The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability

In this paper, the most frequently used power system maintenance strategies are reviewed. Distinction is made between strategies where maintenance consists of replacement by a new (or "good as new") component and where it is represented by a less costly activity resulting in a limited impr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2001-11, Vol.16 (4), p.638-646
Hauptverfasser: Endrenyi, J., Aboresheid, S., Allan, R.N., Anders, G.J., Asgarpoor, S., Billinton, R., Chowdhury, N., Dialynas, E.N., Fipper, M., Fletcher, R.H., Grigg, C., McCalley, J., Meliopoulos, S., Mielnik, T.C., Nitu, P., Rau, N., Reppen, N.D., Salvaderi, L., Schneider, A., Singh, Ch
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 646
container_issue 4
container_start_page 638
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 16
creator Endrenyi, J.
Aboresheid, S.
Allan, R.N.
Anders, G.J.
Asgarpoor, S.
Billinton, R.
Chowdhury, N.
Dialynas, E.N.
Fipper, M.
Fletcher, R.H.
Grigg, C.
McCalley, J.
Meliopoulos, S.
Mielnik, T.C.
Nitu, P.
Rau, N.
Reppen, N.D.
Salvaderi, L.
Schneider, A.
Singh, Ch
description In this paper, the most frequently used power system maintenance strategies are reviewed. Distinction is made between strategies where maintenance consists of replacement by a new (or "good as new") component and where it is represented by a less costly activity resulting in a limited improvement of the component's condition. Methods are also divided into categories where maintenance is performed at fixed intervals and where it is carried out as needed. A further distinction is made between heuristic methods and those based on mathematical models; the models themselves can be deterministic or probabilistic. From a review of present maintenance policies in electric utilities, it is concluded that maintenance at fixed intervals is the most frequently used approach, often augmented by additional corrections. Newer "as needed"-type methods, such as reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), are increasingly considered for application in North America, but methods based on mathematical models are hardly ever used or even considered. Yet only mathematical approaches where component deterioration and condition improvement by maintenance are quantitatively linked can determine the effect of maintenance on reliability. Although more complex, probabilistic models have advantages over deterministic ones: they are capable of describing actual processes more realistically, and also facilitate optimization for maximal reliability or minimal costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/59.962408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_59_962408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>962408</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28634556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-21465964728d06fd5a8e55888c8a9ba3411993d8429d0af0de618e130ac78c1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0b1PxCAUAHBiNPE8HVydGgeNQ09ogcJoLn4ll7icgxPh6KtyaWkFOtx_L6YXBwfj9BLeD957PITOCV4QguUtkwvJC4rFAZoRxkSOeSUP0QwLwXIhGT5GJyFsMcY8JWbobf0B2eAhgItZiDqOIeubrNPWRXDaGUinXkd4txAy7eospgu2G7SJv2HvMg-t1Rvb2rg7RUeNbgOc7eMcvT7cr5dP-erl8Xl5t8pNyauYF4RyJjmtClFj3tRMC0h9C2GElhtdUkKkLGtBC1lj3eAaOBFASqxNJQxpyjm6nt4dfP85Qoiqs8FA22oH_RiUTAUoKyRP8upPWQheUsb-Aav0fyUpErz8Bbf96F0aVwlBecUIoQndTMj4PgQPjRq87bTfKYLV99IUk2paWrIXk7UA8OP2yS9D7JBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884675114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Endrenyi, J. ; Aboresheid, S. ; Allan, R.N. ; Anders, G.J. ; Asgarpoor, S. ; Billinton, R. ; Chowdhury, N. ; Dialynas, E.N. ; Fipper, M. ; Fletcher, R.H. ; Grigg, C. ; McCalley, J. ; Meliopoulos, S. ; Mielnik, T.C. ; Nitu, P. ; Rau, N. ; Reppen, N.D. ; Salvaderi, L. ; Schneider, A. ; Singh, Ch</creator><creatorcontrib>Endrenyi, J. ; Aboresheid, S. ; Allan, R.N. ; Anders, G.J. ; Asgarpoor, S. ; Billinton, R. ; Chowdhury, N. ; Dialynas, E.N. ; Fipper, M. ; Fletcher, R.H. ; Grigg, C. ; McCalley, J. ; Meliopoulos, S. ; Mielnik, T.C. ; Nitu, P. ; Rau, N. ; Reppen, N.D. ; Salvaderi, L. ; Schneider, A. ; Singh, Ch</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the most frequently used power system maintenance strategies are reviewed. Distinction is made between strategies where maintenance consists of replacement by a new (or "good as new") component and where it is represented by a less costly activity resulting in a limited improvement of the component's condition. Methods are also divided into categories where maintenance is performed at fixed intervals and where it is carried out as needed. A further distinction is made between heuristic methods and those based on mathematical models; the models themselves can be deterministic or probabilistic. From a review of present maintenance policies in electric utilities, it is concluded that maintenance at fixed intervals is the most frequently used approach, often augmented by additional corrections. Newer "as needed"-type methods, such as reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), are increasingly considered for application in North America, but methods based on mathematical