Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation

Implementing roadmapping guides improved strategy development for organizations not only to produce new products or services but also to navigate the entire process of organizational capability development to accelerate innovation. However, keeping roadmapping alive in organizations is challenging d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE engineering management review 2020-12, Vol.48 (4), p.133-143
Hauptverfasser: Hirose, Yuta, Phaal, Robert, Farrukh, Clare, Gerdsri, Nathasit, Lee, Sungjoo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 4
container_start_page 133
container_title IEEE engineering management review
container_volume 48
creator Hirose, Yuta
Phaal, Robert
Farrukh, Clare
Gerdsri, Nathasit
Lee, Sungjoo
description Implementing roadmapping guides improved strategy development for organizations not only to produce new products or services but also to navigate the entire process of organizational capability development to accelerate innovation. However, keeping roadmapping alive in organizations is challenging due to the complex integration process with a broad range of stakeholder involvement. While previous studies have contributed to staged development for managing roadmapping implementation, relatively little attention has been given to practical steps required in each stage for organizations to review the past, understand the current position in terms of where they are up to, and plan for the future to navigate the complex integration process efficiently and effectively. This article introduces a maturity model to guide the process of organization-wide roadmapping implementation. This is achieved by examining industrial cases to characterize practical steps, from the perspective of maturation, by which organizations implement and eventually integrate roadmapping into the organizational system and business cycles for technology and strategic planning. The Gerdsri three-stage model was utilized for discussion and analysis, aligning with the maturity model development. Six maturity levels have been characterized as follows: 1) Initial; 2) Defined; 3) Rolled Out; 4) Developed; 5) Standardized; and 6) Sustained.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EMR.2020.3020547
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_EMR_2020_3020547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9184211</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2487437670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-c717edc0b7f9f529164aaf46bc4d88eda3594b581de2227d34a36d9dd29d88f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3wcuC56352k1ylFK10FIoiseQbiY1pfthshXav97UFi8zh_fezOOH0D3BI0KweprMlyOKKR6xNAouLtCAKCZyToS8RAPMSpzLQpJrdBPjBmNScqYGaDH-MsFUPQR_8M06m5t-F3y_z2bwA9uYuTZki7A2jT-Y3rdN_uktZMvW2Np03TExrbst1ND0f_otunJmG-HuvIfo42XyPn7LZ4vX6fh5llcUl31eCSLAVnglnHIFVamNMY6Xq4pbKcEaVii-SnUtUEqFZdyw0iprqUq6Y2yIHk93u9B-7yD2etPuQpNeasql4EyUAicXPrmq0MYYwOku-NqEvSZYH7HphE0fsekzthR5OEU8APzbFZGcEsJ-Afe5abk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487437670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation</title><source>IEL</source><creator>Hirose, Yuta ; Phaal, Robert ; Farrukh, Clare ; Gerdsri, Nathasit ; Lee, Sungjoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirose, Yuta ; Phaal, Robert ; Farrukh, Clare ; Gerdsri, Nathasit ; Lee, Sungjoo</creatorcontrib><description>Implementing roadmapping guides improved strategy development for organizations not only to produce new products or services but also to navigate the entire process of organizational capability development to accelerate innovation. However, keeping roadmapping alive in organizations is challenging due to the complex integration process with a broad range of stakeholder involvement. While previous studies have contributed to staged development for managing roadmapping implementation, relatively little attention has been given to practical steps required in each stage for organizations to review the past, understand the current position in terms of where they are up to, and plan for the future to navigate the complex integration process efficiently and effectively. This article introduces a maturity model to guide the process of organization-wide roadmapping implementation. This is achieved by examining industrial cases to characterize practical steps, from the perspective of maturation, by which organizations implement and eventually integrate roadmapping into the organizational system and business cycles for technology and strategic planning. The Gerdsri three-stage model was utilized for discussion and analysis, aligning with the maturity model development. Six maturity levels have been characterized as follows: 1) Initial; 2) Defined; 3) Rolled Out; 4) Developed; 5) Standardized; and 6) Sustained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-8581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2020.3020547</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Business cycles ; Conferences ; Implementation ; innovation ; maturity model ; Navigation ; Organizational aspects ; Organizations ; roadmapping ; Stakeholders ; Standards organizations ; Strategic management ; Strategic planning ; technology and strategic planning</subject><ispartof>IEEE engineering management review, 2020-12, Vol.48 (4), p.133-143</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-c717edc0b7f9f529164aaf46bc4d88eda3594b581de2227d34a36d9dd29d88f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-c717edc0b7f9f529164aaf46bc4d88eda3594b581de2227d34a36d9dd29d88f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3235-6533 ; 0000-0001-9361-3380 ; 0000-0003-4235-5902</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9184211$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9184211$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirose, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phaal, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrukh, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdsri, Nathasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungjoo</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation</title><title>IEEE engineering management review</title><addtitle>EMR</addtitle><description>Implementing roadmapping guides improved strategy development for organizations not only to produce new products or services but also to navigate the entire