Older people and research partnerships
Increasing consumer consultation is a priority for those involved in health and social care research and practice, with promoting greater public participation being widely accepted as 'a good thing' (Reason, 1994: 3). However, whilst such consultation may improve the quality of research an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quality in ageing 2003-12, Vol.4 (4), p.18-23 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 23 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 18 |
| container_title | Quality in ageing |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Tetley, Josephine Haynes, Lorna Hawthorne, Maud Odeyemi, Joe Skinner, Jeanne Smith, Dora Wilson, Vanlis |
| description | Increasing consumer consultation is a priority for those involved in health and social care research and practice, with promoting greater public participation being widely accepted as 'a good thing' (Reason, 1994: 3). However, whilst such consultation may improve the quality of research and practice, there is a need to recognise the considerable investment of time and energy that is required for success (Baxter et al., 2001). Given the extra resources needed, it is important to understand how consultation and user involvement can work to benefit all parties.This paper describes our experiences of working together on a research project exploring people's involvement in decision-making processes when using care services in later life. When we started the project in March 2001 each of us could draw on a range of experiences that we hoped would make a valuable contribution. We have now worked together for over two years and this paper describes how our combined efforts have not only enhanced the overall quality of the research but also had personal benefits that we did not anticipate when we started out. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14717794200300024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_14717794200300024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>654281931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-873f49df1fa60d9ce850e81224e9a99061f5878c7d1d26e31b0c977cae519d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0LtOwzAUBmALgUQpPABbxAALAR_b8WVEFTepoksFo2XsEzUlbYLdSvD2JApiKEJiOoO_3-dCyCnQKwCqr0EoUMoIRimnlDKxR0aMCpGD5sU-GfXveQ8OyVFKy04YBcWInM_qgDFrsWlrzNw6ZBETuugXWeviZo0xLao2HZOD0tUJT77rmMzvbueTh3w6u3-c3Exzz5UWuVa8FCaUUDpJg_GoC4oaGBNonDFUQllopb0KEJhEDq_UG6W8wwJMkHxMLoZv29i8bzFt7KpKHuvarbHZJqtkt6AUUnTybEcum21cd7NZBpx2rQR0CAbkY5NSxNK2sVq5-GmB2v5s9tfZukw-ZKq0wY-fgItvViquCitemC0eYDJ9mj_b3tPB4wqjq8O_Wlz-Edmltg0l_wKtx4co</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213090641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Older people and research partnerships</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Tetley, Josephine ; Haynes, Lorna ; Hawthorne, Maud ; Odeyemi, Joe ; Skinner, Jeanne ; Smith, Dora ; Wilson, Vanlis</creator><creatorcontrib>Tetley, Josephine ; Haynes, Lorna ; Hawthorne, Maud ; Odeyemi, Joe ; Skinner, Jeanne ; Smith, Dora ; Wilson, Vanlis</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing consumer consultation is a priority for those involved in health and social care research and practice, with promoting greater public participation being widely accepted as 'a good thing' (Reason, 1994: 3). However, whilst such consultation may improve the quality of research and practice, there is a need to recognise the considerable investment of time and energy that is required for success (Baxter et al., 2001). Given the extra resources needed, it is important to understand how consultation and user involvement can work to benefit all parties.This paper describes our experiences of working together on a research project exploring people's involvement in decision-making processes when using care services in later life. When we started the project in March 2001 each of us could draw on a range of experiences that we hoped would make a valuable contribution. We have now worked together for over two years and this paper describes how our combined efforts have not only enhanced the overall quality of the research but also had personal benefits that we did not anticipate when we started out.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-7794</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14717794200300024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brighton: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Health services ; Older people ; Participation ; Research advisory group ; Social services</subject><ispartof>Quality in ageing, 2003-12, Vol.4 (4), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Pavilion Publishing (Brighton) Ltd. Dec 2003</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-873f49df1fa60d9ce850e81224e9a99061f5878c7d1d26e31b0c977cae519d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-873f49df1fa60d9ce850e81224e9a99061f5878c7d1d26e31b0c977cae519d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14717794200300024/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14717794200300024/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,12825,21674,27901,27902,30976,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tetley, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odeyemi, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Vanlis</creatorcontrib><title>Older