Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design methodology approach - The paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of managing projects in business 2009-06, Vol.2 (3), p.338-354
Hauptverfasser: Oyegoke, Adekunle S., Dickinson, Michael, Khalfan, Malik M.A., McDermott, Peter, Rowlinson, Steve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 3
container_start_page 338
container_title International journal of managing projects in business
container_volume 2
creator Oyegoke, Adekunle S.
Dickinson, Michael
Khalfan, Malik M.A.
McDermott, Peter
Rowlinson, Steve
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design methodology approach - The paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction industry serves as a general frame of reference. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors survey of Contracts in Use from 1985 to 2004 is used to probe the share and value of contracts along different procurement routes and across different conditions of contracts in the UK. The logic is that the value and the share of contracts will indicate the behaviour of different procurement routes in the UK construction market while the in-depth analysis of conditions of contracts will show the gaps and relationships between the general definition categorisation and contractual context (conditions of contracts) of each of the procurement routes.Findings - The preliminary result of the analysis shows that traditional routes remain the main type of procurement route for the construction project industry sector, within which different management and incentivisation systems are applied for greater efficiency. The conditions of contracts in the UK support this assertion by aligning different procurement routes to different conditions of contracts and additionally specifying different forms of agreements, special provisions and incentivisation in order to increase performance, reduce risks and improve compensation methods.Research limitations implications - The study can serve as a learning opportunity for construction project stakeholders internationally, and clients in particular, to differentiate between procurement routes, management-oriented systems, relational contracting and incentivisation.Originality value - The research provides an original assessment of construction procurement which can be used as intervening tool in different levels of private and public procurement strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/17538370910971018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_17538370910971018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1872026321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ffc161c5db0fe82ac1d522002df1f6b5daeba69a610a66ab32b258c0be44ca333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFtdV7kzZNBRdSxgcMuNF1SPPAlpm2JunCf29LxYUiuDqXy_nu4xByjnCFCOIai5wJVkCJUBYIKA7Iau6lggl--F0X4pichNAC8DJDXJHbqu9C9KOOTd8lg-9bq-OsevR2b7uY-H6MNtwkqkuaLjV2iG-J9k1s3kd7So6c2gV79qVr8nq_eake0-3zw1N1t001ExhT5zRy1LmpwVlBlUaTUwpAjUPH69woWyteKo6gOFc1ozXNhYbaZplWjLE1uVjmTodNa0OUbT_6blopKaOcZRnmkwkXk_Z9CN46Ofhmr_yHRJBzSPJXSBMDCzP96tXO_Au5_AP5aZWDcewTf9p11Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232634415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Oyegoke, Adekunle S. ; Dickinson, Michael ; Khalfan, Malik M.A. ; McDermott, Peter ; Rowlinson, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Oyegoke, Adekunle S. ; Dickinson, Michael ; Khalfan, Malik M.A. ; McDermott, Peter ; Rowlinson, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design methodology approach - The paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction industry serves as a general frame of reference. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors survey of Contracts in Use from 1985 to 2004 is used to probe the share and value of contracts along different procurement routes and across different conditions of contracts in the UK. The logic is that the value and the share of contracts will indicate the behaviour of different procurement routes in the UK construction market while the in-depth analysis of conditions of contracts will show the gaps and relationships between the general definition categorisation and contractual context (conditions of contracts) of each of the procurement routes.Findings - The preliminary result of the analysis shows that traditional routes remain the main type of procurement route for the construction project industry sector, within which different management and incentivisation systems are applied for greater efficiency. The conditions of contracts in the UK support this assertion by aligning different procurement routes to different conditions of contracts and additionally specifying different forms of agreements, special provisions and incentivisation in order to increase performance, reduce risks and improve compensation methods.Research limitations implications - The study can serve as a learning opportunity for construction project stakeholders internationally, and clients in particular, to differentiate between procurement routes, management-oriented systems, relational contracting and incentivisation.Originality value - The research provides an original assessment of construction procurement which can be used as intervening tool in different levels of private and public procurement strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-8378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-8386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/17538370910971018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Construction industry ; Contracts ; Costs ; Joint ventures ; Project management ; Purchasing ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of managing projects in business, 2009-06, Vol.2 (3), p.338-354</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ffc161c5db0fe82ac1d522002df1f6b5daeba69a610a66ab32b258c0be44ca333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ffc161c5db0fe82ac1d522002df1f6b5daeba69a610a66ab32b258c0be44ca333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17538370910971018/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17538370910971018/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,962,11616,21676,27905,27906,52667,52670,53225,53353</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oyegoke, Adekunle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalfan, Malik M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlinson, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique</title><title>International journal of managing projects in business</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design methodology approach - The paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction industry serves as a general frame of reference. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors survey of Contracts in Use from 1985 to 2004 is used to probe the share and value of contracts along different procurement routes and across different conditions of contracts in the UK. The logic is that the value and the share of contracts will indicate the behaviour of different procurement routes in the UK construction market while the in-depth analysis of conditions of contracts will show the gaps and relationships between the general definition categorisation and contractual context (conditions of contracts) of each of the procurement routes.Findings - The preliminary result of the analysis shows that traditional routes remain the main type of procurement route for the construction project industry sector, within which different management and incentivisation systems are applied for greater efficiency. The conditions of contracts in the UK support this assertion by aligning different procurement routes to different conditions of contracts and additionally specifying different forms of agreements, special provisions and incentivisation in order to increase performance, reduce risks and improve compensation methods.Research limitations implications - The study can serve as a learning opportunity for construction project stakeholders internationally, and clients in particular, to differentiate between procurement routes, management-oriented systems, relational contracting and incentivisation.Originality value - The research provides an original assessment of construction procurement which can be used as intervening tool in different levels of private and public procurement strategies.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Joint ventures</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1753-8378</issn><issn>1753-8386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFtdV7kzZNBRdSxgcMuNF1SPPAlpm2JunCf29LxYUiuDqXy_nu4xByjnCFCOIai5wJVkCJUBYIKA7Iau6lggl--F0X4pichNAC8DJDXJHbqu9C9KOOTd8lg-9bq-OsevR2b7uY-H6MNtwkqkuaLjV2iG-J9k1s3kd7So6c2gV79qVr8nq_eake0-3zw1N1t001ExhT5zRy1LmpwVlBlUaTUwpAjUPH69woWyteKo6gOFc1ozXNhYbaZplWjLE1uVjmTodNa0OUbT_6blopKaOcZRnmkwkXk_Z9CN46Ofhmr_yHRJBzSPJXSBMDCzP96tXO_Au5_AP5aZWDcewTf9p11Q</recordid><startdate>20090619</startdate><enddate>20090619</enddate><creator>Oyegoke, Adekunle S.</creator><creator>Dickinson, Michael</creator><creator>Khalfan, Malik M.A.</creator><creator>McDermott, Peter</creator><creator>Rowlinson, Steve</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090619</creationdate><title>Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique</title><author>Oyegoke, Adekunle S. ; Dickinson, Michael ; Khalfan, Malik M.A. ; McDermott, Peter ; Rowlinson, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ffc161c5db0fe82ac1d522002df1f6b5daeba69a610a66ab32b258c0be44ca333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Joint ventures</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oyegoke, Adekunle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalfan, Malik M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlinson, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of managing projects in business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oyegoke, Adekunle S.</au><au>Dickinson, Michael</au><au>Khalfan, Malik M.A.</au><au>McDermott, Peter</au><au>Rowlinson, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique</atitle><jtitle>International journal of managing projects in business</jtitle><date>2009-06-19</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>338-354</pages><issn>1753-8378</issn><eissn>1753-8386</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design methodology approach - The paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction industry serves as a general frame of reference. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors survey of Contracts in Use from 1985 to 2004 is used to probe the share and value of contracts along different procurement routes and across different conditions of contracts in the UK. The logic is that the value and the share of contracts will indicate the behaviour of different procurement routes in the UK construction market while the in-depth analysis of conditions of contracts will show the gaps and relationships between the general definition categorisation and contractual context (conditions of contracts) of each of the procurement routes.Findings - The preliminary result of the analysis shows that traditional routes remain the main type of procurement route for the construction project industry sector, within which different management and incentivisation systems are applied for greater efficiency. The conditions of contracts in the UK support this assertion by aligning different procurement routes to different conditions of contracts and additionally specifying different forms of agreements, special provisions and incentivisation in order to increase performance, reduce risks and improve compensation methods.Research limitations implications - The study can serve as a learning opportunity for construction project stakeholders internationally, and clients in particular, to differentiate between procurement routes, management-oriented systems, relational contracting and incentivisation.Originality value - The research provides an original assessment of construction procurement which can be used as intervening tool in different levels of private and public procurement strategies.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/17538370910971018</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-8378
ispartof International journal of managing projects in business, 2009-06, Vol.2 (3), p.338-354
issn 1753-8378
1753-8386
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_17538370910971018
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Alliances
Construction industry
Contracts
Costs
Joint ventures
Project management
Purchasing
Studies
title Construction project procurement routes: an in-depth critique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A14%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20project%20procurement%20routes:%20an%20in-depth%20critique&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20managing%20projects%20in%20business&rft.au=Oyegoke,%20Adekunle%20S.&rft.date=2009-06-19&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=338-354&rft.issn=1753-8378&rft.eissn=1753-8386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/17538370910971018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1872026321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232634415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true