Router plugins: a software architecture for next-generation routers

Present-day Internet protocol routers typically employ monolithic operating systems that are not easily upgradable and extensible. With the rapid rate of protocol development it is becoming increasingly important to dynamically upgrade router software in an incremental fashion. We have designed and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE/ACM transactions on networking 2000-02, Vol.8 (1), p.2-15
Hauptverfasser: Decasper, D., Dittia, Z., Parulkar, G., Plattner, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Present-day Internet protocol routers typically employ monolithic operating systems that are not easily upgradable and extensible. With the rapid rate of protocol development it is becoming increasingly important to dynamically upgrade router software in an incremental fashion. We have designed and implemented a high-performance, modular, extended services router software architecture in the Net BSD operating system kernel. This architecture allows code modules, called plugins, to be dynamically added and configured at run time. One of the novel features of our design is the ability to bind different plugins to individual flows; this allows for distinct plugin implementations to seamlessly coexist in the same runtime environment. We achieve high performance through a carefully designed modular architecture, an innovative packet classification algorithm that is highly efficient, and by caching that exploits the flow-like characteristics of Internet traffic. Compared to a monolithic best effort kernel, our implementation requires an average increase in packet processing overhead of only 8%, or 600 cycles per packet when running on an Intel Pentium Pro at 233 MHz. By shortcutting the forward loop based on the per-flow state we establish, we can forward packets up to three times faster than the best effort kernel.
ISSN:1063-6692
1558-2566
DOI:10.1109/90.836474