people and research partnerships</title><title>Quality in ageing</title><description>Increasing consumer consultation is a priority for those involved in health and social care research and practice, with promoting greater public participation being widely accepted as 'a good thing' (Reason, 1994: 3). However, whilst such consultation may improve the quality of research and practice, there is a need to recognise the considerable investment of time and energy that is required for success (Baxter et al., 2001). Given the extra resources needed, it is important to understand how consultation and user involvement can work to benefit all parties.This paper describes our experiences of working together on a research project exploring people's involvement in decision-making processes when using care services in later life. When we started the project in March 2001 each of us could draw on a range of experiences that we hoped would make a valuable contribution. We have now worked together for over two years and this paper describes how our combined efforts have not only enhanced the overall quality of the research but also had personal benefits that we did not anticipate when we started out.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Research advisory group</subject><subject>Social services</subject><issn>1471-7794</issn><issn>2044-1827</issn><issn>2044-1835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0LtOwzAUBmALgUQpPABbxAALAR_b8WVEFTepoksFo2XsEzUlbYLdSvD2JApiKEJiOoO_3-dCyCnQKwCqr0EoUMoIRimnlDKxR0aMCpGD5sU-GfXveQ8OyVFKy04YBcWInM_qgDFrsWlrzNw6ZBETuugXWeviZo0xLao2HZOD0tUJT77rmMzvbueTh3w6u3-c3Exzz5UWuVa8FCaUUDpJg_GoC4oaGBNonDFUQllopb0KEJhEDq_UG6W8wwJMkHxMLoZv29i8bzFt7KpKHuvarbHZJqtkt6AUUnTybEcum21cd7NZBpx2rQR0CAbkY5NSxNK2sVq5-GmB2v5s9tfZukw-ZKq0wY-fgItvViquCitemC0eYDJ9mj_b3tPB4wqjq8O_Wlz-Edmltg0l_wKtx4co</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Tetley, Josephine</creator><creator>Haynes, Lorna</creator><creator>Hawthorne, Maud</creator><creator>Odeyemi, Joe</creator><creator>Skinner, Jeanne</creator><creator>Smith, Dora</creator><creator>Wilson, Vanlis</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Older people and research partnerships</title><author>Tetley, Josephine ; Haynes, Lorna ; Hawthorne, Maud ; Odeyemi, Joe ; Skinner, Jeanne ; Smith, Dora ; Wilson, Vanlis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-873f49df1fa60d9ce850e81224e9a99061f5878c7d1d26e31b0c977cae519d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Research advisory group</topic><topic>Social services</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tetley, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odeyemi, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Vanlis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Quality in ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tetley, Josephine</au><au>Haynes, Lorna</au><au>Hawthorne, Maud</au><au>Odeyemi, Joe</au><au>Skinner, Jeanne</au><au>Smith, Dora</au><au>Wilson, Vanlis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Older people and research partnerships</atitle><jtitle>Quality in ageing</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>1471-7794</issn><issn>2044-1827</issn><eissn>2044-1835</eissn><abstract>Increasing consumer consultation is a priority for those involved in health and social care research and practice, with promoting greater public participation being widely accepted as 'a good thing' (Reason, 1994: 3). However, whilst such consultation may improve the quality of research and practice, there is a need to recognise the considerable investment of time and energy that is required for success (Baxter et al., 2001). Given the extra resources needed, it is important to understand how consultation and user involvement can work to benefit all parties.This paper describes our experiences of working together on a research project exploring people's involvement in decision-making processes when using care services in later life. When we started the project in March 2001 each of us could draw on a range of experiences that we hoped would make a valuable contribution. We have now worked together for over two years and this paper describes how our combined efforts have not only enhanced the overall quality of the research but also had personal benefits that we did not anticipate when we started out.</abstract><cop>Brighton</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/14717794200300024</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1471-7794 |
| ispartof | Quality in ageing, 2003-12, Vol.4 (4), p.18-23 |
| issn | 1471-7794 2044-1827 2044-1835 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_14717794200300024 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
| subjects | Decision making Health services Older people Participation Research advisory group Social services |
| title | Older people and research partnerships |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Older%20people%20and%20research%20partnerships&rft.jtitle=Quality%20in%20ageing&rft.au=Tetley,%20Josephine&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=1471-7794&rft.eissn=2044-1835&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14717794200300024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E654281931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213090641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |