snaGddonEBwkIC9i4mZTOLQ7CVNtB5d87OMTNfeSec27yEXINvAfA9d14OJ1MegkH2UskhxTUCemAEIolTTltZq40yzKtzslFjGvOuUoEdMjrIiL1js6C_9nTiV-WG6Sj2Zekzod2L-vmYCqzwi1WNS0rOvSDGbs3EQs6qmoMFdbMOzZ_K6tVpC9Yf_vwHi_JmTObiFfH3iWLx4f58JmNp0-j4WDMbKJFzRxYV5hMG5mk6VJqYYAvrU3BadQ8ExattUZzXujCKiesVBlaAFn0DbqCp11y2-Z-BP-5w1jna78LVfMyB5VqEH0loVElrcoGH2NAl3-EcmvCPgeeHxjmfwzzA8P8yLAx3bSmEhH_DZnoZynI9BcrDG2b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839154861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-7798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICLEF6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Anchors ; CoAP ; Computer networks ; Data transmission ; Delay ; Delays ; Electronic devices ; Gateways ; Handover ; Internet of Things ; IP (Internet Protocol) ; Messages ; Mobile radio mobility management ; mobile sensor devices ; Mobility management ; Performance evaluation ; PMIPv6 ; Remote control ; Remote sensors</subject><ispartof>IEEE communications letters, 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7547316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7547316$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><title>IEEE communications letters</title><addtitle>COML</addtitle><description>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</description><subject>Anchors</subject><subject>CoAP</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Delays</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Gateways</subject><subject>Handover</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>IP (Internet Protocol)</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Mobile radio mobility management</subject><subject>mobile sensor devices</subject><subject>Mobility management</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>PMIPv6</subject><subject>Remote control</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><issn>1089-7798</issn><issn>1558-2558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cV3snaGddonEBwkIC9i4mZTOLQ7CVNtB5d87OMTNfeSec27yEXINvAfA9d14OJ1MegkH2UskhxTUCemAEIolTTltZq40yzKtzslFjGvOuUoEdMjrIiL1js6C_9nTiV-WG6Sj2Zekzod2L-vmYCqzwi1WNS0rOvSDGbs3EQs6qmoMFdbMOzZ_K6tVpC9Yf_vwHi_JmTObiFfH3iWLx4f58JmNp0-j4WDMbKJFzRxYV5hMG5mk6VJqYYAvrU3BadQ8ExattUZzXujCKiesVBlaAFn0DbqCp11y2-Z-BP-5w1jna78LVfMyB5VqEH0loVElrcoGH2NAl3-EcmvCPgeeHxjmfwzzA8P8yLAx3bSmEhH_DZnoZynI9BcrDG2b</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Choi, Sang-Il</creator><creator>Koh, Seok-Joo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</title><author>Choi, Sang-Il ; Koh, Seok-Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f1cfda79a6233b695a10bcc31f9e9075ceccca900d9dc8f5c687ec116d4aefd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anchors</topic><topic>CoAP</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Delays</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Gateways</topic><topic>Handover</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>IP (Internet Protocol)</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Mobile radio mobility management</topic><topic>mobile sensor devices</topic><topic>Mobility management</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>PMIPv6</topic><topic>Remote control</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Seok-Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE communications letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Sang-Il</au><au>Koh, Seok-Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE communications letters</jtitle><stitle>COML</stitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2284</spage><epage>2287</epage><pages>2284-2287</pages><issn>1089-7798</issn><eissn>1558-2558</eissn><coden>ICLEF6</coden><abstract>Recently, the constrained application protocol (CoAP) has been standardized for remote control of various sensor devices in Internet of Things networks. In CoAP, to support the handover of mobile devices, service discovery should be performed again. So, the handover delay may be increased significantly. To address this limitation of CoAP, in this letter, we propose the two mobility management schemes based on the proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6): CoAP-PMIP and CoAP-DPMIP. In CoAP-PMIP, local mobility anchor (LMA) and mobile access gateways (MAGs) are used to provide network-based mobility support for sensor devices. Each device has to register its IPv6 address with LMA, and all messages are transmitted through LMA. In CoAP-DPMIP, the role of LMA is distributed to each MAG. By using distributed MAGs, this scheme can provide optimized transmission path and also reduce the handover delay. From ns-3 simulations, we can see that the CoAP-DPMIP scheme provides better performance than the CoAP and CoAP-PMIP schemes, in terms of total delay associated with binding update, data transmission, and handover.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-2040</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1089-7798
ispartof IEEE communications letters, 2016-11, Vol.20 (11), p.2284-2287
issn 1089-7798
1558-2558
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_LCOMM_2016_2601318
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Anchors
CoAP
Computer networks
Data transmission
Delay
Delays
Electronic devices
Gateways
Handover
Internet of Things
IP (Internet Protocol)
Messages
Mobile radio mobility management
mobile sensor devices
Mobility management
Performance evaluation
PMIPv6
Remote control
Remote sensors
title Use of Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Mobility Management in CoAP-Based Internet-of-Things Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Proxy%20Mobile%20IPv6%20for%20Mobility%20Management%20in%20CoAP-Based%20Internet-of-Things%20Networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20communications%20letters&rft.au=Choi,%20Sang-Il&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2284&rft.epage=2287&rft.pages=2284-2287&rft.issn=1089-7798&rft.eissn=1558-2558&rft.coden=ICLEF6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1839154861%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839154861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7547316&rfr_iscdi=true