Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes

In many sonar applications, there is a need to detect boundaries, such as sea bottom, sea surface, or ice sheets. The maximum operating range for those applications can be limited by the minimum required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the detection algorithms can operate with high enough fidel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE journal of oceanic engineering 2020-07, Vol.45 (3), p.1078-1090
Hauptverfasser: Taudien, Jerker Y., Bilen, Sven G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1090
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1078
container_title IEEE journal of oceanic engineering
container_volume 45
creator Taudien, Jerker Y.
Bilen, Sven G.
description In many sonar applications, there is a need to detect boundaries, such as sea bottom, sea surface, or ice sheets. The maximum operating range for those applications can be limited by the minimum required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the detection algorithms can operate with high enough fidelity. We propose two bottom detection methods that compute the covariance and correlation coefficient at a time lag, and compare the performance of these detectors with that of power detection. We derive a closed-form solution for the joint characteristic function of the real and imaginary parts of the detector signal and numerically invert it to obtain the probability density function of the amplitude under the null and alternative hypotheses. The detection probability is then computed over a range of operating conditions, including code length, number of samples, and SNR. It is shown that the performance of the three detectors is substantially similar for a wide range of conditions. However, the correlation-coefficient detector has an important advantage over the other two detectors in that it can operate on amplitude-limited signals, for which the amplitude information has been suppressed. The correlation-coefficient detector is implemented on a commercially available Doppler velocity log and tested in the field. Measured performance is shown to agree reasonably well with the theoretical predictions.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JOE.2019.2903357
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JOE_2019_2903357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8681429</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2425619822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-32532439d9b2eaef6f6ab85bf633ca1a514a0f3ea48f21b9244228645c2c36453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EEqVwR-JiiXOKPV4aH0som4oqsYij5SRjkarEwU4P_HvSRZxmDu_7RvMIueRswjkzN8_L-QQYNxMwTAg1PSIjrlSecW34MRkxoWVmmDKn5CylFWNcyqkZkZcixIhr1zehpXfYY7Xbgqe3YdPWLjaYaNPSt9C6SGddt26qHZzoZ9N_0Vfs0PVY0yLUmM7JiXfrhBeHOSYf9_P34jFbLB-eitkiq0DKPhOgBEhhalMCOvTaa1fmqvRaiMpxp7h0zAt0MvfASzOEAHItVQXV8IcSY3K97-1i-Nlg6u0qbGI7nLQgQWlucoCBYnuqiiGliN52sfl28ddyZrfS7CDNbqXZg7QhcrWPNIj4j-c65xKM-AOH2Wcj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425619822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Taudien, Jerker Y. ; Bilen, Sven G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taudien, Jerker Y. ; Bilen, Sven G.</creatorcontrib><description>In many sonar applications, there is a need to detect boundaries, such as sea bottom, sea surface, or ice sheets. The maximum operating range for those applications can be limited by the minimum required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the detection algorithms can operate with high enough fidelity. We propose two bottom detection methods that compute the covariance and correlation coefficient at a time lag, and compare the performance of these detectors with that of power detection. We derive a closed-form solution for the joint characteristic function of the real and imaginary parts of the detector signal and numerically invert it to obtain the probability density function of the amplitude under the null and alternative hypotheses. The detection probability is then computed over a range of operating conditions, including code length, number of samples, and SNR. It is shown that the performance of the three detectors is substantially similar for a wide range of conditions. However, the correlation-coefficient detector has an important advantage over the other two detectors in that it can operate on amplitude-limited signals, for which the amplitude information has been suppressed. The correlation-coefficient detector is implemented on a commercially available Doppler velocity log and tested in the field. Measured performance is shown to agree reasonably well with the theoretical predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2019.2903357</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOEDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Amplitude ; Amplitudes ; Bottom detect ; Boundaries ; Characteristic functions ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Correlation detection ; Covariance ; Detection ; detection performance ; Detectors ; Doppler shift ; Doppler sonar ; Doppler velocity log (DVL) ; Glaciation ; Ice sheets ; Mathematical analysis ; Probability density functions ; Probability theory ; Sea surface ; Sensors ; Signal to noise ratio ; Sonar ; Sonar detection ; Time lag</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2020-07, Vol.45 (3), p.1078-1090</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-32532439d9b2eaef6f6ab85bf633ca1a514a0f3ea48f21b9244228645c2c36453</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5416-7039 ; 0000-0003-0717-062X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8681429$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8681429$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taudien, Jerker Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilen, Sven G.