models are hardly ever used or even considered. Yet only mathematical approaches where component deterioration and condition improvement by maintenance are quantitatively linked can determine the effect of maintenance on reliability. Although more complex, probabilistic models have advantages over deterministic ones: they are capable of describing actual processes more realistically, and also facilitate optimization for maximal reliability or minimal costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/59.962408</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Cost function ; Degradation ; Deterioration ; Electric power generation ; Frequency ; Intervals ; Maintenance ; Maintenance management ; Mathematical model ; Mathematical models ; North America ; Power industry ; Power system modeling ; Power system reliability ; Probabilistic methods ; Probability theory ; Repair &amp; maintenance ; Strategy ; Studies ; System performance</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2001-11, Vol.16 (4), p.638-646</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-21465964728d06fd5a8e55888c8a9ba3411993d8429d0af0de618e130ac78c1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-21465964728d06fd5a8e55888c8a9ba3411993d8429d0af0de618e130ac78c1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/962408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/962408$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Endrenyi, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboresheid, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anders, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgarpoor, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billinton, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dialynas, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fipper, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCalley, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meliopoulos, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielnik, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitu, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reppen, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaderi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ch</creatorcontrib><title>The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>In this paper, the most frequently used power system maintenance strategies are reviewed. Distinction is made between strategies where maintenance consists of replacement by a new (or "good as new") component and where it is represented by a less costly activity resulting in a limited improvement of the component's condition. Methods are also divided into categories where maintenance is performed at fixed intervals and where it is carried out as needed. A further distinction is made between heuristic methods and those based on mathematical models; the models themselves can be deterministic or probabilistic. From a review of present maintenance policies in electric utilities, it is concluded that maintenance at fixed intervals is the most frequently used approach, often augmented by additional corrections. Newer "as needed"-type methods, such as reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), are increasingly considered for application in North America, but methods based on mathematical models are hardly ever used or even considered. Yet only mathematical approaches where component deterioration and condition improvement by maintenance are quantitatively linked can determine the effect of maintenance on reliability. Although more complex, probabilistic models have advantages over deterministic ones: they are capable of describing actual processes more realistically, and also facilitate optimization for maximal reliability or minimal costs.</description><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Deterioration</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Maintenance management</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Power industry</subject><subject>Power system modeling</subject><subject>Power system reliability</subject><subject>Probabilistic methods</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Repair &amp; maintenance</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>System performance</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0b1PxCAUAHBiNPE8HVydGgeNQ09ogcJoLn4ll7icgxPh6KtyaWkFOtx_L6YXBwfj9BLeD957PITOCV4QguUtkwvJC4rFAZoRxkSOeSUP0QwLwXIhGT5GJyFsMcY8JWbobf0B2eAhgItZiDqOIeubrNPWRXDaGUinXkd4txAy7eospgu2G7SJv2HvMg-t1Rvb2rg7RUeNbgOc7eMcvT7cr5dP-erl8Xl5t8pNyauYF4RyJjmtClFj3tRMC0h9C2GElhtdUkKkLGtBC1lj3eAaOBFASqxNJQxpyjm6nt4dfP85Qoiqs8FA22oH_RiUTAUoKyRP8upPWQheUsb-Aav0fyUpErz8Bbf96F0aVwlBecUIoQndTMj4PgQPjRq87bTfKYLV99IUk2paWrIXk7UA8OP2yS9D7JBU</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Endrenyi, J.</creator><creator>Aboresheid, S.</creator><creator>Allan, R.N.</creator><creator>Anders, G.J.</creator><creator>Asgarpoor, S.</creator><creator>Billinton, R.</creator><creator>Chowdhury, N.</creator><creator>Dialynas, E.N.</creator><creator>Fipper, M.</creator><creator>Fletcher, R.H.</creator><creator>Grigg, C.</creator><creator>McCalley, J.</creator><creator>Meliopoulos, S.</creator><creator>Mielnik, T.C.