process of organizational capability development to accelerate innovation. However, keeping roadmapping alive in organizations is challenging due to the complex integration process with a broad range of stakeholder involvement. While previous studies have contributed to staged development for managing roadmapping implementation, relatively little attention has been given to practical steps required in each stage for organizations to review the past, understand the current position in terms of where they are up to, and plan for the future to navigate the complex integration process efficiently and effectively. This article introduces a maturity model to guide the process of organization-wide roadmapping implementation. This is achieved by examining industrial cases to characterize practical steps, from the perspective of maturation, by which organizations implement and eventually integrate roadmapping into the organizational system and business cycles for technology and strategic planning. The Gerdsri three-stage model was utilized for discussion and analysis, aligning with the maturity model development. Six maturity levels have been characterized as follows: 1) Initial; 2) Defined; 3) Rolled Out; 4) Developed; 5) Standardized; and 6) Sustained.</description><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>maturity model</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>roadmapping</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Standards organizations</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>technology and strategic planning</subject><issn>0360-8581</issn><issn>1937-4178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3wcuC56352k1ylFK10FIoiseQbiY1pfthshXav97UFi8zh_fezOOH0D3BI0KweprMlyOKKR6xNAouLtCAKCZyToS8RAPMSpzLQpJrdBPjBmNScqYGaDH-MsFUPQR_8M06m5t-F3y_z2bwA9uYuTZki7A2jT-Y3rdN_uktZMvW2Np03TExrbst1ND0f_otunJmG-HuvIfo42XyPn7LZ4vX6fh5llcUl31eCSLAVnglnHIFVamNMY6Xq4pbKcEaVii-SnUtUEqFZdyw0iprqUq6Y2yIHk93u9B-7yD2etPuQpNeasql4EyUAicXPrmq0MYYwOku-NqEvSZYH7HphE0fsekzthR5OEU8APzbFZGcEsJ-Afe5abk</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Hirose, Yuta</creator><creator>Phaal, Robert</creator><creator>Farrukh, Clare</creator><creator>Gerdsri, Nathasit</creator><creator>Lee, Sungjoo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-6533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-5902</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation</title><author>Hirose, Yuta ; Phaal, Robert ; Farrukh, Clare ; Gerdsri, Nathasit ; Lee, Sungjoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-c717edc0b7f9f529164aaf46bc4d88eda3594b581de2227d34a36d9dd29d88f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>maturity model</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>roadmapping</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Standards organizations</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>technology and strategic planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirose, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phaal, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrukh, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdsri, Nathasit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungjoo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEL</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirose, Yuta</au><au>Phaal, Robert</au><au>Farrukh, Clare</au><au>Gerdsri, Nathasit</au><au>Lee, Sungjoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle><stitle>EMR</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>133-143</pages><issn>0360-8581</issn><eissn>1937-4178</eissn><coden>IEMRAP</coden><abstract>Implementing roadmapping guides improved strategy development for organizations not only to produce new products or services but also to navigate the entire process of organizational capability development to accelerate innovation. However, keeping roadmapping alive in organizations is challenging due to the complex integration process with a broad range of stakeholder involvement. While previous studies have contributed to staged development for managing roadmapping implementation, relatively little attention has been given to practical steps required in each stage for organizations to review the past, understand the current position in terms of where they are up to, and plan for the future to navigate the complex integration process efficiently and effectively. This article introduces a maturity model to guide the process of organization-wide roadmapping implementation. This is achieved by examining industrial cases to characterize practical steps, from the perspective of maturation, by which organizations implement and eventually integrate roadmapping into the organizational system and business cycles for technology and strategic planning. The Gerdsri three-stage model was utilized for discussion and analysis, aligning with the maturity model development. Six maturity levels have been characterized as follows: 1) Initial; 2) Defined; 3) Rolled Out; 4) Developed; 5) Standardized; and 6) Sustained.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EMR.2020.3020547</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-6533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-5902</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0360-8581
ispartof IEEE engineering management review, 2020-12, Vol.48 (4), p.133-143
issn 0360-8581
1937-4178
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_EMR_2020_3020547
source IEL
subjects Business cycles
Conferences
Implementation
innovation
maturity model
Navigation
Organizational aspects
Organizations
roadmapping
Stakeholders
Standards organizations
Strategic management
Strategic planning
technology and strategic planning
title Characterizing Maturity Levels for Organization-Wide Roadmapping Implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Maturity%20Levels%20for%20Organization-Wide%20Roadmapping%20Implementation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20engineering%20management%20review&rft.au=Hirose,%20Yuta&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=133-143&rft.issn=0360-8581&rft.eissn=1937-4178&rft.coden=IEMRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMR.2020.3020547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2487437670%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487437670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9184211&rfr_iscdi=true