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes</title><title>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</title><addtitle>JOE</addtitle><description>In many sonar applications, there is a need to detect boundaries, such as sea bottom, sea surface, or ice sheets. The maximum operating range for those applications can be limited by the minimum required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the detection algorithms can operate with high enough fidelity. We propose two bottom detection methods that compute the covariance and correlation coefficient at a time lag, and compare the performance of these detectors with that of power detection. We derive a closed-form solution for the joint characteristic function of the real and imaginary parts of the detector signal and numerically invert it to obtain the probability density function of the amplitude under the null and alternative hypotheses. The detection probability is then computed over a range of operating conditions, including code length, number of samples, and SNR. It is shown that the performance of the three detectors is substantially similar for a wide range of conditions. However, the correlation-coefficient detector has an important advantage over the other two detectors in that it can operate on amplitude-limited signals, for which the amplitude information has been suppressed. The correlation-coefficient detector is implemented on a commercially available Doppler velocity log and tested in the field. Measured performance is shown to agree reasonably well with the theoretical predictions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amplitude</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Bottom detect</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Characteristic functions</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Correlation detection</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>detection performance</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Doppler shift</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>Doppler velocity log (DVL)</subject><subject>Glaciation</subject><subject>Ice sheets</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Sonar</subject><subject>Sonar detection</subject><subject>Time lag</subject><issn>0364-9059</issn><issn>1558-1691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EEqVwR-JiiXOKPV4aH0som4oqsYij5SRjkarEwU4P_HvSRZxmDu_7RvMIueRswjkzN8_L-QQYNxMwTAg1PSIjrlSecW34MRkxoWVmmDKn5CylFWNcyqkZkZcixIhr1zehpXfYY7Xbgqe3YdPWLjaYaNPSt9C6SGddt26qHZzoZ9N_0Vfs0PVY0yLUmM7JiXfrhBeHOSYf9_P34jFbLB-eitkiq0DKPhOgBEhhalMCOvTaa1fmqvRaiMpxp7h0zAt0MvfASzOEAHItVQXV8IcSY3K97-1i-Nlg6u0qbGI7nLQgQWlucoCBYnuqiiGliN52sfl28ddyZrfS7CDNbqXZg7QhcrWPNIj4j-c65xKM-AOH2Wcj</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Taudien, Jerker Y.</creator><creator>Bilen, Sven G.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-7039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-062X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes</title><author>Taudien, Jerker Y. ; Bilen, Sven G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-32532439d9b2eaef6f6ab85bf633ca1a514a0f3ea48f21b9244228645c2c36453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amplitude</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Bottom detect</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Characteristic functions</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Correlation detection</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>detection performance</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Doppler shift</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>Doppler velocity log (DVL)</topic><topic>Glaciation</topic><topic>Ice sheets</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Sonar</topic><topic>Sonar detection</topic><topic>Time lag</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taudien, Jerker Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilen, Sven G.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taudien, Jerker Y.</au><au>Bilen, Sven G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle><stitle>JOE</stitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1078</spage><epage>1090</epage><pages>1078-1090</pages><issn>0364-9059</issn><eissn>1558-1691</eissn><coden>IJOEDY</coden><abstract>In many sonar applications, there is a need to detect boundaries, such as sea bottom, sea surface, or ice sheets. The maximum operating range for those applications can be limited by the minimum required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the detection algorithms can operate with high enough fidelity. We propose two bottom detection methods that compute the covariance and correlation coefficient at a time lag, and compare the performance of these detectors with that of power detection. We derive a closed-form solution for the joint characteristic function of the real and imaginary parts of the detector signal and numerically invert it to obtain the probability density function of the amplitude under the null and alternative hypotheses. The detection probability is then computed over a range of operating conditions, including code length, number of samples, and SNR. It is shown that the performance of the three detectors is substantially similar for a wide range of conditions. However, the correlation-coefficient detector has an important advantage over the other two detectors in that it can operate on amplitude-limited signals, for which the amplitude information has been suppressed. The correlation-coefficient detector is implemented on a commercially available Doppler velocity log and tested in the field. Measured performance is shown to agree reasonably well with the theoretical predictions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JOE.2019.2903357</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-7039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-062X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0364-9059
ispartof IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2020-07, Vol.45 (3), p.1078-1090
issn 0364-9059
1558-1691
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JOE_2019_2903357
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Algorithms
Amplitude
Amplitudes
Bottom detect
Boundaries
Characteristic functions
Correlation
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Correlation detection
Covariance
Detection
detection performance
Detectors
Doppler shift
Doppler sonar
Doppler velocity log (DVL)
Glaciation
Ice sheets
Mathematical analysis
Probability density functions
Probability theory
Sea surface
Sensors
Signal to noise ratio
Sonar
Sonar detection
Time lag
title Correlation Detection of Boundaries in Sonar Applications With Repeated Codes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20Detection%20of%20Boundaries%20in%20Sonar%20Applications%20With%20Repeated%20Codes&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20oceanic%20engineering&rft.au=Taudien,%20Jerker%20Y.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1078&rft.epage=1090&rft.pages=1078-1090&rft.issn=0364-9059&rft.eissn=1558-1691&rft.coden=IJOEDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JOE.2019.2903357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2425619822%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425619822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8681429&rfr_iscdi=true