</creator><creator>Nitu, P.</creator><creator>Rau, N.</creator><creator>Reppen, N.D.</creator><creator>Salvaderi, L.</creator><creator>Schneider, A.</creator><creator>Singh, Ch</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability</title><author>Endrenyi, J. ; Aboresheid, S. ; Allan, R.N. ; Anders, G.J. ; Asgarpoor, S. ; Billinton, R. ; Chowdhury, N. ; Dialynas, E.N. ; Fipper, M. ; Fletcher, R.H. ; Grigg, C. ; McCalley, J. ; Meliopoulos, S. ; Mielnik, T.C. ; Nitu, P. ; Rau, N. ; Reppen, N.D. ; Salvaderi, L. ; Schneider, A. ; Singh, Ch</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-21465964728d06fd5a8e55888c8a9ba3411993d8429d0af0de618e130ac78c1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Deterioration</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Maintenance management</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Power industry</topic><topic>Power system modeling</topic><topic>Power system reliability</topic><topic>Probabilistic methods</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Repair &amp; maintenance</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>System performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Endrenyi, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboresheid, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anders, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgarpoor, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billinton, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dialynas, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fipper, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCalley, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meliopoulos, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielnik, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitu, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reppen, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaderi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ch</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Endrenyi, J.</au><au>Aboresheid, S.</au><au>Allan, R.N.</au><au>Anders, G.J.</au><au>Asgarpoor, S.</au><au>Billinton, R.</au><au>Chowdhury, N.</au><au>Dialynas, E.N.</au><au>Fipper, M.</au><au>Fletcher, R.H.</au><au>Grigg, C.</au><au>McCalley, J.</au><au>Meliopoulos, S.</au><au>Mielnik, T.C.</au><au>Nitu, P.</au><au>Rau, N.</au><au>Reppen, N.D.</au><au>Salvaderi, L.</au><au>Schneider, A.</au><au>Singh, Ch</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>638</spage><epage>646</epage><pages>638-646</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>In this paper, the most frequently used power system maintenance strategies are reviewed. Distinction is made between strategies where maintenance consists of replacement by a new (or "good as new") component and where it is represented by a less costly activity resulting in a limited improvement of the component's condition. Methods are also divided into categories where maintenance is performed at fixed intervals and where it is carried out as needed. A further distinction is made between heuristic methods and those based on mathematical models; the models themselves can be deterministic or probabilistic. From a review of present maintenance policies in electric utilities, it is concluded that maintenance at fixed intervals is the most frequently used approach, often augmented by additional corrections. Newer "as needed"-type methods, such as reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), are increasingly considered for application in North America, but methods based on mathematical models are hardly ever used or even considered. Yet only mathematical approaches where component deterioration and condition improvement by maintenance are quantitatively linked can determine the effect of maintenance on reliability. Although more complex, probabilistic models have advantages over deterministic ones: they are capable of describing actual processes more realistically, and also facilitate optimization for maximal reliability or minimal costs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/59.962408</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2001-11, Vol.16 (4), p.638-646
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_59_962408
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Cost function
Degradation
Deterioration
Electric power generation
Frequency
Intervals
Maintenance
Maintenance management
Mathematical model
Mathematical models
North America
Power industry
Power system modeling
Power system reliability
Probabilistic methods
Probability theory
Repair & maintenance
Strategy
Studies
System performance
title The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20present%20status%20of%20maintenance%20strategies%20and%20the%20impact%20of%20maintenance%20on%20reliability&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Endrenyi,%20J.&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=638&rft.epage=646&rft.pages=638-646&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/59.962408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28634556%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884675114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=962408&rfr_iscdi=true