Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development
OD conceptualisation has been criticised as being both underdeveloped and too unduly narrow in its focus. Several ways that OD′s conceptualisation might be enhanced are suggested: on the one hand by differentiating its models and theories in terms of their conceptual level or scope, and on the other...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational change management 1991-04, Vol.4 (4), p.6-15 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 15 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 6 |
| container_title | Journal of organizational change management |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Lundberg, Craig C |
| description | OD conceptualisation has been criticised as being both
underdeveloped and too unduly narrow in its focus. Several ways that
OD′s conceptualisation might be enhanced are suggested: on the one hand
by differentiating its models and theories in terms of their conceptual
level or scope, and on the other hand in terms of an enlarged set of
fundamental organisational tasks, different levels of change agent
intentionality, and the time frame involved in change. These suggested
ways of reconceptualising the theoretic possibilities for OD would move
it away from its mostly fix-it, how-to, internal problem-solving image. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/EUM0000000001200 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_EUM0000000001200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1297789461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-3a635de256967b00bf5fe941763a701950e6db8ae4e8eb13b60aa3b9e1681ef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgOeY2e6yX4ctR8qVHppz2GTzGpKko27qeK_NxK9eHEuLwPPMwMvY9cIt4igZqv9M_wOzgFO2ARlqmKpUJyyCeiUx4nC5JxdhHAYICmkmrD7nfswvgxR_0rRwrUFdf3R1NGyspY8tX1l-sq1kbPR1r-YtgrjvqR3ql3XDMQlO7OmDnT1k1O2X692i8d4s314Wtxt4gKl7mNuBE9LmqdCC5kD5Da1pBOUghsJqFMgUebKUEKKcuS5AGN4rgmFQrKST9nNeLfz7u1Ioc8O7ujb4WWGcy2l0onAgYKRKrwLwZPNOl81xn9mCNl3U9nfpgZlNirUkDd1-b_xBR5UaO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297789461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Lundberg, Craig C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Craig C</creatorcontrib><description>OD conceptualisation has been criticised as being both
underdeveloped and too unduly narrow in its focus. Several ways that
OD′s conceptualisation might be enhanced are suggested: on the one hand
by differentiating its models and theories in terms of their conceptual
level or scope, and on the other hand in terms of an enlarged set of
fundamental organisational tasks, different levels of change agent
intentionality, and the time frame involved in change. These suggested
ways of reconceptualising the theoretic possibilities for OD would move
it away from its mostly fix-it, how-to, internal problem-solving image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-4814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000001200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford, England: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of organizational change management, 1991-04, Vol.4 (4), p.6-15</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-3a635de256967b00bf5fe941763a701950e6db8ae4e8eb13b60aa3b9e1681ef73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EUM0000000001200/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EUM0000000001200/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27846,27901,27902,52661,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Craig C</creatorcontrib><title>Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development</title><title>Journal of organizational change management</title><description>OD conceptualisation has been criticised as being both
underdeveloped and too unduly narrow in its focus. Several ways that
OD′s conceptualisation might be enhanced are suggested: on the one hand
by differentiating its models and theories in terms of their conceptual
level or scope, and on the other hand in terms of an enlarged set of
fundamental organisational tasks, different levels of change agent
intentionality, and the time frame involved in change. These suggested
ways of reconceptualising the theoretic possibilities for OD would move
it away from its mostly fix-it, how-to, internal problem-solving image.</description><issn>0953-4814</issn><issn>1758-7816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgOeY2e6yX4ctR8qVHppz2GTzGpKko27qeK_NxK9eHEuLwPPMwMvY9cIt4igZqv9M_wOzgFO2ARlqmKpUJyyCeiUx4nC5JxdhHAYICmkmrD7nfswvgxR_0rRwrUFdf3R1NGyspY8tX1l-sq1kbPR1r-YtgrjvqR3ql3XDMQlO7OmDnT1k1O2X692i8d4s314Wtxt4gKl7mNuBE9LmqdCC5kD5Da1pBOUghsJqFMgUebKUEKKcuS5AGN4rgmFQrKST9nNeLfz7u1Ioc8O7ujb4WWGcy2l0onAgYKRKrwLwZPNOl81xn9mCNl3U9nfpgZlNirUkDd1-b_xBR5UaO8</recordid><startdate>19910401</startdate><enddate>19910401</enddate><creator>Lundberg, Craig C</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>MCB University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910401</creationdate><title>Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development</title><author>Lundberg, Craig C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-3a635de256967b00bf5fe941763a701950e6db8ae4e8eb13b60aa3b9e1681ef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Craig C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational change management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundberg, Craig C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational change management</jtitle><date>1991-04-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>6-15</pages><issn>0953-4814</issn><eissn>1758-7816</eissn><abstract>OD conceptualisation has been criticised as being both
underdeveloped and too unduly narrow in its focus. Several ways that
OD′s conceptualisation might be enhanced are suggested: on the one hand
by differentiating its models and theories in terms of their conceptual
level or scope, and on the other hand in terms of an enlarged set of
fundamental organisational tasks, different levels of change agent
intentionality, and the time frame involved in change. These suggested
ways of reconceptualising the theoretic possibilities for OD would move
it away from its mostly fix-it, how-to, internal problem-solving image.</abstract><cop>Bradford, England</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/EUM0000000001200</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0953-4814 |
| ispartof | Journal of organizational change management, 1991-04, Vol.4 (4), p.6-15 |
| issn | 0953-4814 1758-7816 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_EUM0000000001200 |
| source | Emerald Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| title | Towards the Conceptual Differentiation of Organisation Development |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A58%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20the%20Conceptual%20Differentiation%20of%20Organisation%20Development&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20change%20management&rft.au=Lundberg,%20Craig%20C&rft.date=1991-04-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=6-15&rft.issn=0953-4814&rft.eissn=1758-7816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/EUM0000000001200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297789461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297